|
In the original script for Batman Begins that leaked a few months before the movie, the part where he comes up from saving Rachel to go to his birthday party had him still wearing the eye liner, and Alfred had to stop him and tell him to wipe it off before going out to meet the guests.
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2012 19:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:36 |
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:In the original script for Batman Begins that leaked a few months before the movie, the part where he comes up from saving Rachel to go to his birthday party had him still wearing the eye liner, and Alfred had to stop him and tell him to wipe it off before going out to meet the guests. In Grant Morrison's Batman run Alfred points out that he's still doing the voice out of costume.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2012 19:13
|
|
|
I never understood why they didn't just put little white things over the eyeholes. Then he can do the glowy-eyes in the dark thing like in the comics. And it would make him look more menacing!
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2012 23:14
|
|
|
Talks To Cats posted:I never understood why they didn't just put little white things over the eyeholes. Then he can do the glowy-eyes in the dark thing like in the comics. And it would make him look more menacing! Because it makes it harder for the actor to emote. Same reason Spider-Man gets his mask torn off, or eyes exposed in all of those movies.
|
|
#
?
Aug 6, 2012 23:23
|
|
|
Talks To Cats posted:I never understood why they didn't just put little white things over the eyeholes. Then he can do the glowy-eyes in the dark thing like in the comics. And it would make him look more menacing! Looks real dumb outside of a comic book.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 00:33
|
|
|
teagone posted:
Whichever goon it was that repainted this...  into this...  needs to do the same thing to the Expendables 2 poster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 00:34
|
|
|
Talks To Cats posted:I never understood why they didn't just put little white things over the eyeholes. Then he can do the glowy-eyes in the dark thing like in the comics. And it would make him look more menacing! They sort of did this in The Dark Knight when he has the white eyes so he can get that 3D sonar visual thing going on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 00:43
|
|
|
Talks To Cats posted:I never understood why they didn't just put little white things over the eyeholes. Then he can do the glowy-eyes in the dark thing like in the comics. And it would make him look more menacing! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 02:36
|
|
|
I know you're trying to be joking, but I think that image is more unnerving than anything else.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 03:04
|
|
|
I used headlights of a car. He might be slightly lazy eyed. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 03:19
|
|
|
Honestly, just blacking the eyes right out with dark non-reflective lenses might work better for a movie: The goal of keeping Batman's eyes pupil-free is to give him that slightly unnerving look. It doesn't really work with bright glowing eyes like it will in a comic, but it can work if you have to strain to make out any eyes at all.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 05:49
|
|
|
The Daredevil movie had dark red (same shade as the mask) lenses, and it looked fine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 07:26
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:The Daredevil movie had dark red (same shade as the mask) lenses, and it looked fine. That's because his superpower is that he can see.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 08:10
|
|
|
With Batman just explain via technobabble that it's some special two way glass that's dark on the one side but like looking through something perfectly clear on the other, and then add in that you can have a HUD on it and it's bulletproof or something, done.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 08:57
|
|
|
Well anyway, back to movie posters. I like what it suggests about the power dynamic of the characters. On top of the other, then beneath, both at once... Past Tense Ragu fucked around with this message at 09:11 on Aug 7, 2012 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 09:05
|
|
|
Woah, is Joaquin Phoenix back to doing movies again? He hasn't been in anything since I'm Still Here, right? That was a couple years ago. And that was about how he hadn't been in anything in a couple years before that. Awesome!
