|
zylche posted:You take that back right now, XBMC is already more associated with this mess than it should be To be fair, I didn't say it was a GOOD attempt. Okay, it looks more like an Evolution-X skin. How's that?
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 10:12 |
|
Thoughts from an OUYA backer: http://coffeegeek.tumblr.com/post/46622612558/concerns-about-ouya quote:I won’t be handing my credit card information over to Ouya. So as a result, I guess I bought an expensive, $170 brick (I bought the limited edition metal one with extra controllers). I’ll have to wait until someone fully hacks the device to run stock Android.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:18 |
|
Dex posted:Thoughts from an OUYA backer:
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:20 |
|
Dex posted:Thoughts from an OUYA backer:
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:21 |
|
Tarranon posted:I would love three things cleared up Think of it as a sort of seal of quality. Take a scenario where you're navigating the OUYA store. You say to yourself, "I'm looking for a game that suits the taste of a grown man that likes TV shows targeted at little girls." You can't guarantee that any of those other games on the storefront are 100% Brony. Some of them may be as low as 30% Brony. That's dangerously low. Unless you meant why are we calling RED "100% Brony"? It's in the trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5moED9qfHU
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:23 |
|
DalaranJ posted:Unless you meant why are we calling RED "100% Brony"? Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question of "Why is RED the 100% Brony shooter?"
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:26 |
|
zylche posted:There are a lot of annoyed backers, it's glorious. I can't wait until they get audited for PCI DSS compliance. We can only help they get as serious about a class-action lawsuit as they got about playing N64-era quality games with a LEGO brick and bonus input lag. I love the optimism with which Ur-Man says that YOLATENGO "gift cards" will be carried at Best Buy, Gamestop, etc. Who wants to bet they haven't actually talked to those companies about it at all?
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:26 |
|
packetgrinder posted:Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question of "Why is RED the 100% Brony shooter?" They had an awful trailer where some red square (the main character???) puts on sunglasses that say "100% brony". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5moED9qfHU
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:29 |
|
JazzFlight posted:The sleepers are awakening! The prophecy has begun to be fulfilled! The MUAD'DIB is indeed a weirding module, but its killing word is more of the self-destructive kind that blows up in your face and keeps your CC info in perpetuity.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:30 |
|
precision posted:I love the optimism with which Ur-Man says that YOLATENGO "gift cards" will be carried at Best Buy, Gamestop, etc. Who wants to bet they haven't actually talked to those companies about it at all? Even if they are, that only really helps the US market - I don't think Best Buy even exists in my country, and the only GameStop I know of closed down about three years ago. packetgrinder posted:Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question of "Why is RED the 100% Brony shooter?" Autism.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:30 |
|
DalaranJ posted:
Watching the trailers, I see someone finally had the idea to make a workplace mass shooting sim. Not surprised it would be a brony. Also I don't want to play as some block dude's exploded thyroid. Eww.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:30 |
|
precision posted:I love the optimism with which Ur-Man says that YOLATENGO "gift cards" will be carried at Best Buy, Gamestop, etc. Who wants to bet they haven't actually talked to those companies about it at all? I'm sure they'll totally send them some to put on the shelfs, just like they sent "Minecraft" a unit to develop Minecraft with. This is 2013 man, you don't loving talk to people, you just send them poo poo and they know what to do with it.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:31 |
|
packetgrinder posted:Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question of "Why is RED the 100% Brony shooter?" Because Bronys need to put pony references in everything, and the creator of that game is clearly gunning for the retarded manbaby demographic.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:32 |
|
Breetai posted:Because Bronys need to put pony references in everything, and the creator of that game is clearly gunning for the retarded manbaby demographic. As he made a twin stick shooter and is charging $4.99 for it, I doubt he's going to have much demographic at all. Seriously - I MADE A GAEM WITH ZOMBIES IN IT on XBLIG (which is better than it sounds, honest!) was $1, and that guy wrote a highly entertaining song that is basically the only reason his game has done well. There's no way RED has that.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:35 |
|
Oh man, speaking of Gamestop... You can order your ACHOO from them (of course you can). The best part, though: the reviews: http://www.gamestop.com/elect/consoles/ouya-game-console/107853#reviews quote:THIS IS THE MOST AMAZING GAME CONSOLE EVER!!! I ALWAYS WANTED A GAME CONSOLE THAT WAS BOTH AWESOME AND AFFORDABLE.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:36 |
|
packetgrinder posted:Yes, but that still doesn't answer the question of "Why is RED the 100% Brony shooter?" Actually I think they're on to something. I would like it if all future game releases disclosed just how much brony is in a game. Like an ESRB rating. I don't want too much brony in my game.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:36 |
|
Liquid Penguins posted:They had an awful trailer where some red square (the main character???) puts on sunglasses that say "100% brony". Yes but why why why Why.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:36 |
|
Here's Ouya-developer master Dreamzle's game; which is on that list for sale right now: The Secret of Universe Alpha (not sure if that's the name of the universe or the build). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KniKH9Yfl5Y Perfect music selection. I think I've spent too much time in this thread, I think I need to buy a AAA twin-stick shooter knock off to remember what textures look like
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:37 |
|
Madcosby posted:Here's Ouya-developer master Dreamzle's game; which is on that list for sale right now: The Secret of Universe Alpha (not sure if that's the name of the universe or the build). "Could not fetch app info (errorCode 2005, errorMessage Invalid app Uuid was provided)" is probably the best part.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:39 |
|
Breetai posted:Because Bronys need to put pony references in everything, and the creator of that game is clearly gunning for the retarded manbaby demographic. That seems to be Ouya's target demographic as well.
