|
Windmill Hut posted:Have a few cheeky lines, ya banned oval office. It’s such an easy suspension for the AFL too which makes it more infuriating, “brining the game into disrepute”
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2025 06:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2025 05:14 |
|
|
But should a 25 year old child have his livelihood thrown away from almost killing a person?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2025 06:43
|
|
|
Windmill Hut posted:Bash someone off field? All good mate, play on. Toby Greene: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2025 07:28
|
|
|
Windmill Hut posted:It loving SUCKS being a team on the way down. My whole adult life Melbourne have either been really poo poo, pretty poo poo, coming up, or really good. So I was either excited about maybe getting a win, or excited about playing finals and competing for flsgs. Just enjoy the rollercoaster, now we're poo poo it's more exciting when we eventually win. Besides it's a good time to invest your time into watching the young kids and fringe players get opportunities and develop, like Harvey Langford who played a quarter in his first game, got slagged off by all the fans, gets a run in the VFL then gets called up and gets a rising star nod. Also, the fans should have been able to tell we were in for a poo poo year the moment they announced they were bringing back the flame head tops.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 03:25
|
|
|
Also letting Noah Balta play is a loving joke.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 03:25
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:This is a fun read imo http://thisweekinfootball.great-site.net/?p=1 Week 2 hopefully with fewer malware flags this time? https://www.hpnfooty.com/thisweekinfootball/2025/04/02/round-4-2025/
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 04:38
|
|
|
It does work this time
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 04:47
|
|
|
Papley out for at least a month. Could do with a solid experienced player like a Luke Parker for the North game this weekend.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 06:38
|
|
|
Dan Houston really didn't want to go back to Adelaide
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 11:05
|
|
|
snaeksikn posted:Also letting Noah Balta play is a loving joke. At least Richmond didnt name him. Meanwhile the 2nd half Blues are back in inaction.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 11:29
|
|
|
Nutsngum posted:At least Richmond didnt name him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 12:15
|
|
|
I’m glad that all the security theatre we’re subjected to is effective, given two dudes got loaded guns into the MCG tonight.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 15:36
|
|
|
The last 3 times I went to the footy and showed my bag for inspection the security person literally didn't even glance inside it
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2025 16:38
|
|
|
Jesus the Dees are dysfunctional in the backline the moment one of May or Lever are out
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 10:33
|
|
|
Demolish goomba stadium and bury Dangerfield and these oval office umpires in the ruins.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 11:18
|
|
|
It'd be pretty cool if Melbourne finish last and the Bombers score pick 1
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 12:16
|
|
|
gay picnic defence posted:It'd be pretty cool if Melbourne finish last and the Bombers score pick 1 hosed up that you’d want to consign the best kid in the draft to never winning a final imho
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 12:18
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:hosed up that you’d want to consign the best kid in the draft to never winning a final imho The alternative is the Blues finishing last and pick 1 going to Hawthorn as a result
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 12:21
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:The alternative is the Blues finishing last and pick 1 going to Hawthorn as a result Im all on board with this, if we suck the rest of you can get a loving hawthorn dynasty up ya again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 12:26
|
|
|
Yeah Carlton need to get their poo poo together half way through the season and make a charge for 9th, keep picks away from Hawthorn
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2025 12:28
|
|
|
Crom Fraud, Suns sould have won by 37 if they could kick straight
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 06:06
|
|
|
Suns absolutely gifted the win by the new most one sided umpiring display of the year, overtaking Collingwood v Bulldogs, including a big finish denying blatant free kicks 15 metres out to Rankine and then Thilthorpe
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 06:14
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:Suns absolutely gifted the win by the new most one sided umpiring display of the year, overtaking Collingwood v Bulldogs, including a big finish denying blatant free kicks 15 metres out to Rankine and then Thilthorpe Crows take the moral win meaning they are still undefeated
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 06:16
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:Suns absolutely gifted the win by the new most one sided umpiring display of the year, overtaking Collingwood v Bulldogs, including a big finish denying blatant free kicks 15 metres out to Rankine and then Thilthorpe Can't argue with the Rankine one. He marked, got hit late, ball spilled... it was a mark. He would've almost certainly kicked at least a point to draw the game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 07:14
|
|
|
Yeah, the Rankine non-mark/free was a shocker. There was probably a dozen 50/50s that went against us that you could individually argue on technicalities, but that one was blatant. My favourite umpiring howler of the day was when Gold Coast got a mark, and the umpire is saying "it's Rowell's kick, back to Rowell please". Everyone stops while they wait for the ball to be returned to Rowell, but then mid-sentence the umpire suddenly just yells "PLAY ON" and the Gold Coast player just runs it forward uncontested.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 10:16
|
|
|
Ladhams gonna Ladhams.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 10:51
|
|
|
NTRabbit posted:Suns absolutely gifted the win by the new most one sided umpiring display of the year, overtaking Collingwood v Bulldogs, including a big finish denying blatant free kicks 15 metres out to Rankine and then Thilthorpe 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2025 23:00
|
|
|
ABC Sport saying the AFL admit getting it wrong. Affects nothing, of course.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 04:53
|
|
|
Hogan with the old school FF game. 3 marks, 4 disposals, all kicks, for 4.0.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 05:48
|
|
|
Windmill Hut posted:Hogan with the old school FF game. 3 marks, 4 disposals, all kicks, for 4.0. 9 marks, 10 disposals, 9 kicks, 9.0. Incredible work.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 06:38
|
|
|
Windmill Hut posted:9 marks, 10 disposals, 9 kicks, 9.0. Incredible work. Efficient.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 08:58
|
|
|
Windmill Hut posted:9 marks, 10 disposals, 9 kicks, 9.0. Incredible work. phwoar also hey Sainters 
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 09:02
|
|
|
harperdc posted:also hey Sainters Footy.....good?? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2025 23:00
|
|
|
I like the father-son rule, but when you have two players who might combined with the most Brownlow's and Coleman's in next 10 years, it makes me question it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 02:19
|
|
|
The father-son rule (and academy rules etc) are good things. What is not good is that way the system can be abused to get them without having to actually give up any serious draft capital. If Nick Daicos had actually cost pick 2, or something equivalent to it, there wouldn't be any complaints.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 02:34
|
|
|
Father son/academy picks should come at a points premium instead of a discount. If you elect to jump up the draft order it should cost you points to do so, not net you them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 05:54
|
|
|
What is the advantage of the father-son rule aside from the obvious one of getting dibs on potentially good players? How does it benefit the league? I assumed it was an ancient rule they don't want to scrap because of tradition.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 07:33
|
|
|
tRaDiTiOn
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 07:42
|
|
|
snoremac posted:What is the advantage of the father-son rule aside from the obvious one of getting dibs on potentially good players? How does it benefit the league? Encourages multi-generational buy in from fans.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 07:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2025 05:14 |
|
|
The father-son rule is bullshit, but people like it because a. that's the way we've always done it and we can't change things from the way we've always done it b. they think it's cute when someone gets to play on the same team their dad played for
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2025 08:20
|
|
