|
Lesnar giving the audience the finger for WWE was a great touch imho.
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 23:29 |
|
|
Taker used to be cool and good - but now he's over 50 but looks like 70 and has to cheat and hit people in the junk to have a chance. This writing stinks and it's worse than Flair or Hogan in their twilight days.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
That was a dumb finish but I legitimately want to see them at 32 now
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
DynamiteKidd posted:Perhaps he is the safest worker to ever break a dude's neck in two?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
Hammerstein posted:Taker used to be cool and good - but now he's over 50 but looks like 70 and has to cheat and hit people in the junk to have a chance. This writing stinks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
purkey posted:Any taker that talks is the worst taker. Throat slit, eye roll, choke slam and tombstone were all he should ever have done Ministry Taker was bad because he had become the Big Show in that he was fat and averse to trying at all
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
dsriggs posted:Let's go along with kayfabe & say that the timekeeper rang the bell because he saw Taker tap. I think if this comes up, it'll be about Heyman pointing out the tap
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:That was a dumb finish but I legitimately want to see them at 32 now I agree I want to see a match where both participants are 32
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
hahahaha how does WWE not know how to loving book endings while NXT nails it edit: also I toxxed that the undertaker would lose so gently caress
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
sonicice posted:I think that was supposed to be nothing more than a Dusty tribute that they didn't think all the way through. loving weird though and sucks that it had to go down that way. Paying tribute to Dusty Rhodes by doing a Dusty finish is like paying tribute to Elvis by having a heart attack on the toilet
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
You could set your watch to that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
Ralphis posted:You're right. At least getting the BJ doesn't cost me $9.99 All depends, did you go to dinner first?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
A KANE RUN-IN WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECTLY SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE AND LED TO SOME NEAT BOOKING FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS THAT'S THE CRAZIEST PART ABOUT THIS
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
oatgan posted:that wasn't like a mistake or a botch though. That spot went down exactly as the two workers involved set it up to Oh we're still on the insane "Holly sandbagged him he deserves it" line, as if it would make any sense to assume that Brock Lesnar wouldn't be able to actually lift you up unassisted
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
abraham linksys posted:A KANE RUN-IN WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECTLY SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE AND LED TO SOME NEAT BOOKING FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
abraham linksys posted:A KANE RUN-IN WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECTLY SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE AND LED TO SOME NEAT BOOKING FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS I don't think I agree.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
That Jon Stewart heel turn makes a lot more sense now...
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
ParanoidInc posted:hahahaha how does WWE not know how to loving book endings while NXT nails it NXT doesn't need to setup matches at PPV's 9 months down the road with two legends....
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
sonicice posted:I think that was supposed to be nothing more than a Dusty tribute that they didn't think all the way through. loving weird though and sucks that it had to go down that way. nah, i think they just wanted to make a finish that could lead to a rubber match at mania where both guys aren't technically coming off a loss
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
abraham linksys posted:A KANE RUN-IN WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECTLY SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE AND LED TO SOME NEAT BOOKING FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS Kane blows. Not as much as Stardust but he blows for sure
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
DrVenkman posted:No the problem is that it's a finish that relies on a replay to work. They cause the confusion, and then they show you that actually yes he tapped out. yeah, well also imagine if everyone actually did see the tap the first tiem, there woulda been big pops and a reason for lesnar to let go and the bell ringing might of made more sense. But no we missed yet another move thanks to bad directing. I mean Paul saying "WE ALL SAW IT" when actually we didnt see poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Ralphis posted:You're right. At least getting the BJ doesn't cost me $9.99 I would be freshly alarmed again if it did!
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Speedboat Jones posted:I want the Undertaker I watched as a kid to save me from the Undertaker I'm watching now. This was in no way Undertakers fault(to my knowledge) this was entirely booking.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
DynamiteKidd posted:Ministry Taker was bad because he had become the Big Show in that he was fat and averse to trying at all I can't really hate that taker because hower power taker will always be the funniest taker
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Hammerstein posted:Taker used to be cool and good - but now he's over 50 but looks like 70 and wrestles like he's 40
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
tomorrow is vince's birthday. happy birthday vince.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:nah, i think they just wanted to make a finish that could lead to a rubber match at mania where both guys aren't technically coming off a loss Well they are, because the Undertaker tapped out like a bitch
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:Kane blows. Not as much as Stardust but he blows for sure The one loving thing I honestly believe Kane could still do is one last MASK-ON FEUD with the Undertaker
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Shoenin posted:This was in no way Undertakers fault(to my knowledge) Taker can say no
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Undertaker made me wish Kane was wrestling instead which is really something.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
You know in real sports it doesn't matter if the referee sees it because they're not the story.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
dsriggs posted:Let's go along with kayfabe & say that the timekeeper rang the bell because he saw Taker tap. Guessing WWE will go with "timekeeper saw Taker tap on the Tron" since a camera was pointed right at it for the replay
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
It would be pretty funny if they finally got Dunn fired for being a poo poo director.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Yo how come they don't make undertaker all deathly pale like all them years ago? It would serve him better than eye make up and JUST FOR MEN THINNING HAIR.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Marquis de Pyro posted:Well they are, because the Undertaker tapped out like a bitch the fact that they found a way to have BOTH competitors in a match tap out takes parity booking to a whole new lovely level
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Speedboat Jones posted:I want the Undertaker I watched as a kid to save me from the Undertaker I'm watching now. I've only recently gotten into wrestling, so I've no Undertaker that I watched as a kid to go crying to.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
nooneofconsequence posted:You know in real sports it doesn't matter if the referee sees it because they're not the story. Have you never watched an NBA game?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 23:29 |
|
|
Imagine how mad you would be if you subbed to the network or bought a $300 ticket to that show solely for Taker/Brock How could anyone walk away from that ending satisfied
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 04:00
|
|