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 15:16
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Woah, is Joaquin Phoenix back to doing movies again? He hasn't been in anything since I'm Still Here, right? That was a couple years ago. And that was about how he hadn't been in anything in a couple years before that. Awesome! Have you see the trailer for The Master yet? Dude is looking gaunt and old.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 15:51
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Have you see the trailer for The Master yet? Dude is looking gaunt and old. The whole I'm Still Here project was just preparations for this role! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 16:53
|
|
|
Okay, I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong. The blacked-out eyes thing looks cool though. I hope they do that when they reboot Batman again. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 17:10
|
|
|
I think Nolan inserted that scene with the sonar goggles just to hit back at the nitpicky fans who didn't like his costume design.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 19:54
|
|
|
Past Tense Ragu posted:Well anyway, back to movie posters. I cannot wait to see this. I really like this poster for exactly the reason you said.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 20:21
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:I think Nolan inserted that scene with the sonar goggles just to hit back at the nitpicky fans who didn't like his costume design. Yeah, he's literally never wrong.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2012 20:22
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Woah, is Joaquin Phoenix back to doing movies again? He hasn't been in anything since I'm Still Here, right? That was a couple years ago. And that was about how he hadn't been in anything in a couple years before that. Awesome! It was ironic. Like a poem that doesn't rhyme.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 03:04
|
|
|
Teaser for Zero Dark Thirty, Kathryn Bigelow's latest.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 10:14
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Woah, is Joaquin Phoenix back to doing movies again? He hasn't been in anything since I'm Still Here, right? That was a couple years ago. And that was about how he hadn't been in anything in a couple years before that. Awesome! If you consider making I'm Still Here to be work, you can't really say he took a break.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 10:18
|
|
|
Clearly there is only one way to fix the Batman eye issue:
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 10:26
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Clearly there is only one way to fix the Batman eye issue: This thread makes me so happy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 11:38
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:Teaser for Zero Dark Thirty, Kathryn Bigelow's latest. This fits well with the redacted trailer and the classified information that Bigelow used to produce the later portion of the film. It's pretty clear now that she received nothing but pages of redacted black text. It's weird that at thumbnail size, I can still make out the title, although I wish they could have dialed back on the marker. What's interesting is the title color is lighter than the marker color which is straight black, which may explain why I can still kinda read the title.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 12:54
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Clearly there is only one way to fix the Batman eye issue: "Remember me Eddie? When I killed your brother I talked... JUST... LIKE... THISSSSS!"
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 15:42
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Clearly there is only one way to fix the Batman eye issue: Like you wouldn't watch the gently caress out of Marty Feldman Batman.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 15:56
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:The Daredevil movie had dark red (same shade as the mask) lenses, and it looked fine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 20:18
|
|
|
Rieux posted:"Remember me Eddie? When I killed your brother I talked... JUST... LIKE... THISSSSS!" I imagine that his voice goes deeper and deeper, with "this" sounding like Barry White 
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 21:59
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:Or Bale could have just worn white contact lenses. Not for the first film he couldn't. Batman not being able to turn both his neck and his eyes would be a disaster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:07
|
|
|
What does Zero Dark Thirty mean? Aesop Rock just recently released a song by that title too but I have no idea what the heck Zero Dark Thirty means.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:27
|
|
|
Suzuki Method posted:What does Zero Dark Thirty mean? Aesop Rock just recently released a song by that title too but I have no idea what the heck Zero Dark Thirty means. I assume its the same thing as "oh dark thirty" - the crack of dawn basically.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:28
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:Not for the first film he couldn't. Batman not being able to turn both his neck and his eyes would be a disaster. Point taken. Batman would look really lame if he appears to be staring at the side walk when trying to intimidate you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:29
|
|
|
Yes! I just managed to find out. That's neat, I have never heard that phrase before. I love that poster. The redacted marker scribbles just do enough that you get interested in the poster but not too much that you could never make out the title. Very well executed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:29
|
|
|
I prefer "Dark O' Clock". Or "gently caress O' Clock".
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:40
|
|
|
Suzuki Method posted:What does Zero Dark Thirty mean? Aesop Rock just recently released a song by that title too but I have no idea what the heck Zero Dark Thirty means. 12:30am. On a 24 hour clock it's 0030.
|
|
#
?
Aug 8, 2012 22:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:36 |
|
|
I don't know if it has been posted already, but I've always liked the Showgirls posters.  They manage to be provocative while still maintaining an air of tastefulness. In fact, these are probably the worst posters the movie could have had, because they're just that good.  Ahh. Much better.
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2012 02:30
|
|
