|
Detroit_Dogg posted:Rich Gannon ruled For like 2 years.
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 23:11 |
|
|
Every time I get on Sirius XM i always stammer like an idiot when Rich Gannon is on Hey rich gosh huge raiders fan here, just yknow, really loved your work and im a big fan, uh, yeah, how do uh, you uh think the Raiders are gonna do next year i'm thinking 9-7 ill get off the air and take your comments
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:For real, have you never watched Arrested Development? effectual posted:I cant stand that show. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:Arrested Development is an okay, not great show that everyone says they love so that they can be soooo contrarian. If the show was actually good, it would have been on the air longer and not relegated to being rebooted on Netflix in a way that makes every fan cringe at how bad it's become. Basically, it's a show for hipsters. Or, if Earthbound was a TV show. Am I being trolled?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:27
|
|
|
King Hong Kong posted:You are sincerely defending Wilson's performance during that game? Just admit he was incredibly bad because he was. I'm trying to put his statistics into context instead of just going "lol ints are bad so he is always bad guys". Try to keep up. I mean really, do you think the two interceptions I specifically drew attention to are 100% Wilson's fault?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:30
|
|
|
Burger Trench posted:Am I being trolled? I think hes saying he doesn't like Earthbound
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:30
|
|
|
 Giants were so bad the most important era for the league.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:I'm trying to put his statistics into context instead of just going "lol ints are bad so he is always bad guys". Try to keep up. Like 75% probably if he had better accuracy and could see over the oline maybe he'd be better.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:Arrested Development is an okay, not great show that everyone says they love so that they can be soooo contrarian. If the show was actually good, it would have been on the air longer and not relegated to being rebooted on Netflix in a way that makes every fan cringe at how bad it's become da fuq is this The show was loving brilliant and nobody likes it to be contrarian, being contrarian would be your opinion here. Also lol at the idea that if a show gets cancelled it couldn't have been good. Good shows that have niche audiences get cancelled all the time. In football news TMZ (take it for whatever that's worth) says the hospital is launching an investigation into the JPP thing, which if true would rule out the slim possibility of JPP signing off on the release of the records: http://www.tmz.com/2015/07/09/jason-pierre-paul-hospital-launches-aggressive-investigation-into-medical-records/
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
Regnevelc posted:gently caress you all. I would agree. They are fairly Just.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:34
|
|
|
TubeStank posted:Like 75% probably if he had better accuracy and could see over the oline maybe he'd be better. Ooooooooohhh. I get it now. Rodgers wouldn't have lost the NFCCG if he hadn't been distracted by the butts of his offensive line. Until nick Mangold's sister plays center Rodgers will always be too distracted to totally commit on the field. Am I doing this right? Parmesan Basil posted:I would agree. They are fairly Just. Someone doesn't follow Dockett on twitter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:Wilson had a crappy game that was amplified by Kearse's stone hands. I wouldn't say it was indicative of his play in the playoffs, because he was certainly fine in previous playoff games before that (look at his numbers in the NFC divisional we lost to Atlanta, he went all out there). I think it'd be silly to indicate his play by 1 bad game and 1 unfortunate throw. He's going to probably be overpaid, but I'd rather have him than go to the dumpster to look for a franchise QB. Wilson has played in eight post season games. He's played pretty poorly in about two and a half of them. I don't think that's particularly egregious considering how difficult it is to win in the playoffs. Just think of all crummy playoff games Peyton Manning had.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
Burger Trench posted:Am I being trolled? Nope, products only fail because they're bad, the free market has spoken!
