|
ethanol posted:ok fine your loving coeffecient of kinetic friction is 0.35 for the top and bottom of the lower bloack you loving oval office
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:07 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 16:36 |
|
It's a stupid machine and nobody is going to make that.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:07 |
|
ethanol posted:actually gently caress you use the variables assfuck this isn't some stupid loving homework problem just like life
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:07 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Okay, then the net force is 2.5 N, and the acceleration will be 5/6 m/s2 extremely wrong
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:09 |
|
I cast 7 at the darkness.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:09 |
|
*ties piece of string to hernia* *threads between legs and ties to end of dick* *marks each end with fingers and holds up to eyes* how long is a piece of string?!
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:10 |
|
ethanol posted:extremely wrong
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:13 |
|
That's easy, its over 9000.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:16 |
|
it's loving zero, nothing Is moving in the goddam picture
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:17 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Nuh-uh. We've got a normal force of 10 N for the top block, the friction of which essentially counts double; it acts to the right on the top block as it moves to the left, and by action-reaction, to the left on the lower block as it moves to the right. With a .35 coefficient of friction, that's 7 N of opposing force. Throw in an additional 30*.35 for the whole shebang against the floor, 10.5, and you've got 17.5 opposing the 20 N applied force, leaving 2.5 for acceleration. I'm sorry your wrong and retarded
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:18 |
|
ethanol posted:It's ok 80% of people have the math skills of an 8 year old, it's just amazing they all ended up here in this thread when it clearly says 'math wizards' only Well it's an easy mistake to make when the OP has the mental capacity of a 3 year old crack baby.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:19 |
|
ethanol posted:I'm sorry your wrong and retarded
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:20 |
|
Orkin Mang posted:*ties piece of string to hernia* woah, you just blew my mind
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:26 |
|
20
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:27 |
|
ethanol posted:It's ok 80% of people have the math skills of an 8 year old, it's just amazing they all ended up here in this thread when it clearly says 'math wizards' only I no read so good.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:30 |
|
What the hell is the gamma function anyway?
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:39 |
|
i know how to make good green chile
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:40 |
|
Strudel Man posted:This has not been demonstrated to my satisfaction. Ma = 1 Mb = 2, T = 20 N, uk = 0.35, g = 9.8 m/s^2 (added these here for your retardation) Ax = (T - (uk)(g)(3Ma + Mb))/(Ma+Mb) 9.8 stupid bitch ethanol fucked around with this message at 04:46 on Feb 28, 2016 |
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:42 |
|
BONGHITZ posted:What the hell is the gamma function anyway? I dunno man, that poo poo still confuses me.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:44 |
|
ethanol posted:Ma = 1 Mb = 2, T = 20 N, uk = 0.35, g = 9.8 m/s^2 (added these here for your retardation) lol where did u get those? from ur rear end because u were storing them up there because you enjoy the sexual pleasure of men! hahahaha OWNED you loving iDIOT!
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:48 |
|
Jukeboxblues posted:lol where did u get those? from ur rear end because u were storing them up there because you enjoy the sexual pleasure of men! hahahaha OWNED you loving iDIOT! please interpolate your posting
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:49 |
|
ethanol posted:Ma = 1 Mb = 2, T = 20 N, uk = 0.35, g = 9.8 m/s^2 (added these here for your retardation)
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:57 |
whozzat...? some pulleys? what a gay little contraption you've got 'ere guvner! quite a bellend of a problem, right 'ere. Might I suggest snogging my arse?
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:57 |
|
Strudel Man posted:That's the same thing I said. You just used 9.8 instead of 10 like a damned engineer or something. This is physics, man. No poo poo but you refused to write ur variables and instead posted a bunch of gibberish leaving me to test your value you immense human being
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 04:59 |
|
I don't know what bitchmade school taught you that 10 was an acceptable value for earth g
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:00 |
|
You think that's something, among the true masters c = 1.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:00 |
|
SirEvelynTremble posted:One newton is 9.8 metres per second per second acceleration
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:00 |
|
You misspelled 'meters.'
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:01 |
|
Strudel Man posted:You think that's something, among the true masters c = 1. You're making me mad
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:01 |
ethanol posted:I don't know what bitchmade school taught you that 10 was an acceptable value for earth g it is when in close proximity to your mom
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:01 |
Orkin Mang posted:*ties piece of string to hernia* Ask your mom how long my string is.
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:18 |
|
ethanol posted:please interpolate your posting the only thing interpolating around here is my dick going into the discreet data points that is ur rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:30 |
|
69
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:32 |
|
Jukeboxblues posted:the only thing interpolating around here is my dick going into the discreet data points that is ur rear end in a top hat 0<--------->1
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:34 |
|
The final solution is 1488
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:38 |
|
tuyop posted:Ask your mom how long my string is. she picked a piece of lint out of her naval and help it up to me on the tip of her finger with this look of disgust on her face
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:40 |
|
ethanol posted:I don't know what bitchmade school taught you that 10 was an acceptable value for earth g lol just lol if you don't use g=10 m/s2.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:46 |
|
BONGHITZ posted:What the hell is the gamma function anyway?
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 05:47 |
|
I mean i know what it is, but what IS IT?
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 06:41 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 16:36 |
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2016 07:15 |