|
Jose posted:The greens are a massive joke and its going to be cool at the debates when someone asks Natalie Bennett why people from the UK should vote for an aussie
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2015 16:54 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 08:59 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:The point of a strike is to illustrate the importance of a service by withdrawing same, with the goal of showing people just how important that service is, and hopefully bringing them to the understanding that the people performing that service deserve better pay or conditions commensurate with the level of service they provide. That sounds too much like accelerationism to me though.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2015 23:23 |
|
JFairfax posted:What's infidels of Britain all about, sounds fun
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 00:51 |
|
Hoops posted:edit: I'm renaming it the "If you like the Bake Off you're responsible for British Neo-fascism" theory because that'll get more people's backs up
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 03:13 |
|
Party Boat posted:Andrew Sparrow on the G's politics blog has made an interesting point about the possibility of a hung parliament: http://gu.com/p/468m9
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 12:04 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:the 1917 revolution failed because the thread didn't have the marxism tag?
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 14:32 |
|
I prefer Moism. It makes me moist.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 22:41 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:Communism is terrible and causes nothing but death and as such is evil, now let me tell you how Capitalism and the British Empire were forces for good... Maybe it's not State Communism or Capitalism or Imperialism. Maybe it's humans that are terrible and which something should be done about.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 14:42 |
|
Disinterested posted:a non-troll Marxism thread
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 19:49 |
|
tdrules posted:Voter demographics have shifted in recent years, according to YouGov the primary reason the Conservatives polling figures have recovered is due to a surge in the 18-24 range.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 10:19 |
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:but wait til UKIP get in, it'll be even more difficult then.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 15:28 |
|
Fans posted:A bacon sandwich crossed with another bacon sandwich. e: '10 - Election fever as a bunch of shits are replaced with a shower of shits, many of them worse. Guavanaut fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Mar 4, 2015 |
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 18:22 |
|
Ed will debate an empty sandwich. Tabloids will report the sandwich won.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 01:00 |
|
Disinterested posted:How is that even supposed to work?
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 12:24 |
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:If it was the other benefits that people can get, like child tax credit or the increase in housing benefit then I don't know. Probably a few more people would choose not to have children, a few more women would have abortions when they would have wanted to keep it and a lot more children growing up in poverty. I'm not sure what a carrot for reducing birth rates would look like though. Simply paying people not to have kids would be disproportionately regressive. Better sex education and non-judgmental access to more permanent methods of contraception maybe?
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 14:34 |
|
nopantsjack posted:The British government has been a ideological collection of inbred morons failing to juggle thrown plates for at least a century. quote:Founded in 1900, the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party in general elections during the early 1920s Personally I'd say more like 3 centuries though.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 15:03 |
|
Dabir posted:You all must be colour-blind, they're clearly yellow.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 15:20 |
|
big scary monsters posted:The UK has a lower than replacement birth rate, the fact that we have positive population growth is down to immigration. If you're anti-foreigns like the Tories are you'd think it would make sense to encourage people here to have more children. Other than Tory reasons like making sure there is a permanent pool of unemployed to keep wages low, increasing consumption because it's good for business, and making sure natives are a majority against the foreign hordes? It used to be that things would suck even worse for the elderly if population growth was too low, but a combination of technology and additional socialism would resolve that better than more people.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 16:51 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:Capitalism cannot sustain the compound growth necessary for its survival without growth in the working classes for the purposes of working and consumption. JFairfax posted:more kids to nonce up
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 17:16 |
|
Once you get into the swing of reading it it's pretty swift.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 19:53 |
|
Not as good as
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 22:07 |
|
winegums posted:MDMA or something in little vials in the freezer (had to gently caress off for 1/2 a day while the police searched the place).
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 17:03 |
|
BigPaddy posted:Had a landlord claim the reason the flat was damp was due to my "lifestyle" does that even mean?
