|
veto
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
KarmaticStylee posted:Agreed, I loved it! Great performance by both Owens & Ambrose and MOTYC in my opinion I'm backing this. It was a LMS match that Didn't Suck. Which is a spectacle in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
MOTY: The Rumble Match - Royal Rumble 2016
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Yeah
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
HM: Kevin Owens vs. Dean Ambrose - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble HM: THE Royal Rumble - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
HM: Royal Rumble match -- WWE Royal Rumble, 1/24
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
HM: THE Royal Rumble - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble They learnt from their mistakes, that's the biggest shock here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
Benne posted:HM: Royal Rumble match -- WWE Royal Rumble, 1/24 Yeah this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
Benne posted:HM: Royal Rumble match -- WWE Royal Rumble, 1/24 I'll third this. Solid improvement on the last couple of years
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:04
|
|
|
Matlock posted:MOTY: The Rumble Match - Royal Rumble 2016 it ruled and it cemented Triple H as their top babyface
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
Do not even ask posted:HM: THE Royal Rumble - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble I'll second that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Do not even ask posted:HM: Kevin Owens vs. Dean Ambrose - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble Both of these, yup. I thought about MOTY for KO/Ambrose but the build/stakes wasn't quite there and the wrestling itself wasn't good enough to carry it to MOTY. Really loving good show though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Benne posted:HM: Royal Rumble match -- WWE Royal Rumble, 1/24 HM seems right. Two HMs and no stinkers, that makes this a high class PPV for the WWE
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Benne posted:HM: Royal Rumble match -- WWE Royal Rumble, 1/24 Yeah, lets play a game or whatever
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
Mukaikubo posted:HM: Kevin Owens vs. Dean Ambrose - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble Agreed, great match but it didn't have the extra oomph to push it over to MOTYC territory.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
HM is pretty much the right spot for the Rumble IMO. I had a few nagging issues with it (why is Jericho getting the iron man spot in 2016?) but overall it was a big improvement on the last few years, and even HHH winning told a logical story. Big thumbs up.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
I must be getting bitter/incredibly tired of WWE because I didn't have anything above ***3/4 tonight's show. I thought Ambrose/Owens and the Rumble were very good, but not at the level where I'd tell someone to seek it out as a MOTYC or even a Honorable Mention. I thought the crowd and even commentary did a good job trying to get AJ over, but only having him eliminate 2 people and have him eliminated relatively early really sucked me out of the match. I felt the ending made up for it, but I guess I'm missing something from this show.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 06:41
|
|
|
HM: Royal Rumble - This is the best rumble of the 2010's by far MOTY: Owens vs. Ambrose
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 07:06
|
|
|
NotQuiteQuentin posted:I must be getting bitter/incredibly tired of WWE because I didn't have anything above ***3/4 tonight's show. I thought Ambrose/Owens and the Rumble were very good, but not at the level where I'd tell someone to seek it out as a MOTYC or even a Honorable Mention. I thought the crowd and even commentary did a good job trying to get AJ over, but only having him eliminate 2 people and have him eliminated relatively early really sucked me out of the match. I felt the ending made up for it, but I guess I'm missing something from this show. Nah this is about right, nothing was above "good". RR was hurt by camera being glued to Roman Reigns and booking decisions regarding AJ/Reigns/Lesnar/none of the interference making any drat sense/Jericho's lame duck elimination/flat finish. Owens/Ambrose was two guys having a fun gimmick brawl with no particular emotion and some pacing issues. Tonfa fucked around with this message at 07:12 on Jan 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 07:06
|
|
|
Tonfa posted:Nah this is about right, nothing was above "good". RR was hurt by camera being glued to Roman Reigns and booking decisions regarding AJ/Reigns/Lesnar/none of the interference making any drat sense/Jericho's lame duck elimination/flat finish. Owens/Ambrose was two guys having a fun gimmick brawl with no particular emotion and some pacing issues. The Rumbe had some fun moments, but strange booking of Styles, Jericho having no direction, HHH doesn't need to be Champ [at 46yrs old] to feud with Reigns, and Lesnar feuding with the Wyatts is pretty drat underwhelming. Maybe it was my own self-hype that let me down expecting to see a Daniel Bryan or Taker or Rock - or just really shake up the direction since it's pretty drat clear Reigns isn't working. Still, all that said, this was better than the last 2 years! I'll give it that. The Owens/Ambrose match was a HM for me for those similar reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 08:02
|
|
|
NotQuiteQuentin posted:HM: Jimmy Susumu/Ryo "Jimmy" Saito/Genki Horiguchi H.A.Gee!!Mee!!/Jimmy Kanda vs Shingo Takagi/Naruki Doi/YAMATO/Kotoka - Dragon Gate Open the New Year Gate in Kobe - 1/11 3rding the HM on this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 11:13
