Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Norton
Feb 18, 2006

dicky d seems like a cool guy

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stick Figure Mafia
Dec 11, 2004

The Dennis System posted:

I don't think you understood those tweets at all.

lol i was hoping this guy would post more stuff defending dawkin's stupid rear end tweets

old beast lunatic
Nov 3, 2004

by Hand Knit
Religion should be made fun of at every opportunity. Dorkins just fucks it up by making it more fun to laugh at him than religion.

Tamerlame
Oct 20, 2012

Religion is bad because bad things happened in places where people were also religious.

Ork of Fiction
Jul 22, 2013
"LOL. I believe in evolution by individual selection instead of the superorganism theory of evolution." -Dicky D

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

serious norman posted:

Trolling religious ppl is getting old man

the greatest achievement of civilisation is taking away the worldly power of organised religion

every time any religion tries to get that back it needs to be crushed under the heel of the state

hth~


so in summary

InterFaced posted:

Religion should be made fun of at every opportunity. Dorkins just fucks it up by making it more fun to laugh at him than religion.
:agreed:

JediTalentAgent
Jun 5, 2005
Hey, look. Look, if- if you screw me on this, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine, you rat bastard!
There's no room in either of their arguments for the theory that we a manufactured life form created by aliens from outer space, is there?

psyopmonkey
Nov 15, 2008

by Lowtax
I wonder what Dicky Dorkins thinks of this thread...

Does anyone have twitter? Could they tweet him the link?

ham_sanitizer
Jul 12, 2014

professional swine bather

JediTalentAgent posted:

There's no room in either of their arguments for the theory that we a manufactured life form created by aliens from outer space, is there?

I'm pretty sure Expelled had a clip of Dawkins speculating that aliens seeded earth with life or whatever.

Yes I saw that movie. Teach the controversy bitches.

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!
even better is anyone at the :agesilaus:-ier of the two :agesilaus: universities and goes to his lectures :laugh:

EMILY BLUNTS
Jan 1, 2005

psyopmonkey posted:

I wonder what Dicky Dorkins thinks of this thread...

Does anyone have twitter? Could they tweet him the link?

he'll just offer to show up for $$$$$$

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

EMILY BLUNTS posted:

he'll just offer to show up for $$$$$$

he already gets $$$$$$$ for lectures so have him cover the evolution of the something awful forums and memes

gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

blowfish posted:

he already gets $$$$$$$ for lectures so have him cover the evolution of the something awful forums and memes

I wonder if he knows about all your base

ham_sanitizer
Jul 12, 2014

professional swine bather
We should all just tweet at him "we love you dink donkler"

star trek
Apr 7, 2009
Dank Dokkens

Aesop Poprock
Oct 21, 2008


Grimey Drawer

star trek posted:

Dank Dokkens

settle down

Stick Figure Mafia
Dec 11, 2004

i want to take his honey jar away

gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

star trek posted:

Dank Dokkens

finally somebody noticed

I'm going to change it again

EMILY BLUNTS
Jan 1, 2005

Dirk Dorkler

Aesop Poprock
Oct 21, 2008


Grimey Drawer

Stick Figure Mafia posted:

i want to take his honey jar away

i like imagaining his face getting all red with indignity and sputtering little like an old baby

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

gnarlyhotep posted:

finally somebody noticed

I'm going to change it again

gnarly i approve of you changing thread titles

do it often

do it all sneaky like

gary oldmans diary
Sep 26, 2005
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
show me a video recording of evolution happening in a christian-approved laboratory
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
hitler believed in evolution why would you want to support that?
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
youre so aggressive and unconfident why is that? also youre using ad hominems and censoring me by disagreeing with me and also you seem to have a hidden agenda
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
bishops believing in evolution just shows how creationists have and allow diverse views and people who believe in evolution strictly enforce the hardcore line of evolution
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
teach religion in science class
*passive aggressive laughing while dawkins talks*
high priest of dictatorship science

*gives the crazy eyes*

got about 25 mninutes in

gary oldmans diary fucked around with this message at 07:36 on Apr 7, 2015

5-HT
Oct 17, 2012

RideTheSpiral posted:

its hard to believe an oxford professor can be so stupid

not really. he stole most of his ideas from WD Hamilton and EO Wilson.

5-HT fucked around with this message at 08:27 on Apr 7, 2015

The Dennis System
Aug 4, 2014

Nothing in Jurassic World is natural, we have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if the genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth.

Stick Figure Mafia posted:

lol i was hoping this guy would post more stuff defending dawkin's stupid rear end tweets

So you think that saying "A is worse than B" actually is an endorsement of B. I hate to tell you this, but you don't understand how logic works.

Minimalist Program
Aug 14, 2010

RideTheSpiral posted:

its hard to believe an oxford professor can be so stupid

professors, like most people, are usually really smart about certian stuff at the expense of being really dumb about most stuff.

toggle
Nov 7, 2005

has dicky met the goatman?

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Top City Homo posted:

no one has anything bad to say about carl sagan

He's kinda doofy looking

Blurry Gray Thing
Jun 3, 2009

The Dennis System posted:

So you think that saying "A is worse than B" actually is an endorsement of B. I hate to tell you this, but you don't understand how logic works.

Hi Dick.

I'm sorry people are being mean about your nice and logical attempts to measure and rank different kinds of rapes by their badness level (like a true scientist).

I am glad you made those tweets. They were good tweets. I always wanted to know Richard Dawkins' views on various kinds of rapes and was really glad when you finally weighed in on the issue.

MantisToboggan
Feb 1, 2013
I really don't feel like reading up on Wendy Wright, but just how creationist is she? I mean denying evolution is pretty standard but does she also believe that there's an ocean in the sky like some other fundies do? In high school I had to watch this documentary made by FOX news where they said the moon landings were fake because the book of Genesis clearly states God put a dome over the sky to separate the waters or something. Remembering that always make me lol.

Tamerlame posted:

Religion is bad because bad things happened in places where people were also religious.

Atheism is bad because some guy is really snobby about it.

The Dennis System
Aug 4, 2014

Nothing in Jurassic World is natural, we have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if the genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth.

Blurry Gray Thing posted:

Hi Dick.

I'm sorry people are being mean about your nice and logical attempts to measure and rank different kinds of rapes by their badness level (like a true scientist).

I am glad you made those tweets. They were good tweets. I always wanted to know Richard Dawkins' views on various kinds of rapes and was really glad when you finally weighed in on the issue.

You think those tweets were attempts to measure and rank different kinds of rapes? You really think that was the purpose of those tweets? You think that was the point ? You don't think he randomly chose something terrible to use as an example to illustrate that syllogism? Admittedly, that was a bad example to use, but he just as easily could have said "saying getting both of your arms cut off is worse than getting one of your arms cut off is not an endorsement of getting one of your arms cut off", or "saying Mao was worse than Stalin is not an endorsement of Stalin", and that would have been the same tweet. Those tweets had nothing to do with rape or pedophiles. They were random examples. Do people really not get the point of those tweets? It's stunning.

toggle
Nov 7, 2005

whats darryl dawkins opinion on eastern european gape porn websites?

RideTheSpiral
Sep 18, 2005
College Slice

toggle posted:

whats darryl dawkins opinion on eastern european gape porn websites?


he only watches caesarian section instructional videos. or pornography as he calls it

The Dennis System
Aug 4, 2014

Nothing in Jurassic World is natural, we have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if the genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth.
If monkeys, then Toyota

monkeys

Therefore, Toyota.

That's a valid logical syllogism. And it's a valid syllogism no matter what words or symbols you replace "monkeys" and "Toyota" with. Monkeys and Toyota are beside the point. They have nothing to do with anything.

spud
Aug 27, 2003

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

gnarlyhotep posted:

finally somebody noticed

I'm going to change it again

I cant wait to hear more about the crazy adventures of Digg Daggins!

gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

The Dennis System posted:

If monkeys, then Toyota

monkeys

Therefore, Toyota.

That's a valid logical syllogism. And it's a valid syllogism no matter what words or symbols you replace "monkeys" and "Toyota" with. Monkeys and Toyota are beside the point. They have nothing to do with anything.

what in the hell are you on about

OXBALLS DOT COM
Sep 11, 2005

by FactsAreUseless
Young Orc

gnarlyhotep posted:

what in the hell are you on about

I think he's saying Arabs and aficans like to drive around in armed Toyota pickup trucks

Typical Dorkinite

Ocean Book
Sep 27, 2010

:yum: - hi

The Dennis System posted:

You think those tweets were attempts to measure and rank different kinds of rapes? You really think that was the purpose of those tweets? You think that was the point ? You don't think he randomly chose something terrible to use as an example to illustrate that syllogism? Admittedly, that was a bad example to use, but he just as easily could have said "saying getting both of your arms cut off is worse than getting one of your arms cut off is not an endorsement of getting one of your arms cut off", or "saying Mao was worse than Stalin is not an endorsement of Stalin", and that would have been the same tweet. Those tweets had nothing to do with rape or pedophiles. They were random examples. Do people really not get the point of those tweets? It's stunning.

why do you think he chose to use rape specifically in his syllogism?

Blurry Gray Thing
Jun 3, 2009

The Dennis System posted:

You think those tweets were attempts to measure and rank different kinds of rapes? You really think that was the purpose of those tweets? You think that was the point ? You don't think he randomly chose something terrible to use as an example to illustrate that syllogism? Admittedly, that was a bad example to use, but he just as easily could have said "saying getting both of your arms cut off is worse than getting one of your arms cut off is not an endorsement of getting one of your arms cut off", or "saying Mao was worse than Stalin is not an endorsement of Stalin", and that would have been the same tweet. Those tweets had nothing to do with rape or pedophiles. They were random examples. Do people really not get the point of those tweets? It's stunning.

You can stop saying "he" instead of "I" Mr. Dorkins.

old beast lunatic
Nov 3, 2004

by Hand Knit
Debating creationists is like punching retards. Why do you like to punch retards Dank Doobins?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

MantisToboggan posted:

I really don't feel like reading up on Wendy Wright, but just how creationist is she? I mean denying evolution is pretty standard but does she also believe that there's an ocean in the sky like some other fundies do? In high school I had to watch this documentary made by FOX news where they said the moon landings were fake because the book of Genesis clearly states God put a dome over the sky to separate the waters or something. Remembering that always make me lol.


Atheism is bad because some guy is really snobby about it.

i bet she is into all kinds of freaky poo poo

  • Locked thread