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:36
|
|
|
Thaddius the Large posted:Nope, products only fail because they're bad, the free market has spoken! How I Met Your Mother is a better show than the Wire. I know this because 9 seasons> 5 Checkmate
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
2 Broke Girls is a good show because of the ratings
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
NC-17 posted:Wilson has played in eight post season games. He's played pretty poorly in about two and a half of them. I don't think that's particularly egregious considering how difficult it is to win in the playoffs. Just think of all crummy playoff games Peyton Manning had. Yeah, Wilson owns. Sorry haters. Matt Stafford sucks and cant win in the playoffs or regular season lmao
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Ooooooooohhh. I get it now. Nah Rodgers did decent considering he could barely move in the pocket. The special teams lost it. Just like how Wilson lost the Super Bowl.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
Matt Stafford is Wilson if Wilson could throw the ball or be attractive or have fun or not be a unlikable dweeb
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
TubeStank posted:Nah Rodgers did decent considering he could barely move in the pocket. The special teams lost it. Just like how Wilson lost the Super Bowl. "Wilson lost the Super Bowl" is a really easy and lame talking point. The game wasn't lost until Michael Bennett jumped offsides when we had NE pinned on their own 1 yardline. Honestly, I don't think Bennett deserves a raise just because of that terrible loving play. He deserves a lot more flack than he got for that poo poo. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
All of the Seahawks equally lost it, except for Marshawn Lynch.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:I'm trying to put his statistics into context instead of just going "lol ints are bad so he is always bad guys". Try to keep up. 1 for 8 in the first half: solid play. I'm basing this off of memory, but on at least two of those interceptions he was throwing against pretty good coverage - I think including one of those tipped passes - if not double coverage. He was amazing against some really bad defensive play at the end. Sorry that your otherwise good quarterback had a bad game that the team won anyway. Edit: I watched that highlight clip to refresh my memory. The first interception isn't exactly Wilson's fault, but it isn't a good pass either. I can only assume the receivers down the field were covered, but on 3rd and 7, the targeted receiver was well short of the first down and did not have enough separation to make the catch and the first down while Clinton-Dix was coming in to help anyway. It's a bad decision made worse by the receiver. The second and third interceptions seem mostly to have been Wilson's fault. The fourth interception was comparable to the first, but more understandable given the situation. King Hong Kong fucked around with this message at 23:10 on Jul 9, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:"Wilson lost the Super Bowl" is a really easy and lame talking point. The game wasn't lost until Michael Bennett jumped offsides when we had NE pinned on their own 1 yardline. Honestly, I don't think Bennett deserves a raise just because of that terrible loving play. He deserves a lot more flack than he got for that poo poo. It's an easy talking point because it's correct! Also maybe the whole defense shouldn't be leaning on top of dudes with their hands on the ground. Isn't Bennett looking mostly for actual guaranteed money in his contract after this season more than a raise?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
TubeStank posted:It's an easy talking point because it's correct! Skip to 2:27:50 to see Bennett jump and cost us the game! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVkJ1tfalQM To me it looks like the players behind him are trying to pull him back because they know Bennett will jump offsides, like he often does. You can see it on the first drive of the NFCCG. Bennett literally lead the league in offsides penalties last year.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:"Wilson lost the Super Bowl" is a really easy and lame talking point. The game wasn't lost until Michael Bennett jumped offsides when we had NE pinned on their own 1 yardline. Honestly, I don't think Bennett deserves a raise just because of that terrible loving play. He deserves a lot more flack than he got for that poo poo. especially since that was literally the most obvious attempt to draw someone offsides all season long
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:especially since that was literally the most obvious attempt to draw someone offsides all season long  Bellichick is no slouch. He knew exactly who he was dealing with, and he knew how anxious they would be. I'm not saying the defense would have forced the safety and won the game for us for sure, it would still take a miracle for Seattle to win after that INT. But the game wasn't over until that flag was thrown.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Skip to 2:27:50 to see Bennett jump and cost us the game! Keep watching the video to see Bruce Irvin be a child and get thrown out of the game
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:Keep watching the video to see Bruce Irvin be a child and get thrown out of the game I did. It owned. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
They should have just let him and Gronkowski go at it but I don't think anyone needed to see Rob Gronkowski drink Fireball out of Bruce Irvin's boiled skull
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:They should have just let him and Gronkowski go at it but I don't think anyone needed to see Rob Gronkowski drink Fireball out of Bruce Irvin's boiled skull I need to see that. Gronk owns and I am really happy he finally had a healthy season and got that ring he deserved. Can we trade Graham for him?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
Knowing how the NFL goes we will probably have some playoff rematches this season so you guys can settle this slap fight. *Bengals still lose in first round
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:00
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:The Raiders had three playoff appearances in the fifteen years before Gannon and none since. Three in thirteen and that was their biggest slump since the current one. By winning % they were a top 5 team thru 2002.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:00
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Speaking of! someone made a pretty neat site showing off how each team has performed over any given period of time: http://www.frivoletics.com/team-performances-over-different-spans-of-time/nfl/ new graph, same cardinals 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
A Man and his dog posted:Knowing how the NFL goes we will probably have some playoff rematches this season so you guys can settle this slap fight. Packers @ Hawks is week 2 SNF.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
Yeah but it's all about that postseason baby. Still wet for that week 2 game though. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
Kenny Stabler just died
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
drat
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
Snake? Snake?! SNAAAAAKKKKEEE!
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
MrLogan posted:Three in thirteen and that was their biggest slump since the current one. By winning % they were a top 5 team thru 2002. Winning a whole bunch of games 40 years ago doesn't mean you still get to be considered a consistent contender
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Packers @ Hawks is week 2 SNF. Hawks @ Packers
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 23:11 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2015 23:14
|
|