|
He's talking about a Port Authority and SNC Lavelin, so my immediate response is: "Well, duh!" I'm not sure what the history of Port Authorities is, but somewhere along the line control passed from the federal government to these opaque, appointed boards. More and more they seem to represent the interests of a few high level industries and gently caress anyone else who lives and works on the waterfront. Someone needs to grab a pry bar and start turning over rocks.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 06:46 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 17:01 |
|
The difference is when an individual bribes a politician it's considered corruption. When a corporation bribes a politician it's considered normal.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 07:16 |
|
quote:A good Monday morning to you. It's International Holocaust Remembrance Day, which marks the day Russian troops liberated the Auschwitz death camp in 1945 and laid bare the atrocities of the Nazis. It is also Community Manager Appreciation Day, which, in our case, is a chance to say thank you to our friends at The Hub.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 14:48 |
|
The Neil Young thing just blows my mind. I mean, if you want to rip on Neil Young's politics it isn't hard. Heck, there's a dozen interviews where Graham Nash does it, saying Young changes his political party depending on which side of the bed he wakes up on. Young has supported the Democrats and the Republicans in the United States throughout his life. One could just point to that and say Young will support the oilsands in due time just because he doesn't really have a moral platform. He just gets emotional. Buuuut instead we get this gem on CBC.ca: "If he had some talent he would be a lot more believable, as it is all he wants to do is grandstand." Yeesh. If you're gonna try to slam the guy, going after one of the most legendary music careers of all time is not the way to go. You just sound dumb.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 15:51 |
|
He's no Linkin Park, that's for sure. Living in Calgary, this Neil Young poo poo was on the front page of our paper of record 4 out of 7 days last week. He threw his show in the building I work in and there were reporters crawling all over the place looking for a scoop. The one they found? While he was playing his show, his tour bus was running! Nevermind most artists stay on the bus and only get out to go play music for an hour, but they were running and producing life-sustaining heat for hours! HE'S JUST AS BAD AS THE OIL SANDS! It was a long week around the water cooler, let me tell you.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 17:58 |
|
TOTAL SHUTDOWN OF THE OIL INDUSTRY PUTTING LIVES AT RISK Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 18:34 on Jan 27, 2014 |
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:32 |
|
Yes shut it down or at least cut back significantly since it's of no benefit other than the few workers directly employed and getting exploited as poo poo. A good outcome and one of the reasons I'm involved in any pipe-line stuff, AND anti rail shipments. You can be anti-both! You can be anti-the entire loving industry in its current form.
Baronjutter fucked around with this message at 18:40 on Jan 27, 2014 |
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:38 |
|
PT6A posted:I never said it wasn't? I'm just making the point that good economic conditions in one part of the country do, in fact, benefit those in other areas of the country, just as it was when the East was stronger than the West. I'll admit I'm not overly thrilled with it, but under the current structure, the have-not provinces are definitely benefitting from the energy industry in Alberta. The problem is cost of living in Calgary assumes you make oil and gas money. I'm paying 1k for a lovely one bedroom now, and am afraid to look for a new aparentment because unless I get lucky I will end up paying 1200-1500 for a maybe decent one. And unless I move out to dover or forest lawn, prices don't get that much cheaper in the suburbs.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:44 |
|
Baronjutter posted:Yes shut it down or at least cut back significantly since it's of no benefit other than the few workers directly employed and getting exploited as poo poo. A good outcome and one of the reasons I'm involved in any pipe-line stuff, AND anti rail shipments. You can be anti-both! You can be anti-the entire loving industry in its current form.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:45 |
|
I had a great time slapping down a colleague about the Greece talking point. Mark Blyth does such a great job in his Austerity book that it's basically impossible not to quote it directly in terms that work for even the humblest conversation. That's basically gold for Canadian political conversations.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 18:54 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:I had a great time slapping down a colleague about the Greece talking point. Mark Blyth does such a great job in his Austerity book that it's basically impossible not to quote it directly in terms that work for even the humblest conversation. That's basically gold for Canadian political conversations. That book is like my economic bible.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 19:09 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:I had a great time slapping down a colleague about the Greece talking point. Mark Blyth does such a great job in his Austerity book that it's basically impossible not to quote it directly in terms that work for even the humblest conversation. That's basically gold for Canadian political conversations. Is it just called Austerity? Have an amazon link?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 20:41 |
|
Baronjutter posted:Yes shut it down or at least cut back significantly since it's of no benefit other than the few workers directly employed and getting exploited as poo poo. A good outcome and one of the reasons I'm involved in any pipe-line stuff, AND anti rail shipments. You can be anti-both! You can be anti-the entire loving industry in its current form. Oil backs too much of Alberta's economy to shut it down or cut it back significantly. I'd like to have the province tax it a lot more, and figure out how to let our natural resources give the maximum benefit to citizens and not just the oil company. The problem is that our politicians are working with the oil companies to give them easy guaranteed returns, and the Conservatives or Wild Rose party won't change that. Stopping the pipelines and letting rail traffic continue would be a terrible mistake, because the rail traffic is more dangerous than pipeline transportation. We could hike taxes on oil production and approve a pipeline and it would be a net benefit to average people and the companies. I have serious misgivings about the land acquisition used to route the Northern Gateway pipeline, but in the end the best solution involves some kind of pipeline and not continued rail transport. THC posted:PUTTING LIVES AT RISK You're ridicule the idea that oil transportation by rail is putting lives at risk. 47 people died in Lac-Mégantic. What is wrong with you?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 20:44 |
|
AATREK CURES KIDS posted:You're ridicule the idea that oil transportation by rail is putting lives at risk. 47 people died in Lac-Mégantic. What is wrong with you? Unless you're talking about some post from a few months ago you might want to re-read the headline and the content of his post!
