|
Post more, you boobers. And someone buy HiipFire plat.
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 07:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 01:08 |
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Post more, you boobers.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:01
|
|
|
guts says ##vote EXAKT Science toot toot mother trucker
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:03
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:oh dammit ignore that post it was supposed to go in the scumdoc.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:04
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:Not today! I kinda wanna do Payday 2 Mafia.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:05
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I kinda wanna do Payday 2 Mafia.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:07
|
|
|
if you are going to do that you might as well play a good video game instead as well
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:21
|
|
|
bowmore posted:I got a character from one of the weaker episodes I think bowmore posted:look at this awkward post ##vote bowmore
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:37
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:##vote bowmore
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 08:56
|
|
|
So I don't have my role PM, but I can only assume I'm probably a cop, so I'm gonna preemptively vote EXAKT Science since I'd cop him cause he's always scum. Also I'm gonna preemptively vote him because why the gently caress not ##vote EXAKT Science gg no re
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:03
|
|
|
bowmore posted:guts says ##vote EXAKT Science toot toot mother trucker thank you for joining the cause
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:03
|
|
|
also please don't overanalyze this jokevote as some scumtell like last game OK THANK YOU GUYS I DONT EVEN HAVE MY ROLE PM YET
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:04
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:thank you for joining the cause 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:13
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:also please don't overanalyze this jokevote as some scumtell like last game OK THANK YOU GUYS Eugh, this is bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:14
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Eugh, this is bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:16
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:capps are you capsaicin because if so I kind of remember you
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:52
|
|
|
Quandary posted:are you capsaicin because if so I kind of remember you It's not, but Hi Quandary!
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 09:54
|
|
|
Also if you don't know who I am, Hey I'm HiipFire, I'm relatively new here and I'm "literally 16 years old" as they say. Also my prefered pronouns is he/him, though "it" works for me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:00
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Also if you don't know who I am, Wait are you literally 16 years old? Because if so stop playing mafia and start going to high school dances and flirting with girls goddamn you have your whole life in front of you dont waste it on mafia.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:17
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Also if you don't know who I am, Hey man, no worries, I used to play this game here when I was like 14. I was horrible. Hope you're better.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:19
|
|
|
I watched the first two episodes, and I'm not particularly impressed. If this wasn't split into 1+2, 3+4 eetc I would have stopped at 1. 2 was a bit better, enough to make me give the next one a chance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:30
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I watched the first two episodes, and I'm not particularly impressed. If this wasn't split into 1+2, 3+4 eetc I would have stopped at 1. 2 was a bit better, enough to make me give the next one a chance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:32
|
|
|
The pumpkin heads are the only reason I'm checking the next one out. The story with Wirt and Greg is unengaging to me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:35
|
|
|
why on that website carpet link earlier do they link a bible video on episodes that haven't come out yet
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:42
|
|
|
I already do all those things while also playing mafia
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:46
|
|
|
Ep 3 bad; Ep 4 only good at the end. It's stringing me along.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 10:59
|
|
|
It's not amazing but it's short and enjoyable.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:01
|
|
|
oh the art reminds me of professor layton, i have been trying to figure out what it reminded me of
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:04
|
|
|
Yeah the art is probably the best part.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:10
|
|
|
Confirming that I can't be bothered to follow through on my plan to roleplay as somberbrero and call exakt scum constantly. In fact I'd much rather vote someone who is attacking exakt as scum: bowmore posted:look at this awkward post Arguments from awkwardness are bad and dumb, there's nothing inherently scummy about awkwardness, it's frequently just a vague negative trait that can be applied to a lot of things without ever bothering to explain what's awkward or why being awkward is bad in context, it's a non-argument in my opinion when people have no actual justification to offer. Therefore pushing someone on this basis reflects much worse on the person doing the pushing as far as I'm concerned. bowmore posted:this is a weak post from weak things you weakling As opposed to his super strong gut vote based on "awkwardness". ##vote bowmore
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:29
|
|
|
Puntification posted:Arguments from awkwardness are bad and dumb, there's nothing inherently scummy about awkwardness, it's frequently just a vague negative trait that can be applied to a lot of things without ever bothering to explain what's awkward or why being awkward is bad in context, it's a non-argument in my opinion when people have no actual justification to offer. Therefore pushing someone on this basis reflects much worse on the person doing the pushing as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:31
|
|
|
Yeah, there's a certain unnaturalness that comes off when people try to not give off tells or fit in.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:34
|
|
|
bowmore posted:don't agree, plenty of scum have been pegged from awkward first couple of posts And I've seen plenty of townies railroaded spuriously. Amoeba102 posted:Yeah, there's a certain unnaturalness that comes off when people try to not give off tells or fit in. Some Town players are nervous about trying to fit in as well. I've seen EXAKT be scum in quite a few games but the most awkward I saw him play, he was the town cop. It's a bad metric.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:52
|
|
|
Puntification posted:And I've seen plenty of townies railroaded spuriously.  that's why you put pressure on them to see how they react your hard defense of EXAKT stinks
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:55
|
|
|
STINKS!!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:57
|
|
|
Nothing's ever 100%. It's a good enough place to start discussion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 11:59
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Nothing's ever 100%. He gut voted him and then brought up how awkward that post is that's not discussion-starting that's a post-hoc justification for pushing his lynch and I find it more scummy than awkwardness. Also telling people that their responses either stink or is weak isn't really the behaviour of someone that is interested in discussion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 12:11
|
|
|
you are welcome to discuss anything
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 12:14
|
|
|
Puntification posted:He gut voted him and then brought up how awkward that post is that's not discussion-starting that's a post-hoc justification for pushing his lynch and I find it more scummy than awkwardness. Also telling people that their responses either stink or is weak isn't really the behaviour of someone that is interested in discussion. It always annoys me when people vote first make cases later; like right after minutes/seconds after. It's not much of a tell to me, when it's immediate, but it always gets on my nerves. They were clearly thinking of it when it's posted literally right after, so why not just start with the reasoning first. It's more of when the reasoning comes well after, when people push them on it, that I'd consider it telling. I am waiting to see how Exact responded to weigh in on Bowmore's vote. Him saying your response stinks is a soft accusation in of itself too. His "weak" response reads like a joke response to a a joke vote. I really think you're blowing things out of proportion. Purposely so. ##vote Puntification Aside: I got to the end of it, yeah it's okay I suppose. 6/10.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 12:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 01:08 |
|
|
i'm not killing Exact or Hiip based on those posts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2014 14:50
|
|
