|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:i hate give shaggar this ammo, but don't get mplayerx from the app store. it's an old version. it's no longer being updated on there because the author disagrees with Apple's sandboxing policies. oh i didnt even know. thanks for the heads up
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 08:29 |
|
|
polpotpi posted:oh i didnt even know. thanks for the heads up iirc it was over the feature where it automatically plays the next file in a folder. apparently doing "ls" is a big security no-no
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:55
|
|
|
pagancow posted:its p good on modern nvidia cards. Can't speak for ATI since I havn't used once since 2005. ive been using dxva for years now on an ati card and never had a problem. seems to do a decent job with post processing and such. plus i like using the gpu whenever possible so that i can do more poo poo in the background, sooooo
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:02
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:iirc it was over the feature where it automatically plays the next file in a folder. apparently doing "ls" is a big security no-no more like being able to access arbitrary files instead of the one file the user double clicked on and the OS passed to you as a file descriptor when your executable was launched
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:12
|
|
|
Sniep posted:i just wish there was a separate "compressor-enabled" audio 2 channel stereo audio track available on all movie discs (bluray or dvd) so that if you don't have a ballin home theatre you can still set the volume and let it be without constantly "turn up so we can hear this quiet part / gently caress gently caress turn back down its explosion time" Dolby Digital is supposed to handle this, but if you bought a $200 Chinese TV lol if they even care about this working right. For example, you may have 12 dB headroom between dialogue and 0dB FS, the TV will dynamic range normalize everything up about 8-10dB and then your dynamic range for dialogue to most loud thing will then just be 2dB. It's suposed to work that way, but the device that is playing back the audio has to be set to do it. Flat panel TVs should handle this, but they make settings that you can screw it up with. Cable boxes usually do this as well, so having 2 things do a dynamic range normalization is pretty bad sounding. It's like the background noise is louder than the voices when this happens. pagancow fucked around with this message at 05:43 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 05:39
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Dolby Digital is supposed to handle this, but if you bought a $200 Chinese TV lol if they even care about this working right. i have a decent tv and run all my audio thru it as the mixer/preamp basically, but, still get movies that only have dolby pro digital 5.1 superfuck and have the huge differences. i guess i could get off my rear end since my audio chain is all analog and just dig in my closet and throw an actual compressor in the mix but that only helps so much
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 05:42
|
|
|
every +3dB will appear twice as loud. so -12dB is twice as loud as -15dB
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 05:44
|
|
|
Sniep posted:i have a decent tv and run all my audio thru it as the mixer/preamp basically, but, still get movies that only have dolby pro digital 5.1 superfuck and have the huge differences. i guess i could get off my rear end since my audio chain is all analog and just dig in my closet and throw an actual compressor in the mix but that only helps so much a DVD/BD player should dynamic range normalize anything output via analog, unless it's one of those really OG DVD players that had 6 RCA analogs out because DD decoders didn't exist in consumer level equipment in 1998 Some DVD players let you bypass this in a menu somewhere, but if you did this lol.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 05:46
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:yeah, lemme just go and make this bluray into poo poo quality so i can store a hundred of them on my htpc makemkv = 1:1 copy, hundred blu-rays ~ 2.5 TB. impossible to accomplish using modern technology.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 07:13
|
|
|
how do I get normalized audio playback in windows I'm tired of adjusting audio im looking at you parks and recreation theme song u motherfucker
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 07:36
|
|
|
pagancow posted:https://vimeo.com/55098112
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 08:38
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:theres no need for subtitles if its English audio and if its not English audio it should have hard subs. let's just increase the filesize by 2% by hardcoding some subs instead of embedding a 200kb text file
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 09:57
|
|
|
we can all agree that anyone who encodes black bars should be shot, right
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:we can all agree that anyone who encodes black bars should be shot, right agreed
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 10:10
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:we can all agree that anyone who encodes black bars should be shot, right cool, lets just ignore TV standards too. I'm encoding my video at 34.2 fps cya
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 15:26
|
|
|
the best thing about computer video is that unless you're a huge sperg all your video will be displayed at 60 Hz so even when you've hand tweaked the decoder chain to handle the million different formats it'll still be jerky poo poo playing 24/25 fps content most computer grade LCDs only work at 60, 59 and maybe 50 Hz basically get a DLP projector, runs at anything from 50 to 80 Hz
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 15:52
|
|
|
i just double click videos and play them. couldn't care less about codecs or any of that stuff
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 16:13
|
|
|
