|
I just got caught up on almost a thousand new posts. I've been blueballed because I really wanted to buy dollfucker an avatar and he's resigned  Oh well knowing him he'll be back.
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2008 15:51
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 15:01 |
|
|
April posted:And say, PV, why WERE you photographing children without their parents' consent? is PV copyrighted too? or is it just *removed for copyright violation claims* that we can't use?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2008 11:57
|
|
|
If doll-loving isn't controversial why not put on a doll pride parade to raise awareness of this life choice?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2008 17:14
|
|
|
So he's trying to sue people for making use of images he posted on the web. This is awesome I really don't read this thread as regularly as I should. Seriously though who does he think he's kidding with all the incessant bad insults and "MY GIRLFRIEND!" stuff? It really doesn't help when you're trying to be all >:[ with lawsuits.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2008 12:21
|
|
|
Nemesis Of Moles posted:hahahahaha Is waffle images broken or not working at the moment as I can't get this picture and I really want a copy of it because it's 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2008 16:03
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Sorry, but if this account get banned, the thread dies. Why do you think it has lasted this long? It really means nothing around here. A poo poo load of great threads die for various reasons here. New ones come along and apart from the occasional bout of nostalgia about how retarded the head dollfucker and his lackey were this thread will be all but forgotten by the vast majority of people. A lot of users on here have probably never even read this thread. Threads like this are a drop in the pond here on SA, but this thread is all you really have, so quit thinking it's as important to us as it is to you. It's funny for us when the perverts acting all high and mighty, both in their dollfucktresses of solitude that are their DAs, blogs, or other tiny forums from whence they came, or when they come on here trying to justify their pathetic existences to people who don't even care. It's funny either way, you just make it funnier, so funny it blurs the line between hilarious, pathetic and attention starved.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2008 00:59
|
|
|
I have immense pity for Pit Viper's kids. They don't know any better and he's instilling his morals into them
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2008 08:24
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:I googled your address....  hypocrite much?You're doing a stirling job of proving that dollfuckers are normal, well-balanced people.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2008 02:48
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Computer fast.. brain slow.... What do you blame the pedo dollfucking on?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2008 03:30
|
|
|
CarbonCpy posted:I think we're all losing sight of one thing: We're not going into other forums to defend whatever honor we have left after being outed as a pedoriffic dollfucker, dollfucker. To be honest I don't think he's even trying to defend his honour. He's just here trying to make himself out to be superior to all of us. Of course he's totalling forgetting that he is a pedo dollfucker and we are not, so he's been wasting his time from day 1. Dollfucker. <-- (I like this idea)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2008 11:41
|
|
|
Chem posted:My brother just called me, he said some guy came to his sky-diving field in Nova Scotia with a sex doll and a tiny film crew, my brother and his friends laughed their collective asses off at the guy. Words cannot describe the absolute beauty and hilarity of this post. No words ever can. No words ever will.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2008 20:31
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:You think Cha is ugly? no way dollfucker!  By the way whats the deal with those cookies in the botton right Cha? Are those penguin faces or something? It's really bugging me and I'd like to know whats up with those cookies I'm really sad for looking at this photo and focusing on the cookies oh wait at least I don't gently caress dolls 
duffath fucked around with this message at 12:06 on Nov 2, 2008 |
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2008 12:01
|
|
|
afterhours posted:let's just get all the attractive girls in the thread to post a picture of themselves laughing, pointing at the camera, and holding up a sign saying "You gently caress Dolls." I love this idea!
