|
Roosh is easier to take when you realize one of his pick up tips included the words "I love mud." Or is it harder to take because people still take him seriously?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 06:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:54 |
|
Grondoth posted:Roosh is easier to take when you realize one of his pick up tips included the words "I love mud." Or is it harder to take because people still take him seriously? Also when you know that he considers the Holloween Costume test a legitimate form of analysis. http://www.rooshv.com/the-relationship-between-femininity-education However I still see links from Return of Kings and Elite Daily on my feed every now and again. It's really disheartening that people read this poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 06:46 |
|
Grondoth posted:Roosh is easier to take when you realize one of his pick up tips included the words "I love mud." Or is it harder to take because people still take him seriously? Honestly the main thing that bothers me about him is that I know someone out there is reading his poo poo and taking it to heart.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 06:56 |
|
I think the only way I could take Roosh was if he was placed into a high-power centrifuge and reduced to a uniform-consistency liquid.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 06:58 |
|
But then said liquid would try and find a way to get inside your vagina, with or without your permission, so nothing much would change. Also the comments in the "women and femininity" article are as bad as I'd expect, with people saying he's an idiot and way more people going "who are you, a beta noob? ”
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 07:10 |
|
You misunderstand. I would drink him, digesting his mortal form and stealing his vital essence to be used as nutrients for my body. Nutrients I would use to sustain myself while I fought tirelessly for feminism. Then what little of him remained would be flushed into the sewers, where he and his ilk belong. Or maybe I'd just snap him in half and unhinge my jaw to devour him. Look, the point is, I want to eat MRAs.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 07:23 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:You misunderstand. I would drink him, digesting his mortal form and stealing his vital essence to be used as nutrients for my body. Nutrients I would use to sustain myself while I fought tirelessly for feminism. Then what little of him remained would be flushed into the sewers, where he and his ilk belong. I don't think it works that way. MRAs are toxic so they're obviously acidic. Thus your pH will lower to the point of you yourself becoming an MRA.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 07:45 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:You misunderstand. I would drink him, digesting his mortal form and stealing his vital essence to be used as nutrients for my body. Nutrients I would use to sustain myself while I fought tirelessly for feminism. Then what little of him remained would be flushed into the sewers, where he and his ilk belong. That's just anal sex for him
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 08:21 |
|
A dude in my nursing class, who I am rapidly losing respect for, posted this bullshit: http://www.returnofkings.com/30402/most-women-dont-deserve-a-good-man I'm the first to admit women can be lovely but I don't even know how to respond to this misogynistic crap
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 08:53 |
|
Since it's been a while since I last checked the pages of the people I still keep as friends but blocked thier posts from showing up on my feed and drat if I haven't hit paydirt. I admit I do find the using of the picture from 300 particularly funny for the wear the armor of God bit.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:06 |
|
You should point out that you can't spell 'conservative' without 'con'.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:13 |
|
Oh my god that Bible trail mix post is pure Also I see people still worship Reagan as their lord and savior despite the laundry list of reasons why he was poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:13 |
|
My opinions on cancer selfie have come full circle and now I'm mad at people calling girls "munters" and telling them to put their actual faces away because they're gross.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:16 |
I'd like to see you try to spell progressive without two lightning bolts.
|
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:43 |
|
There's literally a scene where Ricky Bobby is drinking at a bar with his pals in the movie!!! Could these people at least use pictures of people that MAKE SENSE in these things
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 13:42 |
|
Clochette posted:I didn't read the article but I'm guessing the author suggests that there's a slippery slope where making sure you don't literally rape someone will eventually lead to writing up contracts before every sexual encounter. I hate myself so I went to read that "real men don't wait for a yes" article. Have some choice quotes: rapist posted:I simply don’t wait around looking for little signs to pass go – in the moment, all I care about is getting my dick wet, and the path to make that happen. And when I feel like grabbing a girl’s head and making out with her, I do. Sometimes she shoves me off, yet I try again seconds later, and am met with sweet success. serial rapist posted:Don’t be deterred - every first kiss is sexual assault anyway. You’re going from touching her shoulder or hips, to putting your tongue down her throat, without ever asking for her permission. You never know she’s down until you’re balls deep. You will truly never be sure if she is willing to sleep with you, until you go for it. holy poo poo what the gently caress posted:A woman wants nothing more than to be objectified by a high status man; man desires, woman craves being desired. As one fling told me, “sometimes it feels good to be objectified.” As for some harpy braying on about ‘objectification of women,’ put her in a room with a willing Ryan Gosling, and see how she moans as his hand climbs up her skirt. actual loving rapist posted:There will be a few who verbally refuse to have sex, as they’re lying naked in your bed, but you get the distinct feeling that if by some stroke of the gods, your penis ended up inside her, well… she’d be writhing with pleasure, happy that you forcibly ignored her protestations. MRA rapist motherfucker posted:I opt not to forcibly gently caress girls under these conditions; the risk of a girl accusing you of rape after several penis-induced orgasms under such circumstances is too far above zero for my tastes.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 13:49 |
|
Serene Dragon posted:I hate myself so I went to read that "real men don't wait for a yes" article. Have some choice quotes: Is there a way we can contact the proper authorities on this guy? I'm sure we can solve all the rape crimes just by this article alone! He is literally saying that you pretty much have to gently caress a "yes" out of her, because deep down she wants the dick all the time but she doesn't know it.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 14:08 |
|
MyFaceBeHi posted:Is there a way we can contact the proper authorities on this guy? I'm sure we can solve all the rape crimes just by this article alone! He is literally saying that you pretty much have to gently caress a "yes" out of her, because deep down she wants the dick all the time but she doesn't know it. Do you have a telephone? Thats a good way to contact people.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 14:29 |
|
'Mack' has to be trolling, right? ...right? ('Mack' is dad's conservative friend, 'Bobby' is dad, and I avoided touching the poop on this one so far.)
