|
Bleusilences posted:No it's a core 2 quad. I tried it before in may last year but the dev said there was no quad core support back then, only dual. The games where running from full speed to about 66%. If overclocking is an option, 3ghz should be cake to get to. You can probably just crank it straight to there without even worrying about voltage. I'd be surprised actually if there was a core2 chip that can't hit 3ghz...
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2010 03:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:38 |
|
|
Gyoru posted:Yeah I forgot to mention performance has went down since they went to DX11 on the GSdx plugin so use DX9 to get good performance. Huh, I'm sure they'll get it back up. DX10 used to be faster than DX9 for me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2010 03:13
|
|
|
Hung Yuri posted:I too notice a huge performance boost on dx9 compared to dx10 (can't do dx11, don't have a 5x card, only 4x) in that generally it was too slow but dx9 actually ran at an acceptable fps. Terpfen posted:What's the purpose of abandoning DX10 in the first place? I'm a little disappointed: my 4850X2 won't do DX11, so I've got to downgrade to DX9 now? The DX11 runtime has support for all the way down to DX9 hardware.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2010 22:34
|
|
|
Rothgil posted:You need a 57 series card to use DX 11 No you don't. The DX11 runtime supports hardware (via feature levels) all the way back to DX9 stuff. You don't need DX11 hardware to actually use the API. It's up to the developers to add support for the fall-backs though. You need at least Vista SP2 or Windows 7 to actually even install DX11 though.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2010 01:23
|
|
|
TehGherkin posted:Hola PS2 Emulation thread; some of you may (probably don't) remember my post way, way back asking if my piece of poo poo computer could emulate all those PS2 games up on the shelf that I never get to play anymore. I've recently upgraded my system and while I think I should be okay, I could do with another, more educated opinion. 3ghz is basically free on Q6600s. Mine never saw stock speeds, it went straight to 3.0 undervolted. I can almost guarantee it will ~* just work *~ if you roll up and set your FSB to 333. If you have trouble, try it out. There's a million overclocking guides all over. slovach fucked around with this message at 00:36 on Nov 28, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2010 00:32
|
|
|
Golbez posted:
Dreamcast emulators exist and work, pretty sure I remember playing Sonic Adventure before. I think it was fine, but it's a pretty major title so I'm not sure how compatibility fares elsewhere.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2011 04:50
|
|
And I assume, Dreamcast? 
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:38 |
|
|
VDay posted:Yeah it's not really a huge issue or anything, I just always found it weird that some emulators decided that they didn't want to use F3/F5 or whatever but instead would have F2/F4. I figured this would've all been standardized by now. FFT seems to gently caress up after the first real fight with your crew. It seems to crash under JIT and shits itself (but stays alive) under the interpreter. I patched the disc image with something I found on FFHacktics to fix the framerate halving during spells, and it works fine -- but the game itself really isn't playable since it starts vomiting all over itself after battles once it puts you on your own. Latest SVN's still do it. edit: I don't know how the gently caress I missed your next post, aka the one right above me. Oops. slovach fucked around with this message at 05:00 on Jun 26, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2013 04:35
|
|