|
Cool white out on the way to New jersey.
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 03:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 03:45 |
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Cool white out on the way to New jersey. Says the one who's obviously not driving. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 04:25
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Cool white out on the way to New jersey. Don't worry bro, it's not sticking.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 04:40
|
|
|
suicidesteve posted:Says the one who's obviously not driving. I couldn't see so I had to stop. Gonna miss cheap sealed now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 13:04
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:Because I stole your original list, then saw your updated anti-Delver version I'm glad you're enjoying it, I've gotten way more mileage out of it than I thought I would. Tron is always a rough matchup for me at least, especially RG Tron since they're maindecking Pyroclasm for all the Delver that's running around. You could reasonably drop the Collar and third Skylasher for Dismember for the Oblterator matchup, although you could mull hard for a Rancor and Bow of Nylea since deathtouch and trample is pretty spicy. I'm starting to question the usefulness of Skylasher honestly, it dies to bolt and path all the time and it sucks wasting a vines to save a mostly defensive guy. I've got an Arashi, the Sky Asunder I've been meaning to try out that I might put in one of the Skylasher's place.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2014 17:01
|
|
It's fun, so thanks for posting it in the first place.
|
jassi007 posted:Ok so last SCG open 4th place delver has 2 volcanics. What are the cons of doing the mana like this? You are going the sad if they wasteland your two duals, which I totally would. You can run it that way but best bet would be investing in the volts sooner or later. But Tc has to be banned pretty soon it's getting out of hand.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 00:21
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:You are going the sad if they wasteland your two duals, which I totally would. You can run it that way but best bet would be investing in the volts sooner or later. But Tc has to be banned pretty soon it's getting out of hand. Understood. I mean if You had the choice of build legacy delver within 2 months, or build it by next summer-ish, the difference being buying 2 volcanics and 4 fow, or waiting to get all 4 volcanics, it seems that its playable to a reasonable percentage with 2. I understand that it is better with 4, but the extra $400ish will be a down the road project. So if they do ban cruise in legacy (I'm convinced a modern ban is coming but not necessarily legacy) is the deck going to get as bad as it will in modern? Modern UR delver was firmly tier 2 before Khans. I think honestly in legacy it may still be reasonable because it will still be fast. Swiftspear is being overlooked as to how much it adds to the deck imo, everyone is cruise this and that. No doubt cruise is super powerful, but UR Delver has also gained a lot of power from swiftspear.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 14:22
|
|
|
And we are out of deck registration sheets.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 15:43
|
|
|
Parking spots are most likely filling up ajassi007 posted:Understood. I mean if You had the choice of build legacy delver within 2 months, or build it by next summer-ish, the difference being buying 2 volcanics and 4 fow, or waiting to get all 4 volcanics, it seems that its playable to a reasonable percentage with 2. I understand that it is better with 4, but the extra $400ish will be a down the road project. You're fine just playing 2 volcs. In fact it even let's you play price of progress more easily. Also, UR delver was still a fine deck before treasure cruise. It just wasn't nearly as powerful.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 16:03
|
|
|
Where's that jersey Facebook group?
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Where's that jersey Facebook group? It's called Jersey Goons.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 17:17
|
|
jassi007 posted:Understood. I mean if You had the choice of build legacy delver within 2 months, or build it by next summer-ish, the difference being buying 2 volcanics and 4 fow, or waiting to get all 4 volcanics, it seems that its playable to a reasonable percentage with 2. I understand that it is better with 4, but the extra $400ish will be a down the road project. Assuming that Dig Through Time also gets the axe, I don't see any reason why RUG Delver with Wasteland and Stifle won't go back to being the deck du jour.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 19:47
|
|
|
What would Legacy look like if they just banned Delver along with Cruise? Just out of nowhere.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 20:14
|
|
|
bhsman posted:What would Legacy look like if they just banned Delver along with Cruise? Just out of nowhere. Burn supremacy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
bhsman posted:What would Legacy look like if they just banned Delver along with Cruise? Just out of nowhere. It would look amazing. But they should ban stoneforge as well just for fun.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 20:24
|
|
bhsman posted:What would Legacy look like if they just banned Delver along with Cruise? Just out of nowhere. A Brainstorming TNN shitshow.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 21:07
|
|
|
Just ban commons in Modern/Legacy. BAM. Make it anti-Pauper.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2014 21:39
|
|
|
jassi007 posted:So if they do ban cruise in legacy (I'm convinced a modern ban is coming but not necessarily legacy) is the deck going to get as bad as it will in modern? Modern UR delver was firmly tier 2 before Khans. I think honestly in legacy it may still be reasonable because it will still be fast. Swiftspear is being overlooked as to how much it adds to the deck imo, everyone is cruise this and that. No doubt cruise is super powerful, but UR Delver has also gained a lot of power from swiftspear.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 00:22
|
|
|
I went 5-2 and still dropped cause it was 9pm and i was tired and cranky and hungry and it was taking forever in between rounds....
