Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Raenir Salazar posted:


As an Anglophone Quebecer I see the Queen as a symbol for national unity, equality and preserving Canadian culture.

This is a shrieking sound to my ears. Trolling or not i almost started to bleed there.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 19:52 on May 31, 2013

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
Incendies is one of the better film ive seen. It threads on matters that very little movies have been able to.

Worth watching with subtitles. Its like Der untergang. You have to watch it in the original language.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

JoelJoel posted:

Obviously income plays a role. The poor are more likely to interact with the CJS and aboriginals are more likely to be poor in Canada. StatsCan has plenty of studies that document this quite clearly. However, poverty cannot come close to fully accounting for numbers like: Aboriginal adults make up 4% of the adult population but 21% (male) and 30% (female) of the prison population. These numbers can seem slightly deceptive. This number translates into (roughly, as figures are not all from the same year and there are major differences between sentencing, prison time, recidivism, provincial v federal, etc.) 970 per 100,000 aboriginals in Canada are in prison, compared to 140 per 100,000 for the entire population (including aboriginals).

It's always difficult when dealing with numbers, but here is one way to put it: The US, who imprison their own citizens at the highest rate in the world, has a rate roughly five to six times higher than Canada's. This rate is about 730 or so per 100,000 in the US (all demographics). As mentioned above, we imprison aboriginals at a rate of 970 per 100,000. That's an incarceration rate over 30% higher than the US. That is seriously hosed.

e: this also seems to be getting worse. I don't have the data in front of me, but IIRC a major study from 1990 found that Aboriginal adults made up 2.5-3% of the total population and something like 10-15% of the prison population.

Let's not forget that we made them poor by coming here and framing them in a system they never wanted.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Kafka Esq. posted:

Technically, we didn't. I don't know how old you are, but I didn't sign any treaties. Also, I've only voted for a party that has one of the better track records in engaging aboriginal stakeholders, and I've marched in native solidarity at least four times (it was sometimes difficult to tell who we were marching for at Occupy).

I've recognized my privilege due to being white, don't lump me in with the do nothings, if you please.

In the same way you live to benefit from a well developed system and infrastructure you also inherit the bad decisions of the past. That's the way i see it, otherwise it becomes all too easy to distance ourselves from huge issues. Just wait a generation and bam, none of the original perpetrators are there so everything must be fine.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 16:25 on Aug 14, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
In a way if they benefit from our government in any way they should assume it's past wrongdoings as well. I think we have a morale obligation toward the native to at least fix certain injustices, like the disproportionate amount of native in prison.

JoelJoel posted:

My Dutch ancestors did a little bit of colonial fuckery in a few continents. Should I be apologizing to my Indonesian friends?

These things are not personal issues, you don't have people go door to door to apologize, but nations do apologize for crimes, tho rarely.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 16:39 on Aug 14, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

AllTerrineVehicle posted:

I think recognizing privilege and understanding how it came about, and working to address the issues that propagate inequality, is far more productive than trying to assign blame or attribute fault to people who had no direct influence on the creation of the status quo.

There's a difference between saying "Yes, there are problems, and I, personally, benefit from this inequality despite having no part in its origins. Let's work to bring everyone up to the same level" and "Well, I didn't oppress anyone, therefore I have no responsibility to address the issues faced by those less fortunate."

Well in a way that's what i want to convey. You are not to blame directly as a person. You are part of a system that is to blame. You benefit from the system therefor you have a certain morale obligation to not turn a blind eye to its past or current crimes.

JoelJoel posted:

Tell that to Turkey.

Was there some kind of door to door apologize drive in Turkey?

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
With the kind of snowfall and temperature difference we get in canada, I think it would be hilarious to see us build one of these overpriced HSR.

I think we would be better served by some kind of suspended system, like this monorail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AvQGJExago

I mean this basically ignores weather.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 15:33 on Aug 19, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Guigui posted:

Oh gosh - looks like Lyle Lanley visited Montreal after his Ogdenville visit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVqVdQYC44Y

In all seriousness though - I felt like a downer pointing out all the flaws in that original Montreal monorail pitch to my parents who showed it to me.

I can't believe how many people are ready to use the simsons as a valid argument. I mean i think half the answers to my monorail post included the simsons argument.

Kintarooooo posted:

I'm pretty sure I would not want to waste our already stretched tax dollars supporting something that seems to have come from the intelligence of an 1-Eastern Quebecer from Sec2 trying to sell this "idea" which quite literally is a 2-ripoff from the Simpsons.

