|
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:32 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 01:16 |
|
they say smart people tend to underestimate their intelligence and dumb people overestimate I'd put mine at like 130, but since I'm smart it's probably a much higher number
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:33 |
|
I do like having children's intelligence graded like an rpg
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:34 |
|
I've had professionally administered tests a few times, once in 1st grade, once when i was 19 and got checked by a psychiatrist for brain problems, and once when a family member was studying for her PhD in psychology and she practiced administering the test on me. it's really high, but the interesting thing is that i am a big time moron in my day to day life. like for real if you focused on the things that i do slip up or do incorrectly or miss, it would be a HUGE list and it would seriously appear that i am retarded. regardless, apparently when my brain is working properly, it is good at learning and stuff
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:35 |
|
i have very superior intelligence, my vast mind grasps difficult concepts easily and towers over those of only superior or average intelligence
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:35 |
|
however i am still a beta to the people who are genius or almost genius
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:36 |
|
also i have a psych degree and i know people put WAY too much emphasis on these numbers, but yeah the tests are pretty reliable and valid in a narrow sense
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:36 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:i have very superior intelligence, my vast mind grasps difficult concepts easily and towers over those of only superior or average intelligence I'm sure the other kids are very impressed.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:37 |
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:I'm sure the other kids are very impressed. kids? hah, im an employed adult. im talking about real life concepts, actual skills. stop projecting
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:38 |
|
Strudel Man posted:No, it doesn't. the iq formula used to be (mental age / chronological age) * 100. They changed it I guess.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:38 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:however i am still a beta to the people who are genius or almost genius Yes, I'm sure Chad with the broken tooth and backwards ball cap was almost genuis
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:38 |
|
ok the results made me laugh a lot thanks goons
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:39 |
|
im bad at math and logic
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:40 |
|
it's in the 140s, but again i can't emphasize enough how simple and dumb i am just like everyone else. when i was a young child, people used to marvel at it and call me "GENIUS!" and it was really upsetting having a high IQ doesn't mean you are wiser or more reliable or more trustworthy, it doesn't mean you have a perfect memory or whatever, it doesn't mean you are better than anyone in any way at all. it just means your brain can adapt and learn things in a very effective way, but it's not always a good thing there are plenty of people with high IQ's who are bad, who look like failures, who have simple pleb jobs, who are total stupid idiots like me
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:40 |
|
why dont you apply yourself more
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:41 |
|
Ocean Book posted:the iq formula used to be (mental age / chronological age) * 100. They changed it I guess. The mental age/chronological age can only reasonably apply to children, which makes sense, because it was a feature of the original Stanford-Binet intelligence scale, which was given to children to check for those who were mentally deficient. Strudel Man fucked around with this message at 20:43 on Aug 8, 2015 |
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:41 |
|
It all blends together for me. By several years I mean like 7 or 8 years.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:41 |
|
fyi i'm emotionally sensitive about this, it's tough to talk about, because i faced really nasty abusive bullying by people who thought i was privileged but it wasn't my fault
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:42 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Like a hundred years ago, yes. it really hasn't changed that much
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:42 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Like a hundred years ago, yes. I shamefully admit to not being up to date on numerical intelligence descriptor methodology
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:42 |
|
Commie NedFlanders posted:fyi i'm emotionally sensitive about this, it's tough to talk about, because i faced really nasty abusive bullying by people who thought i was privileged but it wasn't my fault then seriously dont talk about it in gbs because this is a no-holds-barred arena of comedy misanthropy
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:43 |
|
Why is there no "goku" or "I'm gay" choice in the poll? This is bullshit. Also, there's only one IQ and it is the number "oval office". There's no reason to know what it is unless you want to join MENSA... but really if you want to join a club for cunts then you yourself are also a oval office.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:44 |
|
i was told 135-140 or whatever as a child but that hasn't been reflected in my life at all because i am dumb and idiot gay
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:45 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:then seriously dont talk about it in gbs because this is a no-holds-barred arena of comedy misanthropy that's because it doesn't mean poo poo. It was given to children to see how smart they could be. All the best scores came from rich children, who had a parent or someone else to teach them things
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:46 |
|
Thank u
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:46 |
|
I'm really, really, really really dumb.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:46 |
|
Minimalist Program posted:I'm really, really, really really dumb. I'm not gonna argue
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:47 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:why dont you apply yourself more i get ahead of myself (a terrible problem for people with higher than average IQ's) and my emotional development isn't special or advanced so i face a lot of difficulties feeling like my brain is pushing me towards things but i'm not emotionally mature enough to handle the load of responsibilities and such i've been trying to buckle down and focus on the basics, like a PreAP kid who is too excited and eager about getting a new math concept who rushes into it and forgets to follow the little seemingly stupid redundant steps which are really necessary. i'm currently focusing on building up my grounding and base of firm values and stuff. having a heavy brain is not good when your foundation is weak.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:47 |
|
Ocean Book posted:I shamefully admit to not being up to date on numerical intelligence descriptor methodology
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:47 |
|
i read on the bbc smoking a ton of weed as an adolescent lowers your iq
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:48 |
|
Never took an IQ test but the idea of trying to measure a humans intelligence through a pen and paper test seems loving retarded.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:48 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:then seriously dont talk about it in gbs because this is a no-holds-barred arena of comedy misanthropy you're right, i've been thunderdomed already, i can handle it
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:49 |
|
Frog Act posted:i read on the bbc smoking a ton of weed as an adolescent lowers your iq sure as poo poo doesn't help as an adult
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:49 |
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:I'm not gonna argue Thank you, that is kind, seeing as how my extremely dumb brain cannot handle argument and I just respond to logic with anger, frustration and grunting.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:50 |
|
Frog Act posted:i read on the bbc smoking a ton of weed as an adolescent lowers your iq i believe weed is not good for the developing adolescent brain. weed is great and all but adolescents should not be using it. i've told kids to not use drugs using chinese foot binding as a metaphor for it's harmful effects. wrapping your feet tightly is rather benign and if you are an adult it won't hurt you, but putting that pressure on your developmental process causes deformity.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:51 |
|
It has pretty good test retest reliability because everytime I take it I get 143.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:51 |
|
Minimalist Program posted:Thank you, that is kind, seeing as how my extremely dumb brain cannot handle argument and I just respond to logic with anger, frustration and grunting. You use a lot of big words for a dumb person
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:51 |
|
I Am A Robot posted:It has pretty good test retest reliability because everytime I take it I get 143. yes, but reliability is not validity
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:51 |
|
148.8
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:52 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 01:16 |
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:You use a lot of big words for a dumb person Yes, but I don't know what any of those words mean.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2015 20:53 |