Cadence is such a big deal though. Having each frame on screen for the same ammount of time is really important to have a smooth playback. when you're trying to shove 24/25/50 into 60, there is always one frame on screen longer than the rest. Once you've seen this you cannot unsee it, and you end up buying expensive equipment just to watch movies. So don't try to find out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 16:47
|
|
|
much like twixtor artifacts, your brain becomes permanently wired to notice them
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 17:29
|
|
|
way to be autismal about putting a movie on your tv
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 17:31
|
|
|
MPC-HC supports resolution switching, and you can install Reclock if you like audio track switching not working. it speeds up or down playback to match the monitor as best as it can, and then does something to correct the pitch. still better than NTSC judder but not as great as actually having the right refresh rate
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 17:38
|
|
|
pro tip for you all - make a custom 48hz res and most monitors will display it fine as its close enough to 50hz
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 21:35
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:much like twixtor artifacts, your brain becomes permanently wired to notice them is this the anti shake video thing like YouTube does? because I cannot unsee it and it makes me nauseous when watching things with it
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 21:54
|
|
|
my display supports 24hz but my movies looked jerky as gently caress when I tried them in that mode. what gives
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:06
|
|
|
THC posted:my display supports 24hz but my movies looked jerky as gently caress when I tried them in that mode. what gives probably inverse telecine not being applied if it was a DVD with my lovely intel graphics laptop htpc moving from internal monitor to external HDMI makes it play video all jerky until I reboot with it already connected also I literally had to make a custom inf to make custom resolutions over HDMI with Intel's lovely drivers, custom resolutions only work over VGA wtf intel
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:15
|
|
|
THC posted:my display supports 24hz but my movies looked jerky as gently caress when I tried them in that mode. what gives movies are inherently jerky as gently caress because they're 24 fps. hth
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:18
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:is this the anti shake video thing like YouTube does? because I cannot unsee it and it makes me nauseous when watching things with it it seems to be some sort of motion interpolation thing for making an artificial slow motion clip. but the youtube anti shaking thing is loving hilarious. the best ones i've seen are from parades or something where there is some sort of uneven parallax motion across the whole frame. poo poo gets wobbly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:26
|
|
|
i have a 120hz tv so 24hz video plays fine since its 120/24=5
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:29
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:is this the anti shake video thing like YouTube does? because I cannot unsee it and it makes me nauseous when watching things with it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQokTc8D0P8 Watch the wheels and the sand when it goes to slowmo. Thats a really bad example, but even in really good examples, Twixtor generally gives itself away. ive seen it in production television even. the youtube antishake thing is a visual representation of dubstep
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 22:59
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQokTc8D0P8 heres a sweet example of antishake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6SgP9ngSFU&t=315s
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 23:04
|
|
|
lord funk posted:hard subs were good in night watch. in fact they were amazing in night watch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 23:50
|
|
|
pagancow posted:cool, lets just ignore TV standards too. I'm encoding my video at 34.2 fps i'm talking about digital stuff not dads widescreen vhs tapes okay
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 00:15
|
|
|
Wheany posted:but the youtube anti shaking thing is loving hilarious. the best ones i've seen are from parades or something where there is some sort of uneven parallax motion across the whole frame. poo poo gets wobbly. it gets loving insane when someone accidentally turns it on for the video game video they just uploaded https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ue-DmQGLRs
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 00:45
|
|
|
this thread made me notice color banding and i hate it
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 01:13
|
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:heres a sweet example of antishake Their anti shake is working p well actually. its just that the footage is poo poo. cant polish a turd. well you can, but it's still a turd
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 01:31
|
|
|
Carthag posted:this thread made me notice color banding and i hate it ONE OF US ONE OF US
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 02:52
|
|
|
if you aint ditherin, you must be trippin
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 03:54
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQokTc8D0P8  who would look at that and say "yup looks good"
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 14:15
|
|
|
longview posted:
probably someone who really wants slow motion but does not have a high speed camera, and realizes that it is impossible to get something that looks really good that way
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 14:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 08:29 |
|
|
Twixtor is like auto tune, you're suposed to use it to give more polish to a shot, not to crazy poo poo like "hey look at me!!!!" they even say in the marketing for it "do you ever wish you needed your shot to last 5 frames longer, but didn't have it?" or "do you wish you would have shot it at a slightly higher framerate?" it is pretty amazing for what it does do correctly. We use it all the time for the "wish it was a few frames longer" aspect.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2013 14:59
|
|