Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Peccadillo
Mar 4, 2013

We Have Important Work To Do
John Key quit for some reason?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Abbott's motivation for pulling funding from landcare was probably because he saw it as a massive repository for greens voters, with the added bonus of giving youth something to do instead of play video games or do drugs or whatever kids do these days.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

The Peccadillo posted:

John Key quit for some reason?

Prob sick of Turnbull hanging around him at summits.

Mr Chips
Jun 27, 2007
Whose arse do I have to blow smoke up to get rid of this baby?

WhiskeyWhiskers posted:

One of my sister-in-laws works in managing part of the green army. I hope she doesn't lose her job. :(
More evidence the Greens hate jobs and want to destroy the economy

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe
Oh good....

GuardianAU posted:

[snip]
If Australia continues to emit carbon pollution at the average rate of the past year, it will spend its entire carbon budget by 2031.
[snip]
The jump in the latest quarter was not unexpected, since it represents increased use of power during winter months, according to Drum. But the analysis suggests Australia’s emissions have not fallen over the longer term either, with emissions over the year to September rising by 1.3m tonnes compared with the previous year.

“Since the carbon pricing mechanism was repealed, slowly but surely carbon emissions have been increasing both in intensity and in volume, so it’s no surprise that overall emissions have started creeping up as well,” Drum said.
[snip]
Australia’s emissions did drop steadily from 2005, almost entirely owing to changes in land-clearing laws in Queensland and NSW. Those changes have now been reversed in Queensland and New South Wales has also just made the clearing of land easier. This is expected to cause an increase in emissions which may not yet be reflected in the projections.
[snip]
There is no evidence the emissions bought through that fund reduce overall emissions, and many of the emissions the government pays to avoid are unlikely to have occurred anyway.

About 83% of the emissions reduction fund has been spent, with the latest auction attracting relatively little interest from polluting industries, resulting in fewer reductions being offered and a higher price being demanded.

World fukt.

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.
Put trade sanctions on us IMO

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)
I'm glad that my skin will melt off before I'm thrown in a camp.

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747
Climate change is a problem and should be combated. A regressive taxation system where the polluters pass the price onto the consumers is not a good method for combating it. Should spend the green army money on reforestation, purchasing and protecting old growth and funding renewable subsidy schemes imo.

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

Anyone who thinks that any combination of carbon tax, reforestation or other grand scheme to address climate change will succeed is delusional.

[EDIT: I should probably point out that I'm all for a carbon taxes and reforestation, just very pessimistic.]

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

hooman posted:

Oh good....


World fukt.

link please

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

open24hours posted:

Anyone who thinks that any combination of carbon tax, reforestation or other grand scheme to address climate change will succeed is delusional.

[EDIT: I should probably point out that I'm all for a carbon taxes and reforestation, just very pessimistic.]

The two data points we have for whether the carbon tax effectively reduced emissions are not enough for a statistical sample, but nevertheless those two years it was in effect saw a reduction in real emissions by like 10% or something? All of which has been made up since.

Whether it helps mitigate climate change or not is another story but still.

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe

Whoopsy, I meant to attach it at the bottom...

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/dec/05/australia-is-blowing-its-carbon-budget-projections-reveal

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN
Jun 26, 2009



quote:


Many of the emissions the government pays to avoid are unlikely to have occurred anyway.

Of course

open24hours
Jan 7, 2001

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-pirates-australia-tax-20161024-snap-story.html

I'm glad we have plenty of money to help out struggling companies like Disney.

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

open24hours posted:

I'm glad we have plenty of money to help out struggling companies like Disney. Adani

adamantium|wang
Sep 14, 2003

Missing you

The Peccadillo posted:

John Key quit for some reason?

Tasmantor
Aug 13, 2007
Horrid abomination

Byolante posted:

Climate change is a problem and should be combated. A regressive taxation system where the polluters pass the price onto the consumers is not a good method for combating it. Should spend the green army money on reforestation, purchasing and protecting old growth and funding renewable subsidy schemes imo.

Source your quotes.

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

actually putting a price on carbon that is regressive is exactly what we should be doing

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

Les Affaires posted:

actually putting a price on carbon that is regressive is exactly what we should be doing

You think putting the burden on the people who can afford it least is the correct way to behave?

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Byolante posted:

You think putting the burden on the people who can afford it least is the correct way to behave?

Yes.

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

Fair enough

SHALASHASKA HAWKE
Nov 10, 2016

No child soldier in poverty by 1990
HEY REMEMVER THE CPRS?

flapy vajannawings
Nov 26, 2016


hahahahaha :suicide:

tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]



Nab And Westpac have raised interest rates on investment home loans

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

tithin posted:

Nab And Westpac have raised interest rates on investment home loans

I think I want to say 'good' but I'm happy to be corrected. Economics isn't my strong suit.

E: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-05/italian-prime-minister-matteo-renzi-to-resign/8092314

quote:

Mr Mattarella will have to embark on a round of consultations with party leaders before naming a new prime minister — Italy's fifth in as many years — who will be tasked with drawing up a new electoral law.

Haha what a garbage almost-country. Pick a leader, guys!

Les Affaires
Nov 15, 2004

Starshark posted:

I think I want to say 'good' but I'm happy to be corrected. Economics isn't my strong suit.

short answer: yes it is good if your goal is to tip the balance back towards owner-operators

ungulateman
Apr 18, 2012

pretentious fuckwit who isn't half as literate or insightful or clever as he thinks he is

anyone have a graph that compares our current carbon spike to conditions like the carboniferous era?

like, 'the poles are covered in rainforest' is not exactly a great goal but i'm curious if we're going to exceed carbon levels that have existed ever or just beyond the scope of human experience

norp
Jan 20, 2004

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

let's invade New Zealand, they have oil

tithin posted:

Nab And Westpac have raised interest rates on investment home loans

And owner occupiers....

