|
just wondering tia
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
retard strength
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:48
|
|
|
Chimp gyms when you're not looking.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:50
|
|
|
I know the real answer, but it's not funny.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:51
|
|
|
they basicallly spend their whole life from birth working out
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:52
|
|
|
if a baby grew up in the wild and climbed trees all the time it would probably be as strong as a chimp.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:53
|
|
|
It's not that chimps are specially strong humans are just the nerd getting shoved in a locker of the animal world
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:54
|
|
|
because they don't waste alot of time monkeying around, op
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:55
|
|
|
Individual muscle density or length, I forget which. Basically humans traded the strength for better agility with our hands or some poo poo like that
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:55
|
|
|
are chimpanzees/apes/monkeys bad at swimming? i have a theory i'm trying to test...
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 03:58
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:Individual muscle density or length, I forget which. Basically humans traded the strength for better agility with our hands or some poo poo like that great so i can weave a basket but not tear somebody's arms from the sockets?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
chimps are strong because they didn't invent guns yet
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:05
|
|
|
They don't do cardio.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:06
|
|
|
crossfit
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:06
|
|
|
racist rear end poo poo op
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:10
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:Individual muscle density or length, I forget which. Basically humans traded the strength for better agility with our hands or some poo poo like that Kinda. Their ligaments attach further down their bones than ours do. If you think of ligaments as a lever you can see that the same force from a muscle contraction would cause a much more powerful reaction. Its the difference between opening a door at the hinges vs. The knob. Source: gently caress chimps, I hate them.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:10
|
|
 honestly this chimp looks p. strong but i meann like is he strong enough to cause real damage to some1? looks like he mite just give u a black eye
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:17
|
|
|
Harald posted:if a baby grew up in the wild and climbed trees all the time it would probably be as strong as a chimp. my stepdad steve did this and instead it just made him an alocholic douchebag
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:22
|
|
|
fivethree posted:
i will fight this chimp (and probably lose)
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:24
|
|
|
VectorSigma posted:chimps are strong because they didn't invent guns yet 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:25
|
|
|
lol where is this from? rise of the apes?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:25
|
|
|
MegaGatts posted:Kinda. Their ligaments attach further down their bones than ours do. If you think of ligaments as a lever you can see that the same force from a muscle contraction would cause a much more powerful reaction. Its the difference between opening a door at the hinges vs. The knob. Source: gently caress chimps, I hate them. This is the real answer. It also means if you trained a chimp to be a baseball pitcher, the best they could do would result in the ball plopping onto the ground half-way to the batter.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:26
|
|
|
MegaGatts posted:Kinda. Their ligaments attach further down their bones than ours do. If you think of ligaments as a lever you can see that the same force from a muscle contraction would cause a much more powerful reaction. Its the difference between opening a door at the hinges vs. The knob. Source: gently caress chimps, I hate them. This is a cool article: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2009/02/how_strong_is_a_chimpanzee.html quote:The suspicious claim seems to have originated in a flapper-era study conducted by a biologist named John Bauman. Poe's story of the scalp-pulling orangutan struck Bauman as being "grotesquely impossible." In 1923, he noted that every expert in the field believed apes were vastly stronger than humans—yet none had ever tried to prove it. So he packed up a device used to measure pull strength, called a dynamometer, and set out for the Bronx Zoo. Later studies did disprove being 5 times stronger than humans but they are much stronger than human for their size.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
fivethree posted:
that looks like a typical shiftless, dim working class chimp. i prefer my beasts to be a bit more refined, tbh 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
Kleen_TheRowdyDog posted:are chimpanzees/apes/monkeys bad at swimming? i have a theory i'm trying to test... I done seen monkeys swimming. Monkeys in china dependent upon tourist peanuts. Swimming after the peanuts. Hth
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:29
|
|
|
how are they at basketball
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:30
|
|
|
fivethree posted:
He could probably pull your legs off. That lady who was attacked by the pet chimp a few years ago and had her face torn off: quote:The emergency crew described Nash's injuries as "horrendous". Within the following 72 hours, Nash underwent more than seven hours of surgery on her face and hands by four teams of surgeons. The hospital provided counseling to its staff members who initially treated her because of the extraordinary nature of Nash's wounds. Paramedics noted she lost her hands, nose, eyes, lips, and mid-face bone structure, and received significant brain tissue injuries. Doctors successfully reattached her jaw, but announced on April 7, 2009 that Nash would be blind for life. The chimp didn't cause those injuries by biting, he did it with his hands. If you're a male, it also common for them to try to pull off your dick and balls.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:32
|
|
|
yeah but that was to some weak woman I bet stone cold steve Austin could take out a chimp
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:35
|
|
|
Chimps are downright sadistic little fuckers. They're not satisfied to just beat you or kill you, instead they want to disfigure you, bite off all your fingers and your nose, tear off your ears and dick, and peel the skin off your face. Every time I see someone on tv with a pet chimp I'm half expecting them to get mauled any second. Video of woman who survived a chimp attack. Intersting to note this chimp was 200lbs! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3DeJjHAz8I 
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:35
|
|
|
Funkstar Deluxe posted:lol where is this from? rise of the apes? Yes. Despite the bonobo dual wielding LMGs while charging on a horse, the movie is actually really good. Way, way better than I expected.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:36
|
|
|
theres like 500000x as many humans as apes how the hell would they take over anything come on hollywood
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:38
|
|
|
because they've got a huge sack
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:39
|
|
|
Acid Haze posted:Yes. Despite the bonobo dual wielding LMGs while charging on a horse, the movie is actually really good. Way, way better than I expected. Oh okay. I didn't watch the remake of Planet of the Apes, but you're saying the sequel (or prequel???) is worth watching?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:40
|
|
|
fivethree posted:
oh yea, he'll hand you your black eye once he rips it from your skull
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:45
|
|
|
gorillas are cooler than chimps, i also think it would be less painful and humiliating to be mauled by a gorilla, like a cleaner kill. discuss
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:49
|
|
|
Funkstar Deluxe posted:Oh okay. I didn't watch the remake of Planet of the Apes, but you're saying the sequel (or prequel???) is worth watching? Oh actually that shot is from Dawn of the Planet of the apes (2014), which is the direct sequel to Rise of the planet of the apes (2011). Both are very good I think, but I think the sequel steels the show as you switch from a human-centric plot in Rise to an ape-centric plot in Dawn. I don't think they are at all related to the 2001 remake if that's what you're referring to. Acid Haze fucked around with this message at 04:52 on Dec 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:49
|
|
|
humans lost their strength by developing fine motor control
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
Acid Haze posted:Oh actually that shot is from Dawn of the Planet of the apes (2014), which is the direct sequel to Rise of the planet of the apes (2011). Both are very good I think, but I think the sequel steels the show as you switch from a human-centric plot in Rise to an ape-centric plot in Dawn. Yeah im referring to the 2001 remake. Also I didn't know the prequel got a sequel.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
Don't chimps rip your balls off to disable you and then go hog-wild on your face?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2014 04:54
|
|
