Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts

MononcQc posted:

it is simultaneously true that ChatGPT has allowed people to write better than they did and that editors out there are flooded by more garbage than ever before and are losing ways to cope with the noise because a lot of it is still poo poo.

This! I work as an editor; now I have to interrogate authors whether or not they use ChatGPT, and then I have to waste time fact checking every single thing they write because if someone's stupid enough to submit AI generated work to me, they're also stupid enough to lie about it.

And then there's these two fuckwits:

https://twitter.com/DulwichQuantum/status/1654066665678688256

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts
What I actually do is whenever a client fucks up I add them to the blacklist me and a couple of people I know share. It's reactive, but I can't think of a good proactive solution atm

armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts

nudgenudgetilt posted:

so, armpit_enjoyer...


:)

Editors and fact checkers are, in fact, different professions.

MononcQc posted:

If you think of something like a technical book, you'll have various people going over it: an editor who makes sure it's readable, a technical reviewer who looks for the factual accuracy of it, and someone dealing with the layout. Some publishers are going to have variants like having audiences of various skills read the text to see how readable it is (and may sometimes fold technical revisions into it), and if they want to pay (or you want to forfeit part of your advances/royalties) you can also have an indexer go around it to write the actual index.

Generally only the technical reviewers have the primary responsibility to call bullshit on things.

What's worse is that a lot of publishing houses these days cheap out on technical reviewers or don't hire them outright. I can do the best possible job ensuring that whatever drivel gets submitted is readable — but if I get a book about, say, Haskell? I'm not going to learn the thing to fact check an author who's got a ten year head start on me, not for a $700 contract.

armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts
Sit the heck up. New Ed Zitron:

https://ez.substack.com/p/artificial-labor

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply