|
Reasons why I will never respect academia case #87361652:quote:LOS ANGELES -- The Los Angeles Unified School District Friday was facing criticism over how the district handled a student sexual assault case involving one of their teachers. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/l-a-school-district-girl-14-mature-enough-to-consent-to-sex-with-teacher/
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:03 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:20 |
|
bet that attorney isn't in mensa.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:04 |
|
She might've wanted it, but he probably shouldn't have gave it to her imo
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:05 |
|
although he is trying to deny the rape of a child - which would suggest he is prob a chld rapist - which would suggest he is a sa mod - which would suggest he is in mensa What a dilemma
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:06 |
|
Voted Worst Mom posted:She might've wanted it, but he probably shouldn't have gave it to her imo In no jurisdiction in the US can a 14 year old legally "want it".
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:07 |
|
Ratjaculation posted:bet that attorney isn't in mensa.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:08 |
|
sounds like your problem rests with the criminal justice system imho
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:09 |
|
TenementFunster posted:he won, so looks like he is. i figured it out in my follow up post
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:09 |
|
comes along bort posted:sounds like your problem rests with the criminal justice system imho It was the civil case that this article refers to, not the criminal one. He was still sentenced to three years in prison, but she didn't get any cash money for being raped.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:11 |
|
how hot is the math teacher?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:11 |
|
Death By Yogurt posted:how hot is the math teacher? There is a picture of him in the article you dolt.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:12 |
|
Apthous posted:There is a picture of him in the article you dolt. i thought that was the articles author? im not in mensa
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:13 |
|
Voted Worst Mom posted:She might've wanted it, but he probably shouldn't have gave it to her imo
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:14 |
|
Apthous posted:There is a picture of him in the article you dolt. would
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:15 |
|
Kinda hosed up that they made those arguments, but the idea that the school itself should be held liable for that guys actions is kinda dumb.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:16 |
|
if you want it here it is come n get it
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:16 |
|
that lawyer must be straight lollin'. or lolin' as the case may be
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:17 |
|
One of these guys is a famous porn star. The other is a guy who likes to gently caress his 14 year old math students. Guess which one is which:
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:18 |
|
Ableist Kinkshamer posted:Kinda hosed up that they made those arguments, but the idea that the school itself should be held liable for that guys actions is kinda dumb. I would also sue for emotional damages. Beats getting a job and working the rest of your life.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:19 |
|
Apthous posted:One of these guys is a famous porn star. The other is a guy who likes to gently caress his 14 year old math students. Guess which one is which: is it a trick question
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:20 |
|
Apthous posted:In no jurisdiction in the US can a 14 year old legally "want it".
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:23 |
lonesomedwarf posted:is it a trick question They're both gross. I don't do guys with short hair and puffy eyes.
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:24 |
|
Cardiovorax posted:By what logic is "she wanted it" a legal defense for breaking the law, anyway? Even if she did, it'd at best be a mitigating circumstance. The legal definition of non consensual is that a person either says no, or is in a state in which their ability to make a decision whether to do something or not is compromised.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:25 |
|
lonesomedwarf posted:is it a trick question both of them are going to star in an anal scene soon
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:26 |
|
Wow, where were all the hot math teachers dtf when I was a 14 yo girl. Not fair
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:26 |
|
Friendly Tumour posted:both of them are going to star in an anal scene soon
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:27 |
|
Friendly Tumour posted:both of them are going to star in an anal scene soon He was convicted to 3 years in 2011 he is probably out of prison now.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:27 |
|
Cardiovorax posted:By what logic is "she wanted it" a legal defense for breaking the law, anyway? Even if she did, it'd at best be a mitigating circumstance. The school didn't break any laws, though. The rapist did, and is going to jail. They aren't defending against charges that they broke the law, they're defending against the accusation that they're responsible for it. If they have to use bullshit arguments to fend off a bullshit accusation, I'm kind of ok with it.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:27 |
|
Ableist Kinkshamer posted:The school didn't break any laws, though. The rapist did, and is going to jail. They aren't defending against charges that they broke the law, they're defending against the accusation that they're responsible for it. If they have to use bullshit arguments to fend off a bullshit accusation, I'm kind of ok with it. The article talks about the offense taken at the reasons used by the school's lawyers to defend themselves in civil court which basically amount to "the victim is a good for nothing slut". When people talk about sexual abuse victims being re-abused by the courts this is exactly what they are talking about. I can understand maybe using the "good for nothing slut" defense when you are talking about someone who is of age, but this poor girl was 14.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:29 |
|
Apthous posted:He was convicted to 3 years in 2011 he is probably out of prison now. though prison will forever remain plastered to the inner walls of his rectum
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:29 |
|
Ableist Kinkshamer posted:The school didn't break any laws, though.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:30 |
|
Friendly Tumour posted:though prison will forever remain plastered to the inner walls of his rectum lol prison rape am i right
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:31 |
|
Libelous Slander posted:lol prison rape am i right lol urrite
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:32 |
|
Apthous posted:The article talks about the offense taken at the reasons used by the school's lawyers to defend themselves in civil court which basically amount to "the victim is a good for nothing slut". When people talk about sexual abuse victims being re-abused by the courts this is exactly what they are talking about. I can understand maybe using the "good for nothing slut" defense when you are talking about someone who is of age, but this poor girl was 14. If these arguments were being made in the criminal trial against the rapist, I'd agree. The claim that the school is responsible for the rape is just as full of poo poo as the claim that she was asking for it. Maybe in the future she'll think twice before filing another frivolous lawsuit.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:34 |
~nice~ Man where were all these teachers when I was in school. amiright?
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:34 |
|
TenementFunster posted:this isn't a criminal suit against the school That post was response to someone who seemed to think it was, so we're in agreement?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:35 |
|
If we let 12 year olds consent to murder we obviously should let 14 year olds consent to sex.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:35 |
|
Ableist Kinkshamer posted:If these arguments were being made in the criminal trial against the rapist, I'd agree. The claim that the school is responsible for the rape is just as full of poo poo as the claim that she was asking for it. Maybe in the future she'll think twice before filing another frivolous lawsuit. If the school hired someone else this wouldn't have happened.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:36 |
|
Nice
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:37 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:20 |
|
Ableist Kinkshamer posted:If these arguments were being made in the criminal trial against the rapist, I'd agree. The claim that the school is responsible for the rape is just as full of poo poo as the claim that she was asking for it. Maybe in the future she'll think twice before filing another frivolous lawsuit. I don't think it is appropriate in any court, civil or criminal, to suggest a 14 year old's sexual history lets the accused off the hook. This is not glorious Nippon where the 14 year olds flow like wine and are all fully emotionally developed adults, this is the real world.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2014 16:37 |