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 20:49 |
|
MASSIVE JOBLESSNESS AND ECONOMIC CHAOS
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 20:56 |
|
B-b-but I thought... Economic chaos -- the free and unfettered market -- was the way to go?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:00 |
|
It's all a huge conspiracy to gently caress Alberta you see. Obviously the environmental concerns are a cynical smokescreen. Those uptight
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:03 |
|
Samurai Quack posted:Is it just called Austerity? Have an amazon link? Specifically it's called Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea Kindle version on Amazon Canada here: http://amzn.to/1b1N28i
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:08 |
|
What's the Greece argument anyway? I thought their issue was having to compete with the more productive German industry because they use the Euro. How does that even apply to Canada? Is it just used as sort sort of boogeyman for what happens if you don't bend to the demands of the global rich?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:12 |
|
THC posted:MASSIVE JOBLESSNESS AND ECONOMIC CHAOS Crippling the oilsands would cause massive joblessness in Alberta. Our irresponsible provincial government hasn't structured the economy for a smooth transition away from oil, which certainly should be done, but yanking out the carpet from our economy is not the solution. People in this thread act like it's hyperbole to say that oil is critical to the Alberta economy, but it is. Stopping the oilsands would be like outlawing tourism in PEI.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:24 |
|
Heavy neutrino posted:What's the Greece argument anyway? I thought their issue was having to compete with the more productive German industry because they use the Euro. How does that even apply to Canada? Is it just used as sort sort of boogeyman for what happens if you don't bend to the demands of the global rich? Canada can do both of those things, and isn't at the mercy of an unsympathetic political body to do so. So the comparison to any of the PIIGS' current situation is dumb as hell. edit: in fact, you could argue (as Andrew Coyne did this weekend) that the government is pressuring the new governor of the BoC to devalue the currency for exactly that reason. Kafka Esq. fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Jan 27, 2014 |
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:26 |
|
AATREK CURES KIDS posted:Crippling the oilsands would cause massive joblessness in Alberta. Our irresponsible provincial government hasn't structured the economy for a smooth transition away from oil, which certainly should be done, but yanking out the carpet from our economy is not the solution. People in this thread act like it's hyperbole to say that oil is critical to the Alberta economy, but it is. Stopping the oilsands would be like outlawing tourism in PEI. Hyperbole is saying that if you're against runaway, irresponsible oil sands development then you're in favour of massive unemployment and rail disasters and people dying in fiery conflagrations. Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 21:39 on Jan 27, 2014 |
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:31 |
|
Heavy neutrino posted:What's the Greece argument anyway? IF WE DON'T VOTE CONSERVATIVE WE WILL BE LIKE GREECE BY SUMMER. Normally in all caps like that.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:37 |
|
Edit ^^^^ oh poo poo I'd better change my party affiliation! AATREK CURES KIDS posted:Crippling the oilsands would cause massive joblessness in Alberta. Our irresponsible provincial government hasn't structured the economy for a smooth transition away from oil, which certainly should be done, but yanking out the carpet from our economy is not the solution. People in this thread act like it's hyperbole to say that oil is critical to the Alberta economy, but it is. Stopping the oilsands would be like outlawing tourism in PEI. I'd lend more credence to the massive joblessness argument if it came with the disclaimer that it's the fault of the albertan and Canadian governments for deciding an economic plan with a single bullet point was a good idea. Instead they range from heavily implying to outright stating it's the fault of literally any group that has never supported a laser focus on oil extraction.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:38 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:The Greece argument is basically a misunderstanding about financing debt. The Greeks had risky debt because of systemic disadvantages in economies within the Euro. The UK, French and German banks invested in this debt due to the earning potential of high risk, high yield debt. This financed the Greek spending on welfare. The Euro starts to get in trouble as the bills come due, because the central bank of the EU has to bail them out, due to the Greeks (and the Portuguese, Irish etc, the PIIGS) having no ability to devalue their currencies to inflate their way out of debt, or to print money (which only the central bank can do). Thanks. I'd figured Greece had massive issues due to having little to no control over its currency, but I didn't know much more than that. From what I'm reading out of your post, I guess I was right -- the argument is "accept all the demands of the global rich or we will literally be speaking Greek and throwing molotovs at riot police in 2015"
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:44 |
|