The smell test for this is to actually fund/build a prototype, 3-let the private sector do what it says it does best: spend its own money to make a) a circular test to prove that it could function 24/7 in all seasons; b) a linear test to prove that it won't vibrate the gently caress out of itself at speeds of 250 km/h (or less). 4-There's a problem with bridges bending themselves out of shape given a certain load... I wouldn't want to test that theory on Trens-Quebec cars potentially falling onto a highway crushing the living poo poo out of hundreds of cars below.

5-Scam, unrealized prototype, pipe dream. I choose to think that this isn't the former, but if you say you're going to revolutionize something, 6-you loving do it, you don't build facebook pages and simulations aimed to 7-lull a population to disburse from the public chequebook.

8-Otherwise, a partially buried TGV line is the more sane option. If this *thing* was as good as it says it is, they would either complement the TGV network or compete with it. Oh wait, they can't have that, it would ruin their profit margin...


(parasitic) Capitalism at work. Let them impoverish some other government. Ending their video with "Suspendu au Québec" is also a lovely idea, 9-the only other suspended thing we have in Quebec are construction companies found guilty of or self-admitted to collusion/corruption. Poor image choice on their part.

1- Quebec bashing: Idea came from a dirty Quebec peasant. Appeal to ridicule
2- It doesn't work in the simsons. Solid argument there. False attribution
3- The private sector is fabulous at testing ideas.
4- So you're saying that things break? Is that the arguement? (I liked the "hundred of cars" hyperbole) Appeal to consequences (Exagerated)
5- You've already decided that the whole thing is a scam. Appeal to motive
6- You just take your toolbox and go make it right. Don't try to get popular attention or funding because that's ridiculous.
7- Some more Appeal to motive.
8- For no valid reason other than your personal hate of the idea you declare TGV the better alternative.Appeal to spite
9- False analogy

Now here are some actual arguments:
A- A TGV cuts a region in half, it requires bridges and tunnels.
B- The rails have to be very smooth and stable which makes it expensive and hard to maintain with our winters.
C- The TGV is not flexible, in that it cant adapt well to different passenger numbers at different hours.

Now, i am not closed to either ideas, but i think hand waving ideas because they come from dirty Quebecois is wasteful.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 16:27 on Aug 20, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

To be honest this all sounds like a load of crap (the quoted article) and someone who is just interpreting the data the way he sees fit. Anecdotal as it might be, the people i know who lost job in factories didn't find new amazing jobs. Most accepted shittier wages, shittier hours, shittier conditions and often quite far from where they live.

The article you quote sounds like someone who's looked at graphs and paper all his life and has never actually been / spoke to people that worked in that industry. Where i live, in Trois-Rivieres, the destruction of those well paying job will have effects that have yet to be felt. A generation lingers here, with no good prospect for a job.

I'm lucky i have time and the opportunity to get my degree and probably more, but so many won't get that chance. I can't foresee a happy future for families living on lovely jobs, with a housing market so blown out of proportion that the simple idea of owning a house sounds comical to them.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

eXXon posted:

Well, to be fair, it sounds like he is inferring that most of the people who lost manufacturing jobs during that time period found similarly well-paying jobs in the oil patch, since unemployment didn't rise significantly... again, during that time period. It's not clear what happened to the 30+% of manufacturing jobs paying over $30/hour, though. Then again, nothing is really clear in that article because the reporting on any kind of research tends to be shoddy.

I mean i don't really know about the rest of Canodia. But the patch where i live it's not looking rosy. I feel most people are simply trying to deny it or live on as if nothing happened. We've gone from a city with plenty of 30 bucks factory jobs of the "GET A HOUSE, A POOL AND 2 CARS, RETIRE AND GET A WINNEBAGO!" type and now all we're left with is the service industry and the retirement houses (sp?).

It's like the city is a zombie living on only to care for the dying boomers. gently caress whatever happens after.

edit: I mean we're having casinos pop up right in front of the retirement houses. It's humorous.

(Complete with their own private red light for their crossing and parking. The whole package is situated right beside the police HQ, so poppy and mommy can spend their retirement on well deserved horse races and poker games)

Coylter fucked around with this message at 19:38 on Sep 6, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

PT6A posted:

I'm about as anti-Quebec as anyone I know, even here in Calgary, and even I think this a little bit extreme. I just wish they'd be treated like any other province in Canada. No other province would get away with trying to entrench racism in law. They should be able to take steps to protect their unique culture, as all provinces should, but Quebec takes it much too far. They ought to promote French instead of trying to poo poo over everything else.

