|
xanif posted:I thought that getting him to call me a hypocrite, arrogant, and ignorant would get him probated since I got slapped when I called someone delusional but I guess it wasn't enough. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 04:07 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 13:10 |
|
Zeike posted:Hey there friend! So whats your fleet looking like these days? Dusty Lens posted:Hey aren't you the bitcoin guy? Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 04:11 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:08 |
|
Claim:Skoll posted:Ha ha. You're a loving idiot. Evidence?
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:17 |
|
Skoll posted:You're a loving autismo legend.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:22 |
|
Skoll posted:You should feel deep shame
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:25 |
|
Zeike posted:Dare I say... Space Court?
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 04:29 |
|
That Works posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/query.php?action=posthistory&userid=215655 Is this what it feels like to be one of you filthy space-poors? Man, your lives must be terrible. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 05:28 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 05:26 |
|
nnnotime posted:If the game ever gets released, how hackable will Star Citizen be? In all seriousness, if CIG doesn't require clients to run listening software when connected to the PU, they're fully loving retarded. BTW awhile back some rando forumturd in this thread said that anyone who claimed to have made money flipping ships is a liar. I made over 2 grand selling LTI ships at inflated prices to fools on reddit - enough to get my destroyer almost for free. Now what? nnnotime posted:How credible is Lesnick on this subject? Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 14:35 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 14:25 |
|
That Works posted:So you made enough money to break even paying for a game that doesn't function yet? Edit: No, you can't have any. Get a fuckin job ya louse. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 14:56 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 14:52 |
|
OhsH posted:confirmed bitcoiners still retarded with money gg close
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:00 |
|
Amun Khonsu posted:Point is if someone spends 3k of his "disposable income" on SC, heckling him for it is silly regardless if it becomes vaporeware.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:19 |
|
OhsH posted:god you all planning on voting trump???
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:33 |
|
OhsH posted:whats to talk about w/r/t the game anyways
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:35 |
|
AP posted:It's all been very well thought out. If the game has as much thought put into as the marketing it might actually be good. I have the money and time to get a Glaive, but I just can't be bothered until SC is playable (and fun) with dual joysticks. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 15:40 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:38 |
|
AP posted:Seraph, What did you get banned for in the end Or restated much more concisely: Reason is the only authority I respect. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 16:18 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:44 |
|
Skoll posted:The fedora is strong with this one.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 15:50 |
|
Skoll posted:If you weren't a j4g Skoll posted:I too, keep a thesaurus next to my keyboard so I can prattle on a bunch of pseudo-intellectualism Eonwe posted:Please dont make me shitpost here today Rutibex posted:A fool and his money are soon parted. even if a literal billionaire spent $3000 on star citizen i would still consider them an idiot and a rube YAWN, this argument is older than dust. Nobody cares dude, idealists gonna idealize. Also Sander 2016 Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 16:11 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:02 |
|
AP posted:Seraph, What did you get banned for in the end
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:19 |
|
Skoll posted:If you're really a girl OhsH posted:personally i love the fact that this game will be bad. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 16:29 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:25 |
|
Rutibex posted:nah, actually when rich people start bragging about their poo poo they expect plebs to be impressed, they get super upset and defensive when they get laughed at for being idiots Warcabbit posted:As I said, gently caress whatever qualifications Sandi has - she knows how to produce, and that's what matters.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:36 |
|
Eonwe posted:Lol you are like a parody Eonwe posted:Seraph84 is the most broken person in the thread that I see
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:43 |
|
Sedisp posted:Conversely I will get the same seat for zero dollars while not wearing the losing teams jersey. Guess I'm the better fun investor.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:46 |
|
Eonwe posted:Sc druggie and seraph84 oh boy Eonwe posted:Whose alt is this
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:48 |
|
Refind Chaos posted:Just a reminder, this is still the worst thread, with the worst posters, on all of the SA forums. Not beer's fault, but man this whole loving thread is a train wreck of awfulness.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 16:50 |
|
Eonwe posted:You like star citizen
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 17:06 |
|
Friendly Tumour posted:Jesus loving christ
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 17:10 |
|
Friendly Tumour posted:You suck dude. You are poo poo and hosed in tje braim Decrepus posted:Who would j4g for a guild that has been clowned on so hard in their own thread on their own forum? Making fun of the members is mod sanctioned and open season. Please do not call anyone a j4g because this is not goonswarm this is nothing. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 17:30 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 17:26 |
|
Eldragon posted:Please explain to me in detail why a fine young bitcoin capitalist like yourself endorses Sanders. I hate capitalism more than I love being wealthy. I hold no illusions about "independence" in the modern world. I hold the following to be self-evident truth. With a reasonably diligent amount of research, any earnest student of history and science will arrive at the same conclusions about industrial capitalism I outline below: 1. Capitalism is a system of resource distribution which actively prevents equilibrium. All systems approach equilibrium unless prevented from doing so by a constantly applied external force. In capitalism, that force is systematic hierarchical violence. 2. Civilization is based on a clearly defined and widely accepted yet often unarticulated hierarchy. Violence done by those higher on the hierarchy to those lower is nearly always invisible, that is, unnoticed. When it is noticed, it is fully rationalized. Violence done by those lower on the hierarchy to those higher is unthinkable, and when it does occur is regarded with shock, horror, and the fetishization of the victims. Our way of living—industrial civilization—is based on, requires, and would collapse very quickly without persistent and widespread violence. 