|
it's good poo poo, as long as you avoid the hipster mustaches.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 18:50 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 15:23 |
|
akadajet posted:now i haven't touched it in 2 years, but opening a xaml file in VS caused the whole thing to come to a screeching halt. a lot of the times making changes would cause the entire IDE to just crash. none of the nice VS code refactoring tools worked with it. there was a slightly less garbage editor (expression blend) that you could get, but that was a separate license and fairly expensive. and it didn't work that great with anything but the most basic of .slns. yeah I guess class definitions and namespace imports are too much to deal with
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 18:51 |
|
lol nerd poo poo
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 18:52 |
|
akadajet posted:it's good poo poo, as long as you avoid the hipster mustaches.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:02 |
|
you could say this is really emberassing
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 19:10 |
|
Yo ember is poo poo use angular
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 20:55 |
|
angular is trash. don't use js but if you have to use js use knockout
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 20:57 |
|
speaking of angular... http://eisenbergeffect.bluespire.com/leaving-angular/ lol
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:09 |
|
Nice image leeching
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:11 |
|
Shaggar posted:angular is trash. don't use js but if you have to use js use knockout Hmm shagger was wrong
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:14 |
|
Angular 2.0s direction is dumb though
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:15 |
|
i thought everybody uses react now as the hot jnew thing
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:24 |
|
KARMA! posted:i thought everybody uses react now as the hot jnew thing react is just a view engine. which is supposed to be nice. the problem is you need something else for the framework which is flux. which everybody grouses about.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:31 |
|
react also uses some custom directive compiler which is gross
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:34 |
|
you can use react with angular but you need to do some fuckery to tie in with the scope digest
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:37 |
|
rekk posted:i hate curly brackets i put in extra curly brackets, just for you. gently caress your one line if statement. its getting brackets.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:54 |
|
pram posted:Angular 2.0s direction is dumb though its just as dumb as angular 1.0.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:55 |
|
pram posted:you can use react with angular but you need to do some fuckery to tie in with the scope digest lmao
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 21:56 |
|
just code ur websites in xaml and asp
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 22:14 |
|
bobbilljim posted:i put in extra curly brackets, just for you. gently caress your one line if statement. its getting brackets. same
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 22:30 |
|
Shaggar posted:angular is trash. use knockout
|
# ? Nov 17, 2014 23:17 |
|
bobbilljim posted:gently caress your one line if statement. its getting brackets.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 00:21 |
|
my stepdads beer posted:dropwizzard seems like a cool thing, tell me about it javahavers? dropwizard is a collection of libraries + a deployment method you should probably be using anyway you can re-create that collection in 30 seconds with a maven pom, but that's not the point. dropwizard's creators chose which libraries you should be using and how you should deploy. the project provides an opinion.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 01:27 |
|
by the time you have any business forming your own opinions you would be able to recreate dropwizard casually without any reference sources anyway, just a text editor + mavencentral.org
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 01:28 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 15:23 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:dropwizard is a collection of libraries + a deployment method you should probably be using anyway excellent i need opinions in java land there are too many options and too many ancient recommendations
|
# ? Nov 18, 2014 07:32 |