|
Kleen_TheRowdyDog posted:has anyone hypothesized about what we can't do now but will be able to do in the future? theoretically we will be more efficient. therefore stronger, smarter, longer lived, and our poops will be small concentrated pellets of waste. that is just through selective breeding on a large scale too, not necessarily evolution. in reality, however, the opposite things will likely happen in that particular scenario. and this doesnt take into account the inevitability of either eradicating ourselves somehow or artificially changes our bodies to circumvent the biological process of genes (and to a far lesser extent actual evolution)
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 19:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 23:50 |
|
|
1gnoirents posted:we are are just in the middle of it evolution. its just the time you happen to be alive I dunno, there's a bunch of animals which haven't really gone anywhere evolution wise.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 19:48
|
|
|
hemale in pain posted:I dunno, there's a bunch of animals which haven't really gone anywhere evolution wise. they would, given time, with the condition that they arent eliminated from other species or environmental changes
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 19:49
|
|
|
Cuckoo posted:Insert Daniel Cormier joke here (I'm sorry) maybe if you were talking about real fighters, like bruce lee or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 19:53
|
|
|
Could you beat a leopard OP? Then don't even think about a gorilla https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm9Ox7jcK7I
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 20:03
|
|
1gnoirents posted:they would, given time, with the condition that they arent eliminated from other species or environmental changes No they wouldn't. If there is no impetus for change there is no evolution. A organism perfectly adapted for its environment has no pressure to evolve. Evolution is the response to environmental change. Being stronger, weaker, faster, or slower has not a god drat thing to do with evolution.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
satanic splash-back posted:maybe if you were talking about real fighters, like bruce lee or some poo poo the fast hands of bruce lee + the wit of the asian guy from ocean's eleven + the wristbands of john cena + whatever the rock is cookin
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 20:20
|
|
|
dads a mall cop posted:the fast hands of bruce lee + the wit of the asian guy from ocean's eleven + the wristbands of john cena + whatever the rock is cookin *witty man cracks wise, is thrown like a rag doll into crowd by gorilla, breaking his neck and killing a small child*
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
Kleen_TheRowdyDog posted:has anyone hypothesized about what we can't do now but will be able to do in the future? Babies will be better composers than Beethoven, and beyond that we have no idea. It's like a chimp trying to imagine what being a human is like.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 22:03
|
|
|
WHAT A GOOD DOG posted:okay yeah ON GENERAL gorillas are stronger than humans and even some chimps are stronger than humans, sure Lol ur a dog, you cant lift poo poo, you just bark and eat shoes. You are a good dog though, A VERY GOOD DOG! *pat pat* 1gnoirents posted:theoretically we will be more efficient. therefore stronger, smarter, longer lived, and our poops will be small concentrated pellets of waste. that is just through selective breeding on a large scale too, not necessarily evolution. We will be asthmatic, diabetic, unable to go outside due to intolerance to sunlight, unable to lift a cup of tea, have massive brains but just use them to watch anime and pony cartoons, and will rely on robots to move sperm from the penis into the vagina as *effort*. spud fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Dec 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 22:06
|
|
|
fivethree posted:just wondering tia calisthenics
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
if chimps are so strong then how come I can beat up all the ones I see down at the dog park so easily?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
mysterious frankie posted:if chimps are so strong then how come I can beat up all the ones I see down at the dog park so easily? Those were chihuahuas. The one you kicked over that fence is now dead. You ruined families. Hope you are happy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:01
|
|
|
keep your chimp hand strong
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:02
|
|
|
spud posted:Those were chihuahuas. The one you kicked over that fence is now dead. You ruined families. Hope you are happy. Well that explains why they were all wearing dog collars... pfffff, whatever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
Chimps are naturally swole because they don't rely on tools to do things. Humans evolved past needing to punch other animals to death or dismember other chimps with our bare hands because we designed tools to do it for us. From an evolutionary point of view this is far better because it means we don't need to waste shitloads of energy maintaining being swole or growing swoleness. chimps are dicks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
gently caress cardio; the bronze age killed gains.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:13
|
|
|
Drone_Fragger posted:Chimps are naturally swole because they don't rely on tools to do things. Humans evolved past needing to punch other animals to death or dismember other chimps with our bare hands because we designed tools to do it for us. From an evolutionary point of view this is far better because it means we don't need to waste shitloads of energy maintaining being swole or growing swoleness. chimps are dicks. I cannot take this comment seriously from someone called "Drone_Fragger" with that Av, and that txt. What the gently caress. Also, why do women still want you to be swole then?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:14
|
|
|
spud posted:I cannot take this comment seriously from someone called "Drone_Fragger" with that Av, and that txt. What the gently caress. I badmouthed UKIP in a thread about how poo poo UKIP is and some rightwing ukiper bought me it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
Drone_Fragger posted:I badmouthed UKIP in a thread about how poo poo UKIP is and some rightwing ukiper bought me it. UKIP ALL THE WAY! UKIP UKIP......GOOOOOOO NIGEL! Do you really frag drones though? I;ve never seen one Also, answer my question please.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
