|
How many whiteboards has this man murdered?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 04:53 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 17:39 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:Why are there no words on the board *squints at board* This means...uh...*sweat beads start forming, whole team is staring*...NOT loving REAL MAN FOOTBALL THAT'S WHAT
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 04:55 |
|
its like that scene in drum line where it turns out nick cannon cant read music at all
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 05:09 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:Why are there no words on the board Oh come on, there are no words for current Gator football.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 12:53 |
|
MACTION, SON FBschedules.com posted:The Mid-American Conference (MAC) has set the home and away football opponents for the 2014 season.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 15:02 |
|
A story on then-freshman Myron Rolle boxing then-RB Marcus Sims http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2014/2/12/5401774/myron-rolle-profile-florida-state-football-nfl-rhodes-scholar the rest of the article seems to suck pillsburysoldier fucked around with this message at 19:26 on Feb 12, 2014 |
# ? Feb 12, 2014 19:22 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So it turns out those games at JerryWorld are pretty much bowl games with none of the downside: That's actually a pretty sweet deal and actual bowl games would be way better for schools if they operated like that. I still don't understand how bowls somehow still get away with forcing schools to take all the risk while they and TV reap all the rewards. I mean, I understand how it actually happens. I just don't get how such open corruption and cronyism is tolerated.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 20:45 |
|
Oodles of Wootles posted:Why on earth hasn't his offer been pulled yet? Dude is on camera suplexing a guard. It's not like there's a chance he is innocent here All he wants is a place at the table.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 20:47 |
|
Former Nebraska kicker Erick Lueschen came out as openly gay when he was playing, nobody really gave a poo poo except for the assistant coachesEruck Lueschen posted:Once everyone found out, several coaches made it very clear to me that I wasn't welcome. I would say the majority of how they made it known that I was unwelcome was through non-verbal communication—body language, looks—but there was definitely some verbal things at times. of course he's gay look at that hair
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:05 |
|
Auburn High School player and Alabama signee Rashaan Evans is having some difficulties since Signing Day:ESPN.com posted:"It's getting worse," Evans told TideSports.com. "Someone actually put out an article about my family's business telling all Auburn fans not to go there. We are going to eventually start losing money. People are telling restaurants in the town not to serve us. Crazy Ted fucked around with this message at 21:21 on Feb 12, 2014 |
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:14 |
|
I hate a lot of college football fans.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:17 |
|
Alabama, folks.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:26 |
|
Thoguh posted:That's actually a pretty sweet deal and actual bowl games would be way better for schools if they operated like that. This is basically what Notre Dame has been doing for like 5 years now with the Shamrock Series.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:28 |
|
Regnevelc posted:I hate a lot of college football fans. I like you guys. You guys are my posting bros. My brosts.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 21:34 |
|
That is a pretty terrible thing
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 22:00 |
|
The AAC released its conference schedule in the form of a hard to read chart. Since all you care about is UCF, basically they go on the road for two of their top challengers (Houston and ECU) and duck Cincinnati. Probably about a 50/50 chance they make the Exception Bowl. Now, keep scrolling: Also ECU slightly changed its skull logo to jump on the Angry Mascot craze.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:04 |
|
ECU fans are really pissed about the logo change, first they emasculated their Petey mascot and now their logo has weird perspective issues
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:16 |
pillsburysoldier posted:A story on then-freshman Myron Rolle boxing then-RB Marcus Sims I like their long forms. But if you wanted it to be about football you'd be disappointed. Most of their long forms are way more human interest than sports knowledge. I've enjoyed the past few they've put up fwiw.
|
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:20 |
|
Can't tell if this is old news or not: NCAA proposing another targetting rule change:FanSided posted:NCAA proposes change to remove 15-yd targeting penalty if ejection is overturned Oh wait you thought they wouldn't try to sneak a dumb poo poo rule change into a new season hahahahaha. quote:The committee also recommended a rules change that will allow defensive units to substitute within the first 10 seconds of the 40-second play clock, with the exception of the final two minutes of each half, starting with the 2014 season. The 7th Guest fucked around with this message at 23:28 on Feb 12, 2014 |
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:25 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:
The Saban Gets His Way rule
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:34 |
|
I have been instructed by Nick Saban to state that the proposed rule change is a prudent one that would improve player safety.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:35 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:Can't tell if this is old news or not: NCAA proposing another targetting rule change: OK so what happens if replay shows that the player didn't hit helmet to helmet, so he gets to stay in, but there still should be some sort of personal foul for unnecessary roughness or roughing the passer or whatever? I guess I didn't really understand everybody complaining last season about the 15 yard penalty not being overturned on replay. No subjective penalties like that are reviewable, and the review was only to ensure no individual player was getting hosed over because of a bad call.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:35 |
|
wa27 posted:OK so what happens if replay shows that the player didn't hit helmet to helmet, so he gets to stay in, but there still should be some sort of personal foul for unnecessary roughness or roughing the passer or whatever?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:39 |
|
