|
gently caress it, dorf me. I'm willing to be a bastard.
|
#
¿
Jul 19, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 09:13 |
|
|
##confirmDr. Hurt posted:Whoops here's some elephants. Whoops here's some more elephants. Who ordered all of these elephants???? What's wrong with having some caged elephants? I mean sure if you order too many you could run into problems.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 04:23
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Why is someone called the hammerer if they're not hammering? Bullshit imo It could be an adamantine hammer, that'd explain why it's just a doublevote instead of a dayvig. Things are like styrofoam.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 04:28
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I like Kumba I like Opop?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 02:14
|
|
|
Kumbamontu posted:get off my man no
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
Juanito posted:There is no easy way to see postcounts now, unfortunately. Huh, you're right. Weird.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 16:50
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Also dumbo you're both voting on each other so in the event you're both scum, you're busing (it's unlikely). One of you is probably scum though, whereas Fry just seems mad, but you seem mad + using fake reasoning. Most notably the use of a narrative hypothetical that involves the use of "OMGUS" I agree that at least one of them is likely to be scum. The whole thing feels overblown, especially for day one, I agree with you there. However I really don't like Fry's response to the "joke" vote case. Fry definitely has enough experience to know that "joke" votes are things that scum does, and to respond with that much emotion feels really forced. Plus, 3E is putting pressure on people, which is a mark in their favor. ##vote Fry
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
yuming posted:The two: Fry or 3E. It's pretty easy to understand. They're both overreacting in really suspicious ways, but 3E is scumhunting. Pretty simple decision.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 02:52
|
|
|
Philip J. Fry posted:Such. A. Bandwagon. Alternate interpretation, the case on you is the strongest, so I'm voting for you. You and 3E were at 3 each at the time, IIRC.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 03:26
|
|
|
Philip J. Fry posted:Alright I'm doing this now so we have the chance to lynch someone else. Why claim BP this far from hammer? You've all but guaranteed that it won't get used now, if you actually are BP.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 14:07
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Yeah Jefepato is scum. Can someone explain the AC and Hal stuff to me? I think it's mostly due to my inactivity. I fell down some stairs yesterday, and immediately fell down another set, which hampered my ability to post somewhat. As for Hal I haven't had a chance to read the thread yet and won't until the morning so I can't give you my take just now.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2014 04:50
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom, the Opop link in the player list goes to pokemafia.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
Also I'm mostly okay, so go ahead and laugh at my clumsiness.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2014 14:38
|
|
|
I've been super busy today and I do feel bad about that, let me just copypaste a text file I started to put together but didn't have time to finishpartial readlist from earlier today posted:BN- Don't like the "I like my role" post but not much to go on otherwise Sorry I can't give you more than this right now. This is what I got when I started re-reading the thread, didn't get through the whole thing though. Real life is a thing. An alternate may be called for honestly.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2014 23:58
|
|
|
yuming posted:It was enough of a stretch that when voting Fry AC shouldn't've been "yes obv one of them is scum!" It's a really narrow lens to filter your vote through. What, this thing? I didn't say "obviously one of them is scum" I said that I thought one of them was likely to be scum based on the argument they were having, and that I thought it was more likely to be fry because 3E was the one who was actually scumhunting.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2014 00:09
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Anyway Grandi is town cool beans Wait, why is Grandi cleared?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2014 02:21
|
|
|
##vote TT That's a really weak reason to hard defend anyone.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2014 02:48
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I don't really have one, I just feel better about everyone else besides him. Part of it is lack of activity, but what little content he has isn't great either. The 'readlist' he posted only calls Fry scum and opts out of opinions on most of the other players. I ran out of time. I have a life outside of internet mafia. S'why I was saying I may need an alternate.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
I figured I should post what thoughts I had instead of just more nothing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:dude, before right now you had 16 real posts over the course of the game, if you count one-word posts. I too have poo poo to do, but if you're gonna play then play. The head injury didn't help anything either. I fully intend to play, and this lurker call-out is starting to get annoying. chaoslord is also post-deficient, if that's what you're basing your case on, and more egregiously so. Granted, he also has a drat good reason for not posting so drop the lurker angle please. I find MEDS' call-out of Hal interesting. Not sure what else, but it's interesting, and "OTHER" aligned isn't quite the slam dunk case MEDS seems to think it was, but it's still something to think about.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 21:19
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:The point isn't that you're lurking, it's that it seems like at this point you are almost aggressively avoiding giving any actual opinions on other players. "Interesting" isn't an actual opinion, neither are "not enough to go on" or "calling attention to people that aren't lynch leaders, null tell?" I have actual opinions down, you are cherry picking out areas where I'm not sure what to think. Capps confuses me, but a double vote is probably a town thing and capps confusing me isn't new. Town. I really don't like tearshed's defense of Fry, I'm convinced that Fry isn't dumb enough to not know what BP is. I also don't like his defense of TT- it looks like scum trying to build town cred by defending someone he knows isn't scum- right before the end of the day, too. Would definitely vote today.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I don't think my interpretation is at all unfair. You called fry scum and hopped on the TT turbowagon. Yeah, you're responding to pressure now and I think your point against tearshed makes sense, but I still would be happy to vote you. Of course I jumped on the TT turbo wagon, his hard defenses of people were completely baseless, and his defense made no sense. Now we know he was dumb and not scum, but if the same pattern happened again you bet your rear end I'd vote for him again. As for calling Fry scum, I think he's scum. I have said why. Why are you bringing that up alongside accusing me of bandwagoning?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 21:59