Byolante
Mar 23, 2008

by Cyrano4747

ungulateman posted:

anyone have a graph that compares our current carbon spike to conditions like the carboniferous era?

like, 'the poles are covered in rainforest' is not exactly a great goal but i'm curious if we're going to exceed carbon levels that have existed ever or just beyond the scope of human experience

Lord Moncton told me of the benefits of tropical beaches on the coast of Antarctica and hell, I am all for it. Always wanted to make a summer trip to Mount Vinson.

Synthbuttrange
May 6, 2007

"Barnaby Joyce needs to clarify any arrangement he has with Don Burke and why he is preferring to take advice from a celebrity gardener as opposed to industry representative bodies who have direct contact with those who will be most affected by this ill-conceived relocation," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

lmaooooo

Mr Chips
Jun 27, 2007
Whose arse do I have to blow smoke up to get rid of this baby?

tithin posted:

Nab And Westpac have raised interest rates on investment home loans

Is this to meet bank capital adequacy regulations? Does it increase profits too?

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

open24hours posted:

How are kids going to learn the value of a hard day's work now?


Work for the dole on an undocumented asbestos reclamation project without any safety gear or workcover.

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN
Jun 26, 2009



quote:

Mr Burke acknowledged that it was politically advantageous for Mr Joyce to move the agency to the heart of his electorate with taxpayers footing the bill, but Mr Burke said he believed the minister was working, ultimately, for the good of the nation.

"It's true that in moving it into his electorate, of course there's gains for Barnaby," Mr Burke said.

"But if you're a politician, if you have all those dreams of making Australia a better place and the rest of it, you can't do that if you're not in office.

"He's got to survive, and that aspect of it is nothing but professional practice.

"It can be corruption, but not in this case."

Mr Burke said he was no fan of decentralisation for its own sake, but he did worry that agencies in Canberra became remote from the communities they served.

"It worries me a bit that these bodies in Canberra are so remote from the industries and the people they serve," he said.

"I do not subscribe to decentralisation, even Moses 3000 years ago could tell you it doesn't work.

"But where something is appropriate to be somewhere other than Canberra and where you can make that work for the people involved, where you can set it up so it's a good lifestyle and professional choice for them, then I do believe in it.

"If most agriculture and most of the chemical industries and the people are on the east coast, and you want somewhere that's farming, then Armidale is pretty close to the middle."


Don burke, rambly old man

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
I know it looks like corruption but it totally isn't in this case, just trust me! SLY WINK

*applause sign lights up*

You Am I
May 20, 2001

Me @ your poasting

tithin posted:

Nab And Westpac have raised interest rates on investment home loans

It's happening?

It's business as usual for Italy and its Prime Ministers. During the 70s and 80s they were going through an average of one Prime Minister per year.

CATTASTIC
Mar 31, 2010

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

quote:

Tony Abbott defends green army amid reports it will be scrapped

:qq:‘It’s a bad principle to axe your own policy for the Greens policy,’ former prime minister complains:qq:

Tony Abbott has lashed out after reports that the green army will be scrapped in the looming midyear budget update, declaring that he is “dismayed” by the development and accusing Malcolm Turnbull of dancing to the tune of the Greens.

The former prime minister took to social media on Monday to defend the program he launched after reports it would be axed to help fund the government’s parliamentary deal with the Greens to restore $100m to Landcare.

Abbott said the program was good for grassroots conservation and “got unemployed people working too”.

“It’s a bad principle to axe your own policy for the Greens policy because it means that their priorities are more important than ours,” Abbott said. “That would hardly be a smart move for a centre-right government.”

Earlier on Monday Turnbull refused to say if the government would axe the program in the midyear budget update, due on 19 December.

The prime minister said he wouldn’t engage with media speculation, and he told reporters in Melbourne that the government had a strong commitment to environmental programs.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/dec/05/tony-abbott-defends-green-army-amid-reports-it-will-be-scrapped

duck monster
Dec 15, 2004

DancingShade posted:

Which party is the Commodore 64?


The Australian Democrats. It was a great console in its day, but now its only remembered in deference to it being superceded by the Commodore Amiga (The greens)

The Socialist Worker Party (Or any one of its descendents) was the MSX. A fragmented family of vaguelly related consoles that where awesome in theory , but nobody owned at all.

And the Democratic Socialists where the Dick smith wizard, owned by even less people. and wasnt actually very good at all.

I'm not sure who the Amstrads where, but Amstrads owned.Probably just the Anarchists. All good fun, until someone got their eye poked out.

ewe2
Jul 1, 2009

You Am I posted:

It's happening?
It's business as usual for Italy and its Prime Ministers. During the 70s and 80s they were going through an average of one Prime Minister per year.

If anything, European democracy is the future of Australian democracy unless they seriously "fix" the system to prevent it.

Nibbles!
Jun 26, 2008

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

make australia great again as well please
Surprised they haven't had higher investment property rates already since the interest is part of what people claim.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]



Nibbles! posted:

Surprised they haven't had higher investment property rates already since the interest is part of what people claim.

It's all a balancing act. the rates go down, people increase their lending so as to run as close to $16k as possible in order to avoid tax. People don't want to be running a profit greater than the tax free threshold.

Interest rates increase, repayments increase, which would normally be a good thing, but because people are gearing themselves out the arse, they've got no money left to account for the increase.

  • Locked thread