Beeftweeter posted:

comrade gay spaceman reporting in

NoneMoreNegative posted:

Yes, once you reach 50 you should be pigeonholed

NoneMoreNegative posted:

distortion park posted:

the future is arriving faster and faster https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00250

"privacy-preserving" only in the same way that having an alexa in your bedroom is more private than someone hiding a mic there

Jim Silly-Balls posted:

has someone just pointed two AIs at each other and let them talk back and forth at 60,000 words per second and see what happens after like 2 weeks?

Alan Smithee posted:

https://twitter.com/westernunion2k/status/1615791648361041920?s=61&t=5DsEzDkmUF4efMoSNmgwPw

Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:

kinda depressing to think that that baby probably accomplished more in a few months than i have in my entire life so far. i sure as gently caress wouldn't get a church floor burial

Alan Smithee posted:

I’m actually Aian Smithee

NoneMoreNegative posted:

effortless cool

Sagebrush posted:

i have glasses like that

RokosCockatrice posted:

That's not right, chatgpt and all large language models see plenty of gibberish and tune the conceptual value of this gibberish to zero during the learning process (rejecting it).

You can say that chatgpt doesn't understand "concepts" and it only works with "words", but it's not clear that concepts and the statistical interrelation of words (and more exactly, the structured, statistically weighted connections between words, phrases, sentences, and groups of sentences) is fundamentally different than a concept. To go further than harry potter, I can tell you about zorblots being bigger than zangos, and you only need words to form these concepts of two things that don't exist. There are no pictures, but does that mean blind people can't have concepts? Obviously you don't need to directly experience things to have a concept of them, as zorblots don't exist, so that can't be the reason why relations between words and concepts are different.

explicitly using it as input to your own research and synthesizing processes. This is something that seems obvious to me (so it's probably wrong), but if chatgpt was less full of poo poo (i.e. more than 90% right on factual issues), writing an on why everything is called postmodernism would be aided by asking chatgpt to write essays on A) what it thinks the answer to this questions is B) what the extent of things called postmodernism is C) What the history of these things are and why they took on this nomenclature etc etc. Using these as summaries to work from for your own research, and then dissecting it to build your own arguments, I think this would make your own work better.

distortion park posted:

is the use of the phrasing "We're doing/building/using X" to describe something that you want to do but are not actually doing yet a recent innovation? I feel like it's a very startup turn of phrase

Jim Silly-Balls posted:

Its a different kind of racist!

NoneMoreNegative posted:

GPTea