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Right, but Betrayer didn't say I was scum (invasion) aligned, we dont even know what faction he was and he could easily just have been trying to discredit me. He didn't say noble aligned either. He got NK'd, and there has only been one NK per night. Barring shenanigans with a PGO or something like that, he was likely town.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 22:12
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Hal has nothing to do with ghosts, ghosts are solely my doing. I don't know why Hal is attempting to claim ghostly things. Grandicap posted:Also, I am onboard with a somber lynch. ??? "Hal lied here is my counterclaim" "Let's vote Somber" Grandi, what?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
I recommend against this. Will claim later most likely.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 19:39
|
|
|
Philip J. Fry posted:Why are you saying these things are mutually exclusive? Haven't you said multiple times that scum can very easily claim noble and get a free ride off it? Lynching nobles is a good idea. Especially since people are proving reluctant to lynch nobles for some reason? If we manage to slap down a scum masquerading as a noble, even better.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
I would definitely vote Hal. In fact, ##vote Hal
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 20:16
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Hey AC, do you want to claim? If you're gonna do it, now would be a good time. Why would I claim when I'm this far from being lynched?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
I like my vote where it is. I would switch to Somber if it came to that.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
I will not be here for deadline and it looks like Hal's not happening. ##vote somber
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
Okay that works ##vote hal
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 02:09
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:yeah it was a really stupid lynch but it was like a dozen minutes from deadline and it was clearly what was happening. Why, exactly, was the Hal lynch stupid?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2014 00:07
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:To help the scum win because you are scum. That- what? I mean, I know we didn't see the flip on BN, but there was only one kill that night.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2014 00:18
|
|
|
Basically what I'm confused about is how you could get to that conclusion, Pig.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2014 00:19
|
|
|
##vote Somber
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2014 04:44
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I don't know what your deal is, other than that you are ostensibly town, but I know that I am town and there is little reason to the contrary unless you are playing this game from inside of your butthole. An inverter is my best guess here because I have no clue otherwise, presuming you aren't lying for some reason. I have two votes on me. No. If you're going to make a mistake on me, fine, but don't drag information out of me before it's needed. tearshed posted:I think I'm going to admit defeat and say I believe BNs claim, at least. Still not sure about Somber. Nobody is opposed to an AC lynch and I think that's the better lynch regardless of Somber's true alignment. "derpdeder, the cop claim's legit but let me tell you why we should vote for someone else" Alternately, "Let's completely ignore this new information that I think is true so we can vote for this other guy" tearshed posted:Well Somber -did- claim Doc on D4, and now it's D5. Possible that the scum have a framer and used it last night on him. "Other" in this case meaning non-dwarf, look at Big Nothing posted:
This post. "Other" just means "not dwarf." "Other" does not mean "benign third party," it means "not town." Bringing up your wincon is pointless- it's literally adding "I'm town" before "and this is what I think." It's a scummy thing to do. I also don't like the "NO PROOF OF BEING A THREAT" line.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 6, 2014 14:15
|
|
How PM tied cop flavour into a game about dwarves. Only brewers can make beer, and obviously dwarves love beer so its easy to see if somebody is a dwarf or not by their reaction to 
free beer!
|
chaoslord posted:All that said, Grandi why did you bury Somber? Burying somber is weird to me, because somber specifically said for Grandi to bury people or things would suck. Any idea what he was freaking out about, Grandi?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:I don't necessarily like giving the nobles a pass either but if there are 4 scum left then we have to lynch scum now. Even if it's 3 remaining, a non-scum lynch still cuts it down to 8 with 3 after NK. I just don't think we can afford to target non-scum and so the nobles for better or worse are untouchable right now. We have a chance to hit town but going after (for example) Science right now would definitely push us closer to LYLO whereas we at least have a chance of righting the ship by leaving the nobles alone. I want to hear from Grandi. His conditional alignment claim has me on edge, as well as the seemingly random pattern of burying bodies.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 21:05
|
|
|
The Science of Suck posted:I mostly agree so by process of elimination there are only a few players I would lynch today Given how important today is I really think we should talk more before voting. Especially you, given that you essentially make whoever you vote for Hated. With you here and voting it could be lylo. If you specifically do not vote it can't be lylo, unless there was a scum team of 6+ which would be absurd.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 14:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 09:13 |
|
|
Well, if someone votes for you, it'd still possibly be lylo. You voting however puts a second vote on them automatically as far as scum would be concerned. With a team of 5 (well within the realm of possibility), there would be 4 scum votes available. Your two votes (hammerer automatically moves to hammer who you're voting on) plus 4 scum means it goes to the next day, where the four of them vote for you and suddenly the game's over. Please, PLEASE rethink your vote. At least unvote for now. I've seen too many games end early because someone voted super early in the day on lylo and right now you're the only one who's actually capable of that mistake.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 14:40
|
|