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:52 |
|
packetgrinder posted:"Could not fetch app info (errorCode 2005, errorMessage Invalid app Uuid was provided)" is probably the best part. I liked "Press Button"
|
# ? Mar 29, 2013 23:53 |
|
precision posted:Oh man, speaking of Gamestop... These comments are gold. quote:I've never heard of this system before. I wonder what games it will have on it. This could be one of the best systems in gaming.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:02 |
|
I don't feel like catching up to 2000+ posts. Has the OUYA killed the evil big 3 yet?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:05 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:"This game is bad, but it's good at it's overpriced. More games need to be expensive." I know that you're being sarcastic, but that is actually a pretty concise & clear summary of what I was saying. Basically, I'm just glad to see a developer with clout release a $5+ game, because I think that's a good influence for the OUYA market. Game devaluation really is a serious problem. Now, so far it's been limited mostly to the mobile space. It's very hard to sell your game on the App Store at above $.99, for instance. That's not good for developers, since it means you can only make money by selling a huge volume of games. Now expectation for mobile platforms has already been set that anything more than $.99 for a game is expensive. Square & other publishers can release games at a higher price, and that will help change it. But it's much easier to change expectations that haven't fully formed yet, like on OUYA. So there's two reasons I'm glad to see FFIII priced at $15. First, I'm glad a developer with clout is selling games in the $5-$15 range, regardless of quality, purely for the sake of creating more flexible price expectations. Second, and more specific to this game, I'm glad to see FFIII sold at $15 because it indicates that if Square brings more games to OUYA, they might be willing to price those games that high, too.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:06 |
|
packetgrinder posted:Yes but why why why I did a bad job of answering your question but hopefully this attempt might work. The developer(s?) lives in south africa.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:08 |
|
Charging a price for a game that is grossly higher than it should be is not a good influence on the ouya market. Are you insane?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:09 |
|
XboxPants posted:First, I'm glad a developer with clout is selling games in the $5-$15 range, regardless of quality, purely for the sake of creating more flexible price expectations. Let me get this straight, you want companies to set the precedent for titles to be expensive (even if they suck) so that all future games which suck can be priced highly? This is what you are saying, right?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:11 |
|
I still don't understand why higher prices are good. Do you think that if the prices are higher, the big boys will think Ouya is cool?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:11 |
|
quote:will also include computer games such as diablo and bring the to the t.v. as well and I know I'm not the only person expecting that.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:12 |
|
Liquid Penguins posted:I did a bad job of answering your question but hopefully this attempt might work. I don't really follow, so I assume you mean that South Africans desperately want to play cellphone games on their TVs.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:12 |
|
Madcosby posted:Here's Ouya-developer master Dreamzle's game; which is on that list for sale right now: The Secret of Universe Alpha (not sure if that's the name of the universe or the build). Bullets that match the background texture - good design choice for a shooter. TaurusOxford posted:I don't feel like catching up to 2000+ posts. Has the OUYA killed the evil big 3 yet? Yeah. Liquid Penguins posted:Charging a price for a game that is grossly higher than it should be is not a good influence on the ouya market. Are you insane? He actually has a point. Think about it: what's the target demographic for OUYA Marketplace? That's right, morons. Once developers realise that anybody with an OUYA will blindly throw money at loving anything, there'll be all kinds of new games appearing! Nothing actually good, obviously, since it's a tiny market, but that's by the by.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:13 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:I still don't understand why higher prices are good. Do you think that if the prices are higher, the big boys will think Ouya is cool? He doesnt want the Ouya to end up like mobile game markets where everything has to be 0.99 or f2p.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:13 |
|
illiniguy01 posted:He doesnt want the Ouya to end up like mobile game markets where everything has to be 0.99 or f2p. Except he's the one who pointed out that Square charge that much on mobile markets anyway.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:15 |
|
Dex posted:Except he's the one who pointed out that Square charge that much on mobile markets anyway. He is bad at making points but I'm pretty sure that was his point.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:16 |
|
XboxPants posted:Game devaluation really is a serious problem. Now, so far it's been limited mostly to the mobile space. It's very hard to sell your game on the App Store at above $.99, for instance This is because most poo poo on the App Store is barely even worth 99 cents, not because of ~game devaluation~.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:17 |
|
Game devaluation is not a serious problem at all, dude. It's not a problem at all. It doesn't even exist.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:17 |
|
Plus there are plenty of Android games that cost $5 or more. Hell even Kairosoft games cost $5 and they're a company made up of like a dozen people.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:22 |
|
XboxPants posted:First, I'm glad a developer with clout is selling games in the $5-$15 range, regardless of quality, purely for the sake of creating more flexible price expectations. This is a stupid thing to say. You are stupid. Charging a hugely inflated price on a bad product is not a good influence on any market. It is not a good thing in any context. It is a bad thing.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:23 |
|
The problem with video games is we don't pay enough for them.
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:24 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 10:12 |
|
XboxPants posted:First, I'm glad a developer with clout is selling games in the $5-$15 range, regardless of quality, purely for the sake of creating more flexible price expectations. What the gently caress? Are you insane?
|
# ? Mar 30, 2013 00:25 |