|
e: just saw that finn
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 13:14 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 12:17 |
|
28 people had signs of no obstruction of airways 16 people heart and lungs showing definite signs of working 'Some overlap between those two figures' but 41 people had evidence that they had potential to survive past 3:15. loving hell.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 14:02 |
|
The Sun didn't send a journalist to cover the panel, no representation at all.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 14:58 |
|
serious gaylord posted:Conflicts with BBC just saying that Trevor Hicks ordered anyone from the sun out of his conference. Nobody was there to move, that's how they realised. The Guardian Liveblog - 14:56 posted:Hicks asks any Sun journalists present to leave the press conference. No one leaves, though, as one of the other family members points out "would they tell the truth?"
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 15:02 |
|
Kelvin MacKenzie just offered his 'profuse apology'.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 15:11 |
|
T. Mascis posted:Where? And I'd like to see the BBC justify his continued employment after this BBC News flashed it and reported it just after the silence, BBC reporter has just put it to the panel as well.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 15:16 |
|
The narrative from the Sun is that they're victims of the Police misleading them, there's no real apology there and they're still scum.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 22:04 |
|
There's also the fact that every conviction made by South Yorkshire Police in that period is potentially unsafe, and the political and legal fallout that will result.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 23:12 |
|
Ninpo posted:I was 8 at the time so some of my recollection is fuzzy, were any supporters convicted of anything following and related to Hillsborough? No I mean every conviction over that period, 116 doctored statements by senior officers.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 23:24 |
|
FullLeatherJacket posted:From reading the report, what they're referring to are statements to the Taylor inquiry, and SYP basically said up front that they'd edited statements, but to remove matters of "opinion" as opposed to fact. There was no great need for them to do that, and that much was said at the time, but then everything carried on as normal. Every decision to alter could be argued as misconduct in a public office.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2012 23:51 |
|
T. Mascis posted:Well since today revealed one of the biggest cover ups in British history the morning papers will probably be something to take note of. Let's see shall we: Just to add to how utterly hosed that is; The FT manage to find some space on their front page to cover the report; And even the New York Times manages to have it feature as well. For the Telegraph to do that is baffling to be honest.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2012 02:07 |
|
Umbriago, what's your view on the AG pursuing Misconduct in a Public Offie charges?
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2012 15:02 |
|
Umbriago posted:Hmmm, well I'm not really familiar with the case law here, so take my thoughts with a pinch of salt. A quick look at the offence and I see at least two grounds where a charge of Misconduct in a Public Office would probably fail. Interesting that you see potential FA culpability, but I meant South Yorkshire Police and the Ambulance service.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2012 15:33 |
|
Sheila Coleman has confirmed that she was a hacking victim, probably more of the JFT96 campaign as well.
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2012 22:42 |
|
irlZaphod posted:Jesus loving Christ I honestly can't think of how it would play out if the Sun had been hacking them, which is what a lot of operation Tuleta is looking at.
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2012 22:57 |
|
This is slightly more removed from Hillsborough as a coverup, but;SW Online posted:Hillsborough campaigner Sheila Coleman’s home was broken into more than once—and her address book and papers about the case stolen. The question is: who did it? Read through Brown Moses' thread for the whole Southern Investigations/NOTW/News International links.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2012 10:00 |
|
The solicitor who represented the families at the initial inquest is on the record as being a oval office. Daily Mail posted:Link Everything coming out about this is hosed, from bottom to top.
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2012 13:06 |
|
Director of Public Prosecutions is reviewing the report;Kier Starmer posted:I have now concluded that the Crown Prosecution Service should consider all the material now available in relation to the tragic events of 15 April 1989, including material made available by the independent panel. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is reviewing the report' Deborah Glass (Deputy IPCC) posted:We are going to be launching an independent investigation into those new matters. We've carried out a review of the report and begun looking at the 450,000 pages of underlying evidence. We have identified a large number of potential criminal and misconduct offences. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/oct/12/hillsborough-disaster-biggest-inquiry-police There are serving senior officers who, hopefully, will be facing charges and they deserve every minute of terror they're going to have in the coming months.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2012 17:43 |
|
They've also revised the number of people who may have survived upwards, from between 41 to somewhere around 58 people based on fresh medical analysis.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2012 14:18 |
|
South Yorkshire Police will always be cunts;quote:South Yorkshire police chiefs wanted to use funds donated in memory of Hillsborough disaster victims to pay for breaks in the sun for their officers, it has emerged.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2013 15:22 |
|
utter scum
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2013 01:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 12:17 |
|
It's clickbait of the worst kind, ignoring it is the only sensible option
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2014 13:27 |