|
Trank was a virulent anti gamergate disciple. If you sew seeds of mediocrity, expect a harvest of reckoning.
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 05:24 |
|
|
osietra posted:Trank was a virulent anti gamergate disciple. wut
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 23:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 23:53
|
|
|
osietra posted:Trank was a virulent anti gamergate disciple. are you pro gamergate then?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
Moola posted:are you pro gamergate then? only assholes are pro gamergate. so maybe?
|
|
#
?
Aug 9, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
which one is the one where i think that gamers are lame cucked manchildren? im that one
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
shiksa posted:which one is the one where i think that gamers are lame cucked manchildren? thats doom dude. no one cares anymore
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Gatekeeper posted:the man who made 'the frighteners' was obviously allowed to do whatever he wanted Frighteners is one of my pet favorites but it's not that great. Heavenly Creatures though is legit good, and probably way better than anything Kevin Smith is capable of. e: I guess I skipped over something somewhere what the hell is a trank
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
King Vidiot posted:Frighteners is one of my pet favorites but it's not that great. take it back 
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
The guy who "directed" ff
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
but yes heavenly creatures was a very good movie, was it also based on a comic book?
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
I don't know but I loved the frighteners comic and also the tusk comic, such good comics books
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
the tusk comic was mostly just pictures of kevin smith but his wife took them and doodled tusks and whiskers onto his face as a fatass walrus joke but it was really some compelling poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:It was a bad movie that wasn't Reynolds fault Not being the reason it sucks isn't exactly the same as bringing something extra to the role. Reynolds doesn't bring anything to the table. I figure he must just be a really charming guy in real life. Xmen for instance, they can write pretty much any old poo poo for a script and as long as Hugh Jackman plays Wolverine it's going to have a following.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
ZombieParts posted:Not being the reason it sucks isn't exactly the same as bringing something extra to the role. Reynolds doesn't bring anything to the table. I figure he must just be a really charming guy in real life. Xmen for instance, they can write pretty much any old poo poo for a script and as long as Hugh Jackman plays Wolverine it's going to have a following. Green lantern was a lame concept because the villains were lame and the ancillary characters were boring.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
ZombieParts posted:Not being the reason it sucks isn't exactly the same as bringing something extra to the role. Reynolds doesn't bring anything to the table. I figure he must just be a really charming guy in real life. Xmen for instance, they can write pretty much any old poo poo for a script and as long as Hugh Jackman plays Wolverine it's going to have a following. I see what you mean, X-men 3 was a great acted movie. No it wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
osietra posted:Trank was a virulent anti gamergate disciple. osietra posted:Countries with low internet speeds have a higher occurrence of rapes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:11
|
|
|
Are Reynolds and Affleck the only two who have starred in movies from both companies? Surprised there isn't some blackballing going on. Also re: Daredevil being worst, have you guys never seen Elektra?
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
Scaramouche posted:Are Reynolds and Affleck the only two who have starred in movies from both companies? Surprised there isn't some blackballing going on. she's a hot greek woman. Don't take your time or she'll look like baba yaga
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
yeah dude seems like a oval office
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
Moola posted:yeah dude seems like a oval office I think he hates fun
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
osietra posted:Trank was a virulent anti gamergate disciple. trash person spotted
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Scaramouche posted:Are Reynolds and Affleck the only two who have starred in movies from both companies? Surprised there isn't some blackballing going on. Not sure if you mean marvel and DC, or marvel\disney and fox\fox? Either way the pretty white dude with mild charm and wit who is captain America also played the first torch guy from FF.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:39
|
|
|
Scaramouche posted:Also re: Daredevil being worst, have you guys never seen Elektra? Ah yeah Elektra. I can't remember anything good about that movie. Even the fight scenes were really abrupt and dull.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Arian_Samurai posted:Ah yeah Elektra. I can't remember anything good about that movie. Even the fight scenes were really abrupt and dull. she did look good in leather tho
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
Sazabi posted:Not sure if you mean marvel and DC, or marvel\disney and fox\fox? Either way the pretty white dude with mild charm and wit who is captain America also played the first torch guy from FF. Yeah Marvel and DC regardless of production company, which makes Captain America/Torch single company by that definition.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:she did look good in leather tho Ah yeah that was pretty cool. They got Bob Sapp to play an assassin in that movie, so you'd think he'd do some kickboxing or wrestling moves, but Jennifer Garner just drops a tree on him and he turns into dust. What the heck!!??!
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Question for the armchair copyright lawyers: Is the pre-Fantastic Four human torch a legally distinct character from the F4 Human Torch?
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Question for the armchair copyright lawyers: Marvel owns both, so it really doesn't matter.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 04:11
|
|
|
Applewhite posted:Question for the armchair copyright lawyers: Supposedly. In fact, there's a brief cameo appearance of pre-Fantastic Four Human Torch android as one of Stark's projects in the World's Fair exhibition in Captain America. Although I'm sure it'll be like one of those things like Captain Marvel, where there can be a flying, flaming android but you better not call him the Human Torch anywhere in the movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
Gatekeeper posted:but yes heavenly creatures was a very good movie, was it also based on a comic book? It was based on real life.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
Scaramouche posted:Are Reynolds and Affleck the only two who have starred in movies from both companies? Surprised there isn't some blackballing going on. the worst comic book movie is catwoman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 06:25
|
|
|
Looks like they hit rock bottom.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 06:28
|
|
|
what happened to your rock penis, ben
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 06:32
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:what happened to your rock penis, ben no penis = body horror. or something. but i like david cronenbergs body horror better.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
Say Nothing posted:Looks like they hit rock bottom. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
Red Letter Media just brought out their F4 review, they pretty much say what you'd expect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ol2rzuRDAE Does anyone else pronounce "Fant4stic" as "fant-four-stic" or is that just me?
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 09:50
|
|
|
Thing doesn't have a thing? No rock cock? "BULLSHIT." - Penn Teller
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 09:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 05:24 |
|
|
Mumpy Puffinz posted:Marvel owns both, so it really doesn't matter. Well it would from a movie making perspective because Fox might only own the rights to one.
|
|
#
?
Aug 10, 2015 09:57
|
|