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 18:32 |
|
General China posted:I'm against fox hunting with hounds- but only as a class issue. Most of the fox population has moved into towns where there is more food for them. So what we need is fox hunting to become a workingclass sport. The workingclass on bicycles with pitbull terriers chase foxes through the middleclass areas in towns. If your pitbull gets the scent you should be allowed to kick a hole in the fence to let the hunt continue. Trample over their gardens and make a lot of noise. I could see it becoming quite popular. It got banned at the same time as fox hunting. Wouldn't surprise me if Cameron's restructuring of the law conveniently left out coursing. thehustler posted:Can it be argued that lots of local spending makes it harder for the country to get value for money when making purchasing decisions etc? Economies of scale and the like
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2015 14:49 |
|
Cerv posted:I have no idea what you are talking about.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2015 19:26 |
|
I wonder why Four Loko never tried exporting to the UK. It seems like the ideal terrible market for that, and it can't really be worse than Buckfast. On the plus (?) side, Jameson is going to be cheap for the next week.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 09:51 |
|
Pork Pie Hat posted:I'm pretty sure this thread could turn out a better side than the current England team. We should write to the ECB. How hard could it be?
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 13:38 |
|
Pesmerga posted:Edit: in no way am I suggesting she either a) drowns puppies or b) has admitted to preferring the wrong flavour of monster munch. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/feb/11/rock-stars-riders-jack-white-guacamole-square-melons e: Ddraig posted:I have it on good authority that Lily Allen drowns kittens in the wrong flavour of monster munch on a regular basis.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 16:32 |
|
quote:Ministers have been accused of putting profit over human rights after organising a secretive arms fair to sell tear gas and rubber bullets to a host of authoritarian regimes.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 18:29 |
|
Extreme0 posted:Why are you getting drunk from washing up liquid?
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 19:28 |
|
Stottie Kyek posted:Pride also has singing communists in it Which one of you got that in there?
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 00:21 |
|
Zephro posted:Does anyone know if there are websites specifically catering to people looking to rent rooms for only a certain number of days per week? Like if I wanted to rent somewhere in the northern half of London, but only on Monday and Tuesday nights?
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 14:00 |
|
Renaissance Robot posted:I still can't believe it's pronounced fracar.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 18:24 |
|
gorki posted:Some of us pronounce our Rs
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 20:21 |
|
PiCroft posted:How was Tony Blair on social issues? I wasn't really politically aware during his government so the main thing I know about his administration was the Iraq War.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 20:40 |
|
JFairfax posted:He was a closet Catholic who hates Islam who had the opportunity to join a crusade and took it. JFairfax posted:I remember being at Glastonbury festival in 1997 and everyone was ridiculously optimistic about Tony Blair and the labour government.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 21:20 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:a strangely religious belief in their own righteousness.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 23:13 |
|
Reveilled posted:In principle, Blue Labour is the idea that the Labour party should rededicate itself to representing the views of the working class, which means going hard left on economic issues while going hard right on everything else. So increase benefits (other than Jobseekers) but hound "scroungers", nationalise industries but stop immigration, bring back capital punishment and then hang the bankers with it. Basically, Blue Labour's manifesto would just be the British Social Attitudes Survey quoted word for word. Proper care for the (right kind of) workers, kick out the foreigners, hang the pedos, nationalize the industries (so that foreigners can't own them), encourage a culture of work (sets you free), etc. e: It's deeply worrying if that's the closest thing to the British Social Attitudes Survey.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 23:45 |
|
Pissflaps posted:They made millions off a plagiarised song so have to pay a large portion of that to the copyright holders they stole from. What's so ridiculous about that? In 1984, Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys invented genetic fingerprinting. The patent, issued to the University of Leicester, expired 20 years later on 2004. They got 20 years of funding benefit from their discovery, and then they didn't. In 1984, Russ Abbot invented (Oh What An) Atmosphere. The copyright will last for 70 years after he is dead, so at least until 2085. This is deserving of 5 times longer a term protection than any medical innovation of the past half century: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFPLk5mJ1D4 I have no problem with protecting artists, but 70 years after the death of the author is a ridiculous term. And they need expanded fair use for people using samples and making mashups, neither of which really existed at the time the laws were written. (The UK has only just secured limited fair use for parody.) This Thicke/Gaye thing is almost as ridiculous as the Sam Smith/Tom Petty thing.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 10:53 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 08:59 |
|
namesake posted:Aren't they either going to be big heavy and dangerous or like the camping gas bottles so you change them every couple of hours at most? This sounds a strange system.... Larry_Mullet posted:Has anyone in the thread ever had their house heating provided by gas bottles? We're looking at a house that's heated like this and we're worried about the cost and inconvenience of heating a house in this way. Any advice would be much appreciated. You can heat with electricity for cheaper than gas by using a heat pump, but those have a very high upfront cost at the moment.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 11:43 |