Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

Grand Fromage posted:

It reduced in frequency as time went on, too. When Crassus did it it was a huge controversy. By the 600s it was explicitly banned, at least if the Strategikon was reflecting policy and not just Maurice's opinion.

Decimation, in a different form, was reintroduced by Cadorna in WW1. Murder by drawing lots, or a punishment for having lovely leadership.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
And people loving despised Luigi for doing it.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Arcsquad12 posted:

And people loving despised Luigi for doing it.

It's a me, Decemario!

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

I feel like arbitrarily executing your soldiers would make you lose more men through desertion than from the actual executions.

Caesar's whole thing of recruiting tribals by defeating them in battle and killing and abusing them until the survivors are all somehow slavishly loyal never made a lot of sense to me. Conquering land and forcing payment of taxes is one thing, but full ideological conversion is a whole lot.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

SlothfulCobra posted:

I feel like arbitrarily executing your soldiers would make you lose more men through desertion than from the actual executions.

Caesar's whole thing of recruiting tribals by defeating them in battle and killing and abusing them until the survivors are all somehow slavishly loyal never made a lot of sense to me. Conquering land and forcing payment of taxes is one thing, but full ideological conversion is a whole lot.

Caesar specifically was able to do it because he was uniquely equipped to live a Dances with Wolves style insane colonialist civilizer fantasy, having organizing knowledge of military tactics (and war crimes) that the completely disorganized, genuinely primitive tribes lacked in the areas he targeted. It's not played up too much but the Legion straight up is convinced he's a god because he's (abusing) (inaccurate, manipulated, hegelian, historicist) centuries of knowledge that they completely lack, the equivalent of a dude with full modern civil and materials engineering dropping into the bronze age...all in service of propaganda and conquest. In a loose sense it's what you can get up to in Honest Hearts, but turned up to 11 and with roman regalia centered on yourself.

Byzantine
Sep 1, 2007

Grand Fromage posted:

It reduced in frequency as time went on, too. When Crassus did it it was a huge controversy. By the 600s it was explicitly banned, at least if the Strategikon was reflecting policy and not just Maurice's opinion.

It’s true.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

SlothfulCobra posted:

I feel like arbitrarily executing your soldiers would make you lose more men through desertion than from the actual executions.

Caesar's whole thing of recruiting tribals by defeating them in battle and killing and abusing them until the survivors are all somehow slavishly loyal never made a lot of sense to me. Conquering land and forcing payment of taxes is one thing, but full ideological conversion is a whole lot.

Congratulations, you've found the message behind the Legion! They're a mess of a "civilization" that will inevitably collapse without something more solid than a cult of personality to back them, because right now they have less than one generation to survive before they inevitably dissolve.

A Sometimes Food
Dec 8, 2010

I'm gonna try Autumn Leaves on my current playthrough, can you bring companions and is there any reactivity? I doubt it given va but I've been surprised before.

BurritoJustice
Oct 9, 2012

A Sometimes Food posted:

I'm gonna try Autumn Leaves on my current playthrough, can you bring companions and is there any reactivity? I doubt it given va but I've been surprised before.

No companions, very self contained.

Anecdotal but the only crashes I had with my last playthrough where from when I entered the library and consistently after, I had to load save before I discovered the landmark. So I can't say much further.

Proletarian Mango
May 21, 2011

A Sometimes Food posted:

I'm gonna try Autumn Leaves on my current playthrough, can you bring companions and is there any reactivity? I doubt it given va but I've been surprised before.

There's different conclusions and endings you can get within the mod if you consider that reactivity.

A Sometimes Food
Dec 8, 2010

Proletarian Mango posted:

There's different conclusions and endings you can get within the mod if you consider that reactivity.

Oh I meant for companions, Burrito already covered that though.

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

I saw autumn leaves on that mod guide and decided to try it out. I don't know why they decided but whenever you get close enough to hypatia it auto dismisses your companions, very frustrating when your exploring around novac

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO
I usually play with no companions at all so not sure why I added all the stuff from that part of the guide.

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



So I first played NV in 2015 which waas a few years before I started to tru, in my own small way, to learn more about history and philosophy.

I bring it up because I've always wondered about this line from Caesar:

Caesar: Rome was a highly militarized autocracy that effectively integrated the foreign cultures it conquered. It dedicated its citizens to something higher than themselves - to the idea of Rome itself. In Rome I found a template for a society equal to the challenges of the post-apocalyptic world - a society that could and would survive. A society that could prevent mankind from fracturing and destroying itself in this new world, by establishing a new Pax Romana.

[What does "Pax Romana" mean?]

Caesar: It means a }nationalist, imperialist, totalitarian, homogenous culture that obliterates the identity of every group it conquers. Long-term stability at all costs. The individual has no value beyond his utility to the state, whether as an instrument of war, or production.


