|
Mokotow posted:Every time this thread drifts into theorizing about a potential Russian invasion of the Baltic countries, a part of me dies. This thread isn't the only place where people are theorizing that. Polish officials seem to be convinced Russia's not finished invading Ukraine to liberate Russian speaking people. Anyone with a Russian speaking population is probably concerned. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62EEByJ-nbk Stanislav Kasei posted:In a military sense, the whole machine of ready for it, because for a long time, tens of thousands of Russian soldiers stationed on the border and train without interruption. Doctrine in this situation are very important because they are nothing but a preparation of various scenarios. A staff officers have the map the different options already spent. Soldiers stretch, and the engines warmed military equipment. One word - war machine is ready, and now it all depends on political will, http://www.tvp.info/14576163/czy-obok-putina-znajdzie-sie-ktos-kto-polozy-mokry-recznik-na-rozgrzana-glowe
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:44 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 22:23 |
|
I thought Russia was doing really badly financially speaking. I don't see how they could support a war, unless the goal is to go back to the good ole days where that poo poo don't matter. Maybe they'll just piecemeal invade and take the Ukraine, slowly but surely secure the border and just keep extending it or whatever. I don't think they'll outright invade the Ukraine though , it seems they want it destablized and another pro russian government back in power.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:49 |
|
The Russians will do everything they can to troll Ukraine, and they will probably be successful. However, it also means that relations between the two countries will be frosty for decades to come, unless there's an electoral upset allowing Russophile parties to form a government. I don't see that happening anytime soon, though.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:54 |
|
steinrokkan posted:The Treaty of Lisbon includes a Mutual Defense Clause independent on NATO. So member states are obliged to protect other members regardless of the NATO membership of any party. That's what I read last night, I was just unsure of what exactly it meant. From the way I read it, I thought it was more of a "mutual aid" clause that could be interpreted as mutual defense, but wasn't explicit in that manner. The whole military section of the EU is pretty difficult to understand, at least for me (using wikipedia) due to the overlapping and redundant articles and treaties and such.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:55 |
|
That would be a less costly and more effective way to bring Ukraine back to their influence. Destabilize from within and people will eventually get sick of it and want the good ole days back. Yanukovych was robbing the nation blind, but at least we didn't have the continuing threat of violence. The story about Right Sector "storming" the Rada yesterday was either hundreds violently attacked or a few went in, sang their anthem and left.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:55 |
|
Cheatum the Evil Midget posted:The US establishment thinks that, sure, but do the american public think dagaupils is worth even the bones of one dead marine? Fighting Russia means real casualties.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:58 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:That would be a less costly and more effective way to bring Ukraine back to their influence. Destabilize from within and people will eventually get sick of it and want the good ole days back. Yanukovych was robbing the nation blind, but at least we didn't have the continuing threat of violence. That reminds me. There was supposed to be an emergency Rada session today regarding Avakov and Sashko Bilyj's death. Anything came out of this yet? E: yep, Avakov is fired. http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/v-rade-zaregistrirovali-zakonoproekt-ob-otstavke-avakova-357499.html Paladinus fucked around with this message at 15:01 on Mar 28, 2014 |
# ? Mar 28, 2014 14:58 |
|
Paladinus posted:That reminds me. There was supposed to be an emergency Rada session today regarding Avakov and Sashko Bilyj's death. Anything came out of this yet? Is this likely to calm things down, or will Bilyj's party still seek vengeance?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:06 |
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:The story about Right Sector "storming" the Rada yesterday was either hundreds violently attacked or a few went in, sang their anthem and left. There was some interesting after-talk from that. Right Sector leaders were claiming their peoke were restraining the would-be seigers, while the acting president claimed the more aggressively oriented people were Russian agents...which strikes me as a bit of a deescalation? At any rate it seeks today's protests were uneventful.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:07 |
|
Doctor Chaxtical posted:Is this likely to calm things down, or will Bilyj's party still seek vengeance? I don't think they'll be satisfied before he's arrested at least.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:19 |
|
Obama actively trolling Putin in speeches says to me that everybody has already agreed that Russia gets Crimea and the greater powers are going to chill with just sanctions. Putin gets to troll Eastern Europe with troop buildups and provocative actions but this is destabilization/psychological poo poo to seed the ground for possible long term installation of political puppets down the road (like what failed this time around in Ukraine). In the short term Putin has shored up his political support at home. Crimea was itself already the big risk (and we won't know whether Putin ultimately won or lost something there for another generation). There is no way in hell that Putin views Crimea as an Anschluss that presages a swift takeover of former Soviet territories, but it is pretty useful to him for everybody else to worry about that.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:20 |
|