Drone_Fragger posted:Chimps are naturally swole because they don't rely on tools to do things. Humans evolved past needing to punch other animals to death or dismember other chimps with our bare hands because we designed tools to do it for us. From an evolutionary point of view this is far better because it means we don't need to waste shitloads of energy maintaining being swole or growing swoleness. chimps are dicks. Chimps don't punch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:35
|
|
|
how come mail kimp are
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:43
|
|
|
1gnoirents posted:we are are just in the middle of it evolution. its just the time you happen to be alive Humans are hosed as far as evolution goes because A) nothing is eating us to weed out the weak, and B) babies born that would have died are saved by doctors and then go on to have kids.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 23:49
|
|
|
I don't think people realize how freaking massive gorillas are.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:10
|
|
|
Say Nothing posted:I don't think people realize how freaking massive gorillas are. Already mentioned this...hands like shovels etc. 10x strength to weight and so on. dog buttz posted:Humans are hosed as far as evolution goes because A) nothing is eating us to weed out the weak, and B) babies born that would have died are saved by doctors and then go on to have kids. No, it's worse than that, we actively save the weak, not just babies. We got some couple that are first cousins that gently caress and have hosed babies which we save, then we also save the babies when they have major organ failure at like age 10. Praise humanity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:10
|
|
|
doesn't make any sense how a weak-rear end human could evolve from a swole-as-gently caress chimp..it's almost like evolution is just a theory
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
now chimps evolving from humans, that i could believe
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:18
|
|
|
Harald posted:now chimps evolving from humans, that i could believe they are probably happier than us by and large due to being dumber
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:19
|
|
|
I always wondered why humans were so weak for their size. Turns out that humans, when in physical condition for a hunt can out-endure almost any animal in running. We're not as fast, or strong but we will chase our quarry to the limits of their stamina.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:26
|
|
|
those are baby chimps (there is also a baby tiger)
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
Tarkus posted:I always wondered why humans were so weak for their size. Turns out that humans, when in physical condition for a hunt can out-endure almost any animal in running. We're not as fast, or strong but we will chase our quarry to the limits of their stamina. yeah that's pretty true. and if you look at the hunting tactics of primitive tribes its a lot of following animals til they basically collapse from exhaustion and can be easily killed. humans are dicks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
Harald posted:yeah that's pretty true. and if you look at the hunting tactics of primitive tribes its a lot of following animals til they basically collapse from exhaustion and can be easily killed. humans are dicks. It also a combination of technology and also physical characteristics. For example being able to carry water during the hunt and also sweating to avoid overheating. The deer on the other hand eventually collapses from dehydration and heat exhaustion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
spud posted:10x strength to weight and so on. 6'8" 450lb Brian Shaw, two-time winner of The World's Strongest Man, lifting 1100lbs+.  Now imagine a barbell with ten times as much weight.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:31
|
|
|
Maldoror posted:those are baby chimps (there is also a baby tiger) if it was an adult it would be going right for the balls etalian posted:It also a combination of technology and also physical characteristics. For example being able to carry water during the hunt and also sweating to avoid overheating. serves that stupid deer right GO HUMANS
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:31
|
|
|
etalian posted:It also a combination of technology and also physical characteristics. For example being able to carry water during the hunt and also sweating to avoid overheating. oh I can't fight it? ok i'll chase it. it's faster than me? ok I'll keep chasing it it's eventually gonna run out of water. yeah i couldn't remember but that's exactly the show i was thinking of Harald fucked around with this message at 00:36 on Dec 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
Harald posted:humans are basically like that guy who figures out how to cheese a video game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=826HMLoiE_o
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
1gnoirents posted:theoretically we will be more efficient. therefore stronger, smarter, longer lived, and our poops will be small concentrated pellets of waste. that is just through selective breeding on a large scale too, not necessarily evolution. i remember reading something a while ago which said we'd get smaller in physical stature in the name of efficiency etc. like how smaller dogs live longer than big dogs, less strain on the physiological side of things. we might get more swole but being 7ft + isn't a long term advantage in terms of life expectancy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Fatkraken posted:If you're just talking about a 1 on 1 boxing ring type situation not "Arnie vs the Predator"/hunger games tho I'm p sure the gorilla dominates 99 times out of 100. im not talking about strongest gorilla in the world vs strongest man, im talking about a really strong, well trained man (trained solely in the art of fighting gorillas) against an average gorilla fake out the gorilla a few times and then pluck its eyes out and you could win imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:im not talking about strongest gorilla in the world vs strongest man, im talking about a really strong, well trained man (trained solely in the art of fighting gorillas) against an average gorilla if it's 1 on 1 in a cage with no weapons, no, any human would be hosed. you're thinking a huge strike on the gorilla would bother him. gorilla wouldn't give a poo poo, he would keep moving forward and then he would gently caress you up big style.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 23:50 |
|
|
Robbie Fowler posted:if it's 1 on 1 in a cage with no weapons, no, any human would be hosed. no it wouldnt be a huge strike. you would have to use agility and youd have to fake out and trick the gorilla and pluck out its eyeballs to get the upper hand. then youd fight dirty the only reason why itd have to be an exceptionally strong human is so he could land enough hits on a blind gorilla to finally take it down before exhaustion
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2014 00:55
|
|