|
Elfface posted:Apparently, these days the writers and/or Rami claim the butler was supposed to be a figment of Harry's imagination, putting the pieces together about what actually happened. Which is madness, but I sort of believe them? Like, they wanted to have Harry looking over evidence, but then test audiences didn't get it, so they added the butler. It's subtle, but when Harry talks to the butler earlier in the movie when Peter's there, you can see Peter have a "...who is he talking to?" look on his face.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2013 17:45 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 02:38 |
|
Byzantine posted:It's subtle, but when Harry talks to the butler earlier in the movie when Peter's there, you can see Peter have a "...who is he talking to?" look on his face. That's just how Tobey Maguire looks all the time.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2013 22:46 |
|
Elfface posted:Really, the problem would have been solved much sooner if, somewhere around Spidey 2, Peter had shown up in costume, and said "Hey, I didn't kill your Dad, the goblin did.". Which is true, from a certain point of view. Ah yes, from the Obi-Wan School of Obfuscation.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2013 22:49 |
|
Byzantine posted:It's subtle, but when Harry talks to the butler earlier in the movie when Peter's there, you can see Peter have a "...who is he talking to?" look on his face. It been a while since I seen the Spiderman movies, but that same butler was in the earlier movies as well. Just never notice him until that scene in Spiderman 3.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2013 23:30 |
|
Rirse posted:It been a while since I seen the Spiderman movies, but that same butler was in the earlier movies as well. Or was he?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 06:47 |
|
LesterGroans posted:Or was he? gently caress it. The butler was really the ghost of Christmas Future, here to give Harry the gift of love.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 06:56 |
|
I can't believe you guys haven't heard of my favourite, Spider-man villain, The Butler!!!
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 17:18 |
|
I'd be interested to see how Spider-Man 3 would have turned out had Raimi not had to shoehorn Venom into it. I also found it it kinda funny that Topher Grace was playing Eddie Brock, considering that I thought he would have made a pretty good Peter Parker.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:07 |
El Gallinero Gros posted:I'd be interested to see how Spider-Man 3 would have turned out had Raimi not had to shoehorn Venom into it. I also found it it kinda funny that Topher Grace was playing Eddie Brock, considering that I thought he would have made a pretty good Peter Parker. There would have been more Sandman probably. So it might have been even worse cause holy poo poo was Sandman terrible in that movie.
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:22 |
|
Ville Valo posted:Is Lando a villain, even in Empire Strikes Back? If Lando had told the Empire where the Rebels were and then sold out Han (which is basically what Selina did), then yes.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:49 |
computer parts posted:If Lando had told the Empire where the Rebels were and then sold out Han (which is basically what Selina did), then yes. Lando was definitely a villain for the majority of Empire, yeah. But then he switches sides. But only after Vader goes back on his word. If Vader would have honored the original agreement they had Lando probably never would have switched over to the rebels side. So he only really went from villain to anti-hero until Jedi.
|
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:55 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:Lando was definitely a villain for the majority of Empire, yeah. But then he switches sides. But only after Vader goes back on his word. If Vader would have honored the original agreement they had Lando probably never would have switched over to the rebels side. So he only really went from villain to anti-hero until Jedi. Lando was put in a situation where he believed he'd negotiated the best possible outcome in the particular situation he'd found himself in - Bespin gets left alone by the Empire, Vader gets the Rebel leadership and Leia, Han, Luke & Chewie are not to be harmed. The Empire were ready to ambush the Rebels at Bespin anyway, and he did what he could to save as many lives as possible.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 23:34 |
|
Goddamn Lando apologists up in here.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 23:57 |
|
Say what you want about his deals with the Empire, but Lando Calrissian kept the space trains running on time.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pK5HmuCMBM How can this man be a villain?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:17 |
|
Kramjacks posted:Say what you want about his deals with the Empire, but Lando Calrissian kept the space trains running on time. Have you been to Bespin? Its so clean. And none of those fuckin twileks. I tell you, they know how to run a space station.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:25 |
|
The Space Trains must flow.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:34 |
|
Calico Heart posted:I can't believe you guys haven't heard of my favourite, Spider-man villain, The Butler!!! They recently gave him his own spinoff sequel and it was so confusing. They didn't even mention Spiderman once!
