|
In
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2025 02:47 |
|
I'm death miller LOL
|
![]() |
|
CubicalSucrose posted:Heads-up to Keats, I'm going to try my best to actually post townie this game, at least at the start. So if things sound off, that might be why (assuming I'm successful). Thanks for the heads up but I already loverized myself with you
|
![]() |
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:Anyway, this time I have an info role ##Vote Yuming
|
![]() |
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:I can investigate certain things about my target. Who volunteers to be my target for N1? Actually fine, I want to be investigated ##Unvote
|
![]() |
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:Also, I may or may not have an additional private day action Same
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:##vote Keats What if Sandwolf is scum with Yuming for this?
|
![]() |
|
Just cuz you skipped over Yuming's claim to vote me for mine
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:You reckon Keats What are you trying to say here? You listed after Yuming's claim without comment on it. So voting for my claim can rightfully be called hopping over Yuming's claim. If you want to say my claim was more worth commenting, you can say that. I've just made an observation
|
![]() |
|
*listed = posted
|
![]() |
|
fool of sound posted:Er, what you’re saying is cube doesn’t know it yet but you’re their best friend in this game??? Exactly!
|
![]() |
|
I think a miller claim after already claiming an investigating role for 5 posts is worth commenting on, just the same as a first-post death miller claim that was probably a joke. But what do I know
|
![]() |
|
How do you feel about Yuming not claiming asap then
|
![]() |
|
Well fine. I assumed Yuming was joking anyway and probably doesn't have an investigative role either. Not even worth bothering about. But why vote me for joke claiming? It doesn't sit right. I was not attracted to the idea of you/Yuming scum together despite what I said, but I am still wary if you in isolation
|
![]() |
|
Besides, that claim was a breadcrumb to my real role so it wasn't even a lie. It is a a couple logical leaps to arrive there so I'm comfortable announcing this
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:Right see this is the stuff I knew was right around the corner lmao It's fun! And doesn't get in the way of my desire to scumhunt so that's even better. I just couldn't resist talking about my own role when I have just received it and it's a funny role. Anyway I'll slow down
|
![]() |
|
##Vote Spork
|
![]() |
|
SporkChan posted:Keats. Are you aware you've mixed up AFQM and yuming? Really? Lol and Sandwolf didn't even notice
|
![]() |
|
Spacebanito posted:Confusing AFQM and Yuming is an odd mistake to make with avatars that don't look terribly similar.? I have confused these two in the past. Something to do with the color avatar not really being *that* colorful and both feature human women, as well as both being IRL women too (I think). Anyway that is definitely what happened
|
![]() |
|
yuming posted:I am serious! And to be as clear as possible I ~seem~ ~bad~ : the wording is vague. What the gently caress (not aggressive) does that mean?
|
![]() |
|
Also Cube voted Yuming randomly before Yuming claimed miller so clearly they are scum together.
|
![]() |
|
CubicalSucrose posted:We were last time along with Maerlyn and mowed down our opposition in the pigeon game. 10/10 would scum with Yuming again. Meh, town didn't have me so it couldn't have been that hard
|
![]() |
|
CubicalSucrose posted:Oh I'm also on Uplift 4. Or possibly Uplift trilogy 2 book 1? It's not as good a series as Hyperion. The first one was fun and the overall concept is kinda interesting, but I wasn't super engaged by the 2nd or 3rd books. Wow you read fast that's more than I have read. I didn't claim they were good I just said you should read them, also didn't totally think you'd actually listen to my suggestion. In the context of Hyperion I recommended it for having a setting that kinda handwaves a lot of stuff for the sake of having a neat political or philosophical theme attached to it. Uplift pretty much does that too in a way that is entertaining while at the same time not having a clear message at all like it is presented extremely confusingly and that's why I think it's great
|
![]() |
|
##Vote AFQM
|
![]() |
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:Has there been a keats claim yet? No
|
![]() |
|
Usually when an investigative role claims, they are not killed that night. It does however make it feel like (for the player with the role) their results are slightly less dependable though
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:I say we kill one of FoS, Cube or Keats. Would vote FoS. Me being in this list is random
|
![]() |
|
I visited Yuming with something beneficial she may or may not have been informed of
|
![]() |
|
Guys, is Sandwolf scum?
|
![]() |
|
Opop why you not claim who you protected?
|
![]() |
|
Spacebanito posted:Did I miss something, why do we believe Opop is doctor? Well he clearly hinted at it today at least
|
![]() |
|
Opop is the scum ##Vote Opop
|
![]() |
|
yuming posted:Thoughts on Illu and the EccoCop result? Wait the what?? How did I miss that
|
![]() |
|
I think it is pretty LOL if Cube is scum. ##Vote FoS
|
![]() |
|
What's the scum flavor in your role, Sandwolf?
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:What? I thought the question was clear... i guess it just says scum then
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:Tempted to kill Cube here, actually. I do not know if being a town vig that cannot kill yet would trigger a false positive. The wording I have for positives is “has a killing action.” Oh nvm
|
![]() |
|
Sandwolf posted:Tempted to kill Cube here, actually. I do not know if being a town vig that cannot kill yet would trigger a false positive. The wording I have for positives is “has a killing action.” It would take a hell of a reach for that to be my role, which can only result in my own death (the "death" part of "death miller" being a breadcrumb, remmeber that?) Anyway I will mot elaborate. Just wanted to say in case of crazy mod ruling.
|
![]() |
|
Spacebanito is also scum
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2025 02:47 |
|
Good morning ![]()
|
![]() |