Ideas for different types of farts

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Video Games > Ideas for different types of farts

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

Alain Post posted:

Considering how much of an idiot he is, it's really remarkable how often he gets into situations where he isn't the dumbest guy in the room

I like drama on Internet.

quote:

Today you may see Storifys floating around trying desperately to prove that I maliciously ruined a charity stream (for a charity I am partnered with). These Storifys will not include the initial reaction of the streamer in which he flipped out and insulted me and I doubt they will include many if any of the 300+ people who within the hours following, sent threats of violence, insults and as many wishes as possible that the cancer get me quickly. They will I'm sure include the tweets in response in which I call them crazy and stupid for these threads and their reaction. I stand by those statements 100%. These are people who have constructed a narrative in their heads in which I am a villain. They know very little of me of course, only what they've been told. Maybe they read that stupid SA post from 8 years ago, practically a lifetime on the internet and made their assumptions there. Maybe they just believe in the guilty by association fallacy and have ignored the focus on ethics and condemnation of harassment that has been going on for YEARS on my channel.

I remember the day in which I said publicly that I was pro Gamergate, it was accompanied by an image that said this "I support women in gaming, I condemn harassment, I am against biased and corrupt games journalism". What pushed me off the fence? A dell employee crazy enough to call everyone involved in the hashtag as "worse than ISIS". As John Clees said, the biggest enemy of any extremist is the moderate. As the insanity went on more and more people came off the fence because of just how awful people were being. I have during this entire thing never engaged in harassment, but I've certainly received a great deal of it and for what? Speaking out about the same things I've been saying since my Mailbox videos in 2011? That games media can do a better job at being less incestuous? Disclosing its friendships? Maybe not writing about people you live with without telling people first? Not treating your readers like idiots? Not claiming "oh yeah we don't accept gifts from publishers" before taking pictures of giant expensive custom flags that you hung on your wall, or selling off custom Bayonetta gun models on ebay for your own personal profit? I get it man, games media doesn't pay that well unless you're big on Youtube but lemme tell you this, honesty costs nothing. But yes that great crime and yesterday for promoting a stream for a charity with whom as of last month I have an OFFICIAL PARTNERSHIP WITH, I was bombarded with threats and even had an irrelevant ex-NFL player demand that games developers following him seriously reconsider working with our company.

Let me tell you Chris why companies work with us. Because we have a 5 year history of professionalism, honesty and fairness. With that we were able to build an audience that eclipses the vast majority of traditional games media and that is only going to grow come 2015. Youtube has outpaced traditional games media to the point where its relevance, at least when it comes to reviewing or even previews, is becoming more tenuous by the day. Those who do not adapt to this change in media consumption will surely fall by the wayside. Those of us did well, we are where we are now. Somehow, I doubt that 5 years of building relationships with these companies and proving time and again that they can trust us to do a good job, is going to be undone by your online warbling. It might however, make developers think twice before working with you, knowing that you are such a volatile public person whose priority seems to be a misguided political agenda built on falsehood and wilful misrepresentation of the facts. Not a spokesperson I would personally engage with for my company, certainly not.

I thoroughly condemn the idea that my followers and viewers are horrible people who would engage in harassment. I accept the obvious, that in such a huge group there will be some assholes and I also accept the reality that I can do nothing about that. I will not apologise for things I did not do or provoke, I will not apologise for defending my audience. Feel free to do the appropriate mental gymnastics to justify your horrendous abuse, if you were one of the ones who perpetrated it. Despite how hurtful yesterday was, I'm kind of glad it happened. It exposed some of these people for what they truly are. Vicious, deluded, self-righteous abusers. If someone like that tells you you are part of a hate group, tell them to look in a mirror.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 03:50

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 13, 2024 02:33

Great Joe: Aug 13, 2008

icantfindaname posted:

So is Far Cry 3 worth $7.50? I liked Far Cry 2

Far Cry 3 is pretty fun and yeah, it's deffo worth seven fiddy.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 03:58

RhoA: Jul 20, 2014

icantfindaname posted:

So is Far Cry 3 worth $7.50? I liked Far Cry 2

Definitely worth it. Lot of content for the price. Vaas is one of my favorite characters of all time.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:01

THE PENETRATOR: Jul 27, 2014; by Lowtax

http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/301380/ss_711d10ddf049e9cb214e344c55261539cf0313d1.1920x1080.jpg?t=1410224532

buy this game

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:15

Adam Bowen: Jan 6, 2003; This post probably contains a Rickroll link!