Baloogan posted:What about the 25% of your population that is Russian? The same guys who might be pissed you tore down their war memorial. My guess, and it is only a guess: few would turn against the Estonian government, a bit more would actually join to fight the Russians because they have so strong economic and societal ties to Estonia and Europe in general, most would simply try to stay the gently caress out of harm's way. The majority don't want to see a single Russian soldier on our territory and that is a fact, because they have nothing to gain from it. Life in Estonia is better than in Russia, even with all the problems of integration that still haven't been solved. Ardennes posted:The national guard units still need time to mobilize, and it may take days, that very well could make the difference. You are talking about general mobilization. The defense league guys can mobilize within HOURS, not days or weeks. I don't know if you have noticed this, but Estonia is actually quite small. Our cities are compact, distances are short and we have some experience in urban warfare: when the Soviet Union was breaking up, our capital was very quickly shut down to prevent tanks and artillery showing up by placing huge slabs of granite in all the access points. By the time the Russian convoy would reach Tallinn, the airspace would be filled with NATO fighters and possibly choppers, all the highways would be blocked and the city would be filled with thousands of paramilitary armed with AK-47s. And trust me the Russians know that as well as I do.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:21 |
|
Mokotow posted:Every time this thread drifts into theorizing about a potential Russian invasion of the Baltic countries, a part of me dies. But would that be enough to elicit a NATO response? How many battalions could your other parts muster? Are your nukes an effective deterrent? I'm starting to feel like Putin is really and truly interested in reconstructing the USSR.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:23 |
|
Would the US, or, I don't know someone like Saudi Arabia, trying to tank oil or natural gas prices be effective at 'sanctioning' Russia?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:25 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:But would that be enough to elicit a NATO response? How many battalions could your other parts muster? Are your nukes an effective deterrent? I can't speak too much for the Central Asian states, but he is going to have a hard time doing that in Europe. The Baltics had the disadvantage of being former Russian territories before WW1, made independent, some fascist governments were created (I forget in which ones), then a takeover by USSR, then Germany, then USSR again. The Baltics are now simply too stable to be under any real credible threat for a takeover. That and there is no strategic reason for Russia to take them over.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:30 |
Incantus posted:Would the US, or, I don't know someone like Saudi Arabia, trying to tank oil or natural gas prices be effective at 'sanctioning' Russia? Very much so. Anyway, Putin isn't done yet with Ukraine. Yanuks speech today and the increasing levels of Russian mobilization plus Russian agents operating in the eastern Ukraine create a scenario that they are trying to either break off the eastern part through unrest or jack the heat up under the interim government in Kiev in the hopes they get another Kremlin friendly one. Note: This does not mean that something is definitely going to go down. This means they are looking for cracks to apply pressure to and may act on it. Also seeing how a few Baltic goons may be worrying, the mobilization in the northwestern front (aimed at the Baltics) is just a show, for time being.
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:48 |
|
In any real sense, all that is "on the table" for Western movement is maybe Eastern Ukraine and that is a stretch otherwise it is extremely problematic. Granted, Putin is still pushing Russia interests in the Caucasus and Central Asia but that isn't a "European" story.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:49 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:But would that be enough to elicit a NATO response? How many battalions could your other parts muster? Are your nukes an effective deterrent? This is like a laundry list of all the worst digressions of the last thread. If I were that fired Minister I would consider getting the hell out of the country, or at least out of any city with a Right Sector presence. There's a real chance of a revenge killing. Still, if he really did order the assassination of a Right Sector leader he probably does deserve to be kicked out, that's unlikely to be legal and also raised tensions for no benefit. The toughest angle of any further Russian interventions in Ukraine is the more of Ukraine they take, the more hostile the territory they're taking becomes and the more hostile the rump state of Ukraine becomes afterward. Taking Eastern Ukraine would involve actual fighting and pierce the "liberation" illusion for a fair number of Russians, and all it'd achieve is remove a large chunk of pro-Russian Ukrainians from the rest of Ukraine and swing the rest of the country's politics further toward aligning with Europe. It might just be easier to sit there, looking ready to invade at any moment, but never do it. Keep Ukraine unstable and panicked. It's not like Ukraine can afford drawn-out tensions, and it keeps factions bickering rather than rallying against an invasion.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 15:52 |
|
Paladinus posted:
That's not what the story says, though? Someone proposed a bill to fire him, but that doesn't say it passed.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:02 |
|
Cheatum the Evil Midget posted:The US establishment thinks that, sure, but do the american public think dagaupils is worth even the bones of one dead marine? Fighting Russia means real casualties. I am unable to think of a strategic goal that would be more important to the US than the continued existence of NATO. Maybe continued access to mideastern oil, but that may be number two. If Article V is invoked, Canada mobilizes. Thinking that the US, and the rest that actually use their military don't because "meh Estonia" is the height of nonsense. Joe Six-pack in Kansas couldn't point to it on a map and really doesn't care, but they know what a Russian is and NATO is the lynchpin to 60 some years of strategic defense.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:08 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:I'm starting to feel like Putin is really and truly interested in reconstructing the USSR. No kidding. He knows he can't get it back in its exact form, but poo poo, dude wants to build the Eurasian Union upon the "best values of the Soviet Union". To be more precise he wants to make Russia the new Soviet Union and in many ways it is already just that. The difference is of course that none of the other former USSR republics aside from maaaaaybe Belarus want to become part of Russia again. Russia itself is very much like what the USSR probably would have been like if it had never ceased to exist and had given up on the Communist ideology. And had lost a tremendous amount of its political power.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:32 |
az posted:Yanuks speech today Is there any tl;dr available?
