|
toanoradian posted:I don't know where they get that 10%. The highest prediction of ISIS members is [url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/war-with-isis-islamic-militants-have-army-of-200000-claims-kurdish-leader-9863418.html]200,000[/spoiler], which is roughly 0.01% of Muslims worldwide. Al-Qaeda has less than 100 thousand, so it is still far away from 10%. Ask the average American which country do they think has the most Muslims and that'd explain it.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 05:15 |
|
toanoradian posted:I don't know where they get that 10%. The highest prediction of ISIS members is 200,000, which is roughly 0.01% of Muslims worldwide. Al-Qaeda has less than 100 thousand, so it is still far away from 10%. Next time somebody asks where the moderate muslims are, just point to the Kurdish forces kicking the poo poo out of IS. Hell, there's a reason IS has started to move South and attack more Iraqi targets: because they were getting their asses handed to them in the North.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:19 |
|
Thump! posted:Giving guns to PTSD addled vets is a sure fire solution, just ask Chris Kyle. "I can cure them, with loud combat-like noises" - Chris Kyle's last words.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:35 |
|
Often the argument is that Muslims should be profiled because "all terrorists are Muslims" which I guess is just like buying a bag of M&Ms and throwing them away instead of eating them, because they look like poisoned M&Ms would.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:37 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Ask the average American which country do they think has the most Muslims and that'd explain it. Is it Indonesia?
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:39 |
|
PhazonLink posted:Is it Indonesia? It is, but most Americans would probably say Iraq or Iran.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:50 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Under the Obama deal, over the next decade, it's predicted that they'll be ten years closer to having a nuclear bomb How could that even be quantified.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:57 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Under the Obama deal, over the next decade, it's predicted that they'll be ten years closer to having a nuclear bomb Any day now.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 17:58 |
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:How could that even be quantified. If you read it a few times you'll realize that the number of years in a decade can be quantified quite easily.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 18:42 |
|
Defenestration posted:
This one seems like a good starting point to talk about support networks for veterans returning to a country they've been away from for years and using immigrant communities as a model to get them started in civilian life but oh well close the borders kill all mexicans etc.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:06 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Under the Obama deal, over the next decade, it's predicted that they'll be ten years closer to having a nuclear bomb Predicted by who?
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:08 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:This one seems like a good starting point to talk about support networks for veterans returning to a country they've been away from for years and using immigrant communities as a model to get them started in civilian life but oh well close the borders kill all mexicans etc. actually this one makes sense if you interpret it as a bumpkin walking down a city street who sincerely believes every homeless panhandler who asks "can you help out a vet"
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:09 |
|
socialsecurity posted:Predicted by who? People who only care about nuclear proliferation when it happens to countries that dislike Israel
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:17 |
|
Seems like you both missed the joke.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:29 |
|
^^Add a third to that then.Dr. Arbitrary posted:Under the Obama deal, over the next decade, it's predicted that they'll be ten years closer to having a nuclear bomb Can you tell me how you got this conclusion? Because it seems mighty hard to do that when you restrict the amount of nuclear material and its associated tech a country can use.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:31 |
|
i have never done that ever
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:31 |
|
SSNeoman posted:^^Add a third to that then. In ten years Iran will be ten years closer to nuclear weapons...
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:33 |
|
Scruff McGruff posted:In ten years Iran will be ten years closer to nuclear weapons... Oh
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 19:33 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:actually this one makes sense if you interpret it as a bumpkin walking down a city street who sincerely believes every homeless panhandler who asks "can you help out a vet" Do you mean to say some of those cardboard signs may have been LYING! I don't have figures, but I'm pretty sure illegal immigrants have high rates of homelessness. After all, they are guys with no prospects in their home country coming over with the clothes on their back and maybe some meager savings, if they didn't spend it all on a people-smuggler. If they get into trouble they have *no* backup. An injury or illness could easily put them on the streets. Tickets back home are costly, and they might not be able to go back.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 20:10 |
|
Interestingly, it actually more than pays for itself to get homeless vets off the streets when you consider the medical costs associated with homelessness. I suspect that it'd be a similar value for non-veteran homeless. Obviously, fiscally responsible politicians are chomping at the bit to get in on this.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 20:18 |
|
Not email related but my teabagger mother is on the phone bitching about how "real life isn't like Leave it to Beaver! and the "Real War on Women!" as well as the Oregon shooting thing.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 21:04 |
|
Would anyone like to see Fox News attempt to perform a character assassination on that clock kid? It's . . . surreal. http://video.foxnews.com/v/4520515914001/boy-arrested-for-clock-had-prior-suspensions/#sp=show-clips
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 21:11 |
|
Play posted:Would anyone like to see Fox News attempt to perform a character assassination on that clock kid? It's . . . surreal. This bit on Last Week Tonight was pretty amazing in the Fox bullshitting department. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umqvYhb3wf4&t=112s
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 21:32 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:Your response reminded me to lookup an old favorite:
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 21:37 |
|
borkencode posted:Hey it's this old small government plan again. A couple years ago, there was someone in this very thread who did some math and figured out it would cost about half as much to give every single school-aged child healthcare coverage than it would be to hire former soldiers to patrol schools. It would also have the benefit of saving more lives once you figure in the number of children that die every year from lack of coverage. I posted up the math and such on Facebook and got someone who honestly said "What about the veterans though?"
