|
Told my mom, she told me to play instead
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2014 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:Your mom seems cool. Why can't she be here instead? She likes the Ouya 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2014 23:51
|
|
|
confirming now sleeping
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2014 02:28
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:at least put down a vote ##vote no lynch happy?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I've only played here twice and I was scum once. Is this like how the Xbone is the third XBOX? It's a 50/50 chance - either you're scum or you're not
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2014 10:05
|
|
|
Sorry, will be quite quiet for a couple of days as I might be getting laid off on Tuesday. Will try and keep an eye on the thread. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2014 15:05
|
|
|
TT is probably still in jester mode from last game :P Also this is the scummiest person so far cool bye ##vote Somberbrero
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2014 11:01
|
|
|
This is a town EP if you ask me.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2014 16:50
|
|
|
I dunno, EP has seemed significantly less poo poo at this whole thing than last game. I feel he's an easy target. Trust me, I'll be keeping my eye out, but for now I'm pretty happy. Also I'm less distracted now as I got laid off a day early wooooooop
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2014 18:36
|
|
|
I'm Sony's $300 Persona 4 Portable machine, which is just great 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2014 11:31
|
|
|
I am sad that being flippant for fun is seen as scummy 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2014 11:06
|
|
|
I'll likely put out a less flippant post once EP comes out with their defence 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2014 11:29
|
|
|
Somberbrero, I hate your reactions to that post. You've put a ton of pressure on EP and, in my view, he hasn't really buckled to it (whereas last game he got very obviously scummily upset). You've made this entire game about you and him so far, and one of you needs to die. I choose you. ##vote Somberbrero
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2014 21:33
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I think I want to vote crocker Any particular reason?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2014 23:29
|
|
|
I find it interesting that I'm the target rather than one of the people that didn't bother voting. Why exactly?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2014 02:35
|
|
|
Also Opop, have you actually done any scum hunting so far this game? (this is a rhetorical question you have not)
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2014 16:44
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Well we'll find out when you flip I guess You've done absolutely gently caress all to progress a case against me, or anyone else for that matter.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 18, 2014 19:18
|
|
|
I'm (obviously) fine with a Somber lynch but I think this is a better vote: #vote Opopanax He's doing exactly gently caress all this game bar riding on popular lynches.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 14:09
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I just reread and I no longer remember why I though crocker was scum. Who was number 2 on your list?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 15:13
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Epsilon, I haven't responded to you because I feel it is a waste of my time, frankly. I am usually busy on weekends and you're not arguing in good faith. The idea that I'm unfairly focused on you is very silly, but something that you've been able to capitalize on effectively. You say that even when you scumhunt I'm all over you for no reason, and people buy into the emotionality of that because you're newer and I'm traditionally kind of a dickhead. I'm tired into playing into this negative feedback loop. I'd actually find that post interesting, so please make it. I legitimately don't believe you've had good enough reasons thus far for zeroing in on EP, so a decent post outlining your case would be nice.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 23:42
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:2) Crocker has been pretending like he's actually trying to contribute to lynches when each day, his contribution has consisted of voting me apropos nothing.  this falls down to even the basic look at my post history in this thread or, say, Votefinder
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 21:34
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:You've had your vote on me at the end of the last two days previous. It was useless day one, I wasn't a candidate at all. Day two it works out slightly better since for whatever reason I was one of the two vote leaders, but you still weren't able to switch to the right candidate(Ep had two more votes I think) within a fairly large window. I don't think we could have lynched regardless but the point stands. Hammer day 2 was at ridiculous o'clock for me, and by your own admission you were a candidate for lynch. If I'd been awake at hammer, I'd have obviously moved over. It's rather odd that you think that makes me scummy instead of, say, one of the people who didn't vote at all. Somberbrero posted:I'm not even pushing for you today Crocker. I'll definitely compromise lynch you because you're probably scum, but I'd like to lynch Epsilon. That post was made for your benefit, you asked for a more in-depth read of Epsilon. I'm aware you're not pushing directly for me today, but you are continuing to try and paint me as scummy with lovely reasoning. I do appreciate the post on Epsilon but it didn't really convince me of much more than the dude being new - he's really not acting the same as Role Mafia where it was as clear as day that he was scum. Also Fiery do some work or get lynched
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I have been completely right this game on flips and have pushed votes away from town players all game. AC was town. Kerro was town. tithin was town. Capps was scum. I called all of those and you must think I am scum playing for credit or I am town as hell. I don't believe Epsilon has given nearly convincing enough reason to think I am scum. I went to check if this was true and yeah, this is a decent point. If you are scummy, then congrats on building up some town cred with me.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 21:59
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I'm much less suspicious of someone who doesn't try at all, it indicates they aren't interested in looking good, which is not scummy. I'm still very very happy with my vote, but I'll definitely be getting involved. I really don't want another no-lynch tonight 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Oh wait, he's voting you sorry. I don't think you're voting anyone? Haha, I made the same mistake as you and thought I'd voted him. Basically, he's done gently caress all except bandwagon vote. No scumhunting, nothing. I can't find a post here that helps town at all ##vote Opopanax because apparently I hadn't
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 22:14
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Yeah I agree with that assessment actually. Or rather, I definitely think Opop hasn't helped town but I don't think that necessitates him as scum. It definitely doesn't make him dyed-in-the-wool scum but it does make me not want him to be in the game. I see it as a pretty safe lynch; at worst, we get rid of a town that isn't contributing, at best we get rid of a scum that's trying to dart under the radar.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 22:23
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I'm the only one voting you, I don't think that's a bandwagon. If i were voting EP that would be a bandwagon. I'm an easy vote - there's been pressure on me from other players for a couple of days now. Face it, you've done no actual scumhunting or even contributed anything to other people's cases.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:From yesterday He's been low content posting a fair bit but to say he's anything as bad as Opop is a hell of a stretch
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I do not There's been plenty to talk about this game
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 23:50
|
|
I just don't invent stuff as town and as a result I post enough to get noticed, but not enough to not get called a lurker, unless I find something and latch onto it.
|
2 hours, where's everyone at?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 21, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
Ain't doing poo poo til I've reread the players left.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 12:47
|
|
|
hey TT nice of you to do your first scumhunting in 7 days
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 21:36
|
|
|
I wanna see what happens when I do this ##vote Epsilon Plus
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 21:45
|
|
|
Having read f_v's game recently, that case was complete cherry-picking bollocks - plenty of scumhunting was done in unquoted posts. It's also really, really easy to have a higher postcount when you make every point over 5 posts, so stop pretending like you didn't go completely missing. I don't think you're Capps' scumbuddy. ##unvote ##vote TT
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
You've triple+ posted a number of times, it's pretty self-evident. That in itself isn't scummy (it's kind of your MO) but using postcount to try and distract from your disappearing act isn't on.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:25
|
|
|
I said it was a null tell but like gently caress is it a valid defence
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:31
|
|
|
"I admit that my postcount is inflated every game. My postcount this game is proof I've not been lurking despite that" I mean, this logic is straight-up bollocks and I'm pretty sure you're scum otherwise you wouldn't be using this poo poo to try and cover your rear end
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:35
|
|
|
Here's a question to EP and Hurt: do you think TT has been active this game?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:44
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:How is that in one post you refer to my Hurt case and in another post you're all "hey someone check hurt out". There's usually a pretty good reason why someone's not making sense
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 23:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Agreed. Right now I think it's you or him for town. I'm not sure which, so I'm more focusing on someone I do think is scum.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 23, 2014 00:17
|
|