Kommando posted:http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/australians-should-prepare-for-more-antiterror-raids-afp-chief-20141103-11ge3x.html It's so nice for them to warn everyone that they might bust down your door at any time, how thoughtful of them! Perhaps they can start a terror raid warning service? You could combine it with the weather report!
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 01:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 04:16 |
|
So, is this just another farce, or is it the beginning of an ethnic cleansing?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 01:46 |
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 02:19 |
|
The best part is that she can't even get the #QAndA hash tag right.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 02:29 |
|
Kommando posted:Brisgoons Count me and Crazy in.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 02:30 |
|
The Guardian posted:
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 02:47 |
Kommando posted:Brisgoons I think they Ayes have it. Motion carried. Would the motion be committed to record that on the 22nd of November at least 9 goons will be in attendance at Sukachi at 108 Albert Street from 1900-2100hrs approximately and will be eating chicken and lamenting the death of Australia. Unlock the doors. Anidav, the goon charity, gets a free meal and drink for November.
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 02:49 |
|
I can't wait for the inevitable royal commission into all this poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:03 |
|
Ignorant idiot here, how does a royal commission get the go-ahead? Would it need the party in power to agree, or a majority vote in both houses? Could the Liberals and Labor just not have one because they don't want to be implicated for a couple of years/decades?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:20 |
Australia's treatment of refugees is like watching a crippled, starving man beg for scraps at the table of a group of obese men, their table filled with every food imaginable. To watch the men get up from their chairs and slowly beat and torture the cripple to death, grins on their faces and grease on their chins. To hear their booming laughter and the man's screams. Nothing less than that.
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:20 |
|
d3rt posted:Ignorant idiot here, how does a royal commission get the go-ahead? Would it need the party in power to agree, or a majority vote in both houses? Royal Commissions,at the Federal level are created by the head of state (i.e. the Governor-General) on advice from the Commonwealth Government. No Labor or Liberal government in their right mind would do this, seeing as they both share the blame for the mess. Our best chance for a Royal Commission is if either Labor gets their act together and is willing to admit they royally hosed up (literally), or if Greens form government. e: we've got a higher chance of an ICC investigation than a Royal Commission, tbh. The Before Times fucked around with this message at 03:30 on Nov 4, 2014 |
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:24 |
|
What's to stop the Governor-General from creating a Royal Commission without being requested by the current government? Are there laws in place or is it more a convention type thing?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:29 |
|
thatfatkid posted:What's to stop the Governor-General from creating a Royal Commission without being requested by the current government? Are there laws in place or is it more a convention type thing? Well may we say Albo save the queen. Because nothing will save the Governor-General (from Tones).
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:34 |
|
thatfatkid posted:What's to stop the Governor-General from creating a Royal Commission without being requested by the current government? Are there laws in place or is it more a convention type thing? s1(a) of the Royal Commissions Act 1902: quote:Without in any way prejudicing, limiting, or derogating from the power of the King, or of the Governor-General, to make or authorise any inquiry, or to issue any commission to make any inquiry, it is hereby enacted and declared that the Governor-General may, by Letters Patent in the name of the King, issue such commissions, directed to such person or persons, as he or she thinks fit, requiring or authorising him or her or them or any of them to make inquiry into and report upon any matter specified in the Letters Patent, and which relates to or is connected with the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth, or any public purpose or any power of the Commonwealth. Technically the G-G or Queen can create a Royal Commission of his or her own volition (see "as he or she thinks fit"), but it'd be very odd to do this without the consent of the Government.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:35 |
|
GG's act on the advice of the government. The day they start acting on their own volition would see them dismissed or us becoming a republic very quickly.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:38 |
|
Mithranderp posted:Technically the G-G or Queen can create a Royal Commission of his or her own volition (see "as he or she thinks fit"), but it'd be very odd to do this without the consent of the Government. Best Whitlam postmortem tribute ever? Nibbles! posted:GG's act on the advice of the government. The day they start acting on their own volition would see them dismissed or us becoming a republic very quickly. They sometime act on the advice of the opposition. There is precedent.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:39 |
Nibbles! posted:GG's act on the advice of the government. The day they start acting on their own volition would see them dismissed or us becoming a republic very quickly. A G-G that thinks for themselves? Not Sir Peter Cosgrove. He wont bite the hand that appointed him.