Dungeon of the Endless is hella good. Play it now goons. Amplitude can clearly make good games, but Dungeon takes it to another level because unlike their two TBS games it doesn't have to be weighed down by decades of unnecessary poo poo from earlier entries in its genre.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:39

KoldPT: Oct 9, 2012

Alain Post posted:

That guy was a huge fucktard IMO

AP

i like your new username

Sleeveless posted:

Totalbiscuit is bad but in terms of sheer punchability I don't think anybody tops that obnoxious fat british guy who always has his gross fat clammy hands stuffed in leather gloves and tries really hard to co-opt fascist imagery but doesn't have the actual energy to speak above a quiet mumble.

at least jim sterling's just a personality, total biscuit is like that all the time

can you imagine being married to that kind of person

jfc

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:41

Ahundredbux: Oct 25, 2007; The right to bear arms

THE PENETRATOR posted:

http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/301380/ss_711d10ddf049e9cb214e344c55261539cf0313d1.1920x1080.jpg?t=1410224532

buy this game

Wowzer, new game of the year incoming ??

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:53

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

KoldPT posted:

at least jim sterling's just a personality, total biscuit is like that all the time

can you imagine being married to that kind of person

jfc

To be fair they have this Russian "two boots form a pair" thing going on for them, if I remember well the details of Starcraft drama involving TB's wife.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:58

Kewpuh: Oct 22, 2003; when i dip you dip we dip

Sleeveless posted:

Totalbiscuit is bad but in terms of sheer punchability I don't think anybody tops that obnoxious fat british guy who always has his gross fat clammy hands stuffed in leather gloves and tries really hard to co-opt fascist imagery but doesn't have the actual energy to speak above a quiet mumble.

he does some okay stuff. also he agrees that zombi u is the poo poo

# ? Jan 2, 2015 04:59

axelblaze: Oct 18, 2006; Congratulations The One Concern!!!

You're addicted to Ivory!!

_{and...oh my...could you please...

oh my...}; Grimey Drawer

This wasn't a bad game year, but it was also a year where most of what I played just gave me what I expected. Mario Kart was what I expected, Smash was what I expected, Hyrule Warriors was what I expected, Binding of Isaac was what I expected, Dark Souls II was what I expected. Guilty Gear was what I expected. None of these games were bad mind you and most of them were pretty amazing but very little actually managed to give me any surprises.

I'm honestly this close to declaring Drakengard 3 my game of the year because despite the fact I should have expected it, that game still managed to blindside me with the trolling it did in the last chapter.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 05:08

THE PENETRATOR: Jul 27, 2014; by Lowtax

just paid 6 cents for this baller steam emote

# ? Jan 2, 2015 06:01

Endorph: Jul 22, 2009

Sleeveless posted:

I appreciate how now all the Let's Players/YouTube personalities use the exact same thumbnail (the title in bubble lettering + the person making a wacky face in the corner) so I know exactly what videos not to click on when I look up a game on YouTube.

hey, some of them steal sexy fanart and paste it in the thumbnail without any credit to the artist in a desperate attempts to get hits from horny 13 year olds

# ? Jan 2, 2015 07:26

Vincent: Nov 25, 2005

THE PENETRATOR posted:

just paid 6 cents for this baller steam emote

Eat the rich.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 07:58

Assepoester: Jul 18, 2004; Can't post for 10 years!; Melman v2

A Steampunk Gent posted:

This is a repost from my rant forum on my site and since I'm interested only in it being read, rather than advertising or shilling it out for hits, I'm going to just repost it here. Before I do let me give you a quick introduction.

I finally registered on the SA forums a week or so ago having been a loyal reader for a couple of years. I don't like the new design of the site, I want to kill it with fire, I liked my good-old Web1.0 scrolly site, give it back please.

I'm posting this here because you lot are smart, and as such, I have no issues with you telling me that you think I'm wrong with this pseudo-rant. This may also be preaching to the choir a bit and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope at least you get some enjoyment out of this. If you're one of those fellows who likes to Digg, the article also has a Digg page, do with it as you see fit - http://digg.com/general_sciences/At...you_intelligent

With that said and done, here goes.