While he does seem to be exaggerating a bit, I came across this in a sort of random place, a paper on the liberal world order:

quote:

Canonical texts in international relations define peace as the absence of violence (Aron 1973, 21; Bull 2012, 18; Clausewitz 1976, 75; Waltz 1959, 1; 1979, 343). However, a glance at the philology of the word “peace” reveals a more complex relationship with violence. The Latin words for peace (pax, pacis, paco) trace their roots to the verb for a pact (pacisci), “which ended a war and led to submission, friendship, or alliance.” As Rome transitioned from republic to empire, pax changed its meaning from a pact among equals to submission to Rome, and “pacare began to refer to conquest” (Weinstock 1960, 45).1

Two monuments built by Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, record this shift in the meaning of peace. The first, the Ara Pacis Augustae, a monument to the goddess of peace, commemorates Augustus’s pacification of Gaul and Spain (Kleiner 2005, 212). The second, the funerary inscription Res Gestae Divi Augusti, appeared on Augustus’s tomb and celebrates his many accomplishments, including bringing peace to the sea, Gaul, Spain, and the Alps. Crucially, the term used to characterize this peace is pacavi, which means pacified. Pacavi is not the absence of violence but the use of violence to reorder the world into a Roman Empire. Thus, Pax Romana meant eliminating the threat of war—both civil and foreign—through the preponderance of Roman military might.

So maybe he wasn't so off-base.

rope kid
Feb 3, 2001

Warte nur! Balde
Ruhest du auch.

Tacitus "quoted" (made up) a speech from a Caledonian chieftain named Calgacus that criticizes Rome's habit of leveling cultures through war and saying yeah this is peace, the Pax Romana is epic.

Tacitus posted:

To us who dwell on the uttermost confines of the earth and of freedom, this remote sanctuary of Britain's glory has up to this time been a defense. Now, however, the furthest limits of Britain are thrown open, and the unknown always passes for the marvelous. But there are no tribes beyond us, nothing indeed but waves and rocks, and the yet more terrible Romans, from whose oppression escape is vainly sought by obedience and submission. Robbers of the world, having by their universal plunder exhausted the land, they rifle the deep. If the enemy be rich, they are rapacious; if he be poor, they lust for dominion; neither the east nor the west has been able to satisfy them. Alone among men they covet with equal eagerness poverty and riches. To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
I'd love to get a clearer sense of how House represents the past and how this representation works in the larger framework the game sets out. House's theming and associations are tied to Vegas and the old world, but also to what seems like futurism, and he stands in stark contrast to the NCR or the Legion in this respect.

Abhorrence
Feb 5, 2010

A love that crushes like a mace.
Yes, part of the irony of House is that, despite (or perhaps, because of) being from the old world, he's the only one who doesn't want to return to it. Unlike the NCR or the Legion, he wants to move society on from where it was, Pre-War. Contrast with NCR and the legion who want to restore an old society.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

House resurrected gambling because it was a good business model to take advantage of the existence of an economy. The specific casinos he resurrected were a matter of taste, but justifiable for the same reason that 3-Dog only has prewar records to play on the radio. There's not much of an entertainment industry in the postapocalyptic wasteland to draw upon.

How well House's plans for the future will work out is up for debate, but it's definitely less loving insane than Caesar's plan to somehow integrate a big city dedicated to entertainment and vice into his teatotalling nomad warrior empire. And it's not like it really hurts the NCR that much to end its eastern manifest destiny when it has an independent state defended by a robot army to be a buffer against anything else out east.

Gobblecoque
Sep 6, 2011
House certainly is akin to the NCR and Legion in terms of having the old world blues. I think when he starts fantasizing about space travel and colonizing the stars some players get the idea that he's more forward-thinking than the competition but it's basically him wanting to dust off his toys at the old repconn test site as though the war and subsequent centuries never happened. Meanwhile the concerns of the people living in and around New Vegas don't even register to him.

I find it notable that the slide for the House ending doesn't mention any of the stuff from the grand vision he pitches to the courier as becoming reality. Centuries of planning and scheming and the only result is that "the streets were orderly, efficient, cold."

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

I mean even he admits it'll take decades to get the initial phases of his space program into action. Probably more since I sent half the functional rockets in the world into an asteroid while loaded with ghouls.

Gobblecoque
Sep 6, 2011
Even if we assume a time limit on what the ending slides are allowed to cover, you would think it would mention something about New Vegas becoming a home to research or industry. Instead it's just "New Vegas continued to be the sole place in the wasteland where fortunes were won and lost in the blink of an eye."

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019
Any reading of House as more foreward thinking than the other factions at least needs to reconcile his forcing of the three major tribes of the strip to imitate pre-war culture. His first act upon awakening from a two hundred year sleep is to immediatley recreate the world as it was; that doesn't read to me as the actions of a man sans old world blues.

