|
Y'all hear about that Leslie Jones poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 11:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 22:14 |
|
|
She's Gwen Stacy in the new Spider-Man movie?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 11:47
|
|
|
Her stuff got hacked and is being released everywhere including personal pics, etc loving poo pooquote:For the second time in just more than a month, Ghostbusters and Saturday Night Live star Leslie Jones has been attacked online, with her personal website allegedly being hacked and now down.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 11:51
|
|
|
That CBR redesign looks fine, if generic. The old design was an eyesore and really poorly designed with poo poo all over the place, so anything's an improvement.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 13:31
|
|
|
But why would you ever go there if Comics Should Be Good is gone?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:00
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:But why would you ever go there if Comics Should Be Good is gone? I like that their frontpage headline type is so overly large, half of the titles end in "..." because there just isn't enough room. redbackground fucked around with this message at 14:22 on Aug 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:16
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:But why would you ever go there if Comics Should Be Good is gone? Just saying the design itself is fine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:That reference is like 6 weeks out of date. SynthOrange posted:Her stuff got hacked and is being released everywhere including personal pics, etc loving poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
Saw a screencap of the page, seems like alt-right hacker revenge for Milo Yiannopoulos getting banned from Twitter/general "fighting back against PC culture" bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:54
|
|
Dario the Wop posted:Saw a screencap of the page, seems like alt-right hacker revenge for Milo Yiannopoulos getting banned from Twitter/general "fighting back against PC culture" bullshit. That's definitely what the scum of the earth that support the hack are taking it as.
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
can we chat about posts made in BSS threads?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:can we chat about posts made in BSS threads? Imma talk about dis post right here
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:can we chat about posts made in BSS threads? You can reply to posts in the threads they're posted in. That's what threads are for.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:can we chat about posts made in BSS threads? Some of them are good, some of them are average, and some of them are bad.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Roth posted:Some of them are good, some of them are average, and some of them are bad. I agree with this, but disagree about which posts are which.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
As an expert in bad posts, I
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
Mods please make Helldump but just for BSS so I can make threads about how Lurdiak should stop posting.
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
i didn't want to helldump, just laugh at the fuckbarrel without derailing a thread.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Mods please make Helldump but just for BSS so I can make threads about how Lurdiak should stop posting. Second.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
Roth posted:Some of them are good, some of them are average, and some of them are bad. I think there should be an overall increase in posts of BSS but only if the new posts are overall average or preferably good. More bad posts on BSS is not a strategy I think SA/the mods should pursue.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
DrProsek posted:More bad posts on BSS is not a strategy I think SA/the mods should pursue. YOU CAN'T STOP US.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:YOU CAN'T STOP US. Oh?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
X-O posted:Oh? THAT WAS NOT DIRECTED AT YOU.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Mods please make Helldump but just for BSS so I can make threads about how Lurdiak should stop posting. Actually, you are wrong.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
X-O posted:You can reply to posts in the threads they're posted in. That's what threads are for. For good posts And bad posts I'll be reading all forever more That's what threads are for
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Since I read CBR only for the solicits, and the CBR solicits now seem to have every image at full size, rendering those articles useless as I'm mostly only interested in HC collections, what other website should I be reading solicits on? The more lightweight the better.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
I'm on a Luke Cage kick which has me reading through New Avengers (on the second volume). Getting tired of the public constantly forgetting that Norman Osborn is a a crazy person. Also wish the team fought...I guess obvious villains instead of public relation nightmares.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
Okay, so, I'm not following these except in a cursory fashion, but why are the comic characters Marvel ought to be putting forward as big heroes in the next couple of years before their movies (like, say, the Inhumans, but also Captain Marvel) mostly coming across as villains? Everything I see the Inhumans (except Kamala Khan) in makes them look awful.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
Rand Brittain posted:Everything I see the Inhumans (except Kamala Khan) in makes them look awful. That's mainly because they're awful.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Chaos Hippy posted:That's mainly because they're awful. Okay, but why are they awful? Aren't they supposed to be the replacement for mutants in the MCU? Shouldn't they be, like, remotely relatable?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
And Iron Man wasn't supposed to be a Nazi, these things happen in Civil Wars.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Rand Brittain posted:Okay, but why are they awful? Aren't they supposed to be the replacement for mutants in the MCU? Shouldn't they be, like, remotely relatable? Making the Inhumans even remotely relatable or likable would involve changing them so drastically that Marvel would be better off just coming up with new characters and calling them Inhumans. Thus, Kamala. Note: The above does not apply to Lockjaw, AKA the greatest character in Marvel history.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
Gaunab posted:Getting tired of the public constantly forgetting that Norman Osborn is a a crazy person. Apropos of nothing, Loeb wrote the Ultimates analogues in Superman/Batman as a response to that Pulse issue (I think they were called the Maximums). He mentioned in an interview how he thought Bendis' Not-Lois-death was in poor taste. Also, I like the Inhumans. And Hawkman. AND HAL JORDAN. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:44
|
|
|
I was thinking about the Inhumans on the drive to work today, oddly enough. Mainly how the X-Men are cursed with Fantastic Abilities, but for the most part are probably able to live in polite society, whereas the Inhumans are gifted with extraordinarily bizzare abilities, and choose to remain their own splinternation of like-minded freaks. Xmutants generally get the Civil/GayQueer Rights label slapped to their plight, but the Inhumans seem more like those folks that rally for Deaf Culture (Inhuman powers likely to be as much a disability as a gift). It's like Marvel Marvelled themselves with Mutants TOO STRANGE to exist in the world!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:I was thinking about the Inhumans on the drive to work today, Very hazardous.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:47
|
|
|
Inhumans have had their separate culture around since like the early bronze age or maybe even the stone age. It's not like they got their powers in the 50s and went "let's gently caress off from society harrumph", they just got tired of people trying to murder them and hid away so they wouldn't have to go to war with their cousins. They HAVE been written as very dickish in the past decade or two, but there's nothing inherently wrong with their basic concept. They're a fantastical hidden society that is unsure about mankind, and tensions arise from villains on both sides. It's classic stuff, really.
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 06:57
|
|
|
Okay, but I really don't have any coherent thoughts relevant to chatting or comics at this point in time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 07:07
|
|
|
Is there a reason DC and Marvel don't advertise on TV? I only ever see ads for comics inside of other comics.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 22:14 |
|
|
Roth posted:Is there a reason DC and Marvel don't advertise on TV? I only ever see ads for comics inside of other comics. Marvel did air ads for their Transformers comic, as a stealth ad for the toys since toy commercials were more limited.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 07:12
|
|