|
Can't judge QB because weaponz. Can't judge QB because oline. Can't judge QB because poo poo playcalling.
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
Joey needs weapons.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
Is the day after the Super Bowl too early to bet on who will win the next one? Of course not:pre:Odds to win Super Bowl LI: Seattle 8-1 New England 8-1 Pittsburgh 8-1 Green Bay 10-1 Arizona 10-1 Carolina 10-1 Cincinnati 14-1 Denver 14-1 Dallas 16-1 Minnesota 20-1 Indianapolis 20-1 Kansas City 20-1 NY Jets 30-1 Buffalo 30-1 Baltimore 30-1 Atlanta 40-1 Houston 40-1 NY Giants 40-1 Washington 40-1 Chicago 40-1 Detroit 40-1 New Orleans 40-1 Philadelphia 50-1 Tampa Bay 50-1 Los Angeles 50-1 Miami 50-1 Tennessee 50-1 Jacksonville 50-1 Oakland 50-1 San Diego 50-1 San Fran 60-1 Cleveland 200-1
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Oh come on, is Cleveland THAT much worse than every other team?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
fsif posted:Oh come on, is Cleveland THAT much worse than every other team?  Looks like it. That poo poo cracked me up. Sorry Browns.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
True he played with cardboard cutouts, a shame really. But next time he will be good, I am sure.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
fsif posted:Oh come on, is Cleveland THAT much worse than every other team? They're in a very tough division which means they'd probably need a wild card slot for the post season, which is hard to get because they're in a very tough division. Then add in that they're in a very tough conference (half of all Super Bowls have either the Broncos, Steelers, or Pats as the AFC slot). Then add in the uncertainty regarding their coaching staff. Then add in their historic failures.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
More importantly: 30/1 Buffalo? The gently caress? They apparently have a better chance of winning than the GIANTS?!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Oakland's a value bet is what I get out of that. I mean it probably won't happen but I could see them over a lot of teams with better odds.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Jacksonville and Oakland at 50-1 are both nice value bets
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:More importantly: 30/1 Buffalo? The gently caress? I mean, I like their chances better than the Giants. They certainly have a more complete team.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
I don't know what a "Jeff Howe" is but Dante Scarnecchia unretiring to rejoin pats according to that
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Is the day after the Super Bowl too early to bet on who will win the next one? Of course not: So you're saying there's a chance
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:More importantly: 30/1 Buffalo? The gently caress? they just let their coach go. Usually takes a couple years for the ball to get rolling
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Butts posted:they just let their coach go. Usually takes a couple years for the ball to get rolling yeah but Denver just won the superbowl
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:More importantly: 30/1 Buffalo? The gently caress? The Giants are poop, yo We got a good 35 year old QB and a stud WR a decent corner and then our last player worth a drat has 8 fingers
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
Will Roman Numerals be back for the Super Bowl?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Will Roman Numerals be back for the Super Bowl? Yeah they specifically dropped it for L. They claim it was to make 50 special but they're lying.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
It's actually because Meek Mill took all the Ls.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Yeah they specifically dropped it for L. They claim it was to make 50 special but they're lying. L would have been a bitch to make look cool stylistically.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:L would have been a bitch to make look cool stylistically. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:L would have been a bitch to make look cool stylistically. It's not like the NFL cares about stylistic looks anymore ever since they moved to the standardized Super Bowl logo
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:Aw dammit, Shady was in my hood and I didn't even see him. Thas right. u didnt see nothin bitch
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
I'm super depressed about Marshawn Lynch retiring, I understand why and it's probably better to quit when you're still mostly healthy, but it's still sad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
The best WR sam bradford has ever had was like a half year of Brandon Lloyd and he was only good for one year in denver
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
maybe bradford's receivers aren't good because its hard to develop wr talent when the qb is a garbage man. but you never know.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:52
|
|
|
Ozu posted:Can't judge QB because weaponz. You can and I judge him to be much better than the stats show. With a SINGLE receiver that can get open and not drop the loving ball 1/3 of the time bradford has a great season.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
Server lag somehow doubleposted, sorry ya'll
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
Sam Bradford is the human equivalent of fools gold. Fooling fans year after year for going on seven years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
I think they should make two rule changes and balance them out to maintain the competitive balance - they should expand the definition of a catch so that stuff like that Cotchery not-catch and other borderline examples err on the side of being catches, and they allow a little more contact by DBs to make up for the advantage the offense gets by getting more catches. This whole "what is a catch" thing that we do nearly every week is an embarrassment to the sport. Normal people think it's weird and inexplicable, and they're right. We need a rule change, and we need something to balance it out. I think my idea works.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:The best WR sam bradford has ever had was like a half year of Brandon Lloyd One of my friends was convinced Brandon Lloyd was an amazing receiver for his whole career for some reason. He also thought Nick Foles was the answer.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
gohuskies posted:allow a little more contact by DBs to make up for the advantage the offense gets by getting more catches. It's time to revert the 2004 Polian/Manning rule changes IMO
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
Make force outs catches again
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
NO.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Make force outs catches again Unlike Rex Ryan, I would be OK with just one foot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
Spiros posted:Server lag somehow doubleposted, sorry ya'll unacceptable, self ban plz
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 03:38
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Sam Bradford is the human equivalent of fools gold. Fooling fans year after year for going on seven years. The Jeff Fischer of QBs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:The Jeff Fischer of QBs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 04:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 21:04 |
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Is the day after the Super Bowl too early to bet on who will win the next one? Of course not: Cleveland being waaay last in that list is the most Cleveland thing Cleveland could do.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 04:45
|
|
