|
creating some serious cyberfunk
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2023 02:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 22, 2023 19:30 |
|
|
you have tens of thousands of words of high quality training data, that you unambiguously own by virtue of having paid for it to be created, and you're giving it away for free to these ai dummys and letting them rent it back to you? they should be the ones paying you!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2023 15:14
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:y'all should look into mpreg while i'm at it, do you have any other search terms for me to check out on my work computer in the middle of a busy office?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2023 07:23
|
|
|
just fully chinese rooming a neural net to try and invent correlations with entirely different data
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2023 02:38
|
|
|
big respect to the artist for drawing them as actual prescription glasses rather than like, fakes worn purely for an aesthetic
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2023 22:05
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:as part of a recent assignment i requested that students come up with a list of ten possible topic ideas with certain specific characteristics, as you do for college assignments. you might find this take from a fellow educator interesting: https://acoup.blog/2023/02/17/collections-on-chatgpt/ the author, despite (or perhaps because of?) being in classics rather than a tech-adjacent field, seems to have a much better idea of what chatgpt is actually capable of than most people i've seen talking about it
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2023 07:58
|
|
|
RokosCockatrice posted:if chatgpt was less full of poo poo (i.e. more than 90% right on factual issues), you have awfully low standards if you think "10% of your source information is completely fabricated, you have no idea which 10%" would allow you to write a cogent essay on a topic. if you're doing enough additional research to discard the fabricated information, you're better off starting with those other sources to begin with. chatgpt isn't even at that point though. and the author's point is that it's not clear that it would even be possible to achieve this goal with a llm+training design.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2023 21:53
|
|
|
like, even if you think human trainers can fix the really embarrassing factual errors (like "what year is it"), what the heck is human rating going to do about the subtle ones that look plausible on the surface and are only laughably wrong to someone with actual experience in a particular field?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2023 21:58
|
|
|
all of the above
|
|
#
¿
Feb 24, 2023 13:29
|
|
|
the second bang is your wrist snapping
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2023 03:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Mar 22, 2023 19:30 |
|
|
that's my jacking arm, i use it to lift cars
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2023 14:19
|
|