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 14:38 |
|
I like how he jumps from birth control to ABORTION ABORTION ABORTION.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 14:48 |
|
LIBERAL PROPAGANDA in the FALSE WAR ON WOMEN People get stuck on such specific turns of phrase sometimes
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 14:50 |
|
Aerdan posted:
I think Mack just wanted an excuse to show off that he knows the word "abortifacients".
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 15:02 |
|
mds2 posted:Do you have a telephone? Thats a good way to contact people. Bit difficult to contact an american police force when I live in the UK but hey, whatever works!
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 15:19 |
|
Little Blackfly posted:OK, so I went and looked up that cancer selfie thing. Can someone explain to me the logical connection between the two? Cause idgi It's mysterious to people who aren't in the know and makes them ask. Then they pay more attention when you tell them as compared to just posting something that's actually about cancer because reasons.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 16:27 |
|
Xombie posted:It's mysterious to people who aren't in the know and makes them ask. Then they pay more attention when you tell them as compared to just posting something that's actually about cancer because reasons. Apparently there was £1,000,000 donated to Cancer Research UK yesterday on the back of it so now my selfie-snark looks mean
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 16:49 |
|
The poop has come to Canada!quote:"Wake-up Call... can only reply with one thing: I wish every day we were like North Korea.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 18:00 |
|
Shannonmcn posted:My opinions on cancer selfie have come full circle and now I'm mad at people calling girls "munters" and telling them to put their actual faces away because they're gross. I've only had two girls on my feed post the makeup free selfie, and neither of them mentioned cancer. Until I read this thread, I had no idea they were an awareness thing, and I doubt they did either (considering one has cancer, if she knew it was for awareness, she'd have made note of it). So I assumed they were just a cute confidence boosting thing girls were doing, which was proven further when the typical dudebro I have on my feed starting getting mad at the selfies, since he thinks girls without makeup is gross.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 18:04 |
|
It's the same on my feed. Most girls were saying the reason was to prove that we're all beautiful even without makeup, more like a confidence booster thing.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 18:34 |
|
Some girl on my girlfriend's Facebook is actually pretty ill at the moment and posted one of those selfies. People were freaking out.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 19:03 |
|
stegoceras posted:It's the same on my feed. Most girls were saying the reason was to prove that we're all beautiful even without makeup, more like a confidence booster thing.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 19:06 |
|
Aerdan posted:
Wouldn't universal healthcare be a fantastic solution to businesses that don't want to cover their employees health care due to religious reasons?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 19:40 |
|
Zeether posted:Oh my god that Bible trail mix post is pure It bothers me that they say "The Bible isn't trail mix: you can't just pick out the parts you like". Because that's how all the M&M's get eaten out of the trail mix, and you're a bad person if you do that. It should read "The Bible is EXACTLY LIKE trail mix: If you pick out only the parts you like, go to hell" Just buy a bag of M&Ms if that's all you want!
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 19:47 |
|
Master Twig posted:Wouldn't universal healthcare be a fantastic solution to businesses that don't want to cover their employees health care due to religious reasons?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 20:07 |
|
canyoneer posted:It bothers me that they say "The Bible isn't trail mix: you can't just pick out the parts you like". Because that's how all the M&M's get eaten out of the trail mix, and you're a bad person if you do that. It should read "The Bible is EXACTLY LIKE trail mix: If you pick out only the parts you like, go to hell" I stand whole-heartedly by the "Bible isn't trail mix" argument. I'd love it if more Christians held themselves to that mantra. I just wish that, instead of believing all the crazy outdated terrible poo poo de facto because they believe in the more rational messages, they would refuse to believe any of it to avoid having to believe in all the crazy poo poo in the first place.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 20:32 |
|
Picking and choosing is actually a-ok if any of these Christians believed in anything Jesus ever said.Matthew 22:36-40 posted:
Basically if you're honoring God and being good to people you're following all the laws and the demands of the prophets just fine. Except you can't justify hating the gays when you do that so...
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 20:41 |
|
Huntersoninski posted:Picking and choosing is actually a-ok if any of these Christians believed in anything Jesus ever said. You know, maybe they are loving the gays as they love themselves. Maybe they just really, really hate themselves.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 20:46 |
|
Huntersoninski posted:Picking and choosing is actually a-ok if any of these Christians believed in anything Jesus ever said. Yeah but Jesus kinda said lots of things, such as Matthew 5:17-18 posted:"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. which is the keystone of the "well you can't pick and choose" argument
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 20:57 |
|
Sure but he then said the law and the prophets is nothing but loving god and other people. Not saying people dont' use it as an excuse, but as far as I'm concerned that's bullshit.RyuujinBlueZ posted:You know, maybe they are loving the gays as they love themselves. I'd buy that. Rat Patrol has a new favorite as of 21:19 on Mar 20, 2014 |
# ? Mar 20, 2014 21:16 |
|
Would it even be possible to believe in everything in the Bible and follow every law set forth? I imagine there would be a few contradictions.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 22:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:54 |
|
Clochette posted:Would it even be possible to believe in everything in the Bible and follow every law set forth? I imagine there would be a few contradictions. No there are plenty: http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html If only they had sci-fi nerds thousands of years ago who would post on message boards about inconsistencies.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 22:48 |