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

It's not particularly difficult in my opinion. When the NCR showed up house was in an incredibly precarious position. He needed to get his own city state set up, make money, and avoid annexation with nearly no time to prepare. Being a businessman first and foremost can we fault him for falling back on an industry that he knew was recession proof and would attract enough tourists to force the NCR to defend the city at their own expense.

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

Gaius Marius posted:

I mean even he admits it'll take decades to get the initial phases of his space program into action. Probably more since I sent half the functional rockets in the world into an asteroid while loaded with ghouls.

Asteroid? Thought they went to the moon.

Gaius Marius
Oct 9, 2012

MariusLecter posted:

Asteroid? Thought they went to the moon.

I believe that's only if you correct the trajectory, which I most certainly couldn't do at level 3

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



SlothfulCobra posted:

House resurrected gambling because it was a good business model to take advantage of the existence of an economy. The specific casinos he resurrected were a matter of taste, but justifiable for the same reason that 3-Dog only has prewar records to play on the radio. There's not much of an entertainment industry in the postapocalyptic wasteland to draw upon.

How well House's plans for the future will work out is up for debate, but it's definitely less loving insane than Caesar's plan to somehow integrate a big city dedicated to entertainment and vice into his teatotalling nomad warrior empire. And it's not like it really hurts the NCR that much to end its eastern manifest destiny when it has an independent state defended by a robot army to be a buffer against anything else out east.

Well they are going to have mass starvation in a decade.

Some people like to say the Mojave was a "brush war" for the NCR, something they weren't taking seriously and that's why the Legion was a threat. But all accounts say that the Mojave is a live or die moment for the NCR, or at least a very critical opportunity. They need the Dam and they need it bad.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

JustaDamnFool posted:

Any reading of House as more foreward thinking than the other factions at least needs to reconcile his forcing of the three major tribes of the strip to imitate pre-war culture. His first act upon awakening from a two hundred year sleep is to immediatley recreate the world as it was; that doesn't read to me as the actions of a man sans old world blues.

He doesn't actually do anything with the tribes until he sees the NCR scouts- it's specifically a response to that situation to try to reclaim power, not just doing it for the sake of recreating the old world. House does seem to have the same rocketry interest that one of his many companies had prewar, but it's all motivated by a sort of contempt for the old world.

A Sometimes Food
Dec 8, 2010

MariusLecter posted:

Asteroid? Thought they went to the moon.

Gaius Marius posted:

I believe that's only if you correct the trajectory, which I most certainly couldn't do at level 3

Don't the ending slides mention surviving cultists shuffling back to Novac sheepishly? Pretty sure you just blast them into the salt lake north of Helios anyway regardless of where you targeted the rockets.

Edit: yeah

Ending for when you fix the rockets and side with anyone but the Legion posted:

Though Novac was a low-priority target for the Legion, many of Novac's citizens died in its defense. In the weeks that followed, several Bright Followers returned to Novac to help restore its defenses, allowing it to remain independent of the NCR

A Sometimes Food
Dec 8, 2010

NikkolasKing posted:

Well they are going to have mass starvation in a decade.

Some people like to say the Mojave was a "brush war" for the NCR, something they weren't taking seriously and that's why the Legion was a threat. But all accounts say that the Mojave is a live or die moment for the NCR, or at least a very critical opportunity. They need the Dam and they need it bad.

TBF they'll have access to the dam in the House and Wild Card endings they'll just need to negotiate for it.

Also my understanding is their wars in the north and south are also pursuing other options for water and food.

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019

Gaius Marius posted:

It's not particularly difficult in my opinion. When the NCR showed up house was in an incredibly precarious position. He needed to get his own city state set up, make money, and avoid annexation with nearly no time to prepare. Being a businessman first and foremost can we fault him for falling back on an industry that he knew was recession proof and would attract enough tourists to force the NCR to defend the city at their own expense.

My point wasn't that he established a gambling empire on the strip, its that he forces the Three Famlies into becoming bizarre knockoffs of various 50s stereotypes in order to run it. You could argue that there's some roundabout efficacy to this emulation, that obliging The Chairmen to talk like they do helps draw more buisness, but I don't think that its coincidental that in a game themed around an obsession with the past has a major player constructing a facsimile of a 200 year old dead culture.

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

JustaDamnFool posted:

My point wasn't that he established a gambling empire on the strip, its that he forces the Three Famlies into becoming bizarre knockoffs of various 50s stereotypes in order to run it. You could argue that there's some roundabout efficacy to this emulation, that obliging The Chairmen to talk like they do helps draw more buisness, but I don't think that its coincidental that in a game themed around an obsession with the past has a major player constructing a facsimile of a 200 year old dead culture.

