Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Joementum posted:

It's sort of interesting that all these online outlets seem to wind up with their own Libertarian. Yglesias at Vox, Moody at Yahoo!, Weigel at Slate, Barro at The Upshot, Friedersdorf at the online version of The Atlantic, and Greenwald, of course. I'm probably missing a few more obvious ones.


ReindeerF posted:

Given what we know about how the Libertarian (it's all capital L where the money's involved) network has been grown, shaped and has spread I've always assumed that these guys are the libertarian version of the conservative pundits and what not that were carefully inserted into, and spread throughout the media.

Yglesias, Weigel, Barro and Greenwald, at least, are definitely different than the Fonzie of Freedom crowd at Reason

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Yglesias, Weigel, Barro and Greenwald, at least, are definitely different than the Fonzie of Freedom crowd at Reason

Yeah, they're talented enough to get hired elsewhere. Weigel and Moody both had fellowships at Reason, Yglesias had one at the American Prospect, Barro at the Manhattan Institute, Friedersdorf interned for Andrew Sullivan.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007


Also of note, fedex losing their independent contractor case, making the people who actually drive and deliver packages members of the company: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/27/fedex-independent-contractors_n_5725076.html

1337JiveTurkey
Feb 17, 2005

Yglesias had a blog with Ezra Klein that I used to read and was pretty solidly liberal and it's been odd watching them move slowly towards whatever the gently caress they are.

ReindeerF
Apr 20, 2002

Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro

Joementum posted:

Yeah, they're talented enough to get hired elsewhere. Weigel and Moody both had fellowships at Reason, Yglesias had one at the American Prospect, Barro at the Manhattan Institute, Friedersdorf interned for Andrew Sullivan.
Exactly, yeah. They're the T-2000s of libertarian punditry.

ufarn
May 30, 2009

Joementum posted:

I've found the content at Vox to be pretty good. I also am a huge sucker for their map posts. The site is being built around getting people to visit it almost exclusively through articles shared on social media - it doesn't even have its own search engine and the front page is just a jumble of a bunch of unrelated topics. It's also being exclusively sponsored by GE at the moment and we'll have to see what they do to pay for the site when that ends.


It's sort of interesting that all these online outlets seem to wind up with their own Libertarian. Yglesias at Vox, Moody at Yahoo!, Weigel at Slate, Barro at The Upshot, Friedersdorf at the online version of The Atlantic, and Greenwald, of course. I'm probably missing a few more obvious ones.
And Nate Silver's this weird brand of semi-nihilistic "journalist" who doesn't even vote in election, because of the "conflict of interest" it would create.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Joementum posted:

Yeah, they're talented enough to get hired elsewhere. Weigel and Moody both had fellowships at Reason, Yglesias had one at the American Prospect, Barro at the Manhattan Institute, Friedersdorf interned for Andrew Sullivan.

Andrew Sullivan has interns?

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Stultus Maximus posted:

Andrew Sullivan has interns?

Paid interns, at least.

Sir Tonk
Apr 18, 2006
Young Orc

ufarn posted:

And Nate Silver's this weird brand of semi-nihilistic "journalist" who doesn't even vote in election, because of the "conflict of interest" it would create.

At least it's a good way to show someone that one vote can matter, I guess.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.
In other news, Marco Rubio is suggesting another government shutdown over immigration.

Fritz Coldcockin
Nov 7, 2005
Yes, please shut down the government a month before the midterms, Republicans. After all, what better way to cement your reputation in the Hispanic community's minds as "the party who would rather burn everything to the ground than pass an immigration bill"?

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013

Shageletic posted:

Also of note, fedex losing their independent contractor case, making the people who actually drive and deliver packages members of the company: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/27/fedex-independent-contractors_n_5725076.html

This is awesomea and should improve the lives of FedEx driverd a lot. My friend just called about it, she has always wanted to be a UPS driver for their benefits, but poo poo's gon change for her hopefully.

Manic_Misanthrope
Jul 1, 2010


Alter Ego posted:

Yes, please shut down the government a month before the midterms, Republicans. After all, what better way to cement your reputation in the Hispanic community's minds as "the party who would rather burn everything to the ground than pass an immigration bill"?

They don't intent to let the Hispanic community vote at all.

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

Manic_Misanthrope posted:

They don't intent to let the Hispanic community vote at all.

Yeah Republicans have been pretty open on the since blacks and hispanics want to vote D then gently caress it you can't vote theory. They also don't see how this is super racist.

edit: Improve our party platform to change with demographics ,gently caress tha,make it so only older white dudes can vote again.

Foyes36
Oct 23, 2005

Food fight!

Alter Ego posted:

Yes, please shut down the government a month before the midterms, Republicans. After all, what better way to cement your reputation in the Hispanic community's minds as "the party who would rather burn everything to the ground than pass an immigration bill"?

I honestly wonder if that would generate the rare D wave.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

SirKibbles posted:

Yeah Republicans have been pretty open on the since blacks and hispanics want to vote D then gently caress it you can't vote theory. They also don't see how this is super racist.

edit: Improve our party platform to change with demographics ,gently caress tha,make it so only older white dudes can vote again.

I'm not entirely joking when I say that the GOP's messaging tactics these days remind me uncomfortably of "Stop making me hit you."

Rygar201
Jan 26, 2011
I AM A TERRIBLE PIECE OF SHIT.

Please Condescend to me like this again.

Oh yeah condescend to me ALL DAY condescend daddy.


1337JiveTurkey posted:

Yglesias had a blog with Ezra Klein that I used to read and was pretty solidly liberal and it's been odd watching them move slowly towards whatever the gently caress they are.

Ygglessias is a liberal. He's just not a socialist or terribly progressive. I like Vox. Following Vox and their writers on twitter is a really good way of staying abreast of current events. It's less funny but more effective than just watching the Daily Show like some people I know do for all of their news.

What does everyone do for news? I get most of my news from AJA, WaPo, Vox, NYT, etc via Twitter. I'm also partial to wonkette and more editorial sites. I recently subscribed to Jacobin as well

Also Joe, did you see the Obama Photoshop'd on Ygglessias's suit tweets?

Rygar201 fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Aug 29, 2014

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Cythereal posted:

In other news, Marco Rubio is suggesting another government shutdown over immigration.

Looks like Friday talking points got updated after the McConnell leak.

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

I have mixed feelings on Vox.

On the one hand, I really should loving hate it because it is just another god damned clickbait site. On the other hand, it actually shows how clickbait can be used with real news to actually inform you about poo poo.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Rygar201 posted:

Ygglessias is a liberal. He's just not a socialist or terribly progressive. I like Vox. Following Vox and their writers on twitter is a really good way of staying abreast of current events. It's less funny but more effective than just watching the Daily Show like some people I know do for all of their news.

What does everyone do for news? I get most of my news from AJA, WaPo, Vox, NYT, etc via Twitter. I'm also partial to wonkette and more editorial sites.

Also Joe, did you see the Obama Photoshop'd on Ygglessias's suit tweets?

This question tends to come up every couple of weeks, so maybe there should be something in the OP (that drat fine OP) about it? Anyway, among others, prospect, long form, New Yorker, New York, Atlantic, and google searching for topics I'm interested.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Doctor Butts posted:

I have mixed feelings on Vox.

On the one hand, I really should loving hate it because it is just another god damned clickbait site. On the other hand, it actually shows how clickbait can be used with real news to actually inform you about poo poo.

Yeah people treat it like it's a zero sum game for journalism where if you are visiting one site you aren't visiting another. Vox would never be my only source of news and it's not like it prevents me from reading other sites as well. It fulfills what it intends to do very well. People who get super mad about it (like Gawker media) want it to be something it isn't and was never intended to be.

Gawker also gets real mad when other Internet sites exist.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Shear Modulus posted:

Here's the phrasing of the question:


This is a pretty positive phrasing of right-to-work laws.
Isn't branding something.

drat, no poo poo.

What if you worded it "Some States want to pass a law that allows employers to fire you for any reason at all and pretty much do anything they want (limiting break times and sick leave, forced unpaid overtime, no collective bargaining) leaving you with no legal recourse. Would you support such a law?"

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

BiggerBoat posted:

drat, no poo poo.

What if you worded it "Some States want to pass a law that allows employers to fire you for any reason at all and pretty much do anything they want (limiting break times and sick leave, forced unpaid overtime, no collective bargaining) leaving you with no legal recourse. Would you support such a law?"

That part at least is not right to work.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

radical meme posted:

The Bundy Clan continues to provide comic relief and fodder for late night tv hosts.


The Bundy solution is just loving let me do whatever I want to do.

I really feel that girl's cry for help.

Let's see here. All ready for school. Got my pen, my paper, my books, my homework, my computer and my lunch. Off I...OH poo poo! I forgot my KNIFE!

Number of times I've needed a pocket knife through my entire education: ZERO.

computer parts posted:

That part at least is not right to work.

I get that mixed up all the time.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

computer parts posted:

That part at least is not right to work.

Yes it is, considering that a union would prevent firings for no reason at all.

anonumos
Jul 14, 2005

Fuck it.

computer parts posted:

That part at least is not right to work.

Yes, 'at-will' and 'right to work' are frequently confused as they are both really lovely laws that limit employees' actual, factual "freedom to work".

kaynorr
Dec 31, 2003

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Paid interns, at least.

Say what you will about Sullivan's maddening brand of contradictory politics, when it comes to "future of journalism" type stuff he really does practice what he preaches and tries to be an example to others. He also pretty relentlessly calls out advertorial crap, but unfortunately he's almost literally preaching to the converted and just doesn't have a wide enough reach to matter.

Pythagoras a trois
Feb 19, 2004

I have a lot of points to make and I will make them later.

InequalityGodzilla posted:

Probably something to do with the content of his character.

I don't think this got any love on the page it was posted, which it deserves.

Still though, I don't get why Bundy isn't arrested on sight the second he leaves his ranch. I thought it was against the law to point guns at federal agents.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Boon posted:

Is this a serious post? Someone help me I cannot tell.

Pohl posted:

I'm rather confused myself.

You guys can't read his post history and know he was kidding?


Thanks for this. I'd never heard of it.

Berke Negri
Feb 15, 2012

Les Ricains tuent et moi je mue
Mao Mao
Les fous sont rois et moi je bois
Mao Mao
Les bombes tonnent et moi je sonne
Mao Mao
Les bebes fuient et moi je fuis
Mao Mao


Joementum posted:

I've found the content at Vox to be pretty good. I also am a huge sucker for their map posts. The site is being built around getting people to visit it almost exclusively through articles shared on social media - it doesn't even have its own search engine and the front page is just a jumble of a bunch of unrelated topics. It's also being exclusively sponsored by GE at the moment and we'll have to see what they do to pay for the site when that ends.


It's sort of interesting that all these online outlets seem to wind up with their own Libertarian. Yglesias at Vox, Moody at Yahoo!, Weigel at Slate, Barro at The Upshot, Friedersdorf at the online version of The Atlantic, and Greenwald, of course. I'm probably missing a few more obvious ones.

Yglesias isn't a libertarian in the slightest. One of his other articles yesterday was that cities aren't doing enough to provide affordable housing and therefore are shedding low income residents and turning to rich playgrounds. Pretty sure he supported something like a trillion dollar stimulus. He's thoroughly liberal. He can say some pretty dumb things from time to time time (his Bangladesh piece a good example, though the core of his point was right) but in general he has pretty sound policy beliefs, I think.

Pope Guilty
Nov 6, 2006

The human animal is a beautiful and terrible creature, capable of limitless compassion and unfathomable cruelty.

Thank you!

Amused to Death
Aug 10, 2009

google "The Night Witches", and prepare for :stare:
So when can we actually expect some executive action on immigration? It's "in the coming weeks" for weeks. I have high anticipation for the conservative freakout.

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

kaynorr posted:

Say what you will about Sullivan's maddening brand of contradictory politics, when it comes to "future of journalism" type stuff he really does practice what he preaches and tries to be an example to others. He also pretty relentlessly calls out advertorial crap, but unfortunately he's almost literally preaching to the converted and just doesn't have a wide enough reach to matter.

Also much credit for him for providing his interns with health insurance as well as a paycheck. Sullivan can be enraging but a lot of his "no really people will take care of people" bullshit seems to come from him believing others will behave the same way he does.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Amused to Death posted:

So when can we actually expect some executive action on immigration? It's "in the coming weeks" for weeks. I have high anticipation for the conservative freakout.

At the beginning of Summer they were drafting legal options and making a decision on whether to go forward. News stories said the final decision will be made during or shortly after the August recess.

kaynorr
Dec 31, 2003

Kalman posted:

Also much credit for him for providing his interns with health insurance as well as a paycheck. Sullivan can be enraging but a lot of his "no really people will take care of people" bullshit seems to come from him believing others will behave the same way he does.

Sullivan probably has the largest subscription-funded site of its kind on the internet, and he can only barely support ten people at most with almost zero original reporting (his schtick is basically aggregation and opinion pieces). I'd say the numbers suggest that regardless of whether or not they want to follow his lead, almost no one in that line of work is in a position to. I'd still maintain that the patronage model of news gathering & reporting is the only one that truly worked, and it relies on people who are simultaneously civic minded and absurdly weather, a vanishingly rare combination.

So yes, in addition to all the other reasons to drink today, more affirmation that journalism at every level is well and truly hosed.

mastershakeman
Oct 28, 2008

by vyelkin

Berke Negri posted:

Yglesias isn't a libertarian in the slightest. One of his other articles yesterday was that cities aren't doing enough to provide affordable housing and therefore are shedding low income residents and turning to rich playgrounds. Pretty sure he supported something like a trillion dollar stimulus. He's thoroughly liberal. He can say some pretty dumb things from time to time time (his Bangladesh piece a good example, though the core of his point was right) but in general he has pretty sound policy beliefs, I think.

Can you link to the affordable housing article?

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007
Yglesias is liberal, he just accepts beltway parameters for every issue.

Or that was how he operated back when I still paid much attention to him, anyway.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Vox is bad because they removed the comment sections exposing them as the anti-free speech commies they are.

Zeitgueist
Aug 8, 2003

by Ralp

Mercury_Storm posted:

So why is this guy not in prison yet?

He's white.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

eggyolk
Nov 8, 2007


Shageletic posted:

Also of note, fedex losing their independent contractor case, making the people who actually drive and deliver packages members of the company: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/27/fedex-independent-contractors_n_5725076.html

That's awesome. I was an independent contractor for a year and a half at a sign painting company. It wad great for my boss. We weren't allowed to work for anyone else or he'd fire us, couldn't request days off (I worked 44 days in a row at one point), no holidays or sick leave, no benefits of any kind. 11 hour days were common and we had a couple 18-20 hour days when he promised clients too much. He bought an expensive company truck that nobody could use for work cause he didnt want it dirtied up when he took his motorcycle to the track every few weeks. I lost an entire paycheck because I got a parking ticket during a job and he deducted it. After 14 months with no raises or benefits I managed to sneak in interviews elsewhere and "exercised my right to work". What a horrible practice.

E: Oh, and the only reason he gave overtime was because he was already being sued for not providing it for years. It was a perk of the job, he said. You should've seen the amount of childish backtalk they'd give to union guys if we had to share a job site.

eggyolk fucked around with this message at 18:19 on Aug 29, 2014

  • Locked thread