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:40 |
|
Nibbles! posted:GG's act on the advice of the government. The day they start acting on their own volition would see them dismissed or us becoming a republic very quickly. An independent GG actually doing their job and overseeing the Australian government doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:41 |
|
thatfatkid posted:An independent GG actually doing their job and overseeing the Australian government doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. It sounds like a recipe for a constitutional crisis to me.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:43 |
|
thatfatkid posted:An independent GG actually doing their job and overseeing the Australian government doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. The problem is, they are an unelected ceremonial Head of State, and running around doing things "for the greater good" would be all well and good, but it's not democracy.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:44 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:It sounds like a recipe for a constitutional crisis to me. The keyword being independent. Mithranderp posted:The problem is, they are an unelected ceremonial Head of State, and running around doing things "for the greater good" would be all well and good, but it's not democracy. Yeah and?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:48 |
|
thatfatkid posted:The keyword being independent. The chances of having an independent GG are nil. They are appointed and dismissed by the Government of the time.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:51 |
|
thatfatkid posted:The keyword being independent. I don't think you understand how this system works. The current GG would never do anything you're suggesting, nor would any other GG likely even consider the course of action. They are purely a ceremonial role that is appointed by the goverment. Think about that before your next reply.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:52 |
|
Kommando posted:Brisgoons What date is this? E; oh, 22nd. Won't be there for that
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:53 |
|
Murodese posted:What date is this? November 22
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:54 |
|
thatfatkid posted:The keyword being independent.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:54 |
|
CrazyTolradi posted:I don't think you understand how this system works. The current GG would never do anything you're suggesting, nor would any other GG likely even consider the course of action. They are purely a ceremonial role that is appointed by the goverment. Think about that before your next reply. Yes i'm aware that the role of GG now is to rubberstamp whatever the current government wants. However they still do have real power, they just simply choose not to use it as it would be career suicide. What i was getting at is that maybe they should use their powers for the benefit of the nation i.e. creating a Royal Commission of their own volition into the handling of asylum seekers arriving by boat, as as it stands now neither the ALP or LNP will ever request such a thing as they would both be pretty hosed.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 03:59 |
|
thatfatkid posted:Yes i'm aware that the role of GG now is to rubberstamp whatever the current government wants. However they still do have real power, they just simply choose not to use it as it would be career suicide. What i was getting at is that maybe they should use their powers for the benefit of the nation i.e. creating a Royal Commission of their own volition into the handling of asylum seekers arriving by boat, as as it stands now neither the ALP or LNP will ever request such a thing as they would both be pretty hosed. And maybe society should focus on things more important than the simple amassing of financial wealth and try to better quality of life on this planet, but what I have suggested and you have suggested have about equal chance of happening. HTH
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:03 |
Mithranderp posted:The problem is, they are an unelected ceremonial Head of State, and running around doing things "for the greater good" would be all well and good, but it's not democracy. Yeah, democracy is the torture, refouling and effective murder of refugees! It's what the people want!
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:18 |
|
The "real power" the GG has is poorly defined and largely untested. Using it for a politically-charged action that isn't an emergency would be taking the country into uncharted waters and there's absolutely no guarantee that what they tried to do would stick. It would be a constitutional clusterfuck.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:20 |
|
I'm on my phone or i'd link but if you look up "Australian constitutional conventions" wiki should have a rundown on how it works. Basically GG's have massive power per the constitution however convention is that they act on the government as they are the elected officials. So while they have power if they act outside of convention they'd be dismissed and if it was enough of an issue we'd be changing the constitution.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:31 |
|
Essential tracks how the worm turns....quote:Sixty three per cent of voters believe that severe bushfires and extreme weather events like floods and cyclones will increase in coming years, while 33% believe they will remain at around the same level. Just 1% believe they will reduce in frequency. Even Coalition voters, traditionally reluctant to accept climate change, agree: 49% of Coalition voters say extreme weather events will increase in coming years compared to 47% who believe they will stay at around the same level. Women are also more likely to say they are increasing than men, 68% to 56%. Moreover, 57% of voters believe the increasing frequency of extreme weather is linked to climate change, compared to 27% who don't believe there's any connection. This includes 43% of Coalition voters who believe there's a connection, compared to 42% who don't think there's a connection. Sixty eight per cent of Labor voters believe there's a connection, and 88% of Greens voters. Leigh Sales and Annabel Crabb are starting a podcast. Sales can sing and play piano. Be very afraid.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:55 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Yeah, democracy is the torture, refouling and effective murder of refugees! It's what the people want! Yes, that's exactly what I was saying. You have in no way misrepresented my point.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 04:59 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Yeah, democracy is the torture, refouling and effective murder of refugees! It's what the people want! So the alternative is to hand power over to the unelected representative of a person who came out of the correct vagina? I mean, yeah, in this situation it might turn out to accomplish something we're happy about. Maybe. Assuming the GG even wants to step in with a Royal Commission. And in return, all we have to do is go back to effective monarchy.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:06 |
|
Monarchs are, after all, known for caring about the rights of oppressed minorities
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:08 |
|
This Thursday I appear to be going to the Hotel Grand Chancellor in Spring Hill to fill in paperwork. Despite this they're still calling it a job trial but otherwise this one looks good. I'm pretty sure doing paperwork before a job trial starts is a good sign. yep yep yep. I should be fine on the 22nd also to watch Attack Dogs search every car.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:22 |
Quantum Mechanic posted:So the alternative is to hand power over to the unelected representative of a person who came out of the correct vagina? I was simply saying that the current treatment of refugees is something that the vast majority of the Australian public is content with and we can see that from the broad support that the Labor and Liberal parties enjoy. If one approves of the Australian model of government then surely one must approve of what results from it, yes?
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:40 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:Yeah, democracy is the torture, refouling and effective murder of refugees! It's what the people want! This isn't as ironic as we'd all hope.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:43 |
|
quote:BREAKING: Unconfirmed reports Admire Rakti has collapsed and died in his stall after finishing last. Another race, another dead horse.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 04:16 |
|
AVeryLargeRadish posted:I was simply saying that the current treatment of refugees is something that the vast majority of the Australian public is content with and we can see that from the broad support that the Labor and Liberal parties enjoy. If one approves of the Australian model of government then surely one must approve of what results from it, yes? That's pretty much the rational. Rather then place restrictions on what the government can do, eg bill of rights, the solution is supposed to be political.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2014 05:44 |