|
|
|
Do not even ask posted:HM: Kevin Owens vs. Dean Ambrose - 1/24 WWE Royal Rumble Agreed on both counts
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 12:23
|
|
|
i'll n'th the royal rumble match itself as an HM. one of the best rumble matches they've ever put on, but it's hard for me to classify a battle royal as a match of the year, even if it was well booked and executed as this was.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 12:26
|
|
|
HM: Owens v. Ambrose MOTY: ROYAL RUMBLE
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
HM: Royal Rumble This is probably the best rumble match since 2004 imo. The last few have been awful and always involved a faction eliminating half the participents before they had a chance to throw a punch. They did well with the Wyatts to ensure this didn't happen again. The only thing that seemed strange to me is that the Wyatts re-entered to eliminate Brock; but when Brock was eliminated I was expecting him to get back in himself and take out the then defenceless Bray Wyatt.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
Manic X posted:HM: Royal Rumble
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
No I don't mean it was strange for the Wyatts to re-enter; it was strange for Brock to not get back in and eliminate Bray.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
What I found weird was why Brock's elimination was considered valid, as the Wyatts who eliminated him were themselves already out of the match. If eliminated people can still eliminate others and have it count, then why even head to the back? I assume Heyman will voice some complaints about this.NotQuiteQuentin posted:I must be getting bitter/incredibly tired of WWE because I didn't have anything above ***3/4 tonight's show. I thought Ambrose/Owens and the Rumble were very good, but not at the level where I'd tell someone to seek it out as a MOTYC or even a Honorable Mention. This isn't being bitter, it's just seeing things for how they are. Compared to other wrestling (operative phrase here, as most only watch WWE), the Rumble is an above average show that more or less did what it needed to without screwing up colossally. Yes, that is a big leap forward from last year's Rumble, which would've won Worst Show were it not for the TripleMania trainwreck (that few people saw), but at the end of the day jumping from the negatives into the middle still leaves it in the middle. It shouldn't merit massive praise, but as Jericho noted in his 1999 WWF debut, people have accepted mediocrity as excellence. (In 2016, I'm less certain of the "Jericho is excellence" follow-up compared to back then.) Thauros posted:MOTYC - Dragon Lee vs. Kamaitachi - NJPW/CMLL Fantasticamania - 1/24 oatgan posted:MOTYC: Zack Sabre Jr and Sami Callihan vs Tommy End and Chris Hero - Evolve 53 1/23 Nth to both of these even though they don't need any more votes because I know some people look at that HM/MOTY vote count when deciding what to rewatch come year's end. Daryl Surat fucked around with this message at 22:54 on Jan 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2016 22:52
|
|
Daryl Surat posted:What I found weird was why Brock's elimination was considered valid, as the Wyatts who eliminated him were themselves already out of the match. If eliminated people can still eliminate others and have it count, then why even head to the back?
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
HM- AJ Styles vs. Chris "Lionheart" Jericho - WWE Monday Night Raw 1/25/2016
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 03:19
|
|
|
MOTY: That Rock promo from Raw tonight
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 04:19
|
|
|
Zyla posted:HM- AJ Styles vs. Chris "Lionheart" Jericho - WWE Monday Night Raw 1/25/2016 2nd
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
Zyla posted:HM- AJ Styles vs. Chris "Lionheart" Jericho - WWE Monday Night Raw 1/25/2016 yes
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
second
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
Super No Vacancy posted:second You can't veto your own veto.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
How was that AJ/Jericho match nearly the match of the year?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 05:46
|
|
|
all you people saying AJ/Jericho for HM are absolutely loving nuts I think the same about people who are giving MOTYC to the RR but at least that has some level of an argument for it (although saying it's a better match than any of the WK10 contenders or pretty much anything going on in the UK is really weird to me), AJ/Jericho was just a good, well-executed raw match with no real storytelling or psychology in it besides "wow, this AJ guy is real good, and a vet who can counter moves"
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
i think a lot of people over the last 48 hours have forgotten the difference between "very good so check it out (3.5-4 stars imo)," "great and you need to see this (4-4.5 stars)," "this might have been the match of the year so got out of your way to see it (4.75-5)." other than the historical note that it was aj styles' first singles match in wwe, it's not going to be something that people are going raving about in ten months. he's already had matches earlier this month that were exponentially and empirically better.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
I can tell you right now there are plenty of HM in the last thread that I do not remember.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 00:33 |
|
|
mfcrocker posted:MOTY: That Rock promo from Raw tonight can we have a promo of the year competition
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2016 06:57
|
|