I do find it pleasantly ironic that Calgary, for our redneck image, managed to elect a fairly left-leaning, visible minority (who is widely assumed to be gay) as a mayor, meanwhile the most "cultured" region in Canada, at least by their own estimation, is so xenophobic that they're actually trying to write laws to control what sorts of clothes people wear.

Ok how about get hosed?

You come in here and throw every Quebecers in the same boat. You then climb onto you're golden throne of pure Anglo-saxon morality and start preaching. Well guess what your emperor has no clothes. Have you looked at the disproportionate amount of native in YOUR prisons? Oh maybe you forgot how utterly racist and condescending English Canadians were in the past with the french. A few decades ago, no french Canadian held leading position in our own companies. Boss was synonymous with English. Up until a few decades ago WE were the INFERIOR race because we mixed with the natives. We all know how much you pure English morality holders like the Natives.

Interesting how in such a little time we've come from that to actually being ridiculously called "nazis" and "racist" for comments that do not even scratch the surface of what you fuckwits did a few decades ago and still do.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
Of course there are differing opinions, but like it was pointed out most medias are one sided. Quebec solidaire is an example of a good left leaning progressive party.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

firewalker posted:

I'm all for denouncing the charter and raking the PQ over the coals for it, but what some of you guys are saying just shows how you hate Quebec.

Joking about sending tanks again? Seriously?

The ingrained Quebec hate has been steadily bubbling to the top in the last few days. This thread is absolutely non-inclusive to Quebecois and just reinforced the feeling that i had that most Canadian see English speakers as real Canadians and Quebecois are just "them". Honestly i don't have a problem with it since we're actually a different nation with an abusive step dad that wont let us leave.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Baronjutter posted:

Every region in canada hates and makes fun of the others, get off your tiny charter-approved sized cross.

Sorry but you're simply fundamentally wrong. Any history book will prove you otherwise.

No province has been abused to the level that we have. This is not a "but we do it to all the others too!" case.

edit: Also i think the charter is a very dumb idea.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

flakeloaf posted:

^^No, this is a "You did it to us so now it's our turn". That's way worse.


I didn't say the court couldn't intervene in provincial rulings, I said it wasn't the job of the court to pass law where none existed. That's pretty much the complete opposite of striking down bullshit racism.

By saying you're against the Charter, I take that to mean you don't believe the freedom to practise your religion is a fundamental human right?

Really cmon, as much as i hate the charter its not even on the same paradigm level to what has been done in the past. It's a slightly controversial issue that has been blown out of proportion and added to the Quebec bashing ammo stack.

I have no idea what you mean there at the end. I would honestly answer, but what you said makes no sense.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
The main problem with the charter i think, is that it attempt to secularize the individuals instead of the institutions.

ex: I don't care if a teacher wears a turban or any other religious symbol (weapons notwithstanding) as long as he doesn't teach his religion or religious point of view.

The charter is a broad stroke in a world that requires subtle details.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

angerbot posted:

I'm terrible at baseball, that's not a reason for baseball not to be an activity. School sports kind of suck in general if you're not good at them. More choices is better than "OK TODAY FLOOR HOCKEY" stomping on a human face forever.

I'll be controversial here but the school system in general sends a huge gently caress you to everyone who practice e-sports. Not being aerobic doesn't remove their sport qualities and physical exercise can be had trough other means.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
Well now now, obviously i didn't mean they could replace physical exercise. My point is that kids nowadays like video games, why not use them to get them into team play, strategy...etc. We seem to be missing an opportunity to use this to get to kids and teach them trough these avenues.

edit: In the same way hockey/sport is used a team spirit builder and involvement in a team can actually keep kids in school.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Ceciltron posted:

It's a Big Deal to reopen the debate and say "No, you are not free to decide if you're going to secede. We'll decide if you're allowed."

Which is a pretty good way to stir up les souverainistes.

I can't see how this wont backfire.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Lexicon posted:

There's definitely some interesting products at the high end. It's far from the case that all our cheese is poo poo. No one buys that stuff in any meaningful quantities though because it's hilariously expensive.

What is poo poo, is most cheese that people buy. The cheese section in Loblaws or Safeway, etc, other than one small speciality corner perhaps, is the very definition of mediocrity. You wouldn't be able to sell a single brick of that weaksauce, plastic "mild cheddar" poo poo anywhere in the UK or continental Europe.

You're full of poo poo. I don't know what assbackward part of Canada you come from but here in Quebec the cheese is good. We get a wide variety that is at least as good as whatever fantasy cheese from Europe you want to think about.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
How is the SAQ utter poo poo. I've always had A1 service and choice there. They have many outlets and alcohol is already available in grocery stores and corner stores.

