|
four million bc is pretty far from here bet i could save some time gas if i kicked this body into a ditch in 1860
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 16:16 |
|
|
logically it would take more time gas, maybe even exponentially, to go back further in time
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:36
|
|
|
numberoneposter posted:logically it would take more time gas, maybe even exponentially, to go back further in time Then send one of the mafiosos back in time to make more time gas.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:46
|
|
|
thats a good question op. guess I just let myself stop questioning the movie when josep geordian levit could somehow become old bruce willlis
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:the moral of Looper is "nothing you do matters kill you are self" That is also seemingly the moral of SomethingAwful and life itself so far.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:50
|
|
|
Dejan Bimble posted:So does the kid become the rainmaker or not since joe doesnt kill his mom he doesnt become the rainmaker and thus joe lives and the kid becomes an autistitic train conductor
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 08:59
|
|
|
the movie ends with bruce willis trying to kill a child so he can live a life where he's married to an asian hooker he married on his assassin's pension its a fun movie
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:04
|
|
|
So I've got a question for you eggheads. Assuming a time machine did send you back to the same exact point in space say, 50 years ago, exactly how far would you be from the earth of 1965 after accounting for solar and galactic rotation as well as universal expansion?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:05
|
|
|
cumshitter posted:the movie ends with bruce willis trying to kill a child so he can live a life where he's married to an asian hooker he married on his assassin's pension the thing is though, the child was dead all along
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:06
|
|
|
murder is super hard to get away with in the future that's the whole premise of our movie okay guys? *casually murders protag's wife*
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:07
|
|
|
James Woods posted:So I've got a question for you eggheads. Assuming a time machine did send you back to the same exact point in space say, 50 years ago, exactly how far would you be from the earth of 1965 after accounting for solar and galactic rotation as well as universal expansion? 565 million years, dear
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:07
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:the moral of Looper is "nothing you do matters kill you are self" Or don't have a life worth losing. I mean really, would Bruce Willis even gone back into time if his wife was just another hooker?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
James Woods posted:So I've got a question for you eggheads. Assuming a time machine did send you back to the same exact point in space say, 50 years ago, exactly how far would you be from the earth of 1965 after accounting for solar and galactic rotation as well as universal expansion? sleep until the nightmare ends
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:16
|
|
|
Poetic Justice posted:the thing is though, the child was dead all along i said it was a fun movie
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:16
|
|
|
dunno i wasn't thinking much when watching this movie. it was really good though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:35
|
|
|
James Woods posted:So I've got a question for you eggheads. Assuming a time machine did send you back to the same exact point in space say, 50 years ago, exactly how far would you be from the earth of 1965 after accounting for solar and galactic rotation as well as universal expansion? Blunderbuss
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 09:36
|
|
|
James Woods posted:So I've got a question for you eggheads. Assuming a time machine did send you back to the same exact point in space say, 50 years ago, exactly how far would you be from the earth of 1965 after accounting for solar and galactic rotation as well as universal expansion? Alright nobody else is fielding it so here goes: just ignoring the motion of the solar system around the galactic core (a mere 483,000 miles per hour) the motion of the Galaxy relative to CMB is about 1,300,000 miles per hour Over 50 years thats a displacement of just 569.4 billion miles.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 14:52
|
|
|
I feel like people miss that a central idea of the movie is that all sci-fi technologies suck and are worse. The fancy space guns, the hover bikes, the psychics, the glass telephones, all of them had multiple scenes about how useless and worse they were than just normal things, every high technology had multiple scenes of people standing around and being broken all the time. Like the time machine being stupid and not very useful wasn't a plot hole, it was the theme of the movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
It's this movie where they eventually save the super autistic child with dangerous powers from getting blown off to everyone's relief ?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
future war
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
i was really hoping Kid Blue was Jeff Daniel's younger loop.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
Can anyone explain to me wtf happens in Primer instead ?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
Why doesn't Donnie Darko bang Gretchen?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:24
|
|
|
Wouldn't all the gold bars cause inflation if the mafia keep sending them back in time, I mean, the gold is already there, then they go back in time with the gold that is already there, but older, so now there is twice as much gold I just think the mafia could have been more creative with how they used the time machine send back all gold bars, and keep doing that poo poo on repeat
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
time travel makes no sense OP
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
how me a frog posted:Why doesn't Donnie Darko bang Gretchen? Because... He does?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
The Protagonist posted:Alright nobody else is fielding it so here goes: just ignoring the motion of the solar system around the galactic core (a mere 483,000 miles per hour) the motion of the Galaxy relative to CMB is about 1,300,000 miles per hour yes but much like matter, time is also affected by gravity, so the earth and our solar system, as it pass through time and the void of space, carries with it the echos of the past in its gravitational pull. travel to the past would be fine up to a certain point
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 15:39
|
|
|
why is everybody watching this movie from lke 2 years ago all of a sudden
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 16:04
|
|
|
Here's my real question: Wouldn't this super government that can detect when someone's been murdered be a little bit curious that people were literally disappearing?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
when it this coming to hbo
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
Because the Earth is only 6000 years old, duh.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 18:19
|
|
|
is that the picture where the dude sticks his dick in he own rear end?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
Korthal posted:Lava destroys all evidence, plus it doesn't need to be paid in a coat of loving silver bars. Eat my rear end in a top hat boy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
heres a fun thing i like to do, since i will never accomplish anything in life I like to point out how imaginary things other people like arent realistic or efficient, it makes me feel smarter than fictional characters
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:murder is super hard to get away with in the future that's the whole premise of our movie okay guys? *casually murders protag's wife* Awww I was gonna post this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 05:21
|
|
|
it's a story that relies heavily on its emotional beats, op. science don't got nuthin' to do with it
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 05:45
|
|
|
Looper won my heart when they tried to discuss time paradoxes and bruce willis basically told everyone to shut the gently caress up and just watch the movie also the scene with the guy disintegrating from his past-self having his parts amputated owned
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
Al Nipper posted:also the scene with the guy disintegrating from his past-self having his parts amputated owned i looked that up when i saw this thread b/c it was the most memorable scene but couldn't find it on the youtube
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 06:24
|
|
|
i also like the scene where he goes nuts with the two guns
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 06:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 16:16 |
|
|
i like the scene in the cafe when jgl doesn't look anything like bruce willis he just looks like he's chewing tobacco and got a forehead enlargement
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2015 06:42
|
|