JT Jag posted:The sole purpose of the targeting penalty is to penalize someone who hit someone in the head. The review checks to see if the guy actually hit someone in the head. If the review proves that the guy did not hit someone in the head, there is no point in the 15-yard penalty that was assessed for something that was just disproven. Otherwise, there would've been multiple flags on the play. So if someone appears to target the quarterback well after a pass they should be throwing two flags? I always thought the official would throw the flag for the most severe penalty (which is always targeting). Edit: replace roughing the passer with Hitting a defenseless receiver or any other personal foul that could come from a hard hit. wa27 fucked around with this message at 23:51 on Feb 12, 2014 |
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:44 |
|
If there are two fouls on the play and one is overturned, they would enforce the other foul. I have never seen an NCAA penalty for targeting that involved the QUARTERBACK, though I have seen plenty of roughing the passer penalties for blows to the head. Which is separate.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:46 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:The RIP Oregon Rule
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:48 |
|
Korranus posted:The AAC released its conference schedule in the form of a hard to read chart. Since all you care about is UCF, basically they go on the road for two of their top challengers (Houston and ECU) and duck Cincinnati. Probably about a 50/50 chance they make the Exception Bowl. Now, keep scrolling: Wish Tulane got to play SMU and USF next season.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:51 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:If there are two fouls on the play and one is overturned, they would enforce the other foul. I have never seen an NCAA penalty for targeting that involved the QUARTERBACK, though I have seen plenty of roughing the passer penalties for blows to the head. Which is separate. UGA/Vandy last year. quote:Georgia already lost defensive end Ray Drew with 11:19 left in the second quarter. Officials flagged the defensive end for targeting when Drew hit Carta-Samuels after he threw a pass and pushed the quarterback to the ground. Georgia linebacker Jordan Jenkins tried to be careful after the game but was not happy with the call or the rule in general. http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=332920238
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:52 |
|
Crazy Ted posted:Auburn High School player and Alabama signee Rashaan Evans is having some difficulties since Signing Day: Just kidding, that's loving awful and unfortunately something that I think a lot of people saw coming. Recruiting is pretty dumb. Can you even imagine what happens if he turns out to be a bust? The same assholes will go from yelling "You should've come here you loving traitor!" to cheering "Hah! We totally knew you'd be a bust! That's what you get!" At least he'll be treated like a king at Alabama if he turns out to be pretty good. Quest For Glory II posted:Oh wait you thought they wouldn't try to sneak a dumb poo poo rule change into a new season hahahahaha.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:54 |
|
vikingstrike posted:UGA/Vandy last year.
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:57 |
|
Aren't these still proposals to be voted on and not official rules?
|
# ? Feb 12, 2014 23:58 |
|
So that is a pretty bit hit to a true hurryup style game, right? I mean, I guess for "fairness" I can understand, but if the idea is that the offense has 40 seconds, who cares if they snap at 39, 20, or 1? It is their 40 seconds to decide what to do.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:05 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:It would probably be completely overturned in that instance, even if it still constitutes roughing the passer. The refs can't assign two separate penalties in that circumstance because they'd stack, which would be unfair in the other direction. Not according to the NCAA press release: quote:However, if the targeting foul is committed in conjunction with another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul remains. For example, if a player is called for roughing the passer and targeting the head and neck area, but the instant replay official rules that targeting did not occur, the player flagged would remain in the game, but the roughing the passer penalty would still be enforced.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:07 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:Aren't these still proposals to be voted on and not official rules?
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:09 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:
gently caress dis poo poo. I mean, it wouldn't necessarily affect Baylor that much (at least not last year's Baylor) because Briles is saying that we averaged around 24-27s left on the clock before snapping the ball, which is in the new rule's safe zone, but I haven't seen any compelling evidence that hurry-up is significantly more dangerous than 'traditional' offense. The Targeting rule makes more sense, at least we all agree that brain damage is hosed and should be avoided at some length. Spiritus Nox fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Feb 13, 2014 |
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:09 |
|
quote:As we turn the page to 2014, it's worth taking a look back at what a truly historic season 2013 was for the ACC. The conference reached several unprecedented milestones that will make 2013 one of the league's more memorable seasons. Just in case you need a little bragging material heading into spring ball ... #supremACC
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:11 |
|
Spiritus Nox posted:I mean, it wouldn't necessarily affect Baylor that much (at least not last year's Baylor) because Briles is saying that we averaged around 24-27s left on the clock before snapping the ball, which is in the new rule's safe zone, but I haven't seen any compelling evidence that hurry-up is significantly more dangerous than 'traditional' offense. The clock isn't as big of an issue as the fact that this change will allow defenses to substitute every play, regardless of whether or not the offense made a substitution. No more using the hurry up to wear a defense down.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:22 |
|
Zypher posted:The clock isn't as big of an issue as the fact that this change will allow defenses to substitute every play, regardless of whether or not the offense made a substitution. Oh, yeah. Duh. I really hope the NCAA doesn't pass a rule solely because Nick Saban wouldn't stop moaning.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:24 |
|
Bruce Feldman @BFeldmanCBS posted:Text from a coach on new rules proposal: "the 2 coaches on the rules committee were 84th & 106th in plays run last year. C'mon man."
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:25 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 17:39 |
|
Zypher posted:The clock isn't as big of an issue as the fact that this change will allow defenses to substitute every play, regardless of whether or not the offense made a substitution. Yeah, this is a response to all the howling about fake injuries.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2014 00:27 |