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2008 13:14
|
|
|
Caligasti posted:You notice he has a quote by you in his sig? you probably did just thought I'd point it out for the benefit of the class. Speaking of Locust. If a doll goes uncleaned for a long time years worth of semen would collect and encrust on it's surface.......  ??? It's even got the fellatio gape. duffath fucked around with this message at 10:37 on Nov 4, 2008 |
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2008 10:29
|
|
|
Volponi posted:Edit: Curiousity  'd the cat.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2008 10:53
|
|
|
While I am neither a girl or attractive I put out a call for any girls on my facebook to send me pictures of themselves holding signs like that. I don't know why I thought it was a good idea because no-one replies to anyone on facebook unless they're inviting you to become a zombievampirepiratedollfuckerninja. Or maybe to find out which model of doll you are most like.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2008 02:42
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Sounds like SA. This thread only highlights that. I TEND TO DOUBT IT CHIEF. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2008 11:38
|
|
|
goonobyl posted:Thats right, and they don't suffer from PMS, or calling me unexpectily on my cell phone when I'm browsing my local pharmacy to buy them a box of tampons to embarrass the gently caress out of me when I go to the register. I TEND TO DOUBT IT CHIEF DOLLFUCKER! It's only Embarrassing because everyone at it's local pharmacy knows it's a dollfucker who will never be in a healthy relationship with a woman and if it's buying tampons then it's making things up to try and appear normal as it yearns for acceptance.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2008 21:09
|
|
|
Gavitron posted:http://coverdoll.ca/drupal/?q=node/403 Poor poor forth rail bridge
|
|
#
¿
Nov 11, 2008 14:43
|
|
|
Gavitron posted:Cha's picture. Yes there really is something wrong with me. Whenever that picture shows up I focus on the ghost cookies. That ain't right. Well could be worse I suppose. I could be a dollfucker with an ex-wife who left me for a pedophile.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2008 08:26
|
|
|
I think it might be worth banning Goonobyl at this point. Cal keeps us in laughs, and Goonbyl account isn't even trying anymore. Plus you know if dave-wiper loses access to this account they're going to be driven batshit insane not being able to "own" those goons! Can threads also be made members only? I think the true test of his patheticness is whether he forks out :tenbux: to carry on making a fool of himself and attracting attention to himself. It's like how he only put Cha on ignore for longer than it took to take a screenie of it, but will probably claim she's still on ignore (and if he admits she isn't )
duffath fucked around with this message at 15:55 on Nov 15, 2008 |
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2008 12:50
|
|
|
Cha posted:Honestly at this point I'd almost prefer if he got banned. Lord knows he's done enough to deserve it, and maybe just removing him entirely would convince him that we literally don't give a poo poo about him or his sad existence. I would nth that in a heartbeat. Plus you know it'd drive him loving batshit if the thread became members only. I doubt he would be able to hack it. It's the same reason you're not still on his ignore list. He can't bear to not read what you are saying about him. I vote for a ban on Goonobyl and make the thread viewable by members only. Most of the recent entertainment in this thread has not been from Goonobyl going "no you!" but from good old Mr.Havens so I doubt Goonobyl would be a loss to the thread. If what I proposed there was done you know he'll be itching to fork out $10 so he can come back in and have his say, he won't like not knowing and being unable to respond. In the event that he buys another account to troll again = Hilarity. I'd be happy to risk killing the thread for that. Just a thought anyway
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2008 14:36
|
|
|
Cha posted:CHA IS A WHORE Carry on! -pv (c) (tm) pat. pending
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2008 19:54
|
|
|
Is there a link/explanation about "challenging someone to helldump." I'm not very clued in on forum goings on it seems.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2008 20:53
|
|
|
If this thread dies I'd rather it did with happy memories about it in my heart.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2008 21:27
|
|
|
Cha posted:We're talking about banning the goonbyl account, not permabanning all of them from our forums. If any of them wanted to shell out ten bucks to reregister, or to register another account, that would be their prerogative. However, the goonobyl account as it stands in the hands of pit_viper has lost any semblance of humor or common sense, and probably should have been banned a while ago. I honestly thought it would be funnier to ban and see if they fork out 10 bucks to come back.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2008 12:54
|
|
|
I think itsme is works for a doll company in some capacity. The one that makes the one with lovely seams and that some guy posted a review of and got trolled for 11 pages for making honest observations about how poo poo the doll was. Incidentally I think Spergin Haven's owns one of those dolls he was slating in his review. terrible english. Worse than chocolatemouse of Ceti fame (hi fellow A.E. Goons woo- sorry I quit )
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2008 19:36
|
|
|
Caligasti posted:^^^^^ Sadly I think that's wishful thinking.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2008 08:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 15:01 |
|
|
Let the baby have his gently caress-doll. At least don't have to deal with him for an undisclosed period of time.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2008 14:16
|
|