Like Medieval Times, are the people who started up the franchise obsessed? Maybe. But the customers love the spectacle and pageantry of it all.

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019
If Medieval Times was run by a 700 year old French noble with an iron fist I'd hope it would at least raise some eyebrows.

By popular demand
Jul 17, 2007

IT *BZZT* WASP ME--
IT WASP ME ALL *BZZT* ALONG!


JustaDamnFool posted:

If Medieval Times was run by a 700 year old French noble with an iron fist I'd hope it would at least raise some eyebrows.

Keep talking :shepspends:

amigolupus
Aug 25, 2017

The way I see it, House's version of "futurism" is rooted in trying to revive the Old World and continuing with that time period's ideas on what constitutes as future-thinking (space travel and exploration), and is really just a way for him to relive his glory days as the technocrat darling of Las Vegas.

What House isn't interested in is moving forward with the post-post-apocalypse world of New Vegas. If he was, then his focus would've been on finding a solution for the food production problem, or creating facilities to produce medicine and medical equipment/devices (where Arcade says that people will run out of hospitals to raid for supplies eventually).

TheLoneStar
Feb 9, 2017

MariusLecter posted:

Asteroid? Thought they went to the moon.
I thought they wanted to reach The Glow.

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



I first played NV in 2015 like I noted and I feel like, from what I've seen of the fandom. House has lost a lot of his original appeal given the everything that has happened in those five years.

Dude just wants Capitalism. Space Capitalism, with him as the CEO. He's going to run this post-apocalyptic world like a business, not like those damned incompetent politicians.

I originally was considering him because of his space plan but in retrospect, it was a lot of bullshit and even if any of it was true, House is not going to uplift humanity so space colonies. He's going to let the rich and powerful move into space and everyone else can stay on the polluted Earth. We know this from literally everything he does in game.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

The Chairmen are really the only weird bringing back the past thing that House did, and that's only 10% House's personal tastes and 90% the game devs wanting to do some kind of referential commentary on Las Vegas. Benny sure seems like he took to the lingo like a fish to water. Nobody ever breaks character, if it is all just an act. Maybe the reason to bring back the rat pack is just because it's a cool aesthetic and everyone seems to agree.

Everything else is pretty basically understandable. A high class luxury option, a low class sleazy option with drugs and hookers, neon signs, and Mr. New Vegas to run a radio station.

Abhorrence
Feb 5, 2010

A love that crushes like a mace.
Yeah, I always imagined it as Mr. House showing the three families a bunch of old records, or whatever, and letting them pick out what ever style they like. Sort of like someone letting someone else go through their closet of old clothes to find something they like. If he's got a case of Old World Blues, he seems to have cleared it up by the time NV starts: "I've resurrected Vegas, spirit intact."

Also, for what ever his faults, House is willing to tolerate the existence of other states; in fact, he relies on it. That's not something the NCR or especially not the Legion can claim.

Edit: I still stand by House being the best choice for the Mojave, and to a certain degree, House himself doesn't matter. His winning is good for the NCR because it does not reward them for their imperial ambitions there.

Abhorrence fucked around with this message at 19:37 on Nov 22, 2020

Funky Valentine
Feb 26, 2014

Dojyaa~an

SlothfulCobra posted:

The Chairmen are really the only weird bringing back the past thing that House did, and that's only 10% House's personal tastes and 90% the game devs wanting to do some kind of referential commentary on Las Vegas. Benny sure seems like he took to the lingo like a fish to water. Nobody ever breaks character, if it is all just an act. Maybe the reason to bring back the rat pack is just because it's a cool aesthetic and everyone seems to agree.

Everything else is pretty basically understandable. A high class luxury option, a low class sleazy option with drugs and hookers, neon signs, and Mr. New Vegas to run a radio station.

House expressly says he nudged the Omertas in their direction and keeps them around because he has an odd fondness for the Chicago Outfit era of Vegas.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

amigolupus posted:

The way I see it, House's version of "futurism" is rooted in trying to revive the Old World and continuing with that time period's ideas on what constitutes as future-thinking (space travel and exploration), and is really just a way for him to relive his glory days as the technocrat darling of Las Vegas.

What House isn't interested in is moving forward with the post-post-apocalypse world of New Vegas. If he was, then his focus would've been on finding a solution for the food production problem, or creating facilities to produce medicine and medical equipment/devices (where Arcade says that people will run out of hospitals to raid for supplies eventually).

That's a very interesting point. I wish house was more developed; the reclusive nature of the character means we're guessing more on some of how they intersect with the game's themes (which is why I was hoping rope kid would respond). We get caesar talking at length ofc, but for the other factions, it's what other people have to say that's also a key source of information. We don't get that with house other than an ongoing effort to automate people out of their jobs.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply