|
Cardboard Fox posted:Unfortunately we don't have any modern Star Wars flying games yet. Flying is pretty fun in the Battlefield games so I think they can pull it off. Have there been any high quality space battle Star Wars games since Rogue Leader? I don't know if the space battles in Rebel Strike were any good because the unavoidable ground missions were terrible with bad controls and not-fun and I rage quit early on.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 03:35 |
|
Jumpjet-rocket-Sullustan is the coolest thing in Star Wars games since jub jub mode in Battlefront 1.klosterdev posted:Have there been any high quality space battle Star Wars games since Rogue Leader? I don't know if the space battles in Rebel Strike were any good because the unavoidable ground missions were terrible with bad controls and not-fun and I rage quit early on. Rebel Strike space combat was basically the same as Rogue Leader, it even had the old Rogue Leader missions for co-op mode.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:48 |
|
I'm not entirely sure if I would play if there's no republic side. The droids are neat and all but the republic jetpack trooper had a EMP cannon (a skinned rocket launcher) and a pistol you could snipe with. It was an amazing rear end in a top hat class. This is the closest we're going to get to a 2143 isn't it.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:52 |
|
The 40 player cap seems way too small for big battles like Hoth. Once all the Skygods have finished killing each other for control of the air vehicles you're going to be left with only a handful of bodies for the control point meatgrinder. I'm cautiously unoptomistic.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:55 |
|
I remember that leaked Battlefront 3 video from years ago had smooth transition between ground to atmosphere to space, so not having space combat like that is kind of depressing. It'd be pretty cool to have orbital artillery support until the other team boards and destroys your ship.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 06:59 |
|
Der Luftwaffle posted:I remember that leaked Battlefront 3 video from years ago had smooth transition between ground to atmosphere to space, so not having space combat like that is kind of depressing. It'd be pretty cool to have orbital artillery support until the other team boards and destroys your ship. Battlefront: Renegade Squadron had ground/air/space transitions and player-controlled orbital artillery support and all of it sucked. Rant incoming: The Orbital Strike Cannon thingy could only hit control points. It could reset a control point it hit to neutral. There were maybe two exposed control points on each map so it was highly situational and basically useless because nine times out of ten the enemy would recapture the point immediately. The starfighters did less damage and had less health than infantry. One dude downing multiple fighters with a blaster rifle was depressingly common. The actual space battles were cool because you could board the enemy's capital ship and blow it up-- except for the part where one dude with a rocket launcher could easily neutralize incoming spacecraft except for landing craft, but landing craft usually didn't survive leaving the hangar.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 07:27 |
|
Delacroix posted:I'm not entirely sure if I would play if there's no republic side. The droids are neat and all but the republic jetpack trooper had a EMP cannon (a skinned rocket launcher) and a pistol you could snipe with. It was an amazing rear end in a top hat class. This man has good taste y'all.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 10:10 |
|
I seem to also recall someone confirming that battlelog will not be used for this.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 13:01 |
|
KiddieGrinder posted:I seem to also recall someone confirming that battlelog will not be used for this. Correct. They will also not being using that godawful web browser for multiplayer on PC.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 13:20 |
|
Any word on achievements?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 13:21 |
|
Will Hunt come back? It was the poo poo back in BF2 when you could hunt down stormtroopers as Wampas.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 13:55 |
|
Cardboard Fox posted:Correct. That's a shame since Battlelog is way better than any in-game server browser.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 14:37 |
|
I wouldn't be surprised if they made some sort of web thing called HoloNet, but allowed you to boot the game from the desktop, instead of force you to use the browser.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 14:58 |
|
I said come in! posted:$60 for a low effort Star Wars mod for Battlefield 4. SpaceAceJase posted:Battlefield 4 Star Wars mod? Sign me the hell up. Are people saying this as a joke because Battlefront has always been Battlefield: Star Wars
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:26 |
|
Cardboard Fox posted:Correct. Instead they will use an even shittier in-game browser.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:32 |
VarXX posted:Are people saying this as a joke because Battlefront has always been Battlefield: Star Wars Eyud posted:That's a shame since Battlelog is way better than any in-game server browser.
