|
ok
|
#
¿
May 7, 2024 15:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jan 17, 2025 01:51 |
|
|
Totally unfamiliar with this game but it def feels very mafia lol
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 16:22
|
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:I'm going to try my best to actually post townie this game Really think you've already failed!!
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 16:35
|
|
|
Spacebanito posted:Meanwhile, I've been out of the game so long I don't even remember how to not be in the awkward standing around at the beginning of day1 phase of things except by swinging wildly so. Yknow. Be warned for that, I guess. Awkwardly standing around is all but meta for day 1 anyway lol
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 16:50
|
|
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:I can investigate certain things about my target. Who volunteers to be my target for N1? Can't imagine why you're volunteering to be the night 1 kill unless you're banking on a watcher lol.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
yuming posted:I’m a miller ! ! Keats is that you?
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 19:41
|
|
|
Johnny Keats posted:Thanks for the heads up but I already loverized myself with you Er, what you’re saying is cube doesn’t know it yet but you’re their best friend in this game???
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 21:36
|
|
|
Really don't think that we should bother debating if a death miller claim is serious. It's not. I read yuming's as a joke too honestly.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2024 23:46
|
|
|
yuming posted:I am trying not to quote my role. What I’m saying is it’s not worded “you investigate as scum.” That sounds like a flavor miller. They've been popular in role madness-y games lately. Like, for example, in touhou mafia town youkai were flavor millers.
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2024 03:59
|
|
|
Nutsack Rangoon posted:Mostly fueled by decade all memories: I honestly don't think that yuming, who is WILDLY uncomfortable as scum to the point of barely playing, pulls a d1 gambit that puts attention on her tbh.
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2024 16:06
|
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:Seems like scum. That's no way to treat the local bulletproof seer/vig
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 02:34
|
|
|
Holy poo poo I didn't know deadline was so soon uh gently caress ##vote opop
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 14:50
|
|
|
This is just because they always read as scummy and I know that I'm going to end up tunneling them by day 3 for lurking and only popping out to defend themself.
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 14:51
|
|
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:This is not the sort of vote you make on a non vote leader an hour away from deadline o ok let me fix that ##vote AFQM
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 14:58
|
|
|
seriously tho "why aren't you voting a leader???" when the leaders have... 2 votes on them is loving nonsense.
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2024 14:59
|
|
|
I think that the targets for today are the people who didn't want to join in a last minute vote: Spork, Cube, Nutsack, Hal, TMor. Refusing to join a deadline ex of a town player is a common scum strategy; I do it all the time. I think Cube/Spork/Nutsack are the better targets of those, since not voting at all is more indicative of just hard lurking than scum refusing to vote on a foregone conclusion for cred.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2024 20:03
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:I don’t really find this to be a wise path to travel down Why? Refusing a join a town yeet and then throwing shade on town who did is classic scum behavior, and usually a pretty good strategy.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2024 22:21
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:Why? Refusing seems like a strong word when I wasnt on my keyboard fool of sound posted:I think that the targets for today are the people who didn't want to join in a last minute vote: Spork, Cube, Nutsack, Hal, TMor. Refusing to join a deadline ex of a town player is a common scum strategy; I do it all the time. I think Cube/Spork/Nutsack are the better targets of those, since not voting at all is more indicative of just hard lurking than scum refusing to vote on a foregone conclusion for cred. I think cube or spork are my top targets.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2024 23:43
|
|
|
Spacebanito posted:Yeah, but nobody has done this yet, and it is weird to bring it up already? Like, there was a solid chance I didn't vote either, except I was really quite confident(wrongly, apparently) of Fancy. I know I said a positive thing about this general mindset, but not to this extent? Mostly just as a "we shouldn't assume all the scum are within the subset of people who DID vote" I think we're violently agreeing. Like, balance of probability is that there's scum somewhere in the AFQM vote, but I think the probability of hitting scum is better outside of that vote.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2024 23:46
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:Why are people town clearing so early when we have no concrete info What? Who is town clearing?