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 04:23
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:I went 5-2 and still dropped cause it was 9pm and i was tired and cranky and hungry and it was taking forever in between rounds.... Sounds like a GP to me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 07:42
|
|
|
Has anyone seen this deck before? WUBRG Aggro just seems so silly, and it isn't even playing tribal flames.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 20:57
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:Has anyone seen this deck before? WUBRG Aggro just seems so silly, and it isn't even playing tribal flames. I have no idea how that won anything.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
5 color decks are sweet because you get all the best sideboard cards
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 01:49
|
|
|
Caverns is startlingly good in that deck. 27 of those creatures are humans, yeesh.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 02:05
|
|
|
I love any deck with 4x Ancient Ziggurat in it. Shine the gently caress on, you crazy diamond. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 18:58
|
|
|
Frank Lepore is running the deck in 4 rounds of videos on magic.tcgplayer.com today, if you want to see it in action.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 19:01
|
|
|
Don't suppise anyome has seen a copy of Andrew Cuneo's UW control decklist? Any legacy deck with fact or fiction has my interest.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2014 23:42
|
|
|
Boco_T posted:Frank Lepore is running the deck in 4 rounds of videos on magic.tcgplayer.com today, if you want to see it in action. That deck is precious and priceless. I do think siding in a couple pieces of noncreature disruption would be sweet tech, especially if the deck becomes known so that people figure out what it is and side out anything that doesn't interact with creatures. Boom! You bring in a couple of Mana Leak/Spell Pierce or what have you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2014 18:42
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:That deck is precious and priceless. I do think siding in a couple pieces of noncreature disruption would be sweet tech, especially if the deck becomes known so that people figure out what it is and side out anything that doesn't interact with creatures. Boom! You bring in a couple of Mana Leak/Spell Pierce or what have you. That mana base is really terrible and awkward for non-creature spells. Why play Mana Leak over Glen Elendra Archmage? It's essentially a Zoo deck that can't even play Lightning Bolt... you just want to kill them all fast-like with creature damage. You're better off being proactive with your disruption by bringing in the Sin Collectors, or playing Tidehollow Sculler. There is no reason to protect your dudes with blue permission, just learn how to not overextend. Don't get all cutesy with the sideboard, just pack some utility.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 03:20
|
|
|
Engineered plague would wreck that thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 05:41
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:Engineered plague would wreck that thing. That's not fair, most Modern decks would get wrecked by Legacy decks!
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 05:50
|
|
|
AnacondaHL posted:That's not fair, most Modern decks would get wrecked by Legacy decks! Oh yeah it's modern. I forget that since I don't play that format. SORRY GUYS!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 06:01
|
|
|
Who's sideboarding engineered plague in legacy and for what? It's actually good in a lot of matchups now that I think about it and stops TNN
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 06:26
|
|
|
Big Anime Fan Here posted:Who's sideboarding engineered plague in legacy and for what? It's actually good in a lot of matchups now that I think about it and stops TNN Jund sideboards it. It crushes merfolk, elves and goblins, wrecks D&T, and kills TNN. It's semi effective against stuff like delver and stoneblade. We had a little tournament today with 10 people. I decided to play RUG Delver instead of Jund. Lost to lands, dredge and smallpox. But I beat Enchantress and Goblins. I prefer Jund any day of the week. Errant Gin Monks fucked around with this message at 06:46 on Nov 19, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 06:42
|
|
|
Big Anime Fan Here posted:Who's sideboarding engineered plague in legacy and for what? It's actually good in a lot of matchups now that I think about it and stops TNN Depends on the mood I'm in when I'm going to play legacy. I've been using Deed in its spot, but I should probably make room for both. It's insanely good against UR Delver if you drop it on turn 2 and name humans. It's also fine later in the game if you name elemental. It's good but not as good as a lot of people seem to think it is against elves, especially if they have a Reclamation Sage. For Jund, it's good enough for Fish because you can Punish their Lords into oblivion and it keeps garbage like True-Name down. I don't think BUG wants it because they don't have nearly as much removal, so a single lord makes the card basically worthless. Even naming Zombie against Dredge can be pretty good. Plus like you said, it's just always good against True-Name. You can bring it in any time you see one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 06:49
|
|
|
Do you bring it in for belcher/storm as an option against warrens?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 10:00
|
|
|
Big Anime Fan Here posted:Do you bring it in for belcher/storm as an option against warrens? Might as well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 13:00
|
|
|
So why are people using Rabblemaster instead of Bloodbraid Elf in Jund builds? I don't get it...
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 17:36
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:So why are people using Rabblemaster instead of Bloodbraid Elf in Jund builds? I don't get it... It's a lot better against Pyro, I imagine? I honestly don't know; I'd maybe drop a Lili and my 3rd Elf and use the Goblin with the Elf as a Cascade target, but definitely not instead of it. The only other thing I can think of is it lowers your curve enough that maybe you can go to 22 lands?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 17:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 03:45 |
|
|
suicidesteve posted:It's a lot better against Pyro, I imagine? I honestly don't know; I'd maybe drop a Lili and my 3rd Elf and use the Goblin with the Elf as a Cascade target, but definitely not instead of it. The only other thing I can think of is it lowers your curve enough that maybe you can go to 22 lands? http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/misc/29759_.html I't's not better against pyro since the tokens you make can't block and most times the rabblemaster is just gonna die....
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 17:44
|
|