"It's novello time, and it's about religion, so unless you're ready to deal with some views you may not agree with, switch off now. In the words of Illidan "You are not prepared".

Let's get this out here right now. I'm a 23 year old law graduate with an IQ of 155. My political beliefs are liberal and leftist, I listen to Metal and I enjoy violent movies, books and videogames, and I've been a Christian since birth. Baptised, confirmed of my own free will, son of a priest (who are pretty notorious for rebelling against their father's religious beliefs just for the sake of it). I'm part of the Anglican Church of England, which is pretty much the result of Henry the 8th getting pissed off with the catholics not allowing him to divorce his wife(s). We're the state religion of the UK, if you could even say the UK has one, we're pretty liberal about most things, women priests, gay priests, homosexuals in general, sex before marriage, contraception, we take the modern, reasonable way of looking at all of them. At the end of the day, the Bible taught us about forgiveness and being excellent to one another. It had a bit of a round-about way of doing it but what do you expect for a 2000 year old book written entirely by clerical males? It's gonna be a bit out of date, you've gotta read it in context.

I have no problems with anyone's beliefs. Be whatever you want, as long as you believe (or don't believe) for a good reason. But here's what I really don't like, trend-atheism/trend-theism (also referred to as e-atheism, since it seems to be most prevelant in the domain of anonymous blogspammers and Digg-users).

In my late teens, I spent a long time thinking. Yeah, just sitting around and thinking, thinking about faith. Thinking about what it is that I believe in. Rationalizing the various conflicts and contradictions that faith presents us with, looking at the viewpoints of other faiths, or those with no faith at all, taking into account the new things we discover every day and factoring in the influence of science. Some people would claim that, if I had indeed done that, I'd have come to the conclusion, as an intellectual, rational thinker, that God does not exist. They would of course, be wrong.

My beliefs center around several factors. Firstly, it is important for us as human-beings to realize our own limits, and the limits of our understanding. Centuries ago we believed the world was flat. "The Bible told us so!", would be the first cry. Wrong, it really didn't. In the Old Testament, Job 26:7 explains that the earth is suspended in space, the obvious comparison being with the spherical sun and moon. The Old Testament, you remember that one? The one with the fiery bushes, the pillar's of salt, the cool plagues and such? Even that managed to get it right. There's a few more references as well to the 'round' earth (and before you say anything, flat is not a shape, it could have been a flat octagon for all they knew) but I'm not going to go into that yet. We've had computers for less than a century, powered flight for just over a century and of course our amazing horseless carriages. Genetics, electricity, nuclear-bombs, toaster-strudel, the world is in the palm of our hands! And it didn't take us too long did it?

Reality-check, we're still primitives. In the great scheme of things this technology is a mere blip on the historical radar. We've got an awful long way to go before we're able to dissect and understand the mysteries of the universe. We haven't even put a man on Mars yet, let alone left our solar system to find out what exactly is out there. How can it be that we have suddenly, so recently, become so arrogant as to believe we know more than we really do? The Laws of Science are written by man, based on our understanding of how things work. They are theories that, while prove true today, may be debunked by another amazing discovery tomorrow. Which leads onto my next point.

Name this quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Arthur C Clarke, physicist and author, smart fellow. It also hilights the point I'm making. Our understanding of the universe is peerless only amongst ourselves. We are not as smart as we think we are. Just as fire wowed the neanderthals, what would it take to wow us? What would make our jaws drop and our minds boggle? Well, any sufficiently advanced technology of course. And what is technology after-all? Man-made machines. The concept of technology is a human concept, a concept that may, in other parts of the universe, not even exist, replaced by something even more advanced than that, so advanced that we cannot comprehend it. Not surprising really as we mammals only use 10% of our brains.

So where am I going with this? Simple really, take yourself off of your high-horse, you, and the human race, is not as smart as it thinks it is. Now, open your mind a little, and let's explore some possibilities.

The definition of a God. Let us turn to the good book.

Wikipedia.

"God most commonly refers to the deity worshipped by followers of monotheistic and monolatrist religions, whom they believe to be the creator and ruler of the universe. Theologians have ascribed a variety of attributes to the various conceptions of God. The most common among these include omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, perfect goodness, divine simplicity, and eternal and necessary existence. God has also been conceived as being incorporeal, a personal being, the source of all moral obligation, and the "greatest conceivable existent"

Hmm, a tall order one might think. Could such a being exist? Some argue that logically, he could not, however, there is very little logic in denying the possibility that a being or beings of such power and advancement exist that they could indeed, be considered 'God' within our definition. That's not to say that God is a small green alien with a flying saucer and a phaser though that would give some of the overzealous fundamentalists something to sweat over, much to our amusement. But what is this God? A creator? Sure, we create. We create technology, we're getting to the stage of being able to create life in one form or another, using the basic building blocks of nature. Could it not be surmised therefore that it is entirely within the realms of possibility that someone or something created those building blocks? Like a programmer creates a new program, someone must have also created the coding language in which he created it. We scramble for answers. We come up with theories. Some believe in the beginning there was nothing, which exploded. Some believe a man in the sky created it everything in 6 days and then mooched around on the 7th. Which is valid?

Neither, and both. They attempt to apply meaning to something where meaning may, or may not exist. Creationism and the Big Bang are in that sense, as bad as each other. They are both merely attempts for us to explain the unexplainable. The Big Bang contradicts our laws of physics (something most catalyse an explosion, therefore something must have been there in the first place, where did that come from, at which point your brain melts). The Creation Story contradicts our laws of physics (Same reasons, who created God after all?). Everything we've so far managed to come up with, from the sublime to the ridiculous, the complex to the simplistic, it's an exercise in desperate straw-clutching. At the end of the day, we don't know jack.

And that's ok. Someone once said that the journey matters more than the destination, it's not the winning, it's the taking part, at least ya tried sport. These explanations of where it all comes from, be they ancient or modern all boil down to the same need. To know. Who'd have thunk it, we've got brains for a reason, and they rather like being used. Those neurons like to be fired, the little grey matter likes a little exercise every once in a while. Just as the Creation Story was a way to explain an unexplainable concept, so is the Big Bang theory. If one were to compare the human mind to a computer, try feeding the Big Bang theory to the medieval man, and it's like trying to shove Bioshock into a Commodore Vic20. Good luck. And what will our children's children's children's grandchildren's children think of our Big Bang theory? My money's on exactly the same thing.

So what am I trying to tell you, stop asking questions, stop looking for answers and just believe whatever the hell suits ya? Absolutely not. Believe whatever suits you, but question it, never stop thinking, never stop asking or learning. In this day and age it seems people are way too willing to believe, or not believe. Belief, or non-belief should be a life-long arduous process and it should end involuntarily, when you fall over dead. Someone (there's a lot of talkative someone's aren't there?) once said 'Never stop believing', I say, "Never stop asking yourself what you believe, and why".

It's time to criticize, so let me load port and starboard cannon and fire a volley at both atheists and theists alike. Believing, or not believing, does not make you intelligent. Smart people do not come to a conclusion on the basis of insubstantial evidence. Smart people do not mindlessly attack other people's beliefs just because they don't conform to their own. Smart people do not assume that their own rigid, poorly formed definitions of logic and faith, reason and belief are mutually exclusive and that if one exists, the other cannot. Smart people think outside the box, not pick fights with those poor souls trapped in it.

What makes you intelligent, is knowing why you believe what you believe. Knowing that you are but one mind, and knowing that at any time you could be proven wrong, only for that person to be proven wrong ad infinitum as we as a race advance.

I suppose you're waiting for my personal beliefs, waiting for this to be some kind of sermon, preaching why my God is better than your God, or non-God. You'll be waiting a long time, because it's not coming. My personal beliefs are just that, personal, they're mine, they belong to me. You cannot take them away from me, only I can. What I can give you though, are my opinions.

Right now shots are being fired. They're not physical shots, they're bullets and shells of ignorance and bigottry. And it's no one-sided battle let me tell you that much. Factionalized camps everywhere you can imagine. Atheists, Theists, Satanists, Christians, Republicans, Democrats, Capitalists, Communists, every group you can imagine, all shouting 'Your God/Non-God sucks, mine is better!'. These days, the internet's become their battleground. So much for sharing knowledge, we're sharing ignorance.