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 02:39
|
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:FoS, would you have tripped a gunsmith investigation? No, that claim was a joke lol. I have an action but it's non-lethal.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 19:04
|
|
|
Anyway, that's a scummy rear end question and I think you know that my claim was fake. There's no pressing reason to disbelieve sand's results.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 19:05
|
|
|
##vote cube If there's scum between keats and cube then I'm going cube.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 19:07
|
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:I thought for a while that maybe that was the "vanilla" equivalent this game This is nonsense CubicalSucrose posted:This is why I was hesitant to actually vote someone out D1, because if all town were BP, then we'd be more likely to get a free night vs. getting a BP to flip and then scum would know a bit more info. This is nonsense. CubicalSucrose posted:FoS's post yesterday is still really weird. Buddy even if that was a real role I would never claim in N1 lol. That would be moronic.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 19:16
|
|
|
Spacebanito posted:And the reason why is it's dumb to just reply to a train of thought with 'no' instead of actually refuting it with anything. Why is "I was BP and thought everyone might be" more of a nonsense claim than Miller, ecco cop, or the eavesdropper we saw flip? Roles this game seem a bit more on the esoteric side, so I find this very believable. That's self evident: Millers and ecco cops are not weird roles. Bulletproof isn't weird either. "Everyone might be bulletproof and their powers key of off expending that protection" is a wild, insane reach.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:08
|
|
|
Anyway I'm basically a supertracker. I target someone and track the next action they take, either the night of the track or thereafter. I can only detect one action per person. My first letter of my first seven posts this game spell out tracker.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:09
|
|
|
Nutsack Rangoon posted:Do you think his claim is fake or just not well thought out? I have no opinion on if cube's claim is real. My objection is cube deciding that because their own role is "becomes a vig when BP is expended" that everyone else has a similar stipulation on their role, and using that supposition (and pretending to believe my obvious overpowered joke claim) to cast doubt on sandwolf's result.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:21
|
|
|
Lying low doesn't work when there's a soft result on someone. That's a trick scum players pull when someone asks them a question they don't want to answer lol. Once a result is out it has to be responded to.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:41
|
|
|
I'm leaning wrong town on illu. They tend to be less confrontational as scum ime. That says, yuming is playing the game and is almost certainly therefore firmly town as far as my experience with her goes.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:54
|
|
|
I'm pretty much settled on a cube vote today though: they were one of the people I thought were suspicious for declining to join the AFQM vote yesterday, and also have a soft result on them. Especially since they've now claimed vig to try to dispel that result.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2024 20:55
|
|
|
Nutsack Rangoon posted:FoS claimed tracker but no results? Think it's best that gets disclosed. I'm not disclosing my target because if they took no action, I basically auto-track their next one.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2024 19:17
|
|
|
My general thoughts: Cube remains my top vote; they're scum overreaching with their role claim and weird fake assumptions about a whole-game gimmick because they got caught by sand's echocop. I'm reading through keats/spaceburrito's bizarre conflict and it feels very forced from keats. I'm weak town lean on SB I think keats' case doesn't make sense and seems designed more to have a beef for content than actually convince anyone. Could be distancing, could be keats faking content, could just be keats getting a weird bug up their rear end; it's happened before. I could see scum there but I think cube is a way better choice for eliminating someone inside the investigation. Spork is my third major scum candidate for their end of d1 voting behavior. Their case on cube feels... a little over-explained kind of out of nowhere for someone who normally makes shorter posts than that? Opop is a hard null and I kinda suspect will remain that way since their town play is just as lurky and unhelpful to town as their scum play. Dude always plays like a survivor. Yuming is a firm town read. I just saw their scum play in the last game I ran and even when scum was under minimal pressure almost all of their posts were to the effect of "hi!!" ->two hours later->"i'll have thoughts later!!"->four hours later->repeat. Illu's reads feel like wrong town from someone who hasn't seen yuming playing scum lately. I'm working under the assumption of townwolf for the result and I think that is largely supported by their posting. I think if scum was playing games with a fake result they'd be harping on about it much harder rather than they to scumhunt. I suspect we have lurking scum somewhere in TMor, Hal, or Nutsack but I don't really have a strong enough feeling to hazard a guess on them.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2024 22:46
|
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:All right well: So you visited yuming last night?
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 03:22
|
|
|
Wait no i misunderstood what was happening lol
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 03:25
|
|
|
Was going to say that was at odds with cube's claim but nevermind
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 03:25
|
|
|
ok great thanks cube for decoding the boring masonry message lol
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 03:28
|
|
|
Ok well now that we've established that the code isn't an in-thread confession we really need to get around to actually voting. We have 8 hours. Votecount for Day 2   CubicalSucrose (2): fool of sound, SporkChan Illusionis (1): yuming, fool of sound (1): CubicalSucrose, yuming (1): Illusionis, Tired Moritz (1): Nutsack Rangoon, Spacebanito, Johnny Keats (1): Nutsack Rangoon Opopanax (0): Johnny Keats, Sandwolf (0): Opopanax, Not Voting (5): CubicalSucrose, Hal Incandenza, Opopanax, Sandwolf, Tired MoritzWith 12 alive, it's 7 votes to execute. The current deadline is May 19th, 2024 at 11:59 p.m. UTC -- that's in about 8 hours, 15 minutes.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 15:44
|
|
|
I'm interested in voting cube first and foremost, then keats, then spork as a distant third at this point. I really think we ought to kill cube as the claimed killing role detected by the eccosmith. I'm always open to voting opop just because their unhelpful town play and their scum play are indistinguishable. I could maybe be talked into TM/Hal/Nutsack if we really must but I don't think it's a good idea. I'm not open to voting yuming, illu, or sand today.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 15:52
|
|
|
fool of sound posted:I really think we ought to kill cube as the claimed killing role detected by the eccosmith. To elaborate on this, not only did cube claim a killing role after the eccosmith result was claimed, but also tried to act like my obvious joke role was a killing role to further invalidate the result. Sandwolf would absolutely not have targeted me for the smith if they believed by joke claim.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 15:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jan 17, 2025 01:51 |
|
|
CubicalSucrose posted:I think TMor or Hal today are my preferences. Lazy deflection to lurkers...
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2024 16:37
|
|