Maybe you mean to say that the magic of free markets would make them better? What are we waiting to sell off our water utilities then. Competing water lines would bring well needed competition to a stagnating(le pun) industry.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 16:58 on Oct 30, 2013

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Helsing posted:

Bahahaha. Chrystia Freeland would be a great addition to the party. This is my favourite comment of hers. In Canada your job shouldn't be based on who your father was!

Oh man i could feel daddy's boy get all uncomfortable on that one.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Kafka Esq. posted:

Okay, so maybe we need to discuss what Canada Post said and the way we're portraying it here. Canada Post said they would let people retire and not hire replacements. This is attrition. They're not going to fire those people outright.

Now, is this just softening the blow by Canada Post? Most likely, but we don't really have numbers. Chances are it's going to be both some lay offs and a lot of attrition over the next five years.

edit: also, I think you can burst that talking point by reminding people that Canada Post was profitable quite literally until the Conservatives appointed Deepak Chopra in 2011. If anyone should lose their job, it's him and the people who appointed him.

Basically the youths eat the brunt of the losses? Gotcha! Seems to be a recurrent theme these years. loving ado's and their xbox thats all they deserve.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
But can't you just print money and mail it to people to fight deflation?

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

bunnyofdoom posted:

Last we really heard was Paille stepping down, and the Charter brouhaha, where they said they'd support it after Mourani said they wouldn't, so they kicked her out of caucus reducing themselves to 3 MPs. Mourani subsequently pronounced herself a federalist now.

So, maybe?

That was kind of ridiculous. The charter has absolutely nothing to do with sovereignty. I mean i can understand that she would leave the bloc but there is no relation between the charter and independence. I mean she could have left the bloc and remained pro-independence.

You can be separatiste and not like the bloc or the PQ. Those things are not inter-dependent. I mean i am pro separation, yet i hate most of the PQ policies and always found the bloc to be quite useless.

It just looks like she switched allegiance to piss off people, which speaks volume about her.

Coylter fucked around with this message at 00:56 on Feb 6, 2014

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Helsing posted:

I believe her argument for becoming a Federalist was that she'd come to see how the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms had a role to play in protecting the rights of citizens in Quebec. I think its kind of understandable why, if you opposed the Quebec Secularism charter and what it represents, then it might cause you to reconsider your stance on sovereignty.

So her argument was that daddy Canada is protecting an irresponsible Quebec from itself. Why was she a separatist in the first place, i mean this is a weak argument as all hell considering the vast amount of pro-separation arguments.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
It is absolutely catering to the "hurrdurrr i don't like brown people" rural population.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

They all have cellphones and fridges, kids these days have it easy.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

more like dICK posted:

If the government has to pay to fix your lovely body, they should probably get a say on what goes into it.

Is this a serious post?

Then by all means put some regulation on the amount of soda one can buy. Hell just ban it!

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
Why does the NDP not support marijuana legalization? It seems like they would lose nothing for supporting it and would also remove that card from the libs.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
I don't know what you mean, there is plenty of jobs for those willing to move a bit west.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

tagesschau posted:

But why would I want to move to Etobicoke?

Well for one isn't that the hometown of the glorious leader?

edit: i mean look at that smile.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
We simply need to come to term that we should pay people something decent for being in the service industry.

I know its hard.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

PT6A posted:

Yeah, there was. It took an hour or two, as I recall. No hurry; I trust you.

Let's do a good thing here and raise some money for a children's hospital, everyone! I especially encourage everyone who's already spent money to change my title to contribute an equal amount of money to the Alberta Children's Hospital, which is a fantastic organization.

Remember: it's easy, and the link is in my custom title already.

ITT: Make people donate to charities out of spite.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Franks Happy Place posted:

Holy gently caress, you would people PLEASE shut the gently caress up about a god damned fast food chain?

Canadian culture for you right there.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
But that would only remove what, like 30% of criminal organization's income.

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
This is a troll account right?

I just don't know anymore...

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009
Quebec's liberal are pretty much our conservatives.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Coylter
Aug 3, 2009

Daynab posted:

He's the Anakin Skywalker to PT6A's Emperor Palpatine, he was supposed to bring balance to the force but became Vader instead.

I believe Canadian Politics could learn something from this story.

He's just a bitter bear who externalizes his complex created from not having bought some glorious equity using our unmovable 1% BOC interest rates.

edit: ^The real question is where is our Luke.

  • Locked thread