3. The property of those higher on the hierarchy is more valuable than the lives of those below. It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control—in everyday language, to make money—by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice. NOTE: The recent backlash against police brutality/murder is a sure sign #3 is beginning to change; this change will be fatal for capitalism 4. Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions. Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the monetary fortunes of the decision-makers and those they serve. Stated another way - Social decisions are founded primarily (and often exclusively) on the almost entirely unexamined belief that the decision-makers and those they serve are entitled to magnify their power and/or financial fortunes at the expense of all those beneath them in the hierarchy. 5. Given the premises stated above, anyone who truly despises violence must be opposed to capitalism. As I love reason and loathe violence (and exploitation, poverty, starvation, indignity, drudgery, and suffering) I am therefore opposed to capitalism. This is not a political choice, I am compelled by the evidence to believe as I do. My reason for opposing capitalism is in essence the same as my reason for opposing religion: I loathe human suffering. I look at history and see a long trend away from violence, ignorance, and superstition arcing slowly toward reason, knowledge, and empathy. Like a 350 old man on life support in the hospital, capitalism is dying. It's dying now because growing empathy is finally killing it. To PREVENT capitalism's death now would represent a monumental historical aberration - a break from this thousands of years long undeniable trend toward a civilization of ruled purely by reason and empathy. Capitalists tend to believe that individuals gravitate towards being inherently bad. This belief is not only provably false, but willfully ignorant. Human nature is trusting, open, generous, curious, compassionate, and kind. Study Bonobo Chimpanzees for reference. By contrast, most of human culture is myth-rooted, unscientific, deceptive, ignorant, fearful, hateful, and self-and-other-destructive. Why is that? Culture is ancient, it's been around for tens of thousands of years - most of that time dominated by violence - while modern reason is a relative infant at only around 400 years old. Related reading: http://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/28/science/researchers-trace-empathy-s-roots-to-infancy.html http://www.apa.org/monitor/oct05/mirror.aspx https://www.dnalc.org/view/852-Mirror-Neurons-and-Empathy.html http://news.emory.edu/stories/2014/03/chimpanzees_and_empathy/campus.html http://cultureofempathy.com/references/Experts/Frans-de-Waal.htm http://www.democracyjournal.org/16/6740.php?page=all http://www.democracyatwork.info/ Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 18:42 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 18:20 |
|
Chalks posted:How much have you spent on pictures of internet spaceships? Eldragon posted:Clearly your exile from RSI has changed you for the better. Potato Salad posted:I too can basically spurt pages and pages of self-aggrandizing shitposting that reads like a millenial's take on Rand because I played Bioshock. Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are prsented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect for the ego to protect the core belief they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:10 |
|
3 posted:EDIT: also you unironically think bitcoin has worth as a currency rather than as an unstable escrow system for laundering money and buying child porn It's natural for me, as I don't trust government generally, and especially mistrust national government.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:18 |
|
3 posted:soooooooo why is btc still pegged to currency exchange values?????? https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/why-bitcoin-value-doesnt-matter/ https://medium.com/@agilemofo/why-you-should-care-about-bitcoin-1a812f8fa7cd https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaPgfErzeu0 There will come a time when the average person will think to themselves (about us) "hyperinflation after hyperinflation, why did these idiots keep trusting national money for as long as they did?", and I believe that day is not far off. Sedisp posted:So you lack an understanding of value? If you asked the average joe about the internet in 1995, what do you suppose the probability would be that they would excitedly tell you it's going to completely take over the telecom industry and make a bunch of people rich, while bankrupting others? Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 19:30 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:20 |
|
Rutibex posted:nothing has intrinsic value. Rutibex posted:buttcoins have value assigned to it by a handful of nerds, US dollars have value assigned to it by the most powerful military in history tooterfish posted:You can buy drugs just fine with that dirty fiat money though*? What happens when you get burned? Oh, you didn't know that there's no escrow with cash? Oops, you got hosed. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 19:42 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:36 |
|
Sedisp posted:What happens when you send buttcoins and they don't send you drugs?
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:39 |
|
Potato Salad posted:So, you can buy a Retaliator empty hull with LTI for $150 and two modules for it with LTI for $50.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:45 |
|
Rutibex posted:lol i am literally a historian, i am paid money to know history and tell it to other people I name you economic fundamentalist, sir. Don't feel bad, you're hardly the first academic that I've embarrassed. Hey, at least it wasn't in person in front of all your onlooking students. Seraph84 fucked around with this message at 19:57 on Aug 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 19:53 |
|
Skoll posted:This just in, bitcoin / anarchy fanatic knows more than educated and tenured historian.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 20:00 |
|
3 posted:lucky we have you (who is in no way fundamentally rooted to specific concepts like the superiority of cryptocurrency) to enlighten the masses. why bother applying strict academic scrutiny to anything when i can have a youtube video explain it to me instantly; thanks the internet!
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 20:06 |
|
Chalks posted:If Seraph84, DSmart and Croberts had an ego fight, who would win?
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 20:10 |
|
You guys are a fun crowd, have to admit I'm impressed. All these hurt feelings and nobody has suspended my account yet! It's almost like you don't feel the need to censor opposing perspectives on this here internet forum. The only thing this place needs is more angry Christians. @Rutibex http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/noam-chomsky-kind-anarchism-i-believe-and-whats-wrong-libertarians?sc=fb
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 20:17 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 13:10 |
|
OhsH posted:i'm actually really happy when people come in and loudly proclaim the reasons i should never talk to them.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2015 20:24 |