|
I'm liking everything in this one.
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 18:05 |
|
|
Have you considered doing any perspective correction? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
The perspective is part of why it's a good picture in my humble opinion. vvv keep it exactly how it is! Beige fucked around with this message at 01:59 on Nov 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:Have you considered doing any perspective correction? I'm so so so so bad at it. I feel like every adjustment makes it look wonky. EDIT: Here is my attempt, in any case 
iSheep fucked around with this message at 02:04 on Nov 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:Have you considered doing any perspective correction? I'm not sure if that was a legitimate attempt because you just made everything look distorted as hell. Like, foreshortening is a thing, you're removing perspective by making everything straight. How does getting rid of that aspect of reality improve this photo Might as well make it completely isomorphic. Subyng fucked around with this message at 03:07 on Nov 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Subyng posted:I'm not sure if that was a legitimate attempt because you just made everything look distorted as hell. lol wut
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 04:22
|
|
|
Subyng posted:I'm not sure if that was a legitimate attempt because you just made everything look distorted as hell. How does correcting verticals on the side remove perspective in your wacky dimension?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:How does correcting verticals on the side remove perspective in your wacky dimension? Because when you look at the world with your eyes, all lines are subject to foreshortening. That is the perspective we view the world from. The perspective in this photo is "looking slightly upwards", which you intuitively know because of the converging verticals. Why not correct the horizontals too? Those drawings on the walls look like parallograms, and they are pointing downwards. We should straighten them so they look like rectangles because that's what they really are! Obviously you wouldn't do that because you know that drawings look crooked because you are viewing the wall at an angle and they are being subjected to foreshortening. But if you did then the whole photo would just look like if Picasso did photography and you would have removed all sense of depth. That's what I mean by removing perspective. Basically I don't think straightening the verticals helps the photo. You've changed the perspective from "looking slightly up" to "looking straight on" but why does that perspective need to be changed at all? I don't really see anything being enhanced by virtue of more straightness in this context other than a compulsive need for straightness. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Subyng posted:Because you don't understand art maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 06:47
|
|
|
Here, I fixed it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
Not nearly enough acceleration.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
The gently caress is the lens flare you scrub
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
Subyng posted:Because when you look at the world with your eyes, all lines are subject to foreshortening. That is the perspective we view the world from. The perspective in this photo is "looking slightly upwards", which you intuitively know because of the converging verticals. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 20:28
|
|
|
either you correct perspective, or you do not correct perspective, you will regret it both ways
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 21:39
|
|
|
Tony Two Bapes posted:either you correct perspective, or you do not correct perspective, you will regret it both ways this guy has the correct perspective
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
 lucas "portrait" of ansel autisms
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
a cyberpunk goose fucked around with this message at 23:58 on Nov 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 23:49
|
|
|
Subyng posted:Because when you look at the world with your eyes, all lines are subject to foreshortening. That is the perspective we view the world from. The perspective in this photo is "looking slightly upwards", which you intuitively know because of the converging verticals. wha
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
FWIW I know I've been shooting too low and too wide with my subjects. Which is really bad when you are photographing a human. I just gotta push the focal length as much as I'm willing to go when working small spaces, and bring up the tripod to at least eye level. Or shoot medium format I guess.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
iSheep posted:
Just wanted to say thanks for this super simple but amazing tip. Can't believe how yellowy-green some of my skin tones looked before.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
Mido posted:
Im getting a "foreshortening" of the perspective of my pants
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 05:18
|
|
|
The portrait thread continues to be the opposite of the landscapes thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
some pretty warped perspectives in this thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Trying new things.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2015 17:33
|
|
|
^chuckled What I wrote makes perfect sense, if you don't understand how perspective works, I'm not making this the hill I die on lol
Subyng fucked around with this message at 01:12 on Nov 20, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
Subyng posted:What I wrote makes perfect sense, no offense but ur opinions are something awful lol get it
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
TomR posted:Trying new things. i am fond. RangerScum posted:no offense but ur opinions are something awful i'm not sure htat i get it
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
 Bill & Jordan by Steve V, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
Trying out stroboscopic stuff. Ares by Kyle Sonnenberg, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Nameless Dread posted:Trying out stroboscopic stuff. It makes my head hurt.... but I *really* like it. Oh my eyes 
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2015 10:30
|
|
|
Picked up photography after like 6 years off... teaching myself strobes and studio stuff. Wonder if anyones got any advice or anything they see horribly wrong with these VillageC_court-14-1 by patrick teff, on Flickr steve_guitar_-1 by patrick teff, on Flickr Dee and Jason -portraits-2 by patrick teff, on Flickr Marvis -portraits-3 by patrick teff, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2015 04:30
|
|
|
Taps posted:Picked up photography after like 6 years off... teaching myself strobes and studio stuff. Wonder if anyones got any advice or anything they see horribly wrong with these My first impression of this one was really good. I liked the composition, elements, and colors. Then I saw the backfill flash and I don't think it fits at all. The light back there is too white and too low. Maybe Photoshop the highlights to a gold or incandescent hue to blend it in a bit? Edit: Also I might suggest shooting at a higher f stop for multiple subjects like your second shot. The guy sitting 6 inches back from the woman is out of focus. Using f/8 or f/9 should help a ton. Judge Schnoopy fucked around with this message at 22:26 on Nov 25, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
The lighting is really unflattering. The hard shadows combined with the hair light create a tone that isn't really appropriate for a happy old lady. Plus that chair. Why is the chair there? The hair lights catching on it along with the pillars and the foreground chair are really distracting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2015 13:28
|
|
|
Yeah get rid of the hair light and balance the key light to be at or just above the room lights. The room being like 2 or 3 stops below the subject isn't doing that photo any favors.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
Starting the holiday shots already
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
Been photographing a lot of kids & families this fall www.kneerphoto.com by Nicholas Kneer, on Flickr www.kneerphoto.com by Nicholas Kneer, on Flickr www.kneerphoto.com by Nicholas Kneer, on Flickr www.kneerphoto.com by Nicholas Kneer, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
dakana posted:Been photographing a lot of kids & families this fall What kind of processing do you do for the eyes? This shot has some great colors, and anybody that can hit that kind of depth of field on a moving kid is always impressive
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2015 14:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 18:05 |
|
|
The first 3 are quite good. The thirds could really use more DoF, it's v shallow but it serves no purpose.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2015 16:20
|
|