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:43 |
|
How, of all Battlefield related games, is this the one that DOESN'T get singleplayer? The one where every drooling idiot and his kid will go DERR WANT TO BE IN DA MOVIES and smack his controller with his lightsaber toy? Seriously, their decision making is hilarious sometimes.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:53 |
|
If this is going to be the only Star Wars game for 2015 it is proper weird for there being nothing but the 2002-era MP with bots for singleplayer.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:57 |
|
Battlefront 3 has bots, 2 player splitscreen and single player missions actually
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 15:58 |
|
I am gonna assume this is an Origin exclusive when it comes to the PC version
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 16:39 |
|
I imagine the expansion packs will be the other movies while the base game is just the OT. usually has 4-5 expansions focusing on something different each time. Prequels, space battles, alternative versions, and new movie is what I'm guessing.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 16:41 |
|
Icept posted:How, of all Battlefield related games, is this the one that DOESN'T get singleplayer? The one where every drooling idiot and his kid will go DERR WANT TO BE IN DA MOVIES and smack his controller with his lightsaber toy? Seriously, their decision making is hilarious sometimes. Personally I'm happy with this. I don't think they'd be able to create a decent story for a campaign, so I'm glad they won't even try. Hopefully it means more resources spent on better gameplay. I'm sure there will be a slew of new Star Wars games with great single player only stories on the horizon, so no need to fret. Segmentation Fault posted:Yes, I love dealing with battlefield constantly opening and closing making me reload assets whenever I want to switch servers, browser incompatibility issues, battlelog errors, pointless social media emulation that nobody bothers with... I completely agree. I'm sure they can make a functional browser in the game that does the job just fine, and we won't have to suffer from reloading the whole loving game just to switch servers.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 17:32 |
|
KiddieGrinder posted:Personally I'm happy with this. I don't think they'd be able to create a decent story for a campaign, so I'm glad they won't even try. Hopefully it means more resources spent on better gameplay. I'm sure there will be a slew of new Star Wars games with great single player only stories on the horizon, so no need to fret. I don't care at all either, it's just funny how they've saddled all the recent Battlefield games with single player campaigns no one care about, but in this game where it finally makes sense to add singleplayer they forgo it.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 17:45 |
|
That's true, I guess it's just ?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 17:52 |
|
This really sounds like a downgrade.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 18:40 |
|
Segmentation Fault posted:Yes, I love dealing with battlefield constantly opening and closing making me reload assets whenever I want to switch servers, browser incompatibility issues, battlelog errors, pointless social media emulation that nobody bothers with... Okay but I can look at all my stats and set up loadouts and do clan/friend stuff and check on servers and wait through a queue all without opening the game which owns. I guess I don't switch servers in the middle of my play sessions very much.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:04 |
|
No space, no buy.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:06 |
|
Let me just say that I am extremely hyped for this game and I'll be content even if it turns out to be nothing more than a reskinned BF4.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:08 |
|
Hope they bring back space battles. I was garbage at dogfighting, but goddamn boarding an stardestroyer and blowing poo poo up was fun.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:10 |
|
Perfect title / post combination. Hopefully are pulling a Arkham and while EA are releasing a low-effort installment to buff up the coffers from another studio, while they do work on a 'proper' Battlefield game. Curious how they'll work in lightsabers for the JEDI ARE AWESOME crowd.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:17 |
|
limited posted:Curious how they'll work in lightsabers for the JEDI ARE AWESOME crowd. Same way as the other games, the heroes.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:19 |
|
limited posted:Curious how they'll work in lightsabers for the JEDI ARE AWESOME crowd. Why not just leave it out? the jedi's are easily the worst part of the starwars universe.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:27 |
|
I'm sure Darth Vader was in the trailer just to advertise the fact that he'll be a cheerleader during your battles and whisper sweet nothings to you through your headset.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:36 |
|
Not gunna lie. Pretty excited for this. Hard not to be on the hype train even though games have failed me before. They better not gently caress this up.
SkyEnzo fucked around with this message at 19:39 on Apr 18, 2015 |
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:37 |
|
SkyEnzo posted:Not gunna lie. Pretty excited for this. Hard not to be on the hype train even though games have failed me before. They better not gently caress t his up. I'm hearing all the critics and think "yeah I agree" on some or most of it, but I'm still stoked as hell to play Star Wars again
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:39 |
|
Zsinjeh posted:Me too. Yeah the 40 man cap could be a bit crap by still I really look forward to the week of sitting down and playing a poo poo load of it.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:41 |
|
There is only one era, no space battles, and the AT-ATs are on rails. Signs point to they might be loving this one up. I can kinda get over the one era thing, if they actually provide as much content for it as they did for two eras in the previous games. e: Oh, and no Galactic Conquest is lame Snooze Cruise fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Apr 18, 2015 |
# ? Apr 18, 2015 19:42 |
|
Jimlit posted:Why not just leave it out? the jedi's are easily the worst part of the starwars universe. Someone at Dice is probably getting a headache pointlessly shoe-horning in Lightsabers AND sniper rifles into the game. mr.capps posted:There is only one era, no space battles, and the AT-ATs are on rails. Signs point to they might be loving this one up. Sure it would behilarious to just stomp around on everyone and go where you please, but it could go wrong when they hit building geometry. Basically imagine this Broteam video, and the others. But as a full-price release.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 20:07 |
|
SkyEnzo posted:Not gunna lie. Pretty excited for this. Hard not to be on the hype train even though games have failed me before. They better not gently caress this up. We haven't had a good Star Wars game since Republic Commander came out 10 years ago. There's an actual chance that this game will be great so I'm hyped as well.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 21:46 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 03:35 |
|
I can see the AT-AT on rails working, if they do something like Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. That game had levels where one team had to escort a NPC tank while the other had to destroy it, and the levels were fun as hell. If they they go for objective based maps instead of just control points or team deathmatch my interest will shoot up 10000%. And it is already pretty high.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2015 22:27 |