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 21:43 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Interestingly, it actually more than pays for itself to get homeless vets off the streets when you consider the medical costs associated with homelessness. Anyone have the study that showed, long-term, one of the most cost-effective ways to reducing homelessness and the societal costs that comes from it was just to provide the homeless with houses at government expense?
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 22:54 |
|
Back to back posts. I especially like the metro one. I broke my vow never to engage this guy again and replied back with quote:If this were truly analogous instead of saying "we're investigating to find out why this happened and implement new safety equipment and procedures to try and help prevent it again" which is basically what they're doing, it would say "Look, there's no point in investigating or trying to prevent this in the future, if a train is going to catch fire then it's going to find a way to catch fire and there's nothing we can do about it so we're just going to keep the trains the way they are."
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 23:11 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:If you read it a few times you'll realize that the number of years in a decade can be quantified quite easily. Dammit.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 23:20 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Interestingly, it actually more than pays for itself to get homeless vets off the streets when you consider the medical costs associated with homelessness. To be fair, some have. The rest are still freaking out at the notion of government just giving people stuff.
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 23:30 |
|
Matt Walsh just posted an article that it's fatherless kids that are causing all these school shootings and that's a thing I'm seeing getting shared
|
# ? Oct 5, 2015 23:50 |
|
Ban fatherless children.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 00:17 |
|
seiferguy posted:Matt Walsh just posted an article that it's fatherless kids that are causing all these school shootings and that's a thing I'm seeing getting shared I haven't seen any black mass shooters. Must have got his talking points mixed up.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 00:31 |
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:I haven't seen any black mass shooters. Must have got his talking points mixed up. Don't you know the Oregon guy is half black, so there you go. He isn't pure aryan, so therefore he is full negro
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 00:37 |
|
The Oregon's guy mixed racial background seems to be bringing out the Stormfront from one of my co-workers. He just linked me to this: http://racehist.blogspot.ca/2009/04/more-data-on-racial-mixing.html Which uses this: https://www.nlsinfo.org/investigator/pages/search.jsp to draw some really weird conclusions.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 01:31 |
|
BUBBA GAY DUDLEY posted:The guys who go in and shoot up a school and then shoot themselves only target gun free zones because they're afraid of getting shot. Good point!
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 01:58 |
|
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 02:54 |
|
Correct, he used a very dangerous mix of fertilizer, and the bombing prompted a shitload of regulation regarding who can get it. Hasn't happened since!
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 02:56 |
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:If you read it a few times you'll realize that the number of years in a decade can be quantified quite easily. I don't know; I got the joke, but doesn't that assume technological progress never goes backwards? Yes, I am deliberately overthinking this.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 03:08 |
|
Blarghalt posted:Correct, he used a very dangerous mix of fertilizer, and the bombing prompted a shitload of regulation regarding who can get it. Hasn't happened since! Yup! http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/02/nation/la-na-ammonium-nitrate-20110803
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 03:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 05:15 |
|
Actually, the fertilizer mix he used is pretty heavily regulated now. Anyone trying to buy bulk quantities of ANFO without a very good reason is going to set off alerts at every police department in a hundred-mile radius, and will shortly get a visit from some friendly men with the letters 'ATF' on their jackets. e: beaten
|
# ? Oct 6, 2015 03:33 |