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:33 |
|
A good article about Putin when he first came to power: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26769481 quote:Vladimir Putin: The rebuilding of ‘Soviet’ Russia
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:34 |
kalstrams posted:Is there any tl;dr available? "Hey Ukrainians, your new government are imposters and thugs, you should like totally demand a referendum to restore order "
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:37 |
|
kalstrams posted:Is there any tl;dr available? "I'm not saying you should overthrow the government and put my side in charge, but it'd be pretty valid if you did"
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:39 |
|
Speaking of NATO, Stoltenberg's been selected as the new chief. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26791044
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:40 |
|
I don't see how NATO can hold together as an organization without the unifying principle of Anders Fogh Rasmussen's rugged handsomeness.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:42 |
Tatum Girlparts posted:"I'm not saying you should overthrow the government and put my side in charge, but it'd be pretty valid if you did" az posted:"Hey Ukrainians, your new government are imposters and thugs, you should like totally demand a referendum to restore order " Thanks. Ukrainian Spring is getting more and more interesting.
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:43 |
An important observation is that Yanuk is now doing all of his work from inside Russia. You can bet your soul that he is being controlled or at least held in check by government people.
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 16:48 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:Speaking of NATO, Stoltenberg's been selected as the new chief. Nice to see he picked up a new gig after losing the election.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:02 |
|
Yanukovych turned out to be so blatantly corrupt even by Ukrainian standards that I'm not sure why he thinks he still has any sort of moral authority.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:02 |
|
Phlegmish posted:Yanukovych turned out to be so blatantly corrupt even by Ukrainian standards that I'm not sure why he thinks he still has any sort of moral authority. His moral authority now comes with Putin's tanks.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:14 |
|
Phlegmish posted:Yanukovych turned out to be so blatantly corrupt even by Ukrainian standards that I'm not sure why he thinks he still has any sort of moral authority. Uh do you have Russian soldiers? No? So guess who has the moral authority now.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:19 |
|
Russia is actually searching for anyone from east Ukraine to replace Yanuk. (From Putins pov, Yanuk was friggin expensive, cowardly and inefficient. He also trolled Russia a couple of times with removing other People Russia could work with.) Unfortunatly for Russia, such potential People end up being beaten up by Right Sector, or end up in a Kiev prison, or both. My guess is that Putin would propably go with Mayor of Kharkiv Gennadi Kernes, who was somewhat effective (acutally rebuild the road System in his Oblast), not overly corrupt (actually, his corruption is transparent and not outrageously high, which is something People can actually deal with) and has a "maverick" Reputation (he supported the orange Revolution in 2004, as an "Easterner") that wouldnt make him seen as a total lapdog. He is also Jewish, which would be great in making Right Sector do stupid stuff, and a Jew would propably be more palatable to Ukrainians than a Russian. Contra Points: While not being unusually corrupt, he didnt get any anti corruption laurels, also, previously reported mob Connections.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:21 |
|
At least 4 People from the german left Party observed the Crimea Referendum, and got Major flack for it at home. http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/deutschland-ukraine-linke-die-krim-und-ein-ausgeladener-gysi/9627550.html Russia did send similiar invitations to all parties, it was just that the Mainstream opted to ignore those.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:25 |
|
Phlegmish posted:Yanukovych turned out to be so blatantly corrupt even by Ukrainian standards that I'm not sure why he thinks he still has any sort of moral authority. Ukrainian Truth has an article about the trove of documents found at former attorney general Viktor Pshonka's mansion. You remember those photos, they made Yanukovych's dump of a house seem tasteful in comparison. Pravda.ua posted:Journalists publish the personal archive of former Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Pshonka. It's curious that Right Sector for some reason didn't want the press to have full access to the documents.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:28 |
|
So the documents are gone then?
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:40 |
|
Demiurge4 posted:So the documents are gone then? According to the report, Right Sector took them and are storing them. Why they wouldn't want the press to have full access to them seems interesting to me. Exposing what Yanukovych did while president is important right now for establishing why it was important he be removed from office.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 17:47 |
|
Mightypeon posted:At least 4 People from the german left Party observed the Crimea Referendum, and got Major flack for it at home. They were invitation bullets! http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140308/world/warning-shots-fired-to-turn-osce-monitors-back-from-crimea.509783
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 18:18 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 22:23 |
|
Dolash posted:This is like a laundry list of all the worst digressions of the last thread. . Read what I was responding to, and note the grammar in my response.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2014 18:27 |