The bigottry and the condemnation has to stop. The sad thing is, I'm having to condemn the condemners. Isn't it lowsy how you generally have to be a hypocrite in order to make a point these days? Food for thought. We can look at the extremes and see the simplistic, secular vs sacred, trend-atheists vs fundamentalist evangelical christians, the most common stereotypes. But in reality, it's so much more complicated than that. It's this stereotyping and narrow-minded attitude that prevents us as a race from achieving the greatness we can. I could make as many decrees as I wanted till I was blue in the face, and I'm going to just to let off a little steam mind you,

"Trend-atheist Digg users, shove your agendas where the sun don't shine, refusing the possibility of a supreme-being does not make you a genius or a radical thinker, it makes you a bloody sheep hiding behind a cloak of anonymity"

"Evangelical Fundamentalist morons, get your overly simplistic, judgmental, dogmatic Crayola God out of my face, you have about as much understanding of the universe as a wet lettuce. That does not make you holy, pure, or guaranteed a private booth at the big game in the sky, it makes you a bloody sheep hiding behind a cloak of propaganda that you only believe because you're told to"

Wow, that feels good, I can understand why you internet-bound condemners like it so much. Gives you that warm, fuzzy feeling doesn't it? What, I'm not allowed to indulge in such a guilty pleasure every once in a while? Play fair Wink

Where's my conclusion? Hell if I know. Did you have the mistaken impression this was some carefully constructed plea for tolerance? Absolutely not, it's an angry slap in the face to my peers. Wake the hell up and use your brain, because my God/Non-god/Explosion/Man-in-the-sky/Vic20 gave you it for a reason.

TB.

How about you go play games with your #gg top kekt channer pals and leave SA, poor sadbrained goons, and ablegamers the gently caress alone?

# ? Jan 2, 2015 08:37

Problem Sleuth: Apr 12, 2011; WELCOME TO THE NEW FUTURE

Cardboard Box A posted:

How about you go play games with your #gg top kekt channer pals and leave SA, poor sadbrained goons, and ablegamers the gently caress alone?

what does this sentence even mean

# ? Jan 2, 2015 08:59

Assepoester: Jul 18, 2004; Can't post for 10 years!; Melman v2

Problem Sleuth posted:

what does this sentence even mean

I am not completely sure myself.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 10:40

Archer666: Dec 27, 2008

Cardboard Box A posted:

How about you go play games with your #gg top kekt channer pals and leave SA, poor sadbrained goons, and ablegamers the gently caress alone?

It's funny when sadbrains tell him to leave ablegamers alone... because he has an official partnership with ablegamers and he can do stuff with them whenever he wants. I look forward to seeing idiots meltdown when he does his Ablegamers stream.

Speaking of games, I'm really digging Killer is Dead. It's so stylish, tho the combat is a little stiff.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 10:43

No Dignity: Oct 15, 2007

Can we keep the insanely bad ethics in videogames chat in GBS please? Thanks for your consideration

# ? Jan 2, 2015 10:49

No Dignity: Oct 15, 2007

Echoing Dungeons of the Endless being a really good game. For a scrub gamer like me it's really challenging even on Too Easy but I've never had so much fun with a roguelike, it's a really cool little game :3:

# ? Jan 2, 2015 10:55

Endorph: Jul 22, 2009

A Steampunk Gent posted:

Can we keep the insanely bad ethics in videogames chat in GBS please? Thanks for your consideration

yeah unless its funny like that giant totalbiscuit copy paste no one gives a poo poo

# ? Jan 2, 2015 10:55

Ahundredbux: Oct 25, 2007; The right to bear arms

Endorph posted:

yeah unless its funny like that giant totalbiscuit copy paste no one gives a poo poo

how ironic that it's the only time he's been funny

# ? Jan 2, 2015 11:28

Great Joe: Aug 13, 2008

tb has cancer of the butt lol

# ? Jan 2, 2015 11:43

hubris.height: Jan 6, 2005; Pork Pro

i hope your posting gets cancer and stops completely

# ? Jan 2, 2015 15:11

Lucca Blight: Jun 2, 2009

kalstrams posted:

To be fair they have this Russian "two boots form a pair" thing going on for them, if I remember well the details of Starcraft drama involving TB's wife.

What was the drama?

# ? Jan 2, 2015 15:30

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

Lucca Blight posted:

What was the drama?

So, ATC is Acer TeamStory Cup (SC2 tournament), Genna is TB's wife, Take (Dennis) is chief of TaKeTV, organizer of ATC. Axiom is TB's (legally Genna's, back then) Starcraft 2 team.

