New around here? Register your SA Forums Account here!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $10! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills alone, and since we don't believe in shady internet advertising, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
"the old guy was doing it all for that price until he quit, surely we can find someone else to do the same"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Thanks Ants posted:

Am I unfairly cynical about ~*AI*~? I was watching this and it just seems like a system to pad emails out by including things that the person you're messaging already knows, because they wrote the message.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxR4JZ-2oiU



That email is just word salad, it doesn't add any value at all. Maybe the whole thing is aimed at CEOs who want to be able to say they led an AI strategy, and evaluating how useful it might be is to miss the point. The meeting example they're using is two minutes long and this time-saving AI thing is pulling out thirteen key words and four questions which seems like it would get overwhelming if you met for 30 minutes, and provides nothing over someone making notes as they go.

The purpose of repeating stuff that was in the message you're replying to is that it signals to the recipient that you actually read their message and are interested in what they're saying, rather than blowing them off with a form response.

But it will lose that effect pretty quickly once ai form responses that mimic it become commonplace.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
even if they've never worked with physical documents and manila folders before, most human beings have an intuitive understanding of a physical item that can only be in one place at a time.

if you try to actually build a system entirely around tagging and forego giving things a canonical location at all, it's just hard for people to understand, especially when it comes to things like deleting and making copies.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Concretely: Google Drive tried to ditch the "one canonical location" concept and have things live in many locations at the same time, and it didn't work. They had to go back to having one location for each file.

I've never heard of a situation where having a concrete real-world metaphor made something more difficult to explain.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Also requires whoever's distributing these files to actually sign them, which is a bunch of work on their part for a very unclear benefit to them, so it's unlikely to happen.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply