|
Votecount for Day 1  natx (4): winvirus, Magnus Gallant, Fat Samurai (2): GulagDolls, 100YrsofAttitude Brazen Apothecary (2): King Burgundy, GulagDolls, Your Personal Muse (1): GulagDolls, winvirus (1): mr.capps, Propaganda Machine (1): Magnus Gallant, Your Personal Muse, Magnus Gallant (1): GulagDolls, GulagDolls (1): Ernie., King Burgundy (1): winvirus, Tremendous Taste (0): Magnus Gallant, merk (0): Your Personal Muse, Not Voting (3): apostateCourier, Brazen Apothecary, Ernie.With 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is September 07th, 2014 at 9 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 13 hours, 5 minutes.
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 12:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 01:59 |
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Courier posted this well before you and I think it does a better job of explaining things of your defense that you still felt the need to post. Maybe cause you had bothered to come up with it? Regarding having something to hide, you realize that there is another thread reading this, and we want to hide stuff from them, right? Otherwise, why aren't we posting our abilities so Capps can have a better idea of what we are capable of?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 13:15
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:little mac what do you think of apostate and hal Went to bed after making my last post so sorry for the late response: Apostate I have a town read on. The post asking about whether or not the scum have a nightkill seemed genuine. busb's answer implies the scum have a regular nightkill and I'd assume, were Apostate scum, she'd know that. Were she scum and actually curious she'd just ask out of the thread. Doesn't seem generated. Hal seems like his town self to me. Scum Hal lurks, this Hal's been friendly and jokey. So yeah, would vote for neither.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 16:47
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Also thinking more about it little mac you really haven't said much and latched onto an easy target. That's a bit scummy isn't it? I don't think nat's an easy target, especially with the idea of "newbie armor." However, my argument is this: nat is an unknown quantity and while I'm sure s/he's a wonderful person and I would be overjoyed if they would play more mafia games, in a game where it seems like there's going to be a lot of death and a lot of confusion, I'd rather be able to observe quantities I'm somewhat familiar with. natx is an unknown quantity: No one has any idea what their scum/town meta looks like and newbie armor can allow people to coast pretty far. I feel it's in the best interest of our kingdom to vote them. This could all change, however, because it's Day 1 and I hate Day 1 and honestly who knows what the gently caress nightphase will bring.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1 natx (4): winvirus, Magnus Gallant, Fat Samurai (2): GulagDolls, 100YrsofAttitude Brazen Apothecary (2): King Burgundy, GulagDolls, Your Personal Muse (1): GulagDolls, winvirus (1): mr.capps, Propaganda Machine (1): Magnus Gallant, Your Personal Muse, Magnus Gallant (1): GulagDolls, GulagDolls (1): Ernie., King Burgundy (1): winvirus, Tremendous Taste (0): Magnus Gallant, merk (0): Your Personal Muse, Not Voting (3): apostateCourier, Brazen Apothecary, Ernie. With 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is September 07th, 2014 at 9 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 8 hours, 31 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:I don't think nat's an easy target, especially with the idea of "newbie armor." However, my argument is this: nat is an unknown quantity and while I'm sure s/he's a wonderful person and I would be overjoyed if they would play more mafia games, in a game where it seems like there's going to be a lot of death and a lot of confusion, I'd rather be able to observe quantities I'm somewhat familiar with. natx is an unknown quantity: No one has any idea what their scum/town meta looks like and newbie armor can allow people to coast pretty far. I feel it's in the best interest of our kingdom to vote them. This is a good answer. Thanks. Fat Samurai posted:Regarding having something to hide, you realize that there is another thread reading this, and we want to hide stuff from them, right? Otherwise, why aren't we posting our abilities so Capps can have a better idea of what we are capable of? Ignoring the other thread one doesn't come clean with skills cause of the scum as well. Maybe I'm playing this wrong cause I'm treating this first as a mafia game. The whole battle mechanic I'm sure will fall into place but at the core this is still about finding people who are against my team. Someone who's being self-conscious about what they write has something to hide, that's how I see it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 17:38
|
|
|
7 hours to deadline a hour before that i will pm the raiding party makeup.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1 natx (4): winvirus, Magnus Gallant, Fat Samurai (2): GulagDolls, 100YrsofAttitude Brazen Apothecary (2): King Burgundy, GulagDolls, Your Personal Muse (1): GulagDolls, winvirus (1): mr.capps, Propaganda Machine (1): Magnus Gallant, Your Personal Muse, Magnus Gallant (1): GulagDolls, GulagDolls (1): Ernie., King Burgundy (1): winvirus, Tremendous Taste (0): Magnus Gallant, merk (0): Your Personal Muse, Not Voting (3): apostateCourier, Brazen Apothecary, Ernie. With 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is September 07th, 2014 at 9 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 7 hours, 26 minutes
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 18:34
|
|
|
Right now it's natx and brazen who will be the lynch Everyone get out and vote!
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 18:36
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Ignoring the other thread one doesn't come clean with skills cause of the scum as well. Maybe I'm playing this wrong cause I'm treating this first as a mafia game. The whole battle mechanic I'm sure will fall into place but at the core this is still about finding people who are against my team. Someone who's being self-conscious about what they write has something to hide, that's how I see it. Fat Samurai 101: I'll always be self-conscious about what I write, town or scum. I'll write a post, delete half of it, change a word and read it three times before posting. That's what I do, and twice on this thread has caused me to miss several posts because writing took too long. You're always going to read me as a scum. And more often than not, you'll be wrong. For example, right now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 18:47
|
|
|
##vote brazen
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 18:50
|
|
|
Fat Samurai posted:Fat Samurai 101: I'll always be self-conscious about what I write, town or scum. I'll write a post, delete half of it, change a word and read it three times before posting. That's what I do, and twice on this thread has caused me to miss several posts because writing took too long. ## unvote fat samurai . Gonna give you the benefit of the doubt. Going out tonight but i should be back in time. Gonna go over the vote leaders and those whom i feel bad about.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
I don't feel awesome about going whole hog on natx. On one hand, it's true that the complete X factor is more dangerous in this game than most, but I'm getting funny feelings elsewhere.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 20:58
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I don't feel awesome about going whole hog on natx. On one hand, it's true that the complete X factor is more dangerous in this game than most, but I'm getting funny feelings elsewhere. Where are you getting feelings? I would be happy going after someone other than natx
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:10
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Where are you getting feelings? I would be happy going after someone other than natx Little mac and taste in nor particular order, then ypm. I don't know, man. I'm not great at this, but I'm getting bad vibes. ~gut~ Which is why I'm not terribly willing to push it. If we lynch natx and get a town flip, though...? I just have to express the hesitation. We're going for it because we have nothing to go on, which doesn't seem fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:20
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Little mac and taste in nor particular order, then ypm. I don't know, man. I'm not great at this, but I'm getting bad vibes. Well, why do you think that natx might not turn up scum?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
We are not going for natx because we had nothing to go on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:24
|
|
|
Fat Samurai posted:I build a case on Gulag because the two random votes he threw, the second of them under the excuse of not having 2 lynches, which we already knew it was going to happen anyway. Him posting like that isn't helping, though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jQkxsEbnS4
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:25
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:We are not going for natx because we had nothing to go on. You got one post from them that gave you scummy vibes, and then argued to lynch lurkers.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
more people should be voting ot lynch brazen, though. a lot more. brazen is better lynch than natx.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:33
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:more people should be voting ot lynch brazen, though. a lot more. brazen is better lynch than natx. luckily we can get two for the price of one Propaganda Machine posted:You got one post from them that gave you scummy vibes, and then argued to lynch lurkers. Yes, "vibes"
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:36
|
|
|
But I think the argument that new players kinda suck and don't know how NOT to look scummy is quite salient.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
Hey Capps, reading the other thread I don't think it's a good idea to have the votes spread out like this. I don't really have strong feelings for anyone other than pm and natx in my group and I don't want to vote natx for reasons stated before. Can I vote brazen or someone else who has some votes on them from the other group
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:48
|
|
|
Hi I'm back
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:49
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Hey Capps, reading the other thread I don't think it's a good idea to have the votes spread out like this. I don't really have strong feelings for anyone other than pm and natx in my group and I don't want to vote natx for reasons stated before. Can I vote brazen or someone else who has some votes on them from the other group yeah sure the whole purpose of the group thing was just to make sure things don't get too chaotic and see if forcing those restrictions would get any interesting reads from people
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 21:53
|
|
|
Vote Magnus
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
Brazen is a wrong choice by the way.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
Brazen Apothecary posted:back, desert specialist. seriously. I believe this 100%
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:I believe this 100% So that makes him town?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:21
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:So that makes him town? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:21
|
|
|
I didn't had too many people reply to me last time, so again can I have people quote this post and tell me if they are a deep desert specialized melee fighter or a ranged guy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:22
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:I didn't had too many people reply to me last time, so again can I have people quote this post and tell me if they are a deep desert specialized melee fighter or a ranged guy. Yes. Melee deep
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:23
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:Yes. Why?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:I didn't had too many people reply to me last time, so again can I have people quote this post and tell me if they are a deep desert specialized melee fighter or a ranged guy. Melee
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
I just don't think he is lying. His posts don't read dishonest to me. If he is scum it wouldn't make since to say "I am only useful in combat in this one type of situration" either, and you know place himself on the back row, aka, the ranged row, the one that has a 20% of getting eaten by sandworms. Sure its possible that he might be immune to that, but yeah.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
People we need to consolidate our choices. If it's natx then let's get votes there. If you want to go a different way then say so. ##vote natx Stop voting whatever random person you're voting.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
Groups are officially disband.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:31
|
|
|
The fact that Brazen and nat haven't been defending themselves yet they're the top vote-getters makes me extremely wary suddenly.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:38
|
|
|
Little Mac posted:The fact that Brazen and nat haven't been defending themselves yet they're the top vote-getters makes me extremely wary suddenly. Brazen hasn't been doing poo poo though. So maybe it's just business?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 01:59 |
|
|
Neither merk or natx have said anything about their build.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2014 22:41
|
|