THC posted:Good thing nobody's suggesting we shut down the oil sands, just that projects should not be rubber-stamped "BECAUSE THE ECONOMY" and companies should actually be held fully accountable for the risks they take with our environment and the disasters they cause - if that would yank the carpet out that's their loving problem for being atrocious businesspeople, not anyone else's. Also maybe we should not have an oil lobbyist prime minister and an oil lobbyist environment minister and an oil lobbyist industry minister and an oil lobbyist overseeing CSIS. senae posted:I'd lend more credence to the massive joblessness argument if it came with the disclaimer that it's the fault of the albertan and Canadian governments for deciding an economic plan with a single bullet point was a good idea. Instead they range from heavily implying to outright stating it's the fault of literally any group that has never supported a laser focus on oil extraction. I agree with both of these posts, I apologize if I've been getting too charged with my rhetoric.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 21:46 |
|
Do you think that the folks at CBC look for the worst photos of Jim and purposefully put them on the front page?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 22:39 |
|
Professor Shark posted:Do you think that the folks at CBC look for the worst photos of Jim and purposefully put them on the front page? You think it's easy to pass a budget? Takes a lot of hard effort to get it out.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2014 23:11 |
|
AATREK CURES KIDS posted:Crippling the oilsands would cause massive joblessness in Alberta. Our irresponsible provincial government hasn't structured the economy for a smooth transition away from oil, which certainly should be done, but yanking out the carpet from our economy is not the solution. People in this thread act like it's hyperbole to say that oil is critical to the Alberta economy, but it is. Stopping the oilsands would be like outlawing tourism in PEI. Good.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 00:19 |
|
RBC posted:Good. Why on earth is that 'good'
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 02:50 |
|
Alctel posted:Why on earth is that 'good' Because taking away Alberta's The downside is that all those oil workers will probably move to BC, and I don't want them on this side of the Rockies.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 03:05 |
|
Okay, so, question period was exciting today, right, politics junkies? (can we please stop the petty bullshit in this sitting? gently caress)
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 03:22 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:Okay, so, question period was exciting today, right, politics junkies? I'm watching right now with a Scotch and it's pretty good so far. Any choice bits I should skip to?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 03:37 |
|
Flaherty saying he doesn't talk about the dollar, basically lying through his big stupid mouth.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 03:45 |
|
Kafka Esq. posted:Flaherty saying he doesn't talk about the dollar, basically lying through his big stupid mouth. Either that or hes just that incompetent.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 05:52 |
|
Whiteycar posted:Either that or hes just that incompetent. Why not both? In other news, Mulcair's forcing a vote on Canada Post home delivery, hammering on about the Senate and the refused 27 out of 27 access to information requests, and made a stop on something about uniting the progressives.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 06:37 |
|
Alctel posted:Why on earth is that 'good' Hmm perhaps some of us consider an economy based on literally destroying the global environment a "bad thing"
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 13:46 |
|
In Calgary news, the Sun's Rick Bell seems to have a bug up his rear end about a "Sunshine" list for Calgary civil servants. http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/01/2...ncy-on-salaries The fact that the man has any political influence in Calgary is laughable. I am surprised lists like these can even exist with current privacy legislation. I am also surprised that the unions seem to be giving the thumbs up, doesn't seem like terrible foresight to me. When have these lists ever been used for anything but attack civil servants their "luxurious" wages?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 14:39 |
|
linoleum floors posted:Hmm perhaps some of us consider an economy based on literally destroying the global environment a "bad thing" Why, then, not do something to address the demand side of the equation instead of the supply side? Future generations will thank you for it if you actually get off your rear end, leave the Internet, and start coming up with practical ways to replace oil. What are you waiting for? Like all leftists, the "environmentalist left," no matter if they try to hide it or not, always ends up pining for Uncle Joe's good-ol'-fashioned command economy, without realizing that it hasn't worked in the past, and will never work in the future. Even if we called a halt to all fossil fuel exploration in Canada, there's still be plenty of countries willing to "literally destroy" the global environment for a bigger piece of the pie, and we'd only be out the money. P.S. To anyone who's wondering why Alberta feels alienated by everyone except the CPC, it's people like the poster I'm quoting and RBC. Even if I felt comfortable voting for another party, I'd probably vote for the CPC just out of spite at this point.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 18:07 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 17:01 |
|
PT6A posted:Why, then, not do something to address the demand side of the equation instead of the supply side? Future generations will thank you for it if you actually get off your rear end, leave the Internet, and start coming up with practical ways to replace oil. What are you waiting for? But Canada doesn't need to do that, we have everything needed to get off a resource driven economy, yet we double down and send raw resources elsewhere and miss out on the better margins involved in refinement. Us "leftists" know that we could do better if the government was run with long term vision but the system, people and vested interests are only interested in the short term.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2014 18:13 |