Axiom announces they can't afford the travel costs to attend the ATC offline finals.
The StarCraft community (mainly TL in this instance) got mad, giving Axiom poo poo for dropping out so close to the tournament date.
Genna makes a long blog post outlining the reasons they dropped out and the measures they took to try and prevent in in the first place. This includes chat logs with Take where Take mentions that he will try (unsuccessfully) to get more money from Acer to assist Axiom with travel costs.
According to Genna, Take sent Genna angry messages concerned that her posting the chat logs between them would paint Acer (his sponsor) in a bad light and vaguely threatens some kind of legal action.
Genna resigns.

That's kind-of short and vague description. For the long version you can read Genna-1, Genna-2, Dennis, end. While it came down to a relatively calm settlement, the initial shitstorm was amazing.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 16:17

axelblaze: Oct 18, 2006; Congratulations The One Concern!!!

You're addicted to Ivory!!

_{and...oh my...could you please...

oh my...}; Grimey Drawer

That all sounds incredibly boring.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:45

Adam Bowen: Jan 6, 2003; This post probably contains a Rickroll link!

So how about those motherfucking video games?

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:52

eonwe: Aug 11, 2008; Lipstick Apathy

Adam Bowen posted:

So how about those motherfucking video games?

they're good

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:53

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

axleblaze posted:

That all sounds incredibly boring.

That's because it's aftermath company/company perspective and a cautiously made description of events. It gets way better when you read stuff from when most people knew nothing and just started throwing poo poo at the fans. Looking up all the discussion threads is :effort:

so I ended up just giving brief overview and not some "LMAO!!111" material.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:54

codenameFANGIO: May 4, 2012; What are you even booing here?

Adam Bowen posted:

So how about those motherfucking video games?

They're really good. I am about to play some. :cool:

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:54

axelblaze: Oct 18, 2006; Congratulations The One Concern!!!

You're addicted to Ivory!!

_{and...oh my...could you please...

oh my...}; Grimey Drawer

Adam Bowen posted:

So how about those motherfucking video games?

They are good and fun.

I'm currently playing Akiba's Trip because it was better than it has any right to be. It's not amazing but it's better than it had any right to be. It's also thankfully less fanservicey than you'd expect despite it seeming to only exist to provide fan service.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:55

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

In games' news, latest flavour of abuses in Destiny is pulling out network cable for a bit. Apparently that makes the most difficult boss in game easy.

It's not like anyone plays that crap either way.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 17:56

Lucca Blight: Jun 2, 2009

kalstrams posted:

Words

Thank you for typing that all up.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 18:08

cinci zoo sniper: Mar 15, 2013

Lucca Blight posted:

Thank you for typing that all up.

I copied it from elsewhere mostly, but you're welcome.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 18:09

Static Rook: Dec 1, 2000; by Lowtax

Adam Bowen posted:

So how about those motherfucking video games?

Some are good, some are bad. Time marches on.

I downloaded Okami HD and am about to make that the first game I beat in the new year. Hope to get it done before the RE remake comes out.

EDIT

I forgot about Alien Isolation, gotta finish that, too. Game rules so far.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 21:19

precision: May 7, 2006; by VideoGames

Adam Bowen posted:

So how about those motherfucking video games?

I'm replaying Hotline Miami and forgot how great it is.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 22:02

Fergus Mac Roich: Nov 5, 2008; Soiled Meat

Revengeance is the most fun I've had with a character action game since God Hand.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 22:06

hubris.height: Jan 6, 2005; Pork Pro

i am looking forward to playing that sometime after i finish lightning returns

then im gonna play mgs 2 and 3

# ? Jan 2, 2015 22:07

Fergus Mac Roich: Nov 5, 2008; Soiled Meat

hubris.height posted:

i am looking forward to playing that sometime after i finish lightning returns

then im gonna play mgs 2 and 3

For maximum enjoyment please play 2 and 4 first. It's for the sake of you enjoying those as much as it is for the sake of Revengeance.

Revengeance probably works just fine on its own, but it's better if you know MGS.

# ? Jan 2, 2015 22:21

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 13, 2024 02:33

hubris.height: Jan 6, 2005; Pork Pro

i have played 2 before like a decade ago and just remember some cyber nonsense

but i don't know if i want to touch 4 it seems like a lot of time to sink into cinematics for a series im unsure if i even like

# ? Jan 2, 2015 22:39

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Video Games > Ideas for different types of farts

«‹›62 »