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:38 |
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:48 |
|
Volume 1? Is it being split into multiple films now?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:49 |
|
Yeah I hadn't heard it was getting the Kill Bill treatment.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:50 |
|
I thought that was the plan years ago.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:56 |
|
Mister Chief posted:I thought that was the plan years ago. I think it was more recently the plan because the full thing is not only going to be NC 17, but nearly 4.5 hours long.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 01:01 |
|
CaptainHollywood posted:I think it was more recently the plan because the full thing is not only going to be NC 17, but nearly 4.5 hours long. Well, it was 5.5 hours long, but the distributor is forcing it to be only 4.5 hours long and in two parts.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 01:50 |
|
That's an awful lot of loving.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 04:16 |
|
Fat Lou posted:Well, it was 5.5 hours long, but the distributor is forcing it to be only 4.5 hours long and in two parts. Is a 4.5 hour Lars Von Trier film really that much more marketable than a 5.5 hour Lars Von Trier film?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 04:17 |
|
The shorter version will also be censored depending on the whims of the distributor where as the longer version will be uncut.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 04:31 |
|
Mister Chief posted:The shorter version will also be censored depending on the whims of the distributor where as the longer version will be uncut. I think it's entirely up to the parents.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 07:06 |
|
The uncut version better have Udo Kier furiously jizzing everywhere or I swear to god...
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 08:59 |
|
kiimo posted:Yeah I hadn't heard it was getting the Kill Bill treatment. Not so much Kill Bill as gently caress Lars von Trier. I didn't want to see his movie before, I want to see it even less now.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 14:11 |
|
Mister Chief posted:The shorter version will also be censored depending on the whims of the distributor where as the longer version will be uncut. It's a matter of screenings per day.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 14:36 |
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 14:55 |
|
THANK YOU for getting that loving song stuck in my head for the next couple of days.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 15:05 |
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 15:29 |
|
ubergnu posted:THANK YOU for getting that loving song stuck in my head for the next couple of days. Is someone gonna get their loving head kicked in?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 15:51 |
|
This poster was at a movie store I went to as a kid. I actually got my parents to rent it because I loved the poster so much. It wasn't a good movie for a 7 year old. Thanks for the memory lane trip
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 15:54 |
|
I Before E posted:Is someone gonna get their loving head kicked in? Hey, Bryan seems too cool for me to come back with a snarky reply, so just imagine it here I guess. In threadworthy news, I just my hung up my movie poster based on this image for Tetsuo, the Iron Man: I can't find it on Google images strangely enough, but it doesn't matter. The full size poster looks just fantastic! People going by will just stop and go "Woha, what's that film!". ed: It's kinda like this. Dammit why is it so hard to find? ubergnu fucked around with this message at 16:17 on Dec 7, 2013 |
# ? Dec 7, 2013 16:12 |
|
Jedit posted:Not so much Kill Bill as gently caress Lars von Trier. I didn't want to see his movie before, I want to see it even less now. Well, thanks for keeping us updated. ubergnu posted:I can't find it on Google images strangely enough, but it doesn't matter. The full size poster looks just fantastic! People going by will just stop and go "Woha, what's that film!". And then you're going to have to tell them about Tetsuo, which is an impressively unpleasant film. It's like having a coffee-table book of mutilated genitals.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 17:37 |
|
Mr. Squishy posted:And then you're going to have to tell them about Tetsuo, which is an impressively unpleasant film. It's like having a coffee-table book of mutilated genitals. My mother and my brother liked it very much. Not gonna tell you about my sister though
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 18:52 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 02:38 |
|
Tetsuo: The Iron Man is nothing short of a goddamn masterpiece.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 19:42 |