|
Make his retirement fund disappear
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:11 |
|
|
what is it about australian internet forums are utter brainless dickheads
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:08
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:what is it about australian internet forums are utter brainless dickheads Don't sign your posts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showthread.php?p=17364950#post17364950 Must be a users only subforum.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:26
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Don't sign your posts. closing my account
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 08:32
|
|
|
So now we're snatching refugees in the middle of the night and deporting them if they arrived via boat while on a valid visa.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:05
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:what is it about australian internet forums are utter brainless dickheads Not exclusive to forums or the internet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:08
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:what is it about australian
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:13
|
|
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-08/senate-committee-says-george-brandis-mislead-parliament/8006842  (This may be the article referenced on the previous page but there wasn't a URL soooo)
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:16
|
|
|
adamantium|wang posted:So now we're snatching refugees in the middle of the night and deporting them if they arrived via boat while on a valid visa. Imagine facilitating that and not even having the decency to hang yourself.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:22
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showthread.php?p=17364950#post17364950 Ah OCAU, when you're too stupid for Whirlpool
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:24
|
|
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Imagine facilitating that and not even having the decency to hang yourself. Well at least they aren't mixing broken glass into the camp food like they did in the Boer war. Yet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 10:05
|
|
|
I don't know how to feel any more - is this what it was like in Germany or Spain when people were being disappeared - you just say 'that's hosed but what can I do?' I really hope I'm wrong about Hell not existing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 10:17
|
|
|
Malcolm Roberts has a livestream up on facebook talking about climate change.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 10:44
|
|
|
You Am I posted:Ah OCAU, when you're too stupid for Whirlpool Whirlpool was very helpful with my ISP issues recently 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 11:06
|
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:New NT tourism slogan: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 11:17
|
|
|
hello friends it is good to be back also ratbag craig please gently caress off if you think that the racial discrimination act is somehow a bad thing
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 12:30
|
|
|
NYTimes' piece on the Marriage Equality plebiscite being voted down makes out like the LNP are the ones who want ME to happen and everyone else are just being bigots http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/world/australia/australia-same-sex-marriage.html?_r=0
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 13:09
|
|
|
It wasn't too bad. Thisquote:It was unclear what action supporters of legalization might take next. Mr. Turnbull had resisted discussing the issue ahead of the Senate vote. was probably the worst, most misleading line, but they mention straight after that Labor and the Greens support SSM, and why they opposed the plebiscite.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
The first five paragraphs read completely as if Labour and The Greens have killed ME in Aus for ages
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 13:38
|
|
|
To be fair it's dead till 2020 unless another DD happens
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 13:54
|
|
|
starkebn posted:NYTimes' piece on the Marriage Equality plebiscite being voted down makes out like the LNP are the ones who want ME to happen and everyone else are just being bigots Note that they use the term Vote and don't mention it's nonbinding in the head lines. Edit: But then the article appears to be fairly neutral? Except for the odd way they delay some important facts. WhiskeyWhiskers posted:It wasn't too bad. This Yeah basically that. Gridlocked fucked around with this message at 14:10 on Nov 8, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
norp posted:To be fair it's dead till 2020 unless another DD happens Nah. The Greens won't drop it. Labor probably would if it became stale, but it's too easy a stick to hit Turnbull with. In the unlikely combination scenario that Turnbull is PM 2 years from now, and their hasn't been a parliamentary vote, Labor will still hit Turnbull with public requests for a vote. By that point the media narrative won't be about the plebiscite, it will be Turnbull either blocking a vote or voting a bill down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:You need a transfer system regardless of whether there's a GST or not. It's completely unavoidable unless you want a radically different economic system or you want to kill poor people. In any case, transnational corporations are rewriting the rules with state compliance to suit themselves so everyone is hosed. It's a little bit  but we're getting to the point of effective transnational command economies where the supply chain is controlled, and any interference will have penalties such as suggested in the TPP or perhaps worse. Fortunately this is only likely in a few specific cases. Unfortunately, the whole apparatus is vulnerable to poo poo HappeningTM like natural events, wars, etc which fucks us over worse.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 14:51
|
|
|
Senor Tron posted:Nah. There is absolutely zero chance of Turnbull keeping his job at this point if he brings on a vote for ssm. It's dead as in it's not going to be legislated this term or some Libs cross the floor for a private members bill.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:10
|
|
|
norp posted:There is absolutely zero chance of Turnbull keeping his job at this point if he brings on a vote for ssm. It's dead as in it's not going to be legislated this term or some Libs cross the floor for a private members bill. Oh totally. But unless he can find some new issue to get the public latched onto (see the Coalition trying to go back to the BOAT PEOPLE boogeyman) then he is going to persist in doing poorly in public polls due to a perception of having no spine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DoctorKarl/status/795961829147058176
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:28
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SenatorMRoberts/status/795962833062113281 https://twitter.com/DoctorKarl/status/795964032796815360 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:36
|
|
|
Didn't this guy gently caress up his own presser? Karl's going to hand him his rear end.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:45
|
|
|
Like imagine being so loving stupid that you weren't anxious at all about being in a debate on a subject you knew nothing about. It must be nice in some ways not to ever suffer imposter syndrome. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Like imagine being so loving stupid that you weren't anxious at all about being in a debate on a subject you knew nothing about. Dunning-Krugerands because gold never goes down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
One problem I can see is that these people come up with so much bullshit on the fly it's hard to keep up and debunk them - and in a debate, saying something like 'did you get this from peer-reviewed research or did you get it from something like christianclimatetruth.com?' doesn't really go over well with an audience. Karl has spoken a lot on climate change and whacked many moles over the years, but I wonder what would happen if Roberts suddenly came out with IF CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL WHY ISN'T THE MOON GREEN or something like that which just makes you go 'buh?!'
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Karl is however very good at talking, and explaining scientific concepts, to children.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 16:18
|
|
|
The end result of any debate between then is negligible anyway. There will be some laughs no doubt but very few will be swayed one way or another. If you don't believe in climate change yet then no amount of fact is going to change your mind. The best of will do is show that a senate seat is held by someone detached from reality.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Karl is however very good at talking, and explaining scientific concepts, to children. Yeah, this, he's been taking questions without notice on the dumbest poo poo imaginable weekly for decades
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 21:21
|
|
|
I like when people ask him about superstitious or supernatural stuff looking for science answers and he goes on script but very sincerely about the million dollars they can get from the skeptics society when they demonstrate their ability.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
I am not confident about the voting numbers on the lifetime ban bill
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:https://twitter.com/SenatorMRoberts/status/795962833062113281 Kick his rear end Karl
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
Trumps gonna win
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:11 |
|
|
Reminder that Robets sat opposite Brian Cox, ignored everything said to him and just kept saying 'show me the empirical evidence' over and over.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 03:46
|
|
