|
Zephro posted:The firm you're thinking of is Trafigura. Not sure if they pioneered the idea or were just famous early adopters, though. They didn't pioneer the idea exactly, it had been used from the 19th century in blackmail and divorce cases, and there was precedent for its use to protect corporates in a tightly-defined and strictly time-limited way from disclosure of corporate information obtained illegally at the height of the insider-trading days of the eighties. What made Trafigura different was that it was a) ordered in perpetuity and b) to cover up illegal activity. The celebrity superinjunctions started in the eighties as an extension of the older blackmail precedent, to stop people selling stories to the press. The Sun were infamous for then just reporting the legal news of the writ being served on them by the celebrity, and someone (for some reason I want to say Noel Edmonds but I'm sure it's not right) succesfully argued that this was itself blackmail because the paper would earn money from it.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:42 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:37 |
|
Namtab posted:Peak tibfc
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:42 |
|
Namtab posted:I'm watching some show called news night and this BBC political editor doesn't seem very impartial Not watching but im going to take a wild stab at Laura 'Engineered a shadow cabinet ministers resignation live on air' Kuenessberg?
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:43 |
|
Yeah p. sure that's Laura Kronenbourg.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:46 |
|
Nah the woman on the giant touchscreen said he's a new guy. Then they had a Labour mp saying the party's needs to be less anti Tory and more pro Labour and not alienating the rich. Now they're doing more on the anti Semitic thing, and saying that the Jewish group that released that statement is not impartial.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:48 |
|
The inquiry needs more mainstream Jewish groups apparently.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:49 |
|
Three topics in, they're onto zac and his hate of the muslims. Pretty decent, albeit Tory, guy they've got here who's saying that its hardly dogwhistle politics if it's so overt. "You can't hear a dogwhistle". Ofc he's blaming the campaign team though. Namtab fucked around with this message at 22:52 on May 5, 2016 |
# ? May 5, 2016 22:50 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:Burnham's transition to the Manchester mayoralty looks like a great move for someone who's expecting an extended period of violent ugliness in the PLP and would like to be able to step in at the end with clean hands. I think he's got a lot of capital stored up from Hillsborough from taking the anger in 2009, setting up the panel and following it through to its conclusion.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:51 |
|
"We don't want socialist Jews. We want rich Jews. The Jewish elite that would be alienated by Corbyn's Labour and be prepared to slam him. Jewish landlords. Jewish bankers." - The Not Anti-Semitic Side
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:53 |
|
Andy Burnham is a good guy and you all hated him for no reason.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:53 |
|
Hoops posted:Andy Burnham is a good guy and you all hated him for no reason. He'll probably be a good mayor, but I don't think he's got enough conviction to be a Labour leader.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:54 |
|
Hoops posted:Andy Burnham is a good guy and you all hated him for no reason.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:56 |
Theo Bartram can be quite an interesting follow on twitter, having been a wonk for both Blair and Brown. He's quite honest about what is needed in terms of message discipline and spin. Here's something he wrote today about managing expectations: https://medium.com/@theobertram/they-didnt-win-bury-d603abe083b0#.4n39u45cc Thing is, Corbyn needs a few people like that on his team, just to do the stuff he and Seamus have no loving clue about. It's not pretty, it's not noble, but actually being Leader of the Opposition isn't at all the cosy bubble he's used to. John McDonnell seems to get this a lot better, I think.
|
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:56 |
|
Guavanaut posted:"We don't want socialist Jews. We want rich Jews. The Jewish elite that would be alienated by Corbyn's Labour and be prepared to slam him. Jewish landlords. Jewish bankers." - The Not Anti-Semitic Side "It's not a racist stereotype if it's true!" - somebody's dad, probably
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:57 |
|
Oh aye yeah I did forget about that admittedly. Edit: although if there is a single politician in the UK who I don't believe buys the sun, it is him.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:58 |
|
I retract my earlier statement
|
# ? May 5, 2016 22:59 |
|
Hoops posted:Andy Burnham is a good guy and you all hated him for no reason. he's really weird looking
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:03 |
|
Hoops posted:Oh aye yeah I did forget about that admittedly. That photo really made me sad, because for once I hoped his Hillsborough campaigning was more out of general "my loving friends died that day" conviction than the shrewd politicking he's known for. Also, Burnham once almost got sued for libel when he implied Shami Chakrabarti and David Davis MP were sleeping together because they both opposed 42-day detention.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:04 |
|
My biggest gripe with Burnham is that he's a political wind sock. Also that story about how when he tried to pitch an anti austerity message before running for leader Harriet Harman told him they couldn't do that because "We lost the election" and he just done a sad puppy face rather than point out that Labour were pushing for more austerity during the run up to the election.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:05 |
|
Jose posted:he's really weird looking Big Groucho Marx style eye brows
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:05 |
|
Jose posted:he's really weird looking He was born with a cleft palate.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:06 |
|
Hoops posted:Oh aye yeah I did forget about that admittedly. So he (maybe) doesnt buy it (which is a pitifully small gesture for a man of his political influence and is basically just a bare minimum PR move if true) but he will take the meaningful benefit of exposure in that national newspaper when it suits him. He's an opportunist without any evidence of posessing real conviction.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:06 |
|
Did you know about the smiley? Is this corbyn? I cant quite tell.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:06 |
|
Pissflaps posted:He was born with a cleft palate. i didn't know that but its not why i think he's weird looking. i think its just his eyes
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:07 |
|
Zero Gravitas posted:Did you know about the smiley? Is this corbyn? I cant quite tell. It's Corbyn vaporising the remnants of Labour's electoral success.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:08 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:My biggest gripe with Burnham is that he's a political wind sock. Also that story about how when he tried to pitch an anti austerity message before running for leader Harriet Harman told him they couldn't do that because "We lost the election" and he just done a sad puppy face rather than point out that Labour were pushing for more austerity during the run up to the election. Case in point: Hinchingbrooke Hospital. He couldn't move any faster to privatise it, despite the BMA, RCN, and the TUC begging him not to, but as soon as Labour lost office, he spun on a dime.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:10 |
|
TinTower posted:Case in point: Hinchingbrooke Hospital. He couldn't move fast enough to privatise it, despite the BMA, RCN, and the TUC begging him not to, but as soon as Labour lost office, he spun on a dime. aren't you a member of the lib dems?
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:11 |
|
TinTower posted:he implied Shami Chakrabarti and David Davis MP were sleeping together because they both opposed 42-day detention. Some people just can't believe that people support civil liberties for moral reasons rather than purely personal ones.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:15 |
|
Mods please rename the thread Votey McVoteface
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:17 |
|
sebzilla posted:Mods please rename the thread Votey McVoteface He's quite a good panellist. Isabel Oakeshott's voice has reached Dianne Abbott levels of patronising though. Edit: Hahaha, she's just given David Cameron's u-turn on child refugees as an example of how Britain "leads Europe" in being compassionate.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:18 |
|
https://twitter.com/UKGE2020/status/728351448543670272
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:41 |
|
This is bad for Corbyn.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:43 |
|
Depressing turnout through an aggressively negative campaign is Crosby 101. Starting to feel a little concerned about the mayoral election. The Conservatives keep using the same tactics, and they keep drawing blood. Labour's going to have to figure out how to Lynton-proof themselves pronto.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:44 |
|
Pissflaps posted:This is bad for Corbyn. I think UKIP doing well in elections in the middle of an EU referendum is not exactly something Corbyn or anyone else in Labour would be able to stop.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:50 |
|
Has not one person told Nikki Morgan to stop going . Kuensberg is licking her lips at the prospect of Labour getting a drubbing.
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:52 |
|
how strong were the tories in this ward to begin with? ukip progress isn't strange, but the tories really should be bleeding as well here
|
# ? May 5, 2016 23:57 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:how strong were the tories in this ward to begin with?
|
# ? May 6, 2016 00:02 |
|
yes, i know, but that's not what i asked
|
# ? May 6, 2016 00:04 |
|
67 Labour, 6 Con, pretty decisive in the end for Sunderland. Labour end up with 54% of vote, UKIP with 11%. Increase of 4% vote share for Labour since 2015 local elections.
|
# ? May 6, 2016 00:07 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:37 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:yes, i know, but that's not what i asked Also not what you asked but this is something that can be looked at as maybe vaguely hopeful https://twitter.com/liamyoung/status/728360371